If you figure out some kind of a long-term bitcoin strategy, and even if you ONLY buy small amounts over the next 4-10 years, such as $100 per week or maybe even a smaller amount if you cannot afford $100 per week, like $10 per week, then perhaps if you are able to secure your bitcoin, you will end up seeing that your bitcoin performed quite well compared to anything else that you had invested in.. even if you might consider something like allowing the whole matter to play out for 20 years.. that is if you were to have such a potentially long investment timeline.
Long-term projections for bitcoin investing are very reasonable,
but always set an amount you can afford to lose. Bitcoin is the best alternative to consider no matter what budget we have, but one shouldn't 100% go for it without considering about the risks. Bitcoin's long-term performance as an investment asset is to be expected to be good and work as we expect, but since the government is its main enemy we really have to recognize that they have the ability to prohibit us from investing or trading in the future.
Those are just some of the risks I think, but still bitcoin is the best investment choice compared to many other assets out there.
If you're single, with a stable job/a second job, with no other responsibilities for anyone else but yourself, then it could be considered that you can risk more than what you're willing to lose, especially when the current situation of the market is presenting us those "Golden Opportunities". It's also probably good to move back in with your parents temporarily to save more fiat to buy Bitcoin.
You (Wind_FURY) seem to be making a different point than indah rezqi, and maybe you are making a kind of argument about semantics in regards to 1) how to define what is "more than you can afford to lose" and 2) what kinds of measures can be taken (sacrifices made) in order to be more aggressive/assertive in regards to "buying the dip" and also saving on expenses.
My own definition of "more than you can accord to lose" would involve entering into some kind of an arrangement in which you have failed/refused to sufficiently cover your expenses or ending up having to sell some bitcoin at a later date because you over-did it... or maybe there is some other asset that you had not wanted to have to sell, but you are forced into such selling because you had bought to much bitcoin and had not sufficiently prepared.
By definition if you plan to move in with your parents or you choose to ONLY eat Ramen soup for the next year, then you are choosing in advance to take such measures; however, on the other hand if you end up getting forced to move in with your parents because you "over did it" or you have to sacrifice your diet because you "over did it" then those are not planned in advance.
Sure, there are several things that people might be "willing to allow" as their "back up plan" in case shit hits the fan.. and their investment moves against them, but by definition, personally, I would not consider those to be acceptable (even though others are going to be willing to make such sacrifices).. So, sure, there may well be some definitional quibbling going on here, and also sometimes life choices regarding how prudent (and preparing for the future) that anyone might be willing to be could end up with quite differing consequences, and some people might not end up homeless because of how much they chose to gamble, but they may well end up having a way less comfortable life later on in life because they over did their levels of aggressiveness and/or lack of preparedness at earlier times in life.
We can also rationalize where we got in life, such as if we are having to struggle with dead end jobs in our 50s, 60s and even into our 70s, while maybe some others start out in similar places and with similar resources, but pretty much have a life of relaxation in their 50s, 60s and 70s...
So there are ways to describe your situation in ways in which you had been wiling to live with the consequences (and even say "no regrets"), yet there are also ways to sufficiently prepare so that you are not taking those kinds of excessive risks.. which brings us back to definitional quibblings in regards to what seems to be excessive risks, and at one point in time, we do not necessarily know the consequences of our excessive risks.. which kind of gets me back to points that I made in my other post (and
you responded to it)... hahahahaha. All points
(and all threads) are related. Go figure.
If you're single, with a stable job/a second job, with no other responsibilities for anyone else but yourself, then it could be considered that you can risk more than what you're willing to lose, especially when the current situation of the market is presenting us those "Golden Opportunities". It's also probably good to move back in with your parents temporarily to save more fiat to buy Bitcoin.
Yes, This "Golden Opportunities" Bitcoin (BTC) has just taken everyone into the next bull market. The displacement from the accumulation zone mentioned in previous reports was the result of more than two months of accumulation by some whales. This is why I am also very confident about the future of bitcoin.
So fucking what?
What are you personally doing in regards to your supposedly positive views about bitcoin besides merely trolling one-liner bullshit platitudes about how bitcoin is a great investment.
What are you adding to the conversation?
Tell us about yourself and your own BTC accumulation practices.
Go on. Give us something concrete to work with and about yourself (by the way, there is no need to give up any OPsec in order to describe these kinds of matters in regards to your relationship with bitcoin). When did you first hear about bitcoin? Have you ever bought any? Do you think that the ONLY way to get involved in bitcoin is to get involved in bounty seeking programs or shitcoins or from your own point of view and practices/plans are there possibly other ways to get into bitcoin?