Cajutel ICO Schedule: 18 Aug to 18 Nov 2017 - page 26.

kiwi66

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: nnekic86 on October 02, 2017, 05:29:17 AM

Quote from: kiwi66 on October 01, 2017, 05:53:33 AM

Quote from: btcminer49er on September 30, 2017, 04:27:56 PM

What is the estimated revenue when the project is finished?

The estimated revenue is documented year by year in https://cajutel.gw/whitepaper.pdf and in detail (month by month) in the excel sheet http://cajutel.gw/investor/cajutel-business-plan-1.6-financials.xls

In year 6 we expect to have 68M$ in EBITA and 151M$ in assets. EBITA is expectedto grow year after year as by then we only expect a market share of 14%.

So you expect just 14% share, how else is present on this market?

In the space where we enter, the market is 98% empty today and the rest is occupied by MTN and Orange on 2G GPRS and a bit of old Wimax.
See whitepaper (http://www.cajutel.gw/whitepaper.pdf) under "4.2 Competitor Analysis".

nnekic86

member

Activity: 240

Merit: 10

Quote from: kiwi66 on October 01, 2017, 05:53:33 AM

Quote from: btcminer49er on September 30, 2017, 04:27:56 PM

What is the estimated revenue when the project is finished?

The estimated revenue is documented year by year in https://cajutel.gw/whitepaper.pdf and in detail (month by month) in the excel sheet http://cajutel.gw/investor/cajutel-business-plan-1.6-financials.xls

In year 6 we expect to have 68M$ in EBITA and 151M$ in assets. EBITA is expectedto grow year after year as by then we only expect a market share of 14%.

So you expect just 14% share, how else is present on this market?

btcltcdigger

hero member

Activity: 2058

Merit: 761

To boldly go where no rabbit has gone before...

Quote from: kiwi66 on October 01, 2017, 05:53:33 AM

Quote from: btcminer49er on September 30, 2017, 04:27:56 PM

What is the estimated revenue when the project is finished?

The estimated revenue is documented year by year in https://cajutel.gw/whitepaper.pdf and in detail (month by month) in the excel sheet http://cajutel.gw/investor/cajutel-business-plan-1.6-financials.xls

In year 6 we expect to have 68M$ in EBITA and 151M$ in assets. EBITA is expectedto grow year after year as by then we only expect a market share of 14%.

These numbers look very lucrative.
What's the error margin on these calculations?

kiwi66

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: YGung on October 01, 2017, 01:01:12 PM

Kiwi, hypothetical question, if the ICO does not sell out, whats the plan for those leftover ICO tokens?

Also, the assumption for me is that if this ICO does not reach funding phase 4 than all contributions will be refunded correct?

see FAQ on cajutel.io

YGung

full member

Activity: 318

Merit: 100

Kiwi, hypothetical question, if the ICO does not sell out, whats the plan for those leftover ICO tokens?

Also, the assumption for me is that if this ICO does not reach funding phase 4 than all contributions will be refunded correct?

kiwi66

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: btcminer49er on September 30, 2017, 04:27:56 PM

What is the estimated revenue when the project is finished?

The estimated revenue is documented year by year in https://cajutel.gw/whitepaper.pdf and in detail (month by month) in the excel sheet http://cajutel.gw/investor/cajutel-business-plan-1.6-financials.xls

In year 6 we expect to have 68M$ in EBITA and 151M$ in assets. EBITA is expectedto grow year after year as by then we only expect a market share of 14%.

btcminer49er

full member

Activity: 327

Merit: 116

What is the estimated revenue when the project is finished?

btcltcdigger

hero member

Activity: 2058

Merit: 761

To boldly go where no rabbit has gone before...

Quote from: kiwi66 on September 28, 2017, 08:31:24 AM

Quote from: btcltcdigger on September 28, 2017, 02:46:20 AM

Quote from: kiwi66 on September 27, 2017, 08:48:20 PM

Quote from: btcltcdigger on September 27, 2017, 01:44:34 PM

Interesting, are you going to do a PHY or NFV approach?

