Buying at a time of decline may be easy for some people, but it will be even more difficult, when the drop is below the buy price, this will make it difficult for people.
although the case of bitcoin is not only seen on a certain period, one must understand the bitcoin chart is on the green or red line.
a similar case will make beginners or people who have invested in bitcoin for a long time, experience a point of chaos and unbalanced control
Sure, you are correct that when bitcoin prices are extremely volatile to the downside, then bitcoin HODLers might either question bitcoin's investment thesis or they might question their own strategies in regards to accumulating bitcoin, and of course, not only newbie bitcoin HODLers are vulnerable to such second-guessing of their own BTC accumulation strategies.
There are quite a few ways to deal with these kinds of extreme BTC price volatility matters, but of course, the strategy is well going to differ between different users, so in that sense they need to attempt to figure out how to tailor their approach to their own situation which involves assessing cashflow, other investments, view of bitcoin as compared with other investments, timeline, risk tolerance, time, skills and abilities to strategize, plan, research and learn along the way including tweaking strategies from time to time to consider trading, reallocating, use of leverage and/or financial instruments.
At the same time, if someone has already figured out that bitcoin is a solid investment for them, then like you mentioned there are some people who may have more trouble continuing to buy when the price is down, and that may have to do with their cashflow, and surely it is usually not a good practice to overly invest into something and not be able to keep a cashflow because your ongoing cashflow had depended upon the asset going up in price, so if the price moves against you, then you end up being in a pickle of a financial situation.
So if someone is in BTC accumulation mode then the strategies are DCA, buying on dip, and lump sum investment, and if you run out of money then you go into HODL mode. Of course, the strategies might be different for someone who feels that they have made it out of BTC accumulation mode and they might either be in maintenance mode or in liquidation mode.. but most of the times, we are assuming that people are in BTC accumulation mode or have to get passed that stage first and then the strategies might be a bit easier for maintenance mode or liquidation mode.. but still any mode is going to be affected when the BTC volatility is high to the downside and there is a decent amount of uncertainty regarding ongoing price direction like it seems to be now.
Ser, selling is not part of DCA, because DCA - or Dollar Cost Averaging - is a buying strategy to accumulate an asset for a long term hold, also called in the Bitcoin community as the "HODL". The philosophy behind DCA is the acceptance that most of us "investors" can't predict market price movements accurately, which can make it a very good strategy for plebs like us who don't know much about trading.
Yes, trading is not DCA but DCA is almost exactly the same as HODL.
The way you are framing this comes off as a bit confusing, ajiz138. Of course, if you have already accumulated a lot of BTC, then you might have an ongoing dollar cost investment amount that continues to add to the size of your bitcoin stash, but it is adding in such a small proportion, that the amount added is not making any kind of large difference to the overall value of your BTC holdings, so in that regard, DCA might be similar to HODL.
It seems to me that HODL is a kind of status that might be telling us to NOT sell when we might be tempted to sell, but I also frequently consider that it can be a strategy that might be employed in buying on dips that seems to happen when the dip keeps happening and the bitcoin HODLer has largely run out of money.. so then when they are faced with the choice to sell in order to get more money to buy back lower, then better advice seems to be to just HODL through it and do not sell.. but instead either wait for the BTC price to go back up or to wait for more cash to come in so that you will be able to buy more if the price goes down more.
I started out with HODL buying dips and came back HODL for a long time.
I think that you are describing a situation in which surely someone like you had increased your options because once you accumulate BTC for a decent amount of time, whether you do it by buying on dips or DCA or some other methods, then your calculations might change regarding what you want to do when the BTC price is down or in a seemingly long period of ongoing consolidation (and perhaps more dips coming, too?).
Second, I started with DCA accumulating this is different from HODL, DCA every week purchase and HODL buying the lowest dips.
The practices can still overlap. Sure there are pure forms of various kinds of practices, but many people will not necessarily employ a BTC accumulation strategy that is a pure strategy, usually if the person is into bitcoin for long enough, it will end up playing out as a combination of strategies.. Of course, someone who has not been in bitcoin for very long may have ONLY started out by employing one strategy, but it seems that the longer that they are into bitcoin, they might end up changing their strategy(ies) or adding new strategies, too.
This strategy is a little different but I'll be comfortable with it.
What you need to know is that HODL and DCA are good things in the long run..
I hate to be argumentative, but HODL might not be very good if the amount of BTC accumulated is really whimpy - even though we know that even whimpy BTC accumulation amounts can end up adding up to a lot of value in the future. I don't always agree with some of the strategies that Wind_FURY describes, but he has been into bitcoin for a long enough period of time that I think that he has set himself into some comfortable positions in regards to his various ways of buying BTC over time, and even if he will not necessarily admit it, he could probably look back and verify that he has likely employed a combination of strategies, even if he does not like to admit to his having had purposefully followed any kind of DCA strategy.. but sometimes even buying on dip does end up looking like DCA depending on how the BTC price plays out.
remember JayJuanGee said that 4-10 of us will feel better and feel it.
Just for clarification, I do believe that people can do whatever they like, but I also think that bitcoin's investment thesis has gotten stronger in the past few years, and also remember that I am just some random person on the internet who has views about bitcoin so you do have to come to your own conclusions in regards to assessing the ongoing strength of bitcoin's investment thesis (and if it has strength).
I have also suggested that setting an investment timeline of at least 4 years is better and if you are able to set an investment timeline of even longer, such as 10 years or longer, then you are likely going to do very good in terms of having had invested in bitcoin, but at the same time, we always should be attempting to frame these matters in terms of probabilities in that ongoingly bitcoin's investment thesis seems to be getting stronger, even when we are experiencing these various kinds of strong price dips and even depressing periods in terms of where BTC price has gone and trepidations about where the BTC price might go in the short term.
So in the end, we cannot know that bitcoin will end up as being a good investment and each person has to take responsibility for themselves in terms of why they are investing into bitcoin, rather than relying on JJG says or anyone else says for that matter... and of course, there are a variety of experts in bitcoin, and there are even bitcoin naysaying experts (or supposed experts, even though many of the bitcoin naysaying experts seem to have not studied bitcoin very well or do not know what the fuck bitcoin is, but still, they may end up being correct about bitcoin failing in the long run - even if the evidence does not seem to currently support that it is very likely that bitcoin is going to fail absent some lesser likely scenarios playing out, such as a bug in the code or successful internal attacks or some other various possible attack vectors that could end up gaining traction and suppressing bitcoin's price much longer than any of pro-bitcoin folks had thought to be possible).