Ok.. whatever with repeating such numerology nonsense... which seems already untrue.. since if you recall the first time that BTC passed through $10k, it corrected quickly for a week or two and then it doubled in a short period of time, corrected back down to $10k and revisited $10k several times - to the extent even significant beyond coincidence.. and golly gee whiz probably one of the ONLY ways that $50k could become something like the old $10k would be if we might get a quick doubling from here (and our stagnation around $50k for about 3 months also seems to negate such thesis regarding the significance of $50k currently.... but whatevers)....
Another thing you had already proclaimed we are never going below $50k again.. wasn't that in March-ish..
And another thing (I am having trouble running out of things in regards to your level of nonsense Wind_FURY... thanks for making so much funzies, at least for me.)... I am having some troubles (in playing with your this is like $10k bullshit) inferring that either the top of this particular cycle would be $100k-ish or that our subsequent correction would be going below $50k for any significant amount of time.. sure it may well go below $50k but it seems quite fucking more likely that our current $50k is more like either $3k or like $5k.. and kind of leaning towards the former.. but I don't really proclaim to know very much except for getting feelings for attempting to incorporate aspects of the various convincing BTC price prediction models into my thinking in terms of attempting to figure out where we might be in the current cycle, and where we may well be going based on where we are at.. which surely is far from guaranteed too, but seems to bring way better conclusions than just throwing out some random number and claiming it is like some other random number and the facts and logic do not really line up including the seeming failure / refusal to adequately account for our current credible BTC price prediction models.
Not really sure if that would be a necessary condition, but such resolution could have some parallels to the 2017 softfork and various battles, even though these current battles in regards to Taproot (to the extent that you might want to exaggerate them) seem like mostly a BIG nothing burger even if you and other peeps seem inclined to draw parallels.. which is not completely illogical, but does seem to have some considerable differences, as well... and whether the market knows or gives any shits about Taproot seems to be a bit of speculation regarding supposed importance of a seemingly somewhat obscure concept.. that even many of longer term bitcoiners are not too enthusiastic about whether it goes through or not and/or what it might mean.. blah blah blah.. even though I will concede that there seems to be considerable overwhelming consensus that it would be a good thing for bitcoin to go through, even though the signaling of the miners seem to be dragging out longer than what such supposed consensus and preference for taproot would suggest.. including maybe that some miners need to just move their shit over to pools that are signaling for taproot rather than supporting miners that are not.
Your seeming desire for drama on this topic has been pointed out in another thread.. and I am starting to see that as well... but whatever, we are each allowed to have our opinions and theories, even if they might seem to be attempting to stir shit up rather than pointing out real material or concerning dynamics.
You seem to be exaggerating Wind_FURY... .. sure some miner pools are not signaling for it but we are still ONLY into the second difficulty period in which this is being measured..
I think that the general trend is UP in terms of signaling.. and as I type, there is so far 63.69% for this period, and of course, there needs to have 90% reached, but the movement of signaling does seem to be slowly increasing.. even though you want to identify negativity in this.. which also seems quite premature.. even if the 90% for quick update is never achieved and the taproot matter has to be readdressed through another way. Does not seem to be the end of the world nor even as dramatic or dire as you want to ascribe to such happenings, including that so far, there has NOT really been any objections to it from anyone of importance.. and maybe just exaggeration of the significance of it from bitcoin haters or shitcoin pumpers blah blah blah.. hopefully you are not one of them, Wind_FURY merely because you are employing similar kinds of exaggerated and seemingly drama-based talking points.