Pages:
Author

Topic: BREAKING NEWS: SATOSHI FINALLY REVEALED! - page 7. (Read 42360 times)

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
BREAKING NEWS: FALSE SATOSHI PROVEN

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36213580

Drama ended. Let's continue with the blocksize debate....

Neither proven if he is or not , anyways - the movie like pr banner painting smart equations on a glass made my day
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'
Classic sociopath. Now he's the "victim". Roll Eyes

Gavin still has some explaining to do in my mind.
No. Gavin either got conned pretty badly, or has signed that NDA that was also offered to Antonopoulos. Either way, he's a risk; it is time for both him and Matonis to depart.

Drama ended. Let's continue with the blocksize debate....
Replace the existing drama with another type of drama? There is no need. Core has a clear plan for 2016.
sr. member
Activity: 552
Merit: 250
BREAKING NEWS: FALSE SATOSHI PROVEN

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36213580

Drama ended. Let's continue with the blocksize debate....
legendary
Activity: 1424
Merit: 1001
There's no way Craig Wright to be Satoshi and I'm disappointed that Jon Matonis and Gavin Andresen joined this crazyness. I lost all my respect to them after this incident.
legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 2535
Goonies never say die.
Quote
I’m Sorry

I believed that I could do this. I believed that I could put the years of anonymity and hiding behind me. But, as the events of this week unfolded and I prepared to publish the proof of access to the earliest keys, I broke. I do not have the courage. I cannot.

When the rumors began, my qualifications and character were attacked. When those allegations were proven false, new allegations have already begun. I know now that I am not strong enough for this.

I know that this weakness will cause great damage to those that have supported me, and particularly to Jon Matonis and Gavin Andresen. I can only hope that their honour and credibility is not irreparably tainted by my actions. They were not deceived, but I know that the world will never believe that now. I can only say I’m sorry.

And goodbye.


And goodbye to you, Sir!  Gavin still has some explaining to do in my mind.
jr. member
Activity: 59
Merit: 10
Not sure if this was posted, too many threads on this.  Seems he hired a PR firm for this

http://qz.com/676834/satoshi-nakamoto-hired-david-bowies-pr-agency-for-his-big-reveal/
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 501

Serves him right, if he continues saying he is Satoshi then he'll go to Jail for suspicions of having involvement in terrorism, if he backs out he'll go to Jail for identity impersonation fraud. tl;dr, he's going to Jail for sure and when he does he'll talk and give names of his accomplices.
hero member
Activity: 2842
Merit: 625
hahaha very funny news indeed , I don't get how people believe with this kind of trick news. And it is definitely a hoax.
He is a famewhore and wants to get attention of bitcoiners.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1045
This is interesting as well:

Gmaxwell R3KT - this criticism below seems reasonable and implies you have no clue how in PGP windows works, how about explaining this?
That document is a thoroughly confused rant written by some fraudster.

What the "paper" is pointing out is that although the hash preference list or "8 2 9 10 11" and the other metadata were not conceived of or implemented until a year after the claimed date (as I pointed out); it was possible, by a long series of complex manual commands to manually override the preferences and punch in whatever ones you wanted, even the 'future' ones.

You may note that it take great care to provide no citation to my actual comments, in fact it quotes me but uses an image for the text-- making it more difficult to even search for it. Allow me:

"The suspect keys claim to be October 2008; the commit was July 2009. So no, not without a time machine. It's possible that the settings could have been locally overridden to coincidentally the same defaults as now." https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3w027x/dr_craig_steven_wright_alleged_satoshi_by_wired/cxsm1yo?context=2

-- so the whole theory that this "paper" writes for pages and pages as if it were some great concealment on my part is a possibility I explicitly pointed out.

The problem with it is that it requires the user to have executed a long series of complex commands to override the preferences and have to have guessed the exact selection and ordering of the preferences that wouldn't be written for a year-- when if they preferred a particular cypher they would more likely have taken the existing "2 8 3" and stuck their choice on the front.  Not only that, but they would have had to have done so on the same day that they created a totally ordinary key and published it, yet this other key-- which looks exactly like one created with post-2009 software and entirely unlike the well known one-- was provided to no one for years, not placed on public key servers and until now and otherwise has no evidence of its prior existence. Come on, give me a break.