The access network has to be PHYsical network as it will be routed for redundancy and you can not run NFV on the towers due to power consumption limitations. It would also be highly expensive without bringing much benefit there.

In the core datacenters some network virtualisation functions could make sense. Todays solutions in software defined routers are however nice in functionality but if it comes at bare metal wirespeed naked bandwidth, nothing will beat dedicated hardware in price/performance or power consumption. especially if you run at multiple 10G/s+ using AES256 encryption on all links. Hardware does 8 x 10G fully encrypted using 90W in a 3500$ box. Software routers can never mach this in price and powerconsumption and space requirements.

But NFV is scalable, and can work on COTS hardware

So far I have not seen any affordable solutions for our type of applications. If you know any vendors to be considered, let me know via email. Im open to look at any vendors

Well, since AT&T bought Brocade, maybe their vEPC is up for sale?

kiwi66

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: btcltcdigger on September 28, 2017, 02:46:20 AM

Quote from: kiwi66 on September 27, 2017, 08:48:20 PM

Quote from: btcltcdigger on September 27, 2017, 01:44:34 PM

Interesting, are you going to do a PHY or NFV approach?

The access network has to be PHYsical network as it will be routed for redundancy and you can not run NFV on the towers due to power consumption limitations. It would also be highly expensive without bringing much benefit there.

In the core datacenters some network virtualisation functions could make sense. Todays solutions in software defined routers are however nice in functionality but if it comes at bare metal wirespeed naked bandwidth, nothing will beat dedicated hardware in price/performance or power consumption. especially if you run at multiple 10G/s+ using AES256 encryption on all links. Hardware does 8 x 10G fully encrypted using 90W in a 3500$ box. Software routers can never mach this in price and powerconsumption and space requirements.

But NFV is scalable, and can work on COTS hardware

So far I have not seen any affordable solutions for our type of applications. If you know any vendors to be considered, let me know via email. Im open to look at any vendors

btcltcdigger

hero member

Activity: 2058

Merit: 761

To boldly go where no rabbit has gone before...

Quote from: kiwi66 on September 27, 2017, 08:48:20 PM

Quote from: btcltcdigger on September 27, 2017, 01:44:34 PM

Interesting, are you going to do a PHY or NFV approach?

The access network has to be PHYsical network as it will be routed for redundancy and you can not run NFV on the towers due to power consumption limitations. It would also be highly expensive without bringing much benefit there.

In the core datacenters some network virtualisation functions could make sense. Todays solutions in software defined routers are however nice in functionality but if it comes at bare metal wirespeed naked bandwidth, nothing will beat dedicated hardware in price/performance or power consumption. especially if you run at multiple 10G/s+ using AES256 encryption on all links. Hardware does 8 x 10G fully encrypted using 90W in a 3500$ box. Software routers can never mach this in price and powerconsumption and space requirements.

But NFV is scalable, and can work on COTS hardware

kiwi66

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: btcltcdigger on September 27, 2017, 01:44:34 PM

Interesting, are you going to do a PHY or NFV approach?

The access network has to be PHYsical network as it will be routed for redundancy and you can not run NFV on the towers due to power consumption limitations. It would also be highly expensive without bringing much benefit there.

In the core datacenters some network virtualisation functions could make sense. Todays solutions in software defined routers are however nice in functionality but if it comes at bare metal wirespeed naked bandwidth, nothing will beat dedicated hardware in price/performance or power consumption. especially if you run at multiple 10G/s+ using AES256 encryption on all links. Hardware does 8 x 10G fully encrypted using 90W in a 3500$ box. Software routers can never mach this in price and powerconsumption and space requirements.

OZmaster

sr. member

Activity: 804

Merit: 251

Quote from: kiwi66 on September 22, 2017, 07:37:33 PM

Quote from: OZmaster on September 22, 2017, 05:39:03 PM

Quote from: kiwi66 on September 22, 2017, 10:56:25 AM

Quote from: OZmaster on September 22, 2017, 08:23:23 AM

Are you running a bounty campaign? And how many tokens will bounty participants receive? Is that already decided?

yes we do. Contact [email protected] for details

thank you very much. Do you also have a special presale window or something like that?

The ICO is already running and there is big discounts for early buyers. see section 8 of whitepaper.
We have reached phase 2 of 5 now. see cajutel.io

Ok thanks. Was out of the loop for some time now but will check everything thoroughly and make my decision.

btcltcdigger

hero member

Activity: 2058

Merit: 761

To boldly go where no rabbit has gone before...

Quote from: kiwi66 on September 27, 2017, 01:24:58 PM

Quote from: chocobo21 on September 27, 2017, 09:03:12 AM

What are the estimated costs of this network being built?

The amount we are raising is used for the buildup of the network. So about 30M$ total for both countries. Note: after the first towers are operational and working and we start getting revenues already, this "profit" from the first customers is reinvested. So if you would build the network as is and then turn it on all in one go, you would need a lot more cash.

the exact details can be found here

http://cajutel.gw/investor/cajutel-business-plan-1.6-financials.xls

Click on the tab "detail" and you see the exact costs and revenues month by month.

Interesting, are you going to do a PHY or NFV approach?

kiwi66

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: chocobo21 on September 27, 2017, 09:03:12 AM

What are the estimated costs of this network being built?

The amount we are raising is used for the buildup of the network. So about 30M$ total for both countries. Note: after the first towers are operational and working and we start getting revenues already, this "profit" from the first customers is reinvested. So if you would build the network as is and then turn it on all in one go, you would need a lot more cash.

the exact details can be found here

http://cajutel.gw/investor/cajutel-business-plan-1.6-financials.xls

Click on the tab "detail" and you see the exact costs and revenues month by month.

chocobo21

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

What are the estimated costs of this network being built?

btcminer49er

full member

Activity: 327

Merit: 116

Quote from: ekurtovic on September 26, 2017, 12:28:26 PM

Quote from: btcltcdigger on September 26, 2017, 02:31:41 AM

Quote from: chocobo21 on September 25, 2017, 03:01:05 AM

I really don't understand why people aren't paying more attention to this project.
It has a solid mission, with real people and real goals.

No promise of any "decentralized" bullshit, or imaginary goals.

Plain and simple, bring mobile broadband to remote parts of African continent

I have to agree with you

I agree wit you guys... but other maybe not interested because the project is in Africa? Huh

Hmmm, but Africa is not as poor as people think. _Alot of natural Resources!

ekurtovic

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Bosnia...

Quote from: btcltcdigger on September 26, 2017, 02:31:41 AM

Quote from: chocobo21 on September 25, 2017, 03:01:05 AM

I really don't understand why people aren't paying more attention to this project.
It has a solid mission, with real people and real goals.

No promise of any "decentralized" bullshit, or imaginary goals.

Plain and simple, bring mobile broadband to remote parts of African continent

I have to agree with you

I agree wit you guys... but other maybe not interested because the project is in Africa? Huh

btcltcdigger

hero member

Activity: 2058

Merit: 761

To boldly go where no rabbit has gone before...

Quote from: chocobo21 on September 25, 2017, 03:01:05 AM

I really don't understand why people aren't paying more attention to this project.
It has a solid mission, with real people and real goals.

No promise of any "decentralized" bullshit, or imaginary goals.

Plain and simple, bring mobile broadband to remote parts of African continent

I have to agree with you

chocobo21

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

I really don't understand why people aren't paying more attention to this project.
It has a solid mission, with real people and real goals.

No promise of any "decentralized" bullshit, or imaginary goals.

Plain and simple, bring mobile broadband to remote parts of African continent

btcltcdigger

hero member

Activity: 2058

Merit: 761

To boldly go where no rabbit has gone before...

Quote from: kiwi66 on September 23, 2017, 05:40:55 AM

Quote

Yes agree, i am also want to know how the ICO run
Is it running smoothly? How many funds already raised?

About 15k tokens sold. Every day more. Slowed down a bit last week as for everybody due to china btc announcements but its getting back. Next week we should have some very good news to share which means we also paused most of our marketing temporarely. Next