Pages:
Author

Topic: [BTCT.CO] [IPO-cancelled] BTCGARDEN MINER---Eyes to the horizon - page 16. (Read 198202 times)

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I love Bitcoin
Update :

We have received our sample-PCB and it is being tested in every aspect. Everything s running well so far. ( Mass production of PCBs will start later and can be finished within one week in Shenzhen)
We also dealed with an acquaintances packaging factory to shorten the Package period from 10days to 3days. I.E. we will get our chips in hand only 3-4 days later after out of  Fab.
We will hold a meeting next weekend in Beijing to discuz our future plans incl.: 2nd gen chips, deployment plans for 1st gen chips, application of analog circuit  in our project , a lot of experts both on R and D have been invited.

thanks for the update. i had purchase a little volume of share, BTCGARDEN look good, will continue top up for the share.
cheer
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
I think what dexX7 was trying to say is: a former BTCMAN webmaster's evidence is not as convincing, since they(nightcat, the webmaster and aiwill, the CEO) are on the same boat.
However, dexX7, the posts nightcat quoted in his reply are claims from numerous Chinese victims from numerous sources against this yianding guy since 2009.

No. Wink

I just asked for another confirmation, because I can only use translation to understand what they write in the posts. I think a BTCMAN admin has a lot more credibility than a user with 31 posts and thus I believe you that yianding is the the scammer.

Thanks everyone for helping to understand the situation.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
command of chinese language seems more important than anything else at the moment -
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
He is a well-known cyber-criminal, just ignore him.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2876572

Thanks ronaldlee0917. Just to be sure: yianding is the criminal and in the thread you linked nightcat (a former BTCMAN webmaster) provides evidence for this claim?
Exactly. He was trying to scam BtcGarden into buying back his "shares" which he allegedly does not own any at all. He was angered BtcGarden did not send the bitcoins first and fall to his trap, so he retaliated by spreading false rumours and tarnish the reputation of BtcGarden. Morever he had a long history of scamming people, spreading trojans, so what he said could be safely ignored.
I think what dexX7 was trying to say is: a former BTCMAN webmaster's evidence is not as convincing, since they(nightcat, the webmaster and aiwill, the CEO) are on the same boat.
However, dexX7, the posts nightcat quoted in his reply are claims from numerous Chinese victims from numerous sources against this yianding guy since 2009.

Your own discretion is highly advised.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
He is a well-known cyber-criminal, just ignore him.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2876572

Thanks ronaldlee0917. Just to be sure: yianding is the criminal and in the thread you linked nightcat (a former BTCMAN webmaster) provides evidence for this claim?
Exactly. He was trying to scam BtcGarden into buying back his "shares" which he allegedly does not own any at all. He was angered BtcGarden did not send the bitcoins first and fall to his trap, so he retaliated by spreading false rumours and tarnish the reputation of BtcGarden. Morever he had a long history of scamming people, spreading trojans, so what he said could be safely ignored.
legendary
Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000
Looks like the discourse isn't much better on their side of the forum: Cheesy

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
He is a well-known cyber-criminal, just ignore him.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2876572

Thanks ronaldlee0917. Just to be sure: yianding is the criminal and in the thread you linked nightcat (a former BTCMAN webmaster) provides evidence for this claim?
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
yianding:

As far as I understand, you say GARDEN is fraudulent, but Google translate doesn't do a very good job on translating Chinese. What are the reasons for your claim?
He is a well-known cyber-criminal, just ignore him.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2876572
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
yianding:

As far as I understand, you say GARDEN is fraudulent, but Google translate doesn't do a very good job on translating Chinese. What are the reasons for your claim?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
鸭嘴兽是一个快乐的表。

Platypus is a happy table.

I... wait what?
LOL... Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 2178
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
鸭嘴兽是一个快乐的表。

Platypus is a happy table.

I... wait what?
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1003
Are we still in the English forum? Undecided

I support insta-ban for non-english posts, but with the total lack of moderation on these forums, I doubt it'll happen.
hero member
Activity: 964
Merit: 509
回到主題

back to topic
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
Touchdown
Are we still in the English forum? Undecided
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1003
我创建了一个BTCGARDEN涉嫌诈骗的调查群,请有兴趣的加入群号:195845679, 并请将本消息转发到各大btc相关的QQ群

nice try
hero member
Activity: 843
Merit: 1001
his name is Zeng Chengjie 曾成杰. i didn't find English reports deeply investigate this case, only quote government announcement and weibo(twitter in China). you can see this news, it's in Chinese   http://www.sqxb.cn/content/details2_581.html
oh,come on guys.
let's get back to the topic. Smiley
i mean companies like asciminer\labcoin\btcgarden, they are taking risks of life to run this business. so we should be confident that they don't want things screw up

you gonna joking,we are made in china,nothing can defeat us . so , hold your shares tight,we will make you rich.
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
his name is Zeng Chengjie 曾成杰. i didn't find English reports deeply investigate this case, only quote government announcement and weibo(twitter in China). you can see this news, it's in Chinese   http://www.sqxb.cn/content/details2_581.html
oh,come on guys.
let's get back to the topic. Smiley
i mean companies like asciminer\labcoin\btcgarden, they are taking risks of life to run this business. so we should be confident that they don't want things screw up
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 100
his name is Zeng Chengjie 曾成杰. i didn't find English reports deeply investigate this case, only quote government announcement and weibo(twitter in China). you can see this news, it's in Chinese   http://www.sqxb.cn/content/details2_581.html
oh,come on guys.
let's get back to the topic. Smiley
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Chinese government just shot a guy to death last month since they thought he runs a Ponzi scheme

I see what you're talking about, there was a guy got executed, and there were a lot of protests, because people think he didn't deserve death penalty, because he didn't get to see his family before executed, and probably because we don't have judicial independence here.

But he was running a Ponzi scheme.

I have no interest in defending the Chinese government but your words are misleading, and I have to explain to the westerners what happened.
actually he is not. Chinese government took his property so he can not pay the debt, which makes it look like a Ponzi scheme, but it's not. he didn't waste money he borrowed, he has a big real estate company, and all real estate companies in China profit a lot.

Any more news about this?
his name is Zeng Chengjie 曾成杰. i didn't find English reports deeply investigate this case, only quote government announcement and weibo(twitter in China). you can see this news, it's in Chinese   http://www.sqxb.cn/content/details2_581.html
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Let's assume for a second that the VC investment in Avalon is true.

Wouldn't that mean that BTCGARDEN is worth more, not less?  The panic selling only makes sense if the company isn't well positioned.  Of the companies competing in this space, Asicminer has the best shot at competing due to their current market position/experience and capital.  They however are already highly valued and investment in them at the current time has a limited upside.

BTCGARDEN I believe are next in line of those companies able to realistically compete in a meaningful way.  Now that they've raised the 3 million from the IPO, there really isn't anything in their way in delivering on their plan.  The upside for us of course is that there is a huge potential upside from the current value.

After all, any one company can only control ~35%-~40% or it becomes self defeating.

Thoughts?

Let's assume as has been widely reported in other threads its a fake and move on.
Pages:
Jump to: