Topic: [BTB] The BitBar Information Thread - page 56. (Read 180352 times)
Code:
Value movecmd(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
{
if (fHelp || params.size() < 3 || params.size() > 5)
throw runtime_error(
"move[minconf=1] [comment]\n"
"Move from one account in your wallet to another.");
string strFrom = AccountFromValue(params[0]);
string strTo = AccountFromValue(params[1]);
int64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[2]);
if (nAmount < MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT)
throw JSONRPCError(-101, "Send amount too small");
Code:
if (nAmount < MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT)
throw JSONRPCError(-101, "Send amount too small");
Can I change this value MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT? I can't move 0.000001 form my "1" to "2" account in one wallet.
I generally don't use wallets on my local computer but instead move it directly from my mining pool to an exchange which has worked out well for me so far. You just need to make sure you don't spam the exchange with lots of micro-transactions.
Code:
Value movecmd(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
{
if (fHelp || params.size() < 3 || params.size() > 5)
throw runtime_error(
"move[minconf=1] [comment]\n"
"Move from one account in your wallet to another.");
string strFrom = AccountFromValue(params[0]);
string strTo = AccountFromValue(params[1]);
int64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[2]);
if (nAmount < MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT)
throw JSONRPCError(-101, "Send amount too small");
Code:
if (nAmount < MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT)
throw JSONRPCError(-101, "Send amount too small");
Can I change this value MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT? I can't move 0.000001 form my "1" to "2" account in one wallet.
ah ok thanx for the nice reply!
learned something again today
btb.pnwminer again the site is down. miner whas still running do.
But if this new pool is more promissing in my eyes i think ill stick with btb.scrypthp.com.
pnwminer had some to much off time last week in my eyes. but it can be just my mistake
learned something again today
btb.pnwminer again the site is down. miner whas still running do.
But if this new pool is more promissing in my eyes i think ill stick with btb.scrypthp.com.
pnwminer had some to much off time last week in my eyes. but it can be just my mistake
and maybe a newbie question.. but when does my first unconfirmed show op ?
It will show up as soon as we find the next block. On average the pool should hit a block every 5 hours so we need to wait until that happens. The time to hit a block will go down as we get more hashing power in the pool.
and maybe a newbie question.. but when does my first unconfirmed show op ?
New BitBar Pool opened - Low 1.5% Fee btb.scrypthp.com. Blocks found and running smoothly. It would be nice to distribute the hashing power as most of it is currently in one pool. Mine and hold my friends, BitBar has room to grow quite a bit! Proof of Stake is also a nice bonus!
anyone have a clue when btb.pnwminer.com is on again ? or why it is off perhaps
Allready up and running again
anyone have a clue when btb.pnwminer.com is on again ? or why it is off perhaps
Try to run wallet with param -salvagewallet
My wallet is synced but the balance is 0 BTB this morning 
The explorer shows the correct balance with my adsress
Something is wrong now with the blockchain.
The explorer shows the correct balance with my adsressSomething is wrong now with the blockchain.
Any predictions on the total amount of bitbar in circulation by the end of 2014 and 2015?
New pool!
http://btb.forkpool.com
stratum
proportional payout
2% fee
good powerful server in cloud
Email confirmation not needed!
Tested and first block found.
All work fine.
Welcome!
http://btb.forkpool.com
stratum
proportional payout
2% fee
good powerful server in cloud
Email confirmation not needed!
Tested and first block found.
All work fine.
Welcome!
Did the chain fork? My pool at pnwminer.com is at block 41511, but the block explorer is only at 41508. I just need to get some info before we mine too much more on a possible fork.
It is not uncommon for the block explorers (Both ABE based and the CCE3 test explorers) to be a couple of blocks behind, especially with fast chains. Sometimes processing the blocks after a new block trigger takes longer then the time a new block comes on the network. Orphan blocks also effect both types of explorer. If the daemon gives the explorer an orphan block, that block will be displayed until the daemon corrects itself and the explorer catches it.
In short, I would wait for at least a 1/2 hour if what you are comparing to the explorers is different before becoming concerned.
Did the chain fork? My pool at pnwminer.com is at block 41511, but the block explorer is only at 41508. I just need to get some info before we mine too much more on a possible fork.
Didn't know this thread existed.
Thanks OP
Thanks OP
Ah, I gotcha. thanks!
Hi BTB, Can anyone tell me what the total supply of Bitbar's will be please?
e.g. bitcoin = 21,000,000
I'm preparing a total coin supply list:
http://altcoinspeculation.com/coin-info/
e.g. bitcoin = 21,000,000
I'm preparing a total coin supply list:
http://altcoinspeculation.com/coin-info/
500,000+inflation
Nice website
One contradiction I noticed: Your site says "500,000+ BTB" and the second post on this thread (by the OP) says "Total Supply: 2,800 BTB"
That's a big difference. Which is correct?
2,800 was the outstanding BTB when that post was written. The 500,000 is in the source code for MAX_MONEY which is the same as for Peercoin. (PPC's MAX_MONEY=2000000000)
https://github.com/aLQ/bitbar/blob/master/src/main.h
Hi BTB, Can anyone tell me what the total supply of Bitbar's will be please?
e.g. bitcoin = 21,000,000
I'm preparing a total coin supply list:
http://altcoinspeculation.com/coin-info/
e.g. bitcoin = 21,000,000
I'm preparing a total coin supply list:
http://altcoinspeculation.com/coin-info/
500,000+inflation
Nice website
One contradiction I noticed: Your site says "500,000+ BTB" and the second post on this thread (by the OP) says "Total Supply: 2,800 BTB"
That's a big difference. Which is correct?
Jump to: