maybe 3-4 months when i have... 
Topic: Butterflylabs Huge SCAM - page 80. (Read 415663 times)
Waiting my jalapeno... maybe 3-4 months when i have...
maybe 3-4 months when i have...
I was going to order from here, but decided not to. Seems like if everyone had pooled their money in bitcoin last year instead of equipment...they'd be much further ahead. Instead, Butterfly labs did that for you 
Good thing I didnt preorder back in march
Not for me.
I requested a refund and I had it within a day back in my PP.
The reason was I don't want BTC anymore. I prefer LTC.
The reason was I don't want BTC anymore. I prefer LTC.
Really, how much did they refund you? Can you black out your info on the PP statement and post it for us to see? I don't believe you. I think you are just another BFL sock puppet account.
I requested a refund and I had it within a day back in my PP.
The reason was I don't want BTC anymore. I prefer LTC.
The reason was I don't want BTC anymore. I prefer LTC.
1 GHash/s = 1,000 Mhash/s so 6.8 Ghash
I always wondered about that - cos really it should be 1024MH/s (call me pedantic)
I know the difference is not much, but it really does add up, if you are running a decent set up (like my upgraded LS & Jalapeno will be putting out a combined 37GH/s - which if it was 1024MH/s per Gh/s would be the equivalent of an extra 888MH/s)
Why do you think it should be 1024 MH? These aren't bytes... (or bits, from whence your confusion likely springs)
Yup - that was where my initial confusion came from - logic dictated that it would be a straight 1000, but some tiny bit of me wanted that extra 24 (it is my optimistic side, and therefore tiny, sadly)
At least I have the right of it now. Cheers
I'd agree and say that it is confusing. A lot of people just use it incorrectly, and aren't aware of the difference between a megabyte (MB) and a mebibyte (MiB) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte
1 GHash/s = 1,000 Mhash/s so 6.8 Ghash
I always wondered about that - cos really it should be 1024MH/s (call me pedantic)
I know the difference is not much, but it really does add up, if you are running a decent set up (like my upgraded LS & Jalapeno will be putting out a combined 37GH/s - which if it was 1024MH/s per Gh/s would be the equivalent of an extra 888MH/s)
Why do you think it should be 1024 MH? These aren't bytes... (or bits, from whence your confusion likely springs)
Yup - that was where my initial confusion came from - logic dictated that it would be a straight 1000, but some tiny bit of me wanted that extra 24 (it is my optimistic side, and therefore tiny, sadly)
At least I have the right of it now. Cheers
The saga continues: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-truth-about-the-bfl-1000-btc-fund-234711
Well, you know what Mel Brooks says: never give a saga an even break.
anyone selling there?
1 GHash/s = 1,000 Mhash/s so 6.8 Ghash
I always wondered about that - cos really it should be 1024MH/s (call me pedantic)
I know the difference is not much, but it really does add up, if you are running a decent set up (like my upgraded LS & Jalapeno will be putting out a combined 37GH/s - which if it was 1024MH/s per Gh/s would be the equivalent of an extra 888MH/s)
Why do you think it should be 1024 MH? These aren't bytes... (or bits, from whence your confusion likely springs)
Correct. It's just a standard metric system (giga) prefix meaning 109 Even hard drive manufactures use even 1,000s when specifying size--the 210 multiplier only applies to RAM as far as I know.
1 GHash/s = 1,000 Mhash/s so 6.8 Ghash
I always wondered about that - cos really it should be 1024MH/s (call me pedantic)
I know the difference is not much, but it really does add up, if you are running a decent set up (like my upgraded LS & Jalapeno will be putting out a combined 37GH/s - which if it was 1024MH/s per Gh/s would be the equivalent of an extra 888MH/s)
Why do you think it should be 1024 MH? These aren't bytes... (or bits, from whence your confusion likely springs)
They shipping in 2 weeks 
are they shipping in bulk yet?
1 GHash/s = 1,000 Mhash/s so 6.8 Ghash
I always wondered about that - cos really it should be 1024MH/s (call me pedantic)
I know the difference is not much, but it really does add up, if you are running a decent set up (like my upgraded LS & Jalapeno will be putting out a combined 37GH/s - which if it was 1024MH/s per Gh/s would be the equivalent of an extra 888MH/s)
Yeah due to their fail at power estimating, a 1.5 TH/s box would now consume about 7 KW and would quickly melt itself. They downgraded it to 500GH/s to fit within a reasonable thermal envelope. They still basically require two 120v circuits or 240v power to run one.
I guess I'm not really trusted, but quite a few people have Jalapenos now including me.
Are there any trusted bitcointalk members that received BFL hardware?
I guess I'm not really trusted, but quite a few people have Jalapenos now including me.
uhm....was this not 1.5 thash at one stage?? 
------
The saga continues: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-truth-about-the-bfl-1000-btc-fund-234711
Jump to: