Wa ha ha ha -- Btcat is so right about the arithmetic!
And if nothing else, it's great to see ideas being discussed among competent long-timer krypto geeks.
Mark
Topic: Bullion (CBX) 'the Digital Precious Metal' | 2019 Roadmap published - page 231. (Read 359514 times)
September 30, 2015, 01:57:28 AM
September 29, 2015, 04:37:49 PM
I know this may or may not be the best way to get listed on Bter, but our top position for CBX is increasingly challenged by number two in the voting list.
I have been putting in my 80 votes per day, but number Two is catching up on us; can you guys please help putting in more votes, please?
Let's get back to voting on Bter!!!!
Thanks
I have been putting in my 80 votes per day, but number Two is catching up on us; can you guys please help putting in more votes, please?
Let's get back to voting on Bter!!!!
Thanks
just offer the crooks 3 btc to be listed,
your coin would be active within a day or 2,
September 29, 2015, 04:09:36 PM
long term it ought become a relatively flat rate
the idea is just to start to explorer the option to cross swap
so exploring the discovery of the fair market rate of exchange in low volume
no need for a hot competitive market
just a basis on the books open for all to see
anyone with the skills to generate and make public
the historic UNO/CBX prices and overlays of both paired with BTC and USD to get a good picture
pls feel free
keep us posted
the idea is just to start to explorer the option to cross swap
so exploring the discovery of the fair market rate of exchange in low volume
no need for a hot competitive market
just a basis on the books open for all to see
anyone with the skills to generate and make public
the historic UNO/CBX prices and overlays of both paired with BTC and USD to get a good picture
pls feel free
keep us postedAmen to that and a +1 from me. Competitive, transparent, fair market. Nice words, but...
September 29, 2015, 12:48:53 PM
long term it ought become a relatively flat rate
the idea is just to start to explorer the option to cross swap
so exploring the discovery of the fair market rate of exchange in low volume
no need for a hot competitive market
just a basis on the books open for all to see
anyone with the skills to generate and make public
the historic UNO/CBX prices and overlays of both paired with BTC and USD to get a good picture
pls feel free keep us posted
the idea is just to start to explorer the option to cross swap
so exploring the discovery of the fair market rate of exchange in low volume
no need for a hot competitive market
just a basis on the books open for all to see
anyone with the skills to generate and make public
the historic UNO/CBX prices and overlays of both paired with BTC and USD to get a good picture
pls feel free
keep us posted 
September 29, 2015, 09:11:58 AM
Well, we've at least refreshed our cross-community relations! Let's see if the Cryptopia pair gains any traction 'unilaterally,' so to speak.
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu)
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu)
I just took a look at the UNO/CBX market. I think one of the problems is that people are not familiar with the rates and it takes effort to pick up a calculator. We're so used to BTC and LTC, when you see the price you remember it's history and can make a decision. I think at least a chart should be produced with historic UNO/CBX prices and overlays of both paired with BTC and USD to get a good picture. A better system to reflect on these prices could help get more interest in these altcoin pairings.
Great point BTCat. The conversion rate between these new trading pairs is a bit of a hurdle and definitely acts as a barrier to trading. The chart idea is a very good one.
September 29, 2015, 05:06:47 AM
Well, we've at least refreshed our cross-community relations! Let's see if the Cryptopia pair gains any traction 'unilaterally,' so to speak.
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu)
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu)
I just took a look at the UNO/CBX market. I think one of the problems is that people are not familiar with the rates and it takes effort to pick up a calculator. We're so used to BTC and LTC, when you see the price you remember it's history and can make a decision. I think at least a chart should be produced with historic UNO/CBX prices and overlays of both paired with BTC and USD to get a good picture. A better system to reflect on these prices could help get more interest in these altcoin pairings.
September 29, 2015, 02:51:14 AM
I know this may or may not be the best way to get listed on Bter, but our top position for CBX is increasingly challenged by number two in the voting list.
I have been putting in my 80 votes per day, but number Two is catching up on us; can you guys please help putting in more votes, please?
Let's get back to voting on Bter!!!!
Thanks
I have been putting in my 80 votes per day, but number Two is catching up on us; can you guys please help putting in more votes, please?
Let's get back to voting on Bter!!!!
Thanks
just offer the crooks 3 btc to be listed,
your coin would be active within a day or 2,
September 28, 2015, 11:01:23 PM
Well, we've at least refreshed our cross-community relations! Let's see if the Cryptopia pair gains any traction 'unilaterally,' so to speak.
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu)
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu)
September 28, 2015, 02:39:08 PM
Are you suggesting setting up a stand alone exchange for trading of CBX/UNO exclusively?
The exchange is already ready ... https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=CBX_UNO
The advantage is cross support without the need to constantly back the price with BTC.
The essence of this 'horizontal stuff,' Elambert, is a recognition that similar coins with small caps can 'cross-boot-strap' each other.
Now, in the present situation, members of either coin can trade the other via Bitcoin., and that's beneficial.
But if the two communities each see the other as a sort of 'holding tank' of value against each other* (and Bitcoin is not the middleman . . . ), really significant amounts of buy-support could become the norm.
We are calling here, fellow crypto-commodity developers, for a consideration of a fundamental change of consciousness.
*And I wanna discuss 'bagholderism' a bit later: long time community members end up with a little too much of one crypto than is perhaps healthy for its perception by potential investors. We could progress to significant otc trades between the communities.
Ok, I think I follow now. Your logic makes sense and is a good marketing tool to help UNO grow their market/trading pairs at Cryptopia. I am not opposed to CBX holders getting involved with this should they desire UNO. Just like with the CBX/LTC trade pair or Ripple/CBX trade pair at Cryptsy - people have more options to obtain what they desire without going through BTC.
However, for me personally, I honestly have no interest in other cryptos. So for me to trade CBX for Uno, LTC, Ripple, Bitcoin or even cash for that matter does not make sense. I have worked my butt off for over 2 years on CBX and am fully committed in heart, time and money to continuing this journey with 100% commitment and focus.
To each their own though, but I am confident in what we are doing and where we are going so I don't think I would be of much help in this endeavor...
September 28, 2015, 02:04:45 PM
Looks like I've been missing out on the party. Gotta read and get caught up!
September 28, 2015, 12:55:21 PM
I know this may or may not be the best way to get listed on Bter, but our top position for CBX is increasingly challenged by number two in the voting list.
I have been putting in my 80 votes per day, but number Two is catching up on us; can you guys please help putting in more votes, please?
Let's get back to voting on Bter!!!!
Thanks
I have been putting in my 80 votes per day, but number Two is catching up on us; can you guys please help putting in more votes, please?
Let's get back to voting on Bter!!!!
Thanks
September 27, 2015, 06:24:44 PM
Are you suggesting setting up a stand alone exchange for trading of CBX/UNO exclusively?
The exchange is already ready ... https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=CBX_UNO
The advantage is cross support without the need to constantly back the price with BTC.
The essence of this 'horizontal stuff,' Elambert, is a recognition that similar coins with small caps can 'cross-boot-strap' each other.
Now, in the present situation, members of either coin can trade the other via Bitcoin., and that's beneficial.
But if the two communities each see the other as a sort of 'holding tank' of value against each other* (and Bitcoin is not the middleman . . . ), really significant amounts of buy-support could become the norm.
We are calling here, fellow crypto-commodity developers, for a consideration of a fundamental change of consciousness.
*And I wanna discuss 'bagholderism' a bit later: long time community members end up with a little too much of one crypto than is perhaps healthy for its perception by potential investors. We could progress to significant otc trades between the communities.
September 27, 2015, 01:34:01 PM
I sure won't push this issue -- that would be trollish. Thanks for your comment, CapnBDL
We're trying trying trying to find ways to improve our buy-support/lessen Bitcoin's centrality, really big-picture stuff -- re-wire the motherboard, even if it's just spirited discussion of the theory of it all.
Is Uno's MM-ability not positive? or at least neutral?
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu), Australia
We're trying trying trying to find ways to improve our buy-support/lessen Bitcoin's centrality, really big-picture stuff -- re-wire the motherboard, even if it's just spirited discussion of the theory of it all.
Is Uno's MM-ability not positive? or at least neutral?
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu), Australia
There are many things I like about UNO; I do have a few! To me the suggested market making agreement appears that it would require semi-constant attention and supervision, does it not?
It would require a bot. Of course, if there were 100 people interested in these markets and shifting their orders according to the value of bitcoin pairings, it could work, but that's not going to happen anytime soon. Eventually someone will get a bot working on Cryptopia and the alt pairings will be much more useful.
September 27, 2015, 07:45:59 AM
Are you suggesting setting up a stand alone exchange for trading of CBX/UNO exclusively?
The exchange is already ready ... https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=CBX_UNO
The advantage is cross support without the need to constantly back the price with BTC.
Also, you can trade CBX for Doge, Peer, Start, Black etc via the UNO pair.
September 27, 2015, 06:37:31 AM
Please pardon my intrusion. Thanks so much for your time.
Mark
Mark
No intrusion IMZ. You are always welcome here and we encourage all points of view to be heard. I love the outside of the box thinking and am a firm believer in exploring progressive ideas as there are always lessons to be learned and values to be identified.
That being said, I am not quite sure I understand the proposition or suggestion you are bringing to the table. Are you suggesting setting up a stand alone exchange for trading of CBX/UNO exclusively?
September 27, 2015, 06:26:34 AM
Please pardon my intrusion. Thanks so much for your time.
Mark
Mark
September 27, 2015, 06:04:08 AM
Yes, VonSpass: we both know that the buy-sell split would drift open if the volume were low.* However, a couple of us are willing to put some effort into a trial -- as I said, this is an effort to try some new ideas.
If you guys will bear with us, All This relates to developing the 'horizontal stuff.' Details to follow. Of course, we're all passionate about our 'home-base coins'; but so very many of us -- we all know this is true -- hold a range of other cryptos. 'Horizontal initiatives' concern openly developing these possibilities.
(Yah, the buy-sell split is ludicrous at this second. I'll chip away at it for a few days, and report back.)
*I am often reluctant to speak against the many-exchanges=good attitude that I see in almost all coins. The fact that CBX has just one exchange seems appropriate to me. I see it as a strength. Would it not be beneficial if CBX had one CBX/BTC pair (which aggregates volume)? and the CBX/UNO pair (which would bring volume that would otherwise probably not exist)?
Mark
If you guys will bear with us, All This relates to developing the 'horizontal stuff.' Details to follow. Of course, we're all passionate about our 'home-base coins'; but so very many of us -- we all know this is true -- hold a range of other cryptos. 'Horizontal initiatives' concern openly developing these possibilities.
(Yah, the buy-sell split is ludicrous at this second. I'll chip away at it for a few days, and report back.)
*I am often reluctant to speak against the many-exchanges=good attitude that I see in almost all coins. The fact that CBX has just one exchange seems appropriate to me. I see it as a strength. Would it not be beneficial if CBX had one CBX/BTC pair (which aggregates volume)? and the CBX/UNO pair (which would bring volume that would otherwise probably not exist)?
Mark
CBX has more than one exchange. It also can be traded against many currencies. At least CBX/LTC is very good to have and we're looking for a listing in China. As we researched in the past, more people prefer not to have too many exchanges indeed to keep a reasonable amount of volume. Compared to BTC, LTC, DOGE etc. both CBX and UNO are smaller coins with no big volumes. I would think that a CBX/UNO market would be extreme low volume and I'm not even sure exchanges are interested to host this. That said Cryptopia does it: https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange?market=CBX_UNO , so anyone can use it.
To have just one BTC/CBX and then CBX/UNO only it would be a huge downgrade for CBX and I think against the interest of development and growth. The universe should expand not shrink. My idea is, the more things you can do with it the more it will be used. I would have liked a more continuous campaign to get CBX listed anywhere, everywhere in the world with hundreds of exchanges and a lot more functionality, then more people will take notice and get involved.
September 27, 2015, 01:42:39 AM
Yes, VonSpass: we both know that the buy-sell split would drift open if the volume were low.* However, a couple of us are willing to put some effort into a trial -- as I said, this is an effort to try some new ideas.
If you guys will bear with us, All This relates to developing the 'horizontal stuff.' Details to follow. Of course, we're all passionate about our 'home-base coins'; but so very many of us -- we all know this is true -- hold a range of other cryptos. 'Horizontal initiatives' concern openly developing these possibilities.
(Yah, the buy-sell split is ludicrous at this second. I'll chip away at it for a few days, and report back.)
*I am often reluctant to speak against the many-exchanges=good attitude that I see in almost all coins. The fact that CBX has just one exchange seems appropriate to me. I see it as a strength. Would it not be beneficial if CBX had one CBX/BTC pair (which aggregates volume)? and the CBX/UNO pair (which would bring volume that would otherwise probably not exist)?
Mark
If you guys will bear with us, All This relates to developing the 'horizontal stuff.' Details to follow. Of course, we're all passionate about our 'home-base coins'; but so very many of us -- we all know this is true -- hold a range of other cryptos. 'Horizontal initiatives' concern openly developing these possibilities.
(Yah, the buy-sell split is ludicrous at this second. I'll chip away at it for a few days, and report back.)
*I am often reluctant to speak against the many-exchanges=good attitude that I see in almost all coins. The fact that CBX has just one exchange seems appropriate to me. I see it as a strength. Would it not be beneficial if CBX had one CBX/BTC pair (which aggregates volume)? and the CBX/UNO pair (which would bring volume that would otherwise probably not exist)?
Mark
September 27, 2015, 12:58:51 AM
I sure won't push this issue -- that would be trollish. Thanks for your comment, CapnBDL
We're trying trying trying to find ways to improve our buy-support/lessen Bitcoin's centrality, really big-picture stuff -- re-wire the motherboard, even if it's just spirited discussion of the theory of it all.
Is Uno's MM-ability not positive? or at least neutral?
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu), Australia
We're trying trying trying to find ways to improve our buy-support/lessen Bitcoin's centrality, really big-picture stuff -- re-wire the motherboard, even if it's just spirited discussion of the theory of it all.
Is Uno's MM-ability not positive? or at least neutral?
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu), Australia
There are many things I like about UNO; I do have a few! To me the suggested market making agreement appears that it would require semi-constant attention and supervision, does it not?
September 26, 2015, 07:55:27 PM
I sure won't push this issue -- that would be trollish. Thanks for your comment, CapnBDL
We're trying trying trying to find ways to improve our buy-support/lessen Bitcoin's centrality, really big-picture stuff -- re-wire the motherboard, even if it's just spirited discussion of the theory of it all.
Is Uno's MM-ability not positive? or at least neutral?
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu), Australia
We're trying trying trying to find ways to improve our buy-support/lessen Bitcoin's centrality, really big-picture stuff -- re-wire the motherboard, even if it's just spirited discussion of the theory of it all.
Is Uno's MM-ability not positive? or at least neutral?
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu), Australia
Jump to: