To be fair Wil, to be honest you decided no longer to guide the coin and left (I also clearly remember the rather unsavoury dispute from the original thread), and then this Ken guy was obviously completely made up, no one would pay for something then not do it, Ken doesnt even exist.
I stopped working on Britcoin because it was costing me too much (I have spent a lot more on Britcoin than I've made) and I just didn't have the time to keep working at a loss. As for your "Ken doesn't even exist" comment, you're so wrong it's painful. Keep your moronic assumptions to yourself, I don't appreciate being called a liar by someone who has no clue.
I'm not even going to respond to the rest of the crap you wrote tbh, I have more productive things to do with my time.
I'm trying (with mogreen and others) to get Britcoin going again because it's a cool project and has great future potential, but since you're a giant bag holder and clearly an asshat then I don't think I'm going to bother. Why should I put my time and effort in to something when the largest stake holder is a blithering moron who throws around false accusations at the drop of a hat? I'd rather start a new coin with the Britcoin name than put up with your shit.
I smell a scam
Yes, I'm planning on dumping £50 worth of coins on an exchange that Brit is not even listed on, you discovered my master plan!
Get your head out of your arse mate.
Wil, yes, like many IT people you largely did the work single handedly with little in return at that time, but you should realise these are 25 year projects not 2 year projects, blockchain is long term.
I offered to take it off your hands and continue with its development even partially funding it, however you wanted money for the websites etc which kind of goes against the grain of a "community" project and consensus without quantifying time and value.
I have offered a challenge for you to open up to the community about Ken, however you seem to have declined the challenge, that in itself raises some suspicion - I am not saying you arent a good person and you have clearly done alot with a hope of at least a small return on your efforts however you need to be straight with the community.
Anyone can fork Britcoin and make the new fork undesirable (as long as there are blockchain checkpoints) so a community must work together.
Im not a "giant bagholder" I am a stakeholder and an investor - it is disrespectful to call someone an asshat when they have the best intentions for the coin, blockchain and other investors - if that makes me an asshat looking out for other people then so be it.
Lets look at the Britcoin values, when purchased each coin was around 120 sats, which means even my 500,000 are only worth 0.6 BTC at purchase value (not including losses or gains from trading), given only 10 million coins these are well undervalued (considering DMD with 4 million are around 70,000 sats) so a realistic value at the current time as is should be around 28,000 sats each.
Now that would make my 500k worth 140 bitcoins, around $56,000. Tidy.
So if you, for example, initiated another premine of 10 million which would reduce the value to around 14,000 sats each that would still give you a potential income of 1,400 BTC which is $560,000.
This is EXACTLY why I am against an additional premine, but for the official establishment of a foundation.
I will checkpoint the current blockchain and remain on that chain for the purposes of a rollback to preserve the value and integrity of the chain.
I'm looking forward to seeing the new roadmap, establishment of a foundation with a 25 year timeline, and more information about the mysterious Ken.