It's "possible", a fact a pointed out explicitly back then, but this possibility thoroughly fails Occam's razor-- especially on top of the evidence presented by others: Archive.org showed the subtle "hint dropping" added in blog entries was back-dated, added in 2013, SGI reported that the published letter on their letterhead was fake, the lack of cogent technical commentary from that party, etc.

Bringing it back on topic, I'd say that it's surprising that all these Bitcoin Classic folks believe such tripe, but in the context of all the other incompetent nonsense they believe, it doesn't seem so surprising.

And now:

http://www.economist.com/news/briefings/21698061-craig-steven-wright-claims-be-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin

In an article in the press kit accompanying the publication of his blog post, he takes aim at Gregory Maxwell, one of the leading bitcoin developers, who first claimed that the cryptographic keys in Mr Wright’s leaked documents were backdated. “Even experts have agendas,” he writes, “and the only means to ensure that trust is valid is to hold experts to a greater level of scrutiny.”

The whole "do this, do that" step-by-step in Wright's blog reminds me of this: https://www.scribd.com/doc/306521425/Appeal-to-Authority-a-Failure-of-Trust

...although they both fail spectacularly in terms of substance. So, with the attack on authority, now these 2 things seem connected, and then you have Gavin on top of it. wtf...

=> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hyb8k/the_blocksize_debate_the_personal_attacks_against/
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002
so funny : https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/craig-wright-says-sorry-goodbye/   Grin

Gavin : explainations please ..  Grin


"Andresen said:

"[Craig Wright] signed, in my presence, using the private key from block #1, the very first block mined on a computer. I was convinced."
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
The man definitely has his priorities right. I mean if he was so sorry for Andersen, why doesn't he simply sign something so as to actually do something about it, like repair the damage to Andersens reputation by proving he indeed is Satoshi?

His "sorry" is of no good to Andersen.

Who is this Andersen person you keep referring to?  Grin

My hand always types him that way, lol... I should stick with Gavin Tongue
Gavin? Whos that?  Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1045
The man definitely has his priorities right. I mean if he was so sorry for Andersen, why doesn't he simply sign something so as to actually do something about it, like repair the damage to Andersens reputation by proving he indeed is Satoshi?

His "sorry" is of no good to Andersen.

Who is this Andersen person you keep referring to?  Grin

My hand always types him that way, lol... I should stick with Gavin Tongue
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
What doesn't kill you only makes you sicker!
The man definitely has his priorities right. I mean if he was so sorry for Andersen, why doesn't he simply sign something so as to actually do something about it, like repair the damage to Andersens reputation by proving he indeed is Satoshi?

His "sorry" is of no good to Andersen.

Who is this Andersen person you keep referring to?  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1045
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36213580

Bitcoin 'creator' backs out of Satoshi coin move 'proof'
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 102
Ahaha faketoshi busted
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1001
This has been one of Bitcoin's oddest stories.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1014

Wtf??
This is sooooo ridiculous!!
I hope australian authorities catch him and that bastard gets what he deserves.
Gavin and Jon are so done! No one will ever take these guys serious!
And I don't feel sorry for them to be honest.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1045
The man definitely has his priorities right. I mean if he was so sorry for Andersen, why doesn't he simply sign something so as to actually do something about it, like repair the damage to Andersens reputation by proving he indeed is Satoshi?

His "sorry" is of no good to Andersen.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 548
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
This I can't understand. Why would he buy Bitcoins at $1200 if he had like around a million of them? If he was selling that's OK, but why he was buying them?

Because his coins were locked into a trust  Cry Cry Cry

He had to quench his thirst for bitcoins, paying 1200$ per BTC  Cry Cry Cry

this is a big issue now, because why he appeared now not earlier ??
and really if he is founder of bitcoin then he should not come out for safety of own self, bitcoins & peoples money.
He should know that every thug will try him to solve the blocks and get money faster.

Making such an admission is like painting a target on your back. If anything it shows he has intelligence services protection.

If he is definitely Satoshi then he must be having some blurred thinking on this one. Things are a bit off in his decision making.

None has a perfect or true identity about the person Satoshi, so in what manner a particular person will be given the identity as Satoshi.
Pages:
Jump to: