Author

Topic: BTCD is no more - page 305. (Read 1328507 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
August 28, 2014, 05:05:11 AM

Maybe james just wants to tell us that he feels a little cold at the northpole Wink
it used to be one third of XMR, zoidberg is making improvements to tech, but price goes to 1/30'th of XMR
so just from common sense there is external factor devaluing BBR and will be 10x if it just gets back to where it used to be
If BBR agrees to supernetwork, etc, well that will make them unique among cryptonotes
I just dont get the feeling XMR would want to do any such thing
hero member
Activity: 820
Merit: 1000
August 28, 2014, 04:49:20 AM
sigh missed it Sad
To be fair there is very little volume on the books, it's bound to shoot up.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000
August 28, 2014, 04:48:16 AM
sigh missed it Sad
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
August 28, 2014, 04:41:49 AM

Maybe james just wants to tell us that he feels a little cold at the northpole Wink
price speculating, three letters mention and a whooping 250% increase
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 550
hero member
Activity: 635
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
August 28, 2014, 03:48:01 AM
BBR
hero member
Activity: 552
Merit: 500
August 28, 2014, 03:44:20 AM
Have any of the features for bitcoindark been released yet or is it all still vapor?

Thinking about buying some, but I'd like to know that there is more than just concept going on.
https://github.com/jl777/libjl777

Cool thanks....
Unfortunately I'm one of the dunces that needs a translator.
And good reviews of the code that you could point me towards
There was the IRC chat log where I defended Teleport against critics, including DRK dev. Not sure if the link is on OP, but I am sure somebody has it.
I also posted actively on the Altcoin XMR Observer's thread and other than one guy that tried to FUD it before I made it clear that using his logic all 2FA has to be immediately stopped because it is less secure than not having 2FA (basically he was schooled), there has been no criticisms.

So, it is silence from the very zerosum mentality XMR guys and not sure if they have even looked at the code much, the critic says he did look at the code, or if they are studying it intensely for flaws, probably somewhere in between. I am sure if they found any big problems, it will be a massive anti-BTCD FUD campaign going on. Of course lack of something is not prove of the opposite, so just guessing

Now I do see some massive new volumes on polo, 10 to 20x what it used to be and that is home of XMR crowd. They either are now silent BTCD investors who are hedging their bet on XMR, or loading up on ammo to dump and demoralize. We see such amazing coordinated 45 BTC dumps that snaps the price from .01 to .008, for a few minutes. But if they buy up enough and are determined enough, they could dump dump dump. Of course costing them quite a bundle, but BBR has undergone daily dumping and suffered. Still not sure who is doing it.

So, be careful. These arent the good old days when BTCD is held only by people that believe in BTCD. It is quite possible that people who want to harm BTCD are active, very active. And they have setup a .009 to .012 trading range. This is 33% gain each time, so I think what they did was allocate X BTC to get some inventory, start a trampoline and then parlaying this initial BTC by 33% each cycle. Then they can dump whatever they gained without it impacting their capital base.

So for now, I would advise against buying at .011+ as you could be selling to these guys and just be patient until they dump to .009
Dont chase the price. just be patient and get the .009 BTCD
Then when they realize they cant fool you into giving them free BTCD, they have to decide to increase the capital budget for this campaign or to just stop with this nonsense.

We were on a nice steady increase path before they trampolined it to .012 ahead of schedule and now it is all volatile and dangerous. I really dont want it to go above .012 before beta release, so I suggest buy at .009 sell at .012
This makes a nice trading range for the daredevil day traders of 33% potential gains and will stop feeding the whale games

To bad not everyone is going to know about this and they will unfortunately become victim to this externally created volatility.

Now, I have no proof, just guessing, I could be totally wrong
I go back to coding now, dont worry if I dont post all day, gotta concentrate

James

Your guess is absolutely right. I'm doing the exploitation of whales and XMR team and this scheme works really good. Wink
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
August 28, 2014, 03:10:54 AM
Who has experiences with the trading of mgwBTC, mgwBTCD on AE?

I use those nearly everyday, how can i help?

Thank you, I used it now too.
Deposit /withdrawal is working fine.
Hopefully with more users we will get smaller spreads.
legendary
Activity: 1237
Merit: 1010
August 28, 2014, 02:36:19 AM
I think I might have found a possible bug in the wallet, or maybe it's just a known issue, or maybe I'm totally wrong....
I have my wallet open and unlocked for staking only.  It's been happily staking away since PoS started.  A few days ago I sent someone a small amount of BTCD as a test, whereupon I was prompted to unlock the wallet as usual.  All good so far.  Today I checked back on the wallet to see how my stakes were going to find it wasn't staking as it was locked.  So does the wallet become fully locked after you fully unlock it to make a send transaction, rather than returning it to a unlocked for staking state?  If it does do it, it is highly annoying!

I've had a couple similar instances where my wallet locks for no apparent reason.  Same thing, i come back to look and it's locked
it does seem to autolock after any send.
have to remember to unlock right after any send
I dont do GUI, so you need to complain to someone else, there might be a reason though.

Yeah I discovered the same happening on all mx Txs. I took it as intended and disregarded the fact that I just fully unlocked it twice for no reason  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 623
Merit: 500
August 28, 2014, 01:49:45 AM
since my trial version of Parallels on mac ran out a week ago I'm back to my wallet on Mac.

Virtual Box is free. Not as good as parallels, but it does work.

very awesome thanks! installed it now will try the wallet and see how things go Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
August 27, 2014, 11:59:49 PM
BitcoinDark with teleport
LOL

give it 1 more month

we will also see
BitcoinGreen --- the green no energy coin
BitcoinBlack --- the bitcoin black
BitcoinRed -- the communist China coin
BitcoinBrown -- the Latin coin ..........

btc wave rofl
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 250
August 27, 2014, 11:56:50 PM
Thx for cheap coins guys!)
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
August 27, 2014, 10:58:49 PM
BitcoinDark with teleport
LOL

give it 1 more month

we will also see
BitcoinGreen --- the green no energy coin
BitcoinBlack --- the bitcoin black
BitcoinRed -- the communist China coin
BitcoinBrown -- the Latin coin ..........
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
August 27, 2014, 10:44:01 PM
Hey James, do you know which coins want to/will be be added to the super network ? Or is that inside info ?  Wink

I tend to buy a lot of coins on speculation  Roll Eyes

Look a few pages back for info on this topic.

I looked up to 10 pages back and I have found hints by James such as:

"so a coin getting mgwCOIN is a probabilistic indication of its joining the supernetwork, maybe 50/50 chance
Now if they start making reskinned GUI, then the chances go to 80%
If their devs are posting questions about libjl777, 95%+"

But I don't know where to find this information without searching through a million different threads, can anyone help?

I found this- https://github.com/jl777/libjl777/blob/master/coins.h   But I'm not a coder and I'm not exactly sure what it means. Thanks guys for the great thread so far Smiley



I have made it so that adding any bitcoin fork is a matter for adding a line in the .conf file:

    {\"name\":\"LTC\",\"conf\":\"/Users/username/Library/Application Support/Litecoin/litecoin.conf\",\"asset\":\"2881764795164526882\",\"txfee\":0.000,\"NXTfee_equiv\":0.01,\"rpc\":\"127.0.0.1:9332\",\"blockheight\":564980,\"forkblockheight\":594965,\"minconfirms\":5,\"estblocktime\":150,\"clonesmear\":1,\"maxevolveiters\":10}\

That's all I had to add to get LTC to create a mangled telepod Smiley
Once I get support for bitcoin forks debugged, it really should be more time to download the blockchain for that coin than the time to get teleport for it working

James
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
August 27, 2014, 10:40:57 PM
I think I might have found a possible bug in the wallet, or maybe it's just a known issue, or maybe I'm totally wrong....
I have my wallet open and unlocked for staking only.  It's been happily staking away since PoS started.  A few days ago I sent someone a small amount of BTCD as a test, whereupon I was prompted to unlock the wallet as usual.  All good so far.  Today I checked back on the wallet to see how my stakes were going to find it wasn't staking as it was locked.  So does the wallet become fully locked after you fully unlock it to make a send transaction, rather than returning it to a unlocked for staking state?  If it does do it, it is highly annoying!

I've had a couple similar instances where my wallet locks for no apparent reason.  Same thing, i come back to look and it's locked
it does seem to autolock after any send.
have to remember to unlock right after any send
I dont do GUI, so you need to complain to someone else, there might be a reason though.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
August 27, 2014, 10:39:44 PM
After I remembered to create and fund the "transporter" account, the following program:

Code:
int main(int argc,const char *argv[])
{
    char *cmdstr = "{\"requestType\":\"maketelepods\",\"coin\":\"LTC\",\"amount\":0.001}";
    libjl777_start(confjson);
    printf("(%s) -> %s\n",cmdstr,libjl777_JSON(cmdstr));
    while ( 1 )
        sleep(60);
    return(0);
}

did something.
anybody want to guess what it did?

James


Did we see the first successful teleport?Huh?
Ive been teleporting BTCD via loopback for two weeks now, since I am waiting for BTCDdev to make release to support broadcasting pubkeys (this is needed to construct network topology), I've been doing the stuff I had saved for later, like local file encryption (done), find somebody to review (started), adding more onion layers (done), making fun of trolls (done), and now teleporting non-BTCD

The GUI is making progress, even the InstantDEX GUI in parallel
so we havent seen a remote teleport yet,  but I dont expect it will take more than a day to debug that part after the network topology is propagating properly. That is really the only thing left at the component level

Then the systems debugging is possible. Maybe I missed some stuff and will have to code a bit more, maybe some connections arent quite right, but I am feeling like I am already climbed to the top of the mountain and now it is the climb down. Still have to be careful, but the finish line is in sight.

I warned that I am needing some external things so, i cant predict exact completion date. Its like waiting for the flux capacitor to arrive in the mail and they send you extra dilithium crystals, which you already have plenty of. Even if I am doing all myself, I can still only estimate. With the possible states of all teleports, it will unfortunately take a full week to test all cases, plus whatever time to fix any system integration issues.

James

legendary
Activity: 1206
Merit: 1000
August 27, 2014, 10:36:23 PM
I think I might have found a possible bug in the wallet, or maybe it's just a known issue, or maybe I'm totally wrong....
I have my wallet open and unlocked for staking only.  It's been happily staking away since PoS started.  A few days ago I sent someone a small amount of BTCD as a test, whereupon I was prompted to unlock the wallet as usual.  All good so far.  Today I checked back on the wallet to see how my stakes were going to find it wasn't staking as it was locked.  So does the wallet become fully locked after you fully unlock it to make a send transaction, rather than returning it to a unlocked for staking state?  If it does do it, it is highly annoying!

I've had a couple similar instances where my wallet locks for no apparent reason.  Same thing, i come back to look and it's locked
hero member
Activity: 820
Merit: 1000
August 27, 2014, 10:31:47 PM
I think I might have found a possible bug in the wallet, or maybe it's just a known issue, or maybe I'm totally wrong....
I have my wallet open and unlocked for staking only.  It's been happily staking away since PoS started.  A few days ago I sent someone a small amount of BTCD as a test, whereupon I was prompted to unlock the wallet as usual.  All good so far.  Today I checked back on the wallet to see how my stakes were going to find it wasn't staking as it was locked.  So does the wallet become fully locked after you fully unlock it to make a send transaction, rather than returning it to a unlocked for staking state?  If it does do it, it is highly annoying!
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
August 27, 2014, 10:31:42 PM
Hey James, do you know which coins want to/will be be added to the super network ? Or is that inside info ?  Wink

I tend to buy a lot of coins on speculation  Roll Eyes

Look a few pages back for info on this topic.

I looked up to 10 pages back and I have found hints by James such as:

"so a coin getting mgwCOIN is a probabilistic indication of its joining the supernetwork, maybe 50/50 chance
Now if they start making reskinned GUI, then the chances go to 80%
If their devs are posting questions about libjl777, 95%+"

But I don't know where to find this information without searching through a million different threads, can anyone help?

I found this- https://github.com/jl777/libjl777/blob/master/coins.h   But I'm not a coder and I'm not exactly sure what it means. Thanks guys for the great thread so far Smiley


Jump to: