Topic: BREAKING NEWS: SATOSHI FINALLY REVEALED! - page 38. (Read 42360 times)
I have the proofs. Signed messages will be released soon.
You may think I'm crazy loving paranoid conspiracy theory, but may in fact be true, that this is the front person Craig said that impersonate Nakamoto. A true (s) Nakamoto remain in the shadows forever.
.... and "the Internet" is able to investigate and debunk this fraud in minutes while investigative journalists are fooled once again.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hflr3/craig_wrights_signature_is_worthless/
Pathetic that Gavin went along with this without being more skeptical.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hflr3/craig_wrights_signature_is_worthless/
Quote
JoukeH discovered that the signature on Craig Wright's blog post is not a signature of any "Sartre" message, but just the signature inside of Satoshi's 2009 Bitcoin transaction. It absolutely doesn't show that Wright is Satoshi, and it does very strongly imply that the purpose of the blog post was to deceive people.
So Craig Wright is once again shown to be a likely scammer. When will the media learn?"
Take the signature being “verified” as proof in the blog post:
MEUCIQDBKn1Uly8m0UyzETObUSL4wYdBfd4ejvtoQfVcNCIK4AIgZmMsXNQWHvo6KDd2Tu6euEl13VT C3ihl6XUlhcU+fM4=
Convert to hex:
3045022100c12a7d54972f26d14cb311339b5122f8c187417dde1e8efb6841f55c34220ae002206 6632c5cd4161efa3a2837764eee9eb84975dd54c2de2865e9752585c53e7cce
Find it in Satoshi's 2009 transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/828ef3b079f9c23829c56fe86e85b4a69d9e06e5b54ea597eef5fb3ffef509fe?format=hex
So Craig Wright is once again shown to be a likely scammer. When will the media learn?"
Take the signature being “verified” as proof in the blog post:
MEUCIQDBKn1Uly8m0UyzETObUSL4wYdBfd4ejvtoQfVcNCIK4AIgZmMsXNQWHvo6KDd2Tu6euEl13VT C3ihl6XUlhcU+fM4=
Convert to hex:
3045022100c12a7d54972f26d14cb311339b5122f8c187417dde1e8efb6841f55c34220ae002206 6632c5cd4161efa3a2837764eee9eb84975dd54c2de2865e9752585c53e7cce
Find it in Satoshi's 2009 transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/828ef3b079f9c23829c56fe86e85b4a69d9e06e5b54ea597eef5fb3ffef509fe?format=hex
Pathetic that Gavin went along with this without being more skeptical.
gavin lost all his credits at the moment he walked over to an alternative client. he is only out to disrupt bitcoin at this point. it's indeed very pathetic.
.... and "the Internet" is able to investigate and debunk this fraud in minutes while investigative journalists are fooled once again.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hflr3/craig_wrights_signature_is_worthless/
Pathetic that Gavin went along with this without being more skeptical.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hflr3/craig_wrights_signature_is_worthless/
Quote
JoukeH discovered that the signature on Craig Wright's blog post is not a signature of any "Sartre" message, but just the signature inside of Satoshi's 2009 Bitcoin transaction. It absolutely doesn't show that Wright is Satoshi, and it does very strongly imply that the purpose of the blog post was to deceive people.
So Craig Wright is once again shown to be a likely scammer. When will the media learn?"
Take the signature being “verified” as proof in the blog post:
MEUCIQDBKn1Uly8m0UyzETObUSL4wYdBfd4ejvtoQfVcNCIK4AIgZmMsXNQWHvo6KDd2Tu6euEl13VT C3ihl6XUlhcU+fM4=
Convert to hex:
3045022100c12a7d54972f26d14cb311339b5122f8c187417dde1e8efb6841f55c34220ae002206 6632c5cd4161efa3a2837764eee9eb84975dd54c2de2865e9752585c53e7cce
Find it in Satoshi's 2009 transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/828ef3b079f9c23829c56fe86e85b4a69d9e06e5b54ea597eef5fb3ffef509fe?format=hex
So Craig Wright is once again shown to be a likely scammer. When will the media learn?"
Take the signature being “verified” as proof in the blog post:
MEUCIQDBKn1Uly8m0UyzETObUSL4wYdBfd4ejvtoQfVcNCIK4AIgZmMsXNQWHvo6KDd2Tu6euEl13VT C3ihl6XUlhcU+fM4=
Convert to hex:
3045022100c12a7d54972f26d14cb311339b5122f8c187417dde1e8efb6841f55c34220ae002206 6632c5cd4161efa3a2837764eee9eb84975dd54c2de2865e9752585c53e7cce
Find it in Satoshi's 2009 transaction:
https://blockchain.info/tx/828ef3b079f9c23829c56fe86e85b4a69d9e06e5b54ea597eef5fb3ffef509fe?format=hex
Pathetic that Gavin went along with this without being more skeptical.
How can you not be interested in money and then spend years, your life, to create digital money?
Just another marketing strategy, attention seeking action. When debunked and blocksize tech becomes even more a problem, the world will realize the weakness of Bitcoin and BTC price will enter a new bearmarket, falls below $100...
Mr. Gavin turned his back on Bitcoin and started his own altcoin. Looking to extract attention from the real deal.
Just another marketing strategy, attention seeking action. When debunked and blocksize tech becomes even more a problem, the world will realize the weakness of Bitcoin and BTC price will enter a new bearmarket, falls below $100...
Mr. Gavin turned his back on Bitcoin and started his own altcoin. Looking to extract attention from the real deal.
And the pathetic "evidence" has been proved fake-
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hf4xj/creator_of_bitcoin_reveals_identity/d2pf70v
PATHETIC, OMG..https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hf4xj/creator_of_bitcoin_reveals_identity/d2pf70v
The signature is invalid.
This is so pathetic oh my f.....
As "Nice Try" mentioned above, this is 100% fake. This sort of irresponsible "journalism" is just embarrassing... I mean, they were already fooled once by Wright's obvious fakery.
It is strange that someone who boasts a fairly impressive technical CV like Wright's, would put himself in the position that he has if he can't 'prove' his claims to be true by signing relevant messages. If that would be sufficient proof for the community, that is.
IF he is Satoshi, or an element of the original group, his motivation for coming out could be one of a number of reasons, but this sounds like he's not planning on going quiet into the night with his coins.
A new forum.... coool, I wonder if he'll have sig campaigns, ponzis and all the essentials that we know and love?
Until then, see my new sig....
Really some people are believing this shit, no good proof, made up story with the only people who can verify dead and now Gavin saying his believes it could be true.
This could be a movie in itself, the man who thought he was Satoshi.
This could be a movie in itself, the man who thought he was Satoshi.
Negative evidence -
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hf4xj/creator_of_bitcoin_reveals_identity/d2pf70v
The signature provided: MEUCIQDBKn1Uly8m0UyzETObUSL4wYdBfd4ejvtoQfVcNCIK4AIgZmMsXNQWHvo6KDd2Tu6euEl13VT C3ihl6XUlhcU+fM4=
Is pulled from this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/828ef3b079f9c23829c56fe86e85b4a69d9e06e5b54ea597eef5fb3ffef509fe
Really some people are believing this shit, no good proof, made up story with the only people who can verify dead and now Gavin saying his believes it could be true.
This could be a movie in itself, the man who thought he was Satoshi.
Does anyone here really think Satoshi would put all his bitcoins in a trust?
This could be a movie in itself, the man who thought he was Satoshi.
Does anyone here really think Satoshi would put all his bitcoins in a trust?
if he isn't Satoshi and therefore doesn't have control of 1 million btc what's his economic angle here (they all have one)? does he have ETH and is attempting the mother of all pump and dumps?
Disappointed in Gavin......again.
Putting tin foil on, it could be an attempt to flush out the real Satoshi.
Putting tin foil on, it could be an attempt to flush out the real Satoshi.
Good to know that he is still anonymous the real SATOSHI, for some moments I thought why he wanted to display his actual identity after so long, and why all others were happy to believe it , I wrote in another post that I am afraid of bitcoin price going down. Feeling relaxed now, I don't want to know who the real Satoshi is, sounds much more beautiful to bitcoin not knowing the identity of satoshi for me.
I think that Gavin should be put through the wringer if he really is backing this bullshit story (just shows how ridiculous he has become in order to try and wrest control over the project).
Fuck me, but I agree. At least with the main clause.
And the pathetic "evidence" has been proved fake-
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hf4xj/creator_of_bitcoin_reveals_identity/d2pf70v
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hf4xj/creator_of_bitcoin_reveals_identity/d2pf70v
I am sure he is reading this. I would like to see him post here with his BCT account and quote my post.
As "Nice Try" mentioned above, this is 100% fake. This sort of irresponsible "journalism" is just embarrassing... I mean, they were already fooled once by Wright's obvious fakery.
Why is Gavin participating in this fake? http://gavinandresen.ninja/satoshi
Quote
We love to create heroes – but also seem to love hating them if they don’t live up to some unattainable ideal. It would be better if Satoshi Nakamoto was the codename for an NSA project, or an artificial intelligence sent from the future to advance our primitive money. He is not, he is an imperfect human being just like the rest of us.
Here's my take. Craig Wright was cut a deal by the NSA (or whatever 3-LA) to continue the ruse with Gavin firmly part of the mix, thus taking the focus off them. I see no logical reasoning for Gavin to pen the above about the NSA while stating categorically that CSW is SN.
So just posted to someone in the press thread that they should come say their stuff over here as this is clearly where it's happening... then went and said my piece *over there* 
! So, crossposty...
! So, crossposty...Quote from: me
Hi Crimbit, consensus is emerging (tee hee!) in this thread...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/breaking-news-satoshi-finally-revealed-1457039
... that definitive proof has not yet been provided. SCW's blogpost isn't the smoking gun. I lack the time and will to follow the chains of reasoning in the 'is it or isn't it' show, so I defer for now to people who say 'it isn't'. Worryingly, Gavin Andresen thinks he's the real deal. I say 'worryingly' as I am a big-blocker and if GA has dropped the ball on this, whether innocently or out of motivated reasoning, it greatly damages 'our' cause.
(Digression: 'follow the arguments not the people' is great advice when the arguments can be fully digested by someone prepared to put in the time and effort, and where the questions and proposed solutions are clear-cut. But most real world disagreements are 'messy', and evaluating one's trust in the principal arguers is an imperfect but useful *and rational* way of doing inference)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/breaking-news-satoshi-finally-revealed-1457039
... that definitive proof has not yet been provided. SCW's blogpost isn't the smoking gun. I lack the time and will to follow the chains of reasoning in the 'is it or isn't it' show, so I defer for now to people who say 'it isn't'. Worryingly, Gavin Andresen thinks he's the real deal. I say 'worryingly' as I am a big-blocker and if GA has dropped the ball on this, whether innocently or out of motivated reasoning, it greatly damages 'our' cause.
(Digression: 'follow the arguments not the people' is great advice when the arguments can be fully digested by someone prepared to put in the time and effort, and where the questions and proposed solutions are clear-cut. But most real world disagreements are 'messy', and evaluating one's trust in the principal arguers is an imperfect but useful *and rational* way of doing inference)
As "Nice Try" mentioned above, this is 100% fake. This sort of irresponsible "journalism" is just embarrassing... I mean, they were already fooled once by Wright's obvious fakery.
Why is Gavin participating in this fake? http://gavinandresen.ninja/satoshi
I think that Gavin should be put through the wringer if he really is backing this bullshit story (just shows how ridiculous he has become in order to try and wrest control over the project).
Same true for Jon Matonis.
Meanwhile, more proof just in...
"Craig Wright signed my "Guam is Goin' to Sink" manifesto."
Note the GMT [time] that this revelation was released.
Jump to: