Topic: CACHECOIN 2.0 - Community integration (Scrypt-Jane - PoW, PoS and PoN) - page 13. (Read 30559 times)

Very nice singula! BTW: in light of your cache pool history & all, it would be awesome to get you to be a contributor to the new cache repository. I think one of the important points of Vertoe's ann, was that she should not be the sole code author or owner, rather, known community contributors could/should also push code whenever needed or appropriate. Now would be one such time.
I hope things get moving sooner rather than later ^^

Again, great work, and thank you.

maybe or maybe not...anyway, i've sold mine..

Wasn't that white paper supposed to come a long time ago? 

How many more weeks or months until we reach terminal mining?  Maybe that's when we'll finally get something good.

Did a bit investigation on the fork.
First forked-off block seems to be at height 86210, in the forked-off chain that is:
01af49a8938cc262fb665f10d30a50c4af22ea69c62f0cfb83c9a4d1fde692b5

And .... the commit that seems to be causing the fork is:
f6f40eb18e0d83ca8b322446b5e13a7315786378

Part of that change is:

(MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT is defined to CENT, ie. 0.01 CACH)

In the offending block, there are two transactions with output value of 0.001 (less than previously allowed minimum), one of them is:

This TX seems to be invalid according to the old code, but valid according to the new code.

The fix could be putting back that check, or making it conditional (turn it off after block 100K / 200K based on the roadmap)

Whoever is still mining on P2Pool is just wasting their hashes. Catcoin.cz is rather obviously the correct chain.

FWIW, I deleted the cachecoin data folder (backing up the wallet), loaded up the old client (found in the original cachecoin release ann), and quickly resync'ed, since remaining on the right chain. In any case, moving funds around is not advisable at a time that the network is forked.

Trolls are as quick to show up as were the pumpers (in earlier circumstances).
I'm confident in Vertoe's leadership for this project, though we're not off to the best start, that's for sure....

network right now on 2 chain 

Is block explorer working?

Lol, the same story again and again. Takeover and pump&dump. Before this pump started I owned almost 10% of all Cache. I was buying it just in case someone pump it. I was buying it when everyone dumped it. I sold it during first days of pump. I even did not know someone is preparing this scam when I sold it. I am really surprised people are still buying into coins that pumped 100x in few days. All those takeovers, news, big ideas are scams. Why do you think someone will give you money? Why do you think someone will come, let you buy cheap and give you option to earn money based on his work? The pattern is always the same. Scammers buy cheapest deadest coin as much as they can and then create big news, pump it with small money price skyrocket and people get crazy and buy into that crap. I could dump later, I could earn much more, but I don't care. I earned 12+ BTC on those scammers. They had to buy my 10% pretty expensive. And for a single second I did no regret I sold it cheap. There is more than 99% probability coin will dump after such big pump, so not selling is stupid and buying into it is far more stupid.

PS: I am sure, this was not last Cache pump. There is limited amount of coins on Cryptsy and scammers need to scam again and again. Sooner or later they will scam on Cache again.

R.I.P ?

dump now

this needs more hype, dev should hire marketing people

The main blame to DASH was it depends on one person.

Now, the main thing do not panic, we wait vertoe  

P.s. the track of weekend
Have you heard ‘Rich (Edit) (Ft. Anndreyah Vargas)’ by Cosmo Sheldrake  - https://soundcloud.com/cosmosheldrake/rich

P.s.1 and yes, split chains began after the announcement new ANN ^ before the announcement all was well between version - "v5.4.0.0-g32a928e-cach-wm-alpha" and version - "0.7.5.9-toe" ^ under identical configs

P.s.2 who then replaced the configuration of nodes from new list http://cach.co/api/peers.txt ?

It seems like Vertoe comes here once a month to make some announcement for P&D and goes out. Many people critisized Evan Duffield for his job and deified Vertoe. These people now can get pleasure.

The network forked days ago now, and no word from any dev? It's like a big fuck you to the community. I don't hold any cache, just amazed by the incompetence vertoe has shown.

that would not be vertoe's style, he has shown to be a man of integrity in the past...

Maybe this was a pump and dump and the dump just happened.  Cause we had a huge drop in price a couple days ago on a massive dump.

I hope not - Vertoe seemed like a legit dev with a plan. 

Has the dev team left the project because of the fork? I see no reply's concerning the current fork?

bookmarked 

ok ^ this right chain or now ?



Config

rpcuser=moon
rpcpassword=moon
rpcallowip=192.168.*.*
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
server=1
listen=1
discover=1
maxconnections=32
addnode=78.46.66.139
addnode=188.40.57.201
addnode=207.30.158.106
addnode=204.11.237.235
addnode=207.30.158.106
addnode=178.249.125.94
addnode=5.9.39.9
addnode=5.9.86.18


getpeerinfo
 
{
"addr" : "78.46.66.139:2225",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1432973987,
"lastrecv" : 1432974646,
"conntime" : 1432973987,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 4
},
{
"addr" : "188.40.57.201:2225",
"services" : "00000000",
"lastsend" : 1432973988,
"lastrecv" : 1432974646,
"conntime" : 1432973988,
"version" : 0,
"subver" : "",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : -1,
"banscore" : 4
},
{
"addr" : "5.9.39.9:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979715,
"lastrecv" : 1432979904,
"conntime" : 1432976839,
"version" : 90001,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86609,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "37.205.9.209:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979900,
"lastrecv" : 1432979904,
"conntime" : 1432977668,
"version" : 90000,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86610,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "5.9.86.18:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979375,
"lastrecv" : 1432979904,
"conntime" : 1432977754,
"version" : 90001,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86610,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "82.6.255.43:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979905,
"lastrecv" : 1432979832,
"conntime" : 1432977769,
"version" : 90000,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86610,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "24.112.247.7:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979888,
"lastrecv" : 1432979905,
"conntime" : 1432978008,
"version" : 90001,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86610,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.90.149.57:2225",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1432979888,
"lastrecv" : 1432979904,
"conntime" : 1432979146,
"version" : 90001,
"subver" : "/CACHecoin-WM:0.7.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 86614,
"banscore" : 0
}


and http://explorer.cach.co/rich/ - not correctly display the balance wallet ^ just me ?