Topic: CACHECOIN 2.0 - Community integration (Scrypt-Jane - PoW, PoS and PoN) - page 9. (Read 30559 times)

Thanks coins101 for your effort. But I think vertoe has scammed us, even with pre-planning thoughts. Sorry for anyone who lost money in this scam. We are on the same boat.

Be back on the approach to block 100,000

Because I've done some checking.  donschoe=Vertoe.

For posterity:

And you know this, because? 

Vertoe's account wasn't hacked, he put it up for sale, and from Vertoe's Github entry I guess it's been sold now.  Start at coins101's post about donschoe.

If Vertoe has gone for good, that is still not 100%, then I'd like to know if Cache would still be interested on working towards a P2P exchange for alts.



It is something I very briefly exchanged thoughts about with Vertoe around a few days after he started working on Cache. He was open to looking into the idea, after getting something tangible going for Cache.

This is the overview of the project I put together in May:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/19djUkzO04BhgKrh4VURFC55bI8zvo8qspSmWhJPuXrY/edit#slide=id.g9d55834ca_0_45

There are some things in there that might not work, but its an outline that was intended to serve as a starting point.

Lets see if this is Vertoe, who went to the trouble of signing the initial fork bin:

Signed by vertoe. PGP-key block below.

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=EJp4
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin

https://github.com/vertoe/cachecoin-bin/blob/master/vertoe-key.pgp

I trust the edit watermark from litecointalk that doesn't seem to have been edited since Sept 2014



The Vertoe post does contain that LTC address @ 2014.

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=14422.0

This:
- verify this message with the litecoin address found in this post ?topic=441215.msg4847316

Links to:
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4847316

Where you find the address I posted above.
I am getting validation failure for the message signature, so, no clue. I posted a comment on git.

@Coins101:

Actually, the LTC reference address is not in a quote, it is a direct link to a post (which has so far not been modified though).
Edit: I confirmed the address and contents of the linked post, and it is an exact copy of an identical post on Litecointalk.

For future reference, this is the claimed signer LTC address:

This is the message:

And this is the signature:

Can't find those messages.

I'd like to see a signed pgp message.

CACH falls on cryptsy !! 1050 sato in this time...

why???

His github message is signed by an LTC address that is linked in a bitcointalk quote. Since the quote itself can't be modified by the current holder of the vertoe account, it is reasonable proof of her identity. In short: the message was posted by someone that holds control of: vertoe's github account + vertoe's prior known LTC keys.

If the statement holds true and represents vertoe's take on CACHE going forward, I am thoroughly surprised by the total lack of character/morals. Oh well, just another day in Altcoin land I suppose. 

Vertoe Github account hacked

https://github.com/vertoe/bitcointalk

Vertoe, to validate that post. Please sign with your PGP key.

-----BEGIN LTC SIGNED MESSAGE-----
i'm vertoe and no longer able to access my bitcointalk account - verify this message with the litecoin address found in this post ?topic=441215.msg4847316 - the last post written by me is ?topic=400389.msg11381772 - yes, i never wanted cachecoin 2.0 and allowed the extended cachecoin team to use my account - i couldn't stand the pressure of investors sending me daily half a dozen pms on all channels - screw the altcoin scene - i'm out anyways - and kal, sorry for breaking your coin while trying to rescue it. farewell.
-----END LTC SIGNED MESSAGE-----

So a hacked BTC account is signing a message by reference to a hacked BTC account message?

+101

Vertoe knows how much trolling was thrown around Darkcoin, and that it can be dealt with by the community.

THK U myagui !! 

@mik57:

Nothing changed recently that would affect your mining settings, but you are not selecting the CACHE parameters, you are selecting YAC instead. If they are not exactly on the same nfactor schedule, that would be enough reason.

If the problem relates to the nfactor selection, this one should work:
cudaminer.exe -a scrypt-jane:16 -H 2 -L 8 -i 0 -l t64x1 -b 4096 -m 1 -o stratum+tcp://cach.catcoin.cz:3333 -u xxx -p xxx

Hi,

I used always this script with my 750ti:

cudaminer.exe -a scrypt-jane:YAC -H 2 -L 8 -i 0 -l t64x1 -b 4096 -m 1 -o stratum+tcp://cach.catcoin.cz:3333 -u xxx -p xxx


but for several days it does not work anymore... something changed?

Thank you in advance