Topic: Buy the DIP, and HODL! - page 297. (Read 137192 times)

wow! It's funny how you don't even understand the difference between Bitcoin and altcoin and you're trying to school another with a false information that obviously shows you've not gotten your basics right. Bitcoin is Bitcoin and never any other cryptocurrency other than altcoin. As a matter of fact you're making a reversal of what you should have said. Altcoin where just modeled after Bitcoin and thier wouldn't have been anything like cryptocurrency if Bitcoin is out of the equating so just do your research and get your fact right before jumping into conclusion. I still find everything you've said out their so irritating and confusing and it seems you're mixing a whole lot of things together to generalize on what you assume Bitcoin to be.


this is obviously another error you've just dumped here and I find it disrespectful to even assume that Bitcoin is just a mere term that describes any other coin apart from shitcoin. Shitty coin and every other cryptocurrency where developed after Bitcoin become popular and I think you should get that right so you wouldn't be mixing this up. It's actually Bitcoin standing on it own and every other shitty thing you have out thier is just a mere strategy to create something that looks like Bitcoin.


maybe I will agree with you on this part. Bitcoin stands out as the most reliable decentralized finance that has multiple of functions ranging from it provision of ease in making international transaction easy and convininece and also serves as an investible asset that when stored will give incentive due to it limited number in circulation and the incresing number of adoption and greater number of users that are trooping into th network thereby increasing it demand and bringing a proportionate increase in it value. Altcoin and shitcoins are far from getting to this point and investing into most of them and holding on to them the same way you're holding on to your Bitcoin will indirectly mean you're joky investment.

- bitcon: bitcoin is a term used to describe any cryptocurrency other than altcoin. It stands for "alternative coin." Bitcoin is  a wide range of cryptocurrencies, which has  its own unique features, purposes, and technologies. Which happened to be the Most popular coin right away.....

Bitcoin" is a general term for any cryptocurrency other than any other coins "Shitcoin" is a more colloquial and derogatory term used to express skepticism or criticism towards certain cryptocurrencies. It's essential to conduct thorough research and exercise caution when considering investments in any cryptocurrency......

So in this case you can not in any way compare the both together.. bitcoin has always become the best and sophisticated coin that no other shit coins can compare or context with in any way or value.....

.....and other thigns like having an emergency fund which at times would take 3 months or 6months of income to build and having reserves and floats to carry around that would help us have a financial cushioin and maximise our investment in bitcoin.

That's very true some persons actually think they know about bitcoin and would even engage in conversations about it but don't realise that they don't know what they are supposed to know like the empowerment side of bitcoin and how it is a better asset than other shitcoins.
IMO I think from what yoir saying there is a lesson that everyone needs to do some personal research to learn more about bitcoin and have an understanding of how it works and best to approach it, but another thing is how can these new persons understand what is a good knowledge from bad knowledge since they most likely don't know or have any idea on how to differentiate good knowledge from bad knowledge and most influenecers on social media or sources of knowledge they trust can also carry a lot of misleading information that would potentially lead them astray to shitcoins or even gambling practices like buying at low price and selling at high price, there are very few sources of good information with regards to bitcoin online, unless maybe some other communities like this forum, that information goes through confirmation from a lot of persons.
What I think is people often believe what they think would favour them and not the harsh truth, swaying words that woudl promise them huge profits would definitely sound better than someone teaching then how to build it slowly through proper planning and accumulation, so most times I still blame the reader or seekers of information cause they chose what they feel is best for them without taking time to properly validate those information if they are misleading or not.

There are shitcoiners with legitimate confusion, and they might think that they already know about bitcoin or they know enough about bitcoin.. so frequently a person will not know what they don't know, so even smart people can get sucked into various shitcoin talking points without actually realizing that they have little to no clue in regards to what bitcoin is.

Another thing is that there likely are a lot of people who have heard of the word bitcoin, and they might think that they have some kind of a decent idea what it is, yet merely hearing the word and sometimes hearing some mainstream rendition of what it is, is not enough to actually realize actually what bitcoin is.. and so actually understanding ideas of sound money might be a bit more foreign to people than we presume such a topic as "common sense" when there are a lot of ways that people can get sucked into believing they know more than they do, and it may well be a good idea for some of them to actually spend a bit of time really studying bitcoin specifically.. whether it takes 10, 50, 100, 500 or 1,000 hours of study may well vary from person to person and the kind of source materials they are studying.

Some folks have a lot of difficulties distinguishing between good information and bad information, and they might actually believe the sources of their bad information and believe that their bad information is good information, and so when they actually come across some accurate and informative information about bitcoin, they might skeptically conclude that the good information could not be true since it conflicts with what they believe to be credible sources.

I was listening to a program earlier today about how the greedy companies are gouging consumers by raising their food prices, and so it can sometimes be difficult to realize that money printer go bbbbbrrrrrrr is way more blame worthy than what normies want to give governments more power to control prices - which surely does not seem to be a good solution, and I am not even anti-government, yet we likely should realize that it becomes problematic to have too many controls in place, even though maybe it becomes difficult to get rid of the controls .. so bitcoin and bitcoiners are going to sometimes end up being targeted as part of the problem rather than part of the solution... which still gets us back to either having information available but also having abilities to sort through good information versus not so good information... and we are all not going to agree.. but at the same time do we have rights and/or abilities to disagree or are we told what we are supposed to think and are we accepting of being told what to think.. and do we realize when we are being told what to think versus engaging in our own abilities to critically think about what might really be in our own best interests.

There are shitcoiners with legitimate confusion, and they might think that they already know about bitcoin or they know enough about bitcoin.. so frequently a person will not know what they don't know, so even smart people can get sucked into various shitcoin talking points without actually realizing that they have little to no clue in regards to what bitcoin is.

Another thing is that there likely are a lot of people who have heard of the word bitcoin, and they might think that they have some kind of a decent idea what it is, yet merely hearing the word and sometimes hearing some mainstream rendition of what it is, is not enough to actually realize actually what bitcoin is.. and so actually understanding ideas of sound money might be a bit more foreign to people than we presume such a topic as "common sense" when there are a lot of ways that people can get sucked into believing they know more than they do, and it may well be a good idea for some of them to actually spend a bit of time really studying bitcoin specifically.. whether it takes 10, 50, 100, 500 or 1,000 hours of study may well vary from person to person and the kind of source materials they are studying.

Some folks have a lot of difficulties distinguishing between good information and bad information, and they might actually believe the sources of their bad information and believe that their bad information is good information, and so when they actually come across some accurate and informative information about bitcoin, they might skeptically conclude that the good information could not be true since it conflicts with what they believe to be credible sources.

There are shitcoiners with legitimate confusion, and they might think that they already know about bitcoin or they know enough about bitcoin.. so frequently a person will not know what they don't know, so even smart people can get sucked into various shitcoin talking points without actually realizing that they have little to no clue in regards to what bitcoin is.

Another thing is that there likely are a lot of people who have heard of the word bitcoin, and they might think that they have some kind of a decent idea what it is, yet merely hearing the word and sometimes hearing some mainstream rendition of what it is, is not enough to actually realize actually what bitcoin is.. and so actually understanding ideas of sound money might be a bit more foreign to people than we presume such a topic as "common sense" when there are a lot of ways that people can get sucked into believing they know more than they do, and it may well be a good idea for some of them to actually spend a bit of time really studying bitcoin specifically.. whether it takes 10, 50, 100, 500 or 1,000 hours of study may well vary from person to person and the kind of source materials they are studying.

Some folks have a lot of difficulties distinguishing between good information and bad information, and they might actually believe the sources of their bad information and believe that their bad information is good information, and so when they actually come across some accurate and informative information about bitcoin, they might skeptically conclude that the good information could not be true since it conflicts with what they believe to be credible sources.