Author

Topic: BTCD is no more - page 455. (Read 1328490 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
July 22, 2014, 02:33:44 PM
Good work JL777!

Don't forget to finish MGW for Nxt also  Tongue
There are currently no known bugs for MGW, also I released Universal MGW that allows anybody to host a MGW server for dozens of different gen1 coins.

James
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
July 22, 2014, 02:32:24 PM
i have a great believe in darkcoin , sold all my other coins and going all-in on BTCD , is going well today

love BTCD

If this hits the China exchanges, I can see .01 happening quickly.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Bitcoin is getting bigcoin
July 22, 2014, 02:30:52 PM
i have a great believe in darkcoin , sold all my other coins and going all-in on BTCD , is going well today

love BTCD
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
July 22, 2014, 02:21:30 PM
Hello!

I am part of BTCD community now and I happen to be developing a cryptonote fork to add anon features to NXT. It turns out that my methods should apply to BTCD also. I will be working on integrating cryptonote tech into BTCD, but it is more than "just" cryptonote anon tech as I am also making my solution include a near realtime exchange (InstantDEX) so people can directly trade just by running the coin.

How will all this work you ask?
https://github.com/jl777/pNXT has the current source code and it is rapidly being developed.

Once InstantDEX is done, I will be adding Privatebet (peer to peer sportsbook) to the pNXT framework, plus the way it is implemented there is no reason any other number of useful services cant be added.

My efforts are in parallel with all the other BTCD coders and I try to design a clever way to integrate to require minimal changes to the BTCD codebase. So, if I succeed, then all the peoples selling at current prices will not be so happy.
There is no reason that other anon tech in BTCD can't combine with the cryptonote tech, in fact pushing tx through two independent anon algos would only help if it is done properly. So, I bring very good news to BTCD and now I expect a massive in increase in the FUD level Smiley

James

P.S. I am not so active on BTT, but you can find out more about me on NXT forums and jl777.org

Will the cryptonote tech lead to any issues with blockchain bloat?


yes,blockchain bloat is an issue for all cryptonote coins, however I chose the boolberry fork to base my work on as it was the most advanced as far as blockchain pruning and just being more efficient. However, I have a plan to use a blockchain FIFO to deal with whatever bloat issues we get. There is no reason to store the entire blockchain, but you do have to process it once. A FIFO is perfect for that, just set the FIFO size to the max lookback window into the blockchain dataset you need (of course you need to store all the keyimages, but that is smaller than the full blockchain). Then after loading the blockchain the first time, all that is left in memory is the FIFO. So as long as you have HDD space you are fine, not limited by system RAM

James

P.S. I am also toying with the idea of using the cryptonote blockchain as a sidechain and maintaining a decentralized ledger. Then we can simply toss the blockchain as soon as there is consensus. However, this is pretty tricky, so most likely not for the first version.

It hasn't been done yet because you if you ever need to revert the blockchain because of a fork, or if an exchange is hacked, then you cannot.

This just encourages hackers to infiltrate exchanges, or even exchanges themselves to take the coins because they know they have them permanently.

Cool idea though.

Well klee lost over 1000 bitcoins last week when he was hacked,  no mention of reverting the blockchain then.   Fork idea ill let someone else answer.  I dont agree with what vericoin did on that fork.  It should of been mintpals responsibility to pay everyone back even if it put them out of business.

If someone isn't responsible keeping their coins secure it is there fault

The vericoin protocol was to blame not the exchange. Otherwise the hackers would have just attacked bitcoin or litecoin.

If the vericoin developer had done what the BTCD developer is proposing (blockchain ledger), then everyone would have lost their money, and the hacker wins.

You need to be able to roll back the chain if something as significant as an exchange getting hacked happens, look at MTgox, that is what happens when they don't roll back the blockchain.

CryptoNote inevitably bloats the blockchain at an exponential rate. Period.
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
July 22, 2014, 02:20:14 PM
Glad to see BitcoinDark doing so good in the market. I just wrote another article on bitcoindark regarding all the recent developments
http://www.cryptoslice.com/bitcoindark-way-become-first-fully-anonymous-coin/
full member
Activity: 185
Merit: 100
July 22, 2014, 02:20:00 PM
Took a crack at a new logo. Thoughts?  :/



Donations welcome: RGb89Xv4NRsAasi9a8Go9Ak9SNkoFocrEX

Smiley

How about.. no.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
July 22, 2014, 02:10:31 PM
Took a crack at a new logo. Thoughts?  :/

http://s23.postimg.org/yoyh95qdn/btcd.jpg

Donations welcome: RGb89Xv4NRsAasi9a8Go9Ak9SNkoFocrEX

Smiley
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
July 22, 2014, 02:09:00 PM
Seems there is big sale %%% on bittrex...  Roll Eyes

yea I missed that one... note to self set low buys before having a break.

The transition to bittrex is one of the fastest among the exchanges I know. But in this case not that quick to get a catch for a buy Angry
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
July 22, 2014, 02:08:19 PM
Seems there is big sale %%% on bittrex...  Roll Eyes

someone pushed the price down into the orders or 116k-118k
thanks for the one, just bought more in Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
July 22, 2014, 02:07:30 PM
Seems there is big sale %%% on bittrex...  Roll Eyes

yea I missed that one... note to self set low buys before having a break.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
July 22, 2014, 02:06:45 PM
Seems there is big sale %%% on bittrex...  Roll Eyes

someone pushed the price down into the orders or 116k-118k
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
July 22, 2014, 02:03:53 PM
Seems there is big sale %%% on bittrex...  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
July 22, 2014, 02:01:28 PM
There are not many coins to go around, I still think this price will be going higher, not sure why anyone would be selling really.

So what is going on with the China markets?

Good question would be nice to get some help from the community to get the ball rolling Cheesy
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
July 22, 2014, 01:58:08 PM
There are not many coins to go around, I still think this price will be going higher, not sure why anyone would be selling really.

So what is going on with the China markets?
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
July 22, 2014, 01:53:10 PM
Hello!

I am part of BTCD community now and I happen to be developing a cryptonote fork to add anon features to NXT. It turns out that my methods should apply to BTCD also. I will be working on integrating cryptonote tech into BTCD, but it is more than "just" cryptonote anon tech as I am also making my solution include a near realtime exchange (InstantDEX) so people can directly trade just by running the coin.

How will all this work you ask?
https://github.com/jl777/pNXT has the current source code and it is rapidly being developed.

Once InstantDEX is done, I will be adding Privatebet (peer to peer sportsbook) to the pNXT framework, plus the way it is implemented there is no reason any other number of useful services cant be added.

My efforts are in parallel with all the other BTCD coders and I try to design a clever way to integrate to require minimal changes to the BTCD codebase. So, if I succeed, then all the peoples selling at current prices will not be so happy.
There is no reason that other anon tech in BTCD can't combine with the cryptonote tech, in fact pushing tx through two independent anon algos would only help if it is done properly. So, I bring very good news to BTCD and now I expect a massive in increase in the FUD level Smiley

James

P.S. I am not so active on BTT, but you can find out more about me on NXT forums and jl777.org

Will the cryptonote tech lead to any issues with blockchain bloat?


yes,blockchain bloat is an issue for all cryptonote coins, however I chose the boolberry fork to base my work on as it was the most advanced as far as blockchain pruning and just being more efficient. However, I have a plan to use a blockchain FIFO to deal with whatever bloat issues we get. There is no reason to store the entire blockchain, but you do have to process it once. A FIFO is perfect for that, just set the FIFO size to the max lookback window into the blockchain dataset you need (of course you need to store all the keyimages, but that is smaller than the full blockchain). Then after loading the blockchain the first time, all that is left in memory is the FIFO. So as long as you have HDD space you are fine, not limited by system RAM

James

P.S. I am also toying with the idea of using the cryptonote blockchain as a sidechain and maintaining a decentralized ledger. Then we can simply toss the blockchain as soon as there is consensus. However, this is pretty tricky, so most likely not for the first version.

It hasn't been done yet because you if you ever need to revert the blockchain because of a fork, or if an exchange is hacked, then you cannot.

This just encourages hackers to infiltrate exchanges, or even exchanges themselves to take the coins because they know they have them permanently.

Cool idea though.

Well klee lost over 1000 bitcoins last week when he was hacked,  no mention of reverting the blockchain then.   Fork idea ill let someone else answer.  I dont agree with what vericoin did on that fork.  It should of been mintpals responsibility to pay everyone back even if it put them out of business.

If someone isn't responsible keeping their coins secure it is there fault
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
July 22, 2014, 01:43:41 PM
Hello!

I am part of BTCD community now and I happen to be developing a cryptonote fork to add anon features to NXT. It turns out that my methods should apply to BTCD also. I will be working on integrating cryptonote tech into BTCD, but it is more than "just" cryptonote anon tech as I am also making my solution include a near realtime exchange (InstantDEX) so people can directly trade just by running the coin.

How will all this work you ask?
https://github.com/jl777/pNXT has the current source code and it is rapidly being developed.

Once InstantDEX is done, I will be adding Privatebet (peer to peer sportsbook) to the pNXT framework, plus the way it is implemented there is no reason any other number of useful services cant be added.

My efforts are in parallel with all the other BTCD coders and I try to design a clever way to integrate to require minimal changes to the BTCD codebase. So, if I succeed, then all the peoples selling at current prices will not be so happy.
There is no reason that other anon tech in BTCD can't combine with the cryptonote tech, in fact pushing tx through two independent anon algos would only help if it is done properly. So, I bring very good news to BTCD and now I expect a massive in increase in the FUD level Smiley

James

P.S. I am not so active on BTT, but you can find out more about me on NXT forums and jl777.org

Will the cryptonote tech lead to any issues with blockchain bloat?


yes,blockchain bloat is an issue for all cryptonote coins, however I chose the boolberry fork to base my work on as it was the most advanced as far as blockchain pruning and just being more efficient. However, I have a plan to use a blockchain FIFO to deal with whatever bloat issues we get. There is no reason to store the entire blockchain, but you do have to process it once. A FIFO is perfect for that, just set the FIFO size to the max lookback window into the blockchain dataset you need (of course you need to store all the keyimages, but that is smaller than the full blockchain). Then after loading the blockchain the first time, all that is left in memory is the FIFO. So as long as you have HDD space you are fine, not limited by system RAM

James

P.S. I am also toying with the idea of using the cryptonote blockchain as a sidechain and maintaining a decentralized ledger. Then we can simply toss the blockchain as soon as there is consensus. However, this is pretty tricky, so most likely not for the first version.

It hasn't been done yet because you if you ever need to revert the blockchain because of a fork, or if an exchange is hacked, then you cannot.

This just encourages hackers to infiltrate exchanges, or even exchanges themselves to take the coins because they know they have them permanently.

Cool idea though.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 1126
July 22, 2014, 01:23:56 PM
wow yesterday we had about 16TH combined on the multipools, now there is over 70TH  Shocked

yeah, great support goin on my pool. http://btcd.xpool.ca We're hovering between 55-60TH/s

Happy Hashing!

Cheers!
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
July 22, 2014, 01:19:02 PM
i researched this coin for 48 hours now and convinced this coin is the golden one.




i got bitcoindarkdice.com today.



anyone making a BTCD dice site hit me up if you want to but the best domain name
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
July 22, 2014, 01:17:07 PM
Btw, this is how easy this 'CryptoNote' protocol is to implement.

https://cryptonotestarter.org/

Ring signatures bloat the blockchain insanely as well. Monero's is almost 1 gigabyte now and it was 100 megabytes 20 days ago.

However, I will give it to the developer; you perfected the initial distribution and PoW.

This coin will trump Monero (100%) because of that, plus since the network is supported by ASICS, the speeds will be faster.

But, again, this coin is no less, and no more anonymous than any other CryptoNote coin, Boolberry, Monero, Bytecoin.

Also ring signatures are not the same as stealth addresses, but they are VERY similar. It's like a stealth address collective, that the receiver signs with a one time key.






I believe it was stated jl777 has a way to implement the cryptonote without the bloat,  you would have to dig through his post history to locate what he is talking about.

I've seen a few comments already about btcd rendering other cryptonotes useless, hopefully your correct.  There seems to be a lot on the table as far as development and features so this is an exciting time.

I own both XMR and BTCD so I would like them both to do well Smiley
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
July 22, 2014, 01:09:26 PM
Btw, this is how easy this 'CryptoNote' protocol is to implement.

https://cryptonotestarter.org/

Ring signatures bloat the blockchain insanely as well. Monero's is almost 1 gigabyte now and it was 100 megabytes 20 days ago.

However, I will give it to the developer; you perfected the initial distribution and PoW.

This coin will trump Monero (100%) because of that, plus since the network is supported by ASICS, the speeds will be faster.

But, again, this coin is no less, and no more anonymous than any other CryptoNote coin, Boolberry, Monero, Bytecoin.

Also ring signatures are not the same as stealth addresses, but they are VERY similar. It's like a stealth address collective, that the receiver signs with a one time key.




Jump to: