Pages:
Author

Topic: Build this and I will come - page 2. (Read 3160 times)

full member
Activity: 175
Merit: 100
October 01, 2013, 11:42:00 AM
#30
You keep going back to the wallet hack and I keep telling you that is not why I am getting out of supporting and using coins. There are many factors that is a small one.

Yes it is....

"Someone hacked my wallet.

September 27, 2013, 10:07:04 PM

Not that any body around here gives a fuck and I am sure that its my fucking fault so you can save you fucking comments.

This was it for me. I am gonna forget about fucking coins."


Seriously sublime, this needs to stop. How self-important can you be to expect something as big bitcoin to undergo radical change just because you're unwilling to make a change as simple as adding two-factor authentication. 12 year old who play WoW have 2FA on their Battle.net account, but you act like it's some moral offense that you should have to do the same.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
October 01, 2013, 10:54:42 AM
#29
You keep going back to the wallet hack and I keep telling you that is not why I am getting out of supporting and using coins. There are many factors that is a small one.

full member
Activity: 175
Merit: 100
October 01, 2013, 01:16:54 AM
#28
1. ID... I want to link my real world identity to my wallet
2. Import trust... I want to link to other areas of my life to provide evidence of my character. I need to be able to import trust. 
3. Rate.. I need to be able to rate right to someones wallet ID.. That way I can choose not to transact with people that have no ratings or have been flagged with a neg rating. I bought coins about 2 weeks ago that i later found out were stolen. i dont like that
4. See the people that the people I trust trust and their reputaion.
5. Have a client that isn't susceptible to hacks that is always synced. I want my mom to be able use bitcoin too. Dont let people sign up if you cant make them safe. 
6. have a system for implementing changes

Some of these things already exist in some form, and none of them would've prevented what happened to you.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
September 30, 2013, 11:23:02 PM
#27
If you see bitcoins coming from this address: 1DabsXmraEr18jdEryck8jzcFku873xmRf

You can consider it green. It will not be double-spent. It is linked to this forum.

Code:
1DabsXmraEr18jdEryck8jzcFku873xmRf
Dabs on bitcointalk.org
H6AqbbetO0ltHYIrGOuTU3V0e40JYoFxurh9TYp0hcrkdpRghJd9REOUruFdeQNaqrZIkk/n3/uYgYkvdnovPz4=

And, I will probably use that address for maybe another 2^256 times, or until ECDSA is broken, or the RNG on my offline computer is broken, whichever comes first.

Of course, I still suggest you wait at least one (1) confirmation.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
September 30, 2013, 11:19:44 PM
#26
Or....

Dont accept PayPal for bitcoins...stop trying to find a way to get around that fact.

It has to happen for it to work. Period

You have to be able to trade for debit card payments, paypal, credit cards, bank transfer. That is the only way. 

If you strap an eagle to a dinosaur, it may not benefit either, but think about it in other ways, all of these can exist, it doesn't have to be a direct tether, there may be another path, don't give up.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 10:56:45 PM
#25
Maybe spider silk or nano bees.

Obvious reasons why chickens dont make good money, but anything real is better to store wealth than currency.

I dont recommend keeping fiat as savings either, lucky for me i dont have to worry about it. I dont have money or currency.  Smiley

Bitcoin could be good currency but will never be good money.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 09:44:13 PM
#24
It comes down to this for me.

Money is real wealth

Currency is the illusion of wealth.

Bitcoin is just an idea ones and zeros floating in the clouds. I cant eat it or cloth myself with it. It requires the internet and electricity which a large portion of the world doesnt have. I can go any where in the world with a chicken as money and it will be valuable. I wouldnt recommend saving with bitcoin it isn't real.   
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
September 30, 2013, 09:30:52 PM
#23
Once again we agree, but there is at least the pretense of system for retribution.

I find we agree quite often, on many things, except for when we don't! Wink

I think a major point of contention between us is that I consider Bitcoin a store of value while you do not. I don't quite grasp the concept that something can be "currency" without being a store of value. Why would I accept it if it didn't hold value (at least long enough for me to get rid of it). I will even admit that fiat is a store of value for short periods of time.

I know that Bitcoin has been extremely volatile (which takes away from it's ability to store value), but I also understand that when you introduce a disruptive technology like this, there will be a period of adjustment (possibly quite a long one).

Once again I agree that fiat is a store of value over the short term and so is bitcoin but the difference between money and currency is that money is a store of value over the long term and currency is just a means of transacting. Money is a store of value over time because it is a commodity oil would be good money if it was easily transported, so would chickens they have real value and are not just a representation of value.  

Bitcoin has been designed from the ground up to have all of the valuable properties of a commodity money without the drawbacks of having an alternate purpose. This is superior, in my mind, to a commodity which may fluctuate in value for various reasons having nothing to do with it being used as money.

Except for being innately fungible.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 08:56:57 PM
#22
Once again we agree, but there is at least the pretense of system for retribution.

I find we agree quite often, on many things, except for when we don't! Wink

I think a major point of contention between us is that I consider Bitcoin a store of value while you do not. I don't quite grasp the concept that something can be "currency" without being a store of value. Why would I accept it if it didn't hold value (at least long enough for me to get rid of it). I will even admit that fiat is a store of value for short periods of time.

I know that Bitcoin has been extremely volatile (which takes away from it's ability to store value), but I also understand that when you introduce a disruptive technology like this, there will be a period of adjustment (possibly quite a long one).

Once again I agree that fiat is a store of value over the short term and so is bitcoin but the difference between money and currency is that money is a store of value over the long term and currency is just a means of transacting. Money is a store of value over time because it is a commodity oil would be good money if it was easily transported, so would chickens they have real value and are not just a representation of value.  

 
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 08:50:14 PM
#21
tl:dr

Put up bounty and people will do it, no one cares if you "come"

that is fine but if you cant persuade me (who wants it work) you will never get the general population to use it. They dont know that the worlds financial system is flawed the dont realize the mechanism that creates war and inequality is the control of money. They dont give a shit about that. All they know is that this is easier or this is better. 
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 08:40:40 PM
#20
Social networks can be a system of reputation management, but they don't belong to the blockchain. The dollar has been very successful without a reputation management system built-in. We shall see BTC for what it is: a currency. There will always be good and bad people, exchanging fiat or BTC, but neither fiat nor BTC has any responsibility in telling who's who.

Yes it does it is called the court system

Those with the most dollars can afford competent lawyers who are capable of revealing the loopholes in the system. Those without dollars, fuck 'em.

Once again we agree, but there is at least the pretense of a system for retribution.
hero member
Activity: 740
Merit: 501
September 30, 2013, 08:39:56 PM
#19
tl:dr

Put up bounty and people will do it, no one cares if you "come"
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 08:37:29 PM
#18
but the only things that happen in secrecy is nefarious.

Wut? Wanting privacy is nefarious?

Bullshit. In today's world there are countless reasons to value privacy.

unfortunately that is true, but as you point out in today's world. Because others believe they can dictate what can and can not be done there are valid reasons for secrecy.

I dont consider smoking week to be nefarious but because others do and have the supposed right to enforce their world view on others it does create the need for secrecy.    
 

That is why I ask that it do both.
    
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 08:29:08 PM
#17
Social networks can be a system of reputation management, but they don't belong to the blockchain. The dollar has been very successful without a reputation management system built-in. We shall see BTC for what it is: a currency. There will always be good and bad people, exchanging fiat or BTC, but neither fiat nor BTC has any responsibility in telling who's who.

Yes it does it is called the court system
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 08:25:56 PM
#16

I think this is the root of the problem. In early human civilization trade was simple because you knew the history and reputation of the people that you traded with, but as civilizations grew the desire to trade outside of your trust network grew. So the need for middlemen and financial institutions came about. The problem is those institutions have siphoned off the productive efforts of their citizens or customers and have grown so powerful because of their privilege and have created a world dominated and control at gun point giving us ever growing police states and to big to fail banks. They no longer work for us but we work for them.

So the challenge as I see it is to recreate early civilization. We have a technology that can enable the entire world to know each others reputation. We can know the character of every man women and child on the planet. I will gladly trade without institutions or the protection of the state if i can know who I am dealing with. So far the reputation centers around bitcoin all start from scratch, We need a reputaion center that allows you to import trust from other areas of life, I think the guys at ripple are working on that, but as it stands now it is unusable IMO."        

What if a man you highly trust become manipulated? In today's society, it's impossible to purely rely on trust, you should only rely on your own risk management, e.g. never risk more than you can afford to lose, then all the problem around trust is solved. Being a bitcoiner, the most important thing is risk management. And by doing this you also preserve the privacy, which lots of people (especially high net worth people) desire


It is very good at doing that and if that is your only motivation then there is no need to go further, but the only things that happen in secrecy is nefarious.

If bitcoin is only good for buying drugs, gambling, or paying for peep shows that is fine but is of no interest to me.

I am asking that it do both open and honest transactions and private and nefarious ones too.   
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 08:11:22 PM
#15
You're all putting too much effort into this. Here's the correct answer: That's ok, we don't want to play with you anyway.

Wait that is my view point
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
September 30, 2013, 08:06:47 PM
#14
Quote
I should never have to worry about a flat tire, changing oil or batteries, and it certainly shouldn't ever be possible for me to get into an accident.  When they build cars like this, ill be back.

There are acceptable cost and unacceptable cost (which is a matter of opinion). It is a trade off. I agree tires shouldnt go flat and batteries should last the life of a car, but the cost of tires at this time that wont go flat is prohibitive. Other people feel the same way that is why they developed run flat tires and long lasting batteries, it is just a trade off more cost for less hassle.

With BTC there are alternatives. There are money transfer system that offer protection and positive identification. In your analogy there are no cars that can never be involved in an accident in the future there will be automated cars that never (or almost never) have accidents. When that time comes most people wont be interested in buying a car that is a death trap if it makes financial sense.

Quote
If you don't recognize how your ignorance is influencing your opinion, then you'll likely never use BTC again.

That is okay there is no loss of quality of life if i never use bitcoin, other payment processors exist. That dont ask that I learn It skills or net security. Bitcoin is a tool if there are better tools what do I care.

 
Quote
On a side note, i'd encourage you to think about some of your ideas  about how you would like Bitcoin to look, and then try to think about why some of them are just bad ideas altogether that, if implemented, I'd bet you'd hate.

I already use these methods and like them quite nicely. I dont have access to bio metrics or finger print data, but I establish identity the with the best methods available when I first started selling coins i would only sell through Facebook, I could glean lots of information about the character and identity of the people i was dealing with, I already use a system of rating here on this forum. Coinbase has a wallet that requires sms verification that I use that as a primary wallet.

Quote
So how do you stop a spam rating that is negative

You dont how do they stop that here? This trust system works just fine.

Quote
 Reminds me of the BS credit rating system we have today


That is a bullshit system, there is no method of rebuttal

Quote
 There are a number of ways of linking your ID to an address.  But, while remaining decentralized, how do you propose stopping people from linking fabricated identities to an address?

You dont.. If someone has access to email and can verify it and access to facebook and can verify it and access to power bills and can verify it is 99.9 % that it is them. The way I Id is email verification, paypal verification, facebook verification, drivers licence verification, IP verification. Look at coinbases verification. They know what truck I owned in 2000 and the closest highway to my house in 97.

Bitcoin and the community might not want to admit it but you are competing with the existing system, people are not gonna become It professionals so they can send money. They dont have to with other methods.
      
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
September 30, 2013, 07:59:56 PM
#13

I think this is the root of the problem. In early human civilization trade was simple because you knew the history and reputation of the people that you traded with, but as civilizations grew the desire to trade outside of your trust network grew. So the need for middlemen and financial institutions came about. The problem is those institutions have siphoned off the productive efforts of their citizens or customers and have grown so powerful because of their privilege and have created a world dominated and control at gun point giving us ever growing police states and to big to fail banks. They no longer work for us but we work for them.

So the challenge as I see it is to recreate early civilization. We have a technology that can enable the entire world to know each others reputation. We can know the character of every man women and child on the planet. I will gladly trade without institutions or the protection of the state if i can know who I am dealing with. So far the reputation centers around bitcoin all start from scratch, We need a reputaion center that allows you to import trust from other areas of life, I think the guys at ripple are working on that, but as it stands now it is unusable IMO."        

What if a man you highly trust become manipulated? In today's society, it's impossible to purely rely on trust, you should only rely on your own risk management, e.g. never risk more than you can afford to lose, then all the problem around trust is solved. Being a bitcoiner, the most important thing is risk management. And by doing this you also preserve the privacy, which lots of people (especially high net worth people) desire
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
September 30, 2013, 07:47:01 PM
#12
You're all putting too much effort into this. Here's the correct answer: That's ok, we don't want to play with you anyway.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1491
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
September 30, 2013, 07:20:53 PM
#11
So how do you stop a spam rating that is negative?

Reminds me of the BS credit rating system we have today. They dont care if you pay your rent, cell, and other bills on time.

Only ones they care about is your debt payments based on a loan you took out to buy something.

Technically that system is biased towards people who like to be debt slaves.
Pages:
Jump to: