Pages:
Author

Topic: BTCDice.io - New dice site, fast rolls, instant withdrawals - INVEST - page 4. (Read 2136 times)

copper member
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
Only 9 users in 10 top wagered gamblers!!!
Seems that the gambling website has not been successful to attracting gamblers.

Too early to judge like that, it was their 2nd wagering contest and it was the first contest with lower rewards. Not surprising enough if there were less players compared to the first one that has higher rewards. Bear in mind that it is also a new site dice site, it is not easy to attract gamblers because there are so many other dice sites out there. Give the site more times and lets see what they can do to attract gamblers.

The rewards are lower because the contest runs and pays every day instead of once a week.
We can't give out the weekly prize every day if all that is going to happen is players wait until midnight and bet 1 satoshi to win the prize.

As traffic increases we will increase the prizes. Also the more people that wager the higher the prize is as it is progressive.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 512
Only 9 users in 10 top wagered gamblers!!!
Seems that the gambling website has not been successful to attracting gamblers.

Too early to judge like that, it was their 2nd wagering contest and it was the first contest with lower rewards. Not surprising enough if there were less players compared to the first one that has higher rewards. Bear in mind that it is also a new site dice site, it is not easy to attract gamblers because there are so many other dice sites out there. Give the site more times and lets see what they can do to attract gamblers.

You are right. And that's why I said they should be patient. They said they will close their website if the volume doesn't increase until Sunday. What I said about the number of users is a fact and cannot be ignored. I aslo said that It's only one month they have launched their website.

They should give it sometime. You cannot expect 100s of users without making any advertisement. The site doesn't even have a twitter account so users can only hear about this site through this topic.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 116
Only 9 users in 10 top wagered gamblers!!!
Seems that the gambling website has not been successful to attracting gamblers.

Too early to judge like that, it was their 2nd wagering contest and it was the first contest with lower rewards. Not surprising enough if there were less players compared to the first one that has higher rewards. Bear in mind that it is also a new site dice site, it is not easy to attract gamblers because there are so many other dice sites out there. Give the site more times and lets see what they can do to attract gamblers.

You are right. And that's why I said they should be patient. They said they will close their website if the volume doesn't increase until Sunday. What I said about the number of users is a fact and cannot be ignored. I aslo said that It's only one month they have launched their website.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1312
Only 9 users in 10 top wagered gamblers!!!
Seems that the gambling website has not been successful to attracting gamblers.

Too early to judge like that, it was their 2nd wagering contest and it was the first contest with lower rewards. Not surprising enough if there were less players compared to the first one that has higher rewards. Bear in mind that it is also a new site dice site, it is not easy to attract gamblers because there are so many other dice sites out there. Give the site more times and lets see what they can do to attract gamblers.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 116
Only 9 users in 10 top wagered gamblers!!!
Seems that the gambling website has not been successful to attracting gamblers.

If we don't see an increase in volume or players by then we will close the site and return any investments or balances.
Even if that does not happen, you shouldn't close your website. You have been online only for a month. You should be more patient. This behavior will cause those who have already joined your website leave you too.
copper member
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
Just under 1 and a half hours left of todays daily leaderboard. Current rankings are shown below



We will keep running daily leaderboard contests until Sunday.
If we don't see an increase in volume or players by then we will close the site and return any investments or balances.

Good luck
copper member
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
When you do a contest you can put a lag in there or a latency, doesn't have to be because of the internet connection or anything, you can put a latency in the results, so you can actually gamble let's say at 14:59 but your bet still may not be considered in the contest that ends at 15:00 (times are just for example) hence if you actually put that in there then people will have to play even earlier to get away from it and if they play earlier than their opponents they are racing will see it as well and at least it will be a fair race, however if you don't put it there then someone may come in and do a huge bet on the last minute without anyone noticing. That's how you can eliminate the last second snipers, you just have to put some small latency like 30 seconds and it will be fine.

Actually we don't put latency on bets but the actual leaderboard page only updates every 15 minutes. So even if you do try to snipe the 1st position right at the end you won't know excatly how much you need to wager to do so
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1124
When you do a contest you can put a lag in there or a latency, doesn't have to be because of the internet connection or anything, you can put a latency in the results, so you can actually gamble let's say at 14:59 but your bet still may not be considered in the contest that ends at 15:00 (times are just for example) hence if you actually put that in there then people will have to play even earlier to get away from it and if they play earlier than their opponents they are racing will see it as well and at least it will be a fair race, however if you don't put it there then someone may come in and do a huge bet on the last minute without anyone noticing. That's how you can eliminate the last second snipers, you just have to put some small latency like 30 seconds and it will be fine.
copper member
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
We have now started a daily leaderboard contest.

The top 10 users who wager the most each day will win a share of the progressive prize pool.

The prizepool increases by 10% of the edge on every bet.

Join https://btcdice.io now for your chance to win
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
Good to see that the wagering contest continues after the first one ended few days ago. I have suggestion for the contest related to its timeframes because the ending time may not be ao friendly for some timezone. So I think you should change the timeframe as well, at least give opportunity to those who live in area where the last hours of the contest is during their sleeping time.

No matter how well are your timeframe setting, the result will be just the same. OP does not want to let players in the last minute snipe everything away from the people who join in the first time they start the contest. OP want everything to have a  fair chance among the players. So in order to make it fair, their team will do their best. Mean while you can start wagering here when it still around 60k bits

Even if the owner does not want players snipping in the last minutes, what can they do about it? This kind of activity will always happen in any wagering contest.
My main idea is the same, waiting for the last minutes/hour to see the whole situation on the leaderboard. By this way I and most players will be able to calculate whether it will worth to wager and compete in the last minutes or not. I also think that sniping in the last minutes is not something unfair as it is like a strategy to be used on the contest. I wonder how it can be unfair just because the winners plays in the last minutes and how the site will do to make it fair like what you say.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1008
Good to see that the wagering contest continues after the first one ended few days ago. I have suggestion for the contest related to its timeframes because the ending time may not be ao friendly for some timezone. So I think you should change the timeframe as well, at least give opportunity to those who live in area where the last hours of the contest is during their sleeping time.

No matter how well are your timeframe setting, the result will be just the same. OP does not want to let players in the last minute snipe everything away from the people who join in the first time they start the contest. OP want everything to have a  fair chance among the players. So in order to make it fair, their team will do their best. Mean while you can start wagering here when it still around 60k bits
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
Good to see that the wagering contest continues after the first one ended few days ago. I have suggestion for the contest related to its timeframes because the ending time may not be ao friendly for some timezone. So I think you should change the timeframe as well, at least give opportunity to those who live in area where the last hours of the contest is during their sleeping time.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1008
We had 2.5 Bitcoin wagered on last day of the leaderboard.
Think we should add a daily leaderboard contest as well as a weekly one?
This would reduce the chance of people sniping the weekly leaderboard at last minute.

No it wont, there will be always some people with huge balance who come in the last minute to overtake those who play every single hour during the day. This is the art of wagering contest where whale will bust small players in the last minute. If you want to get something different then you should make different promotions where there is no chance for people snipping in the last minute. Surely, it wont be something related to wagering contest but it should be something like number hunt competition where all players has the same chance unless you set too high minimum bet.

Yes agree with you, the only way I can think of is about the winning percentage like what other sites doing. I think this is pretty fair enough for everyone. Because most of the big whale sure hard enough to handle this kind of losing. But when it comes to the winning percentage then they should really careful on what they do. They can't randomly just place their bet, they sure need to have some calculations
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 953
Temporary forum vacation
I got the PM from OP so I am checking this place out. I see many new names coming up in the gambling scene so that is good for us overall as players. But of course,,, the newer they are the more they have to prove about themselves.

Can those who won the last leaderboard come and say some testimonials here?

Daily leaderboard is good idea but always same person anyway;)
legendary
Activity: 3402
Merit: 1227
Top Crypto Casino
Tried the site I really liked it : site run flawless and autobet speed is incredibly stunning.

I'd like to see implemented some more features for autobet like : change target on win/lose and also a "stop on win" button to select when you are chasing high multiplier.

Site staff was very friendly and helpful and my overall experience there is positive.

legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1312
We had 2.5 Bitcoin wagered on last day of the leaderboard.
Think we should add a daily leaderboard contest as well as a weekly one?
This would reduce the chance of people sniping the weekly leaderboard at last minute.

No it wont, there will be always some people with huge balance who come in the last minute to overtake those who play every single hour during the day. This is the art of wagering contest where whale will bust small players in the last minute. If you want to get something different then you should make different promotions where there is no chance for people snipping in the last minute. Surely, it wont be something related to wagering contest but it should be something like number hunt competition where all players has the same chance unless you set too high minimum bet.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1008
We had 2.5 Bitcoin wagered on last day of the leaderboard.
Think we should add a daily leaderboard contest as well as a weekly one?
This would reduce the chance of people sniping the weekly leaderboard at last minute.

What does this matter? I believe most of the sites also have the same situation but the problem here is about the wagering amount. Most of them having such a very huge amount which it can't be sniped meanwhile this site is still new so most of the players will wait for this opportunity to get easy money without wagering so much. To have split contest is good enough but if there is only huge prize but without good prize it wont do anything good either
copper member
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
We had 2.5 Bitcoin wagered on last day of the leaderboard.
Think we should add a daily leaderboard contest as well as a weekly one?
This would reduce the chance of people sniping the weekly leaderboard at last minute.
copper member
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
The leaderboard contest is over.

There was a small issue with some payments not being automatic. If you haven't received the leaderboard prize email [email protected] or pm me and I'll credit it.

We need to fix a little display issue with the leaderboard but will start a new week contest tomorrow.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1008
The leaderboard is paying 0.05 Bitcoin and currently you would only need to wager 0.00011618 to win the whole lot!

Any gambler would risk depositing 0.0000001 bitcoin to win 0.05 bitcoin for free.

I'm interested with above posts especially the words "the whole lot" and 'to win 0.05". Do you mean that a user is able to win all the prize? For me it sounds like you are letting people to create multiple accounts and wager on every account so all prizes will be won by 1 person only. Correct me if I misunderstand your post.
Related to leaderboard, how often you do the update as it seems that it is not updated lively?

Even if they let players to create more and more account but they can't wagered this amount on leaderboard which is currently 52,000 bits for thr first place, so this will be pointless because only one account that able to get it. Instead of creating more account why dont you put it into one account? And btw I still saw some unfilled spots which is still very low wagered but it is still 3 days long. Let see how much this wagered will go then

You did not get my point here.
My main idea is that once a user create multiple accounts the he/she can get the whole prizepool (not only for the 1st place). It will worth with this current situation as someone do not need to wager much to be on the leaderboard. Surely it wont worth to have multiple accounts for wagering competition if there are so many participants who wager a lot.

So you are saying that most of them will try to create more accounts and aim for every prize for this current time because the wagered amount is still so small? Is this possible to create like 10 accounts and get everything here? Wont they get banned just to try something like this? I believe OP is smart enough to not let people try this kind of thing. Instead of getting banned why not try to get something for sure, with the current leaderboard I think it is still easy to get the first prize
Pages:
Jump to: