Topic: BTCD is no more - page 217. (Read 1328507 times)

If you are using Ubuntu 14.04.1 with gnome desktop environment, when the BTCD wallet is active, look at top-left corner for File, Settings & Help menu. I was lost for the first time as well. But working perfect for me now.

To testers, I pushed a new version. Please ./m_unix so we sync to the new version

It has a new API call:
./BitcoinDarkd SuperNET '{"requestType":"getPservers"}'

this triggers the remote node to send:
{"requestType":"publishPservers","NXT":"13434315136155299987","Pservers":["209.126.70.159","162.248.163.43","209.126.70.170","209.126.70.156"],"firstPserver":0,"Numpservers":4,"xorsum":2196080243}

In addition to helping synchronize routing, this is also debugging remote API calls.

Over 20 source files have changed, so I hope I didnt break anything. I had to create an entirely new data structure for the IP address oriented data. This is put into a hashtable and linked to the normal account data in its own hashtable. I am having to maintain the privacyServer (Pservers) that all the other nodes know about so that I can make sure to not put it in an onion layer where it wont be able to route. At least for the hops that are not  the last hop

To fix the routing problem basically an entirely parallel data structure had to be made. A bunch of other small changes and I am not quite happy with the handshaking, but I think it should be much improved.

Still need to propagate a new node appearing without flooding the network, not sure the best way yet, but slowly things are getting more and more solid and more and more functional

James

I took a look at it a week or two ago (sometime during their pump) and didn't see any new tech/innovation.  Unless something has changed, it looks like they are just playing off of the popularity of BTCD.  Either way, who wants LitecoinDark when you have BitcoinDark?  I mean, would you rather own Litecoin or Bitcoin?

As a random side note, I would love nothing more than to see Litecoin get dethroned from its 2nd place in market cap.  It's held onto that place for far too long and I believe it no longer deserves it, especially with all the new innovations that are out there.

We are considering BTCD to be added in the very first days of the release at: Coin Market App Let your voices be heard about getting BitcoinDark (BTCD) added into the mobile app.

Think we can compile a list of links to show up when people click on 'BitcoinDark' Link Directory?
Please feel free to tell us in the thread what should be added at Coin Market App ..

all staking is visible on the blockchain. doesnt matter who controls the address for the staking based rewards as the dividend will be sent to the staking address (assuming it is bigger than some minimum level)

Ok, now I am confused,  How does it know I am staking X amount of coins if the addy I publish is empty?

edit:

Example:

1.  John has 1200 BTCD in a personal wallet and the wallet is currently staking at approx 5% year.
2.  John wants to publish his addy so he can receive the extra income from superNet to btcd stakeholders.

Question1.  HOW does he publish his address?
Question2.  How does the program know he is staking 1200 coins if the address he publishes is a new one?


Jim

sorry for all the questions, trying to understand what is going on.  I cannot find documentation other then the white paper and infomationsl PDF on superNet site.

This happens to me occasionally on Ubuntu with various QT wallets. Restarting the client usually fixes it.

it does have the File and Settings, so some sort of option or build problem is my guess

errmm.. now here is a real newb Windo$e question:

I have made a build of Bitcoindark-qt, but I seem to be unable to access the File and Settings functions.
I would expect them to be the same as in bitcoin.

Did my build screw up the drop down menus with the access to the wallet file functions?
Or is Bitcoind-qt not supposed to have these?

BitcoinDarkd accessed with RPC should have them, but can anyone give me a hint just to be sure?





as opposed to:





Thanks!

over half a dozen people have successfully built the test BitcoinDarkd and now we have about a dozen nodes in the network for me to test with.

So, this is a good step forward as it means the code is not specific to my dev environment and other than some onetime build issues, things seem to be pretty smooth

James

maybe this will help?

10   BitcoinDark   $ 6,232,584   $ 5.26   

just tell them each one is worth a bit more than a $5 USD note

I've shown girls my BTCD account in private, they are only impressed by US Dollars 

James, can you tell us your oppinion on NHZ and it's possible SuperNET future?

unless you want to impress girls, the public address should probably have a minimal amount of btcd.
now you can still impress the girls by showing your big acct in private

edit: just make a new address and it is your public address, or you can just use the address you have already been using. I am just nervous to publish accts with any big amounts in them

Not correct.
They both spend the funds, but only one of them succeeds as it has been seen that the blockchain does in fact prevent double spends. So, one of the vendors is happy and sends the goods for the purchase. the other is angry and blacklisting Alice and certainly not sending anything to her. Alice cant send any funds as one of the vendors already has it

James

I took a look when they first launched and labeled it a BTCD wannabe.

But in the spirit of Unity I guess it wouldn't hurt to take a second look see  

JJ

LTCD has nothing to do with BTCD apart from the name. Go away.

Why does it already have over 200pages and has been growing much faster than BTCD. I did come on here to fight. I like BTCD, I think they can work well together.

LTCD is a shitcoin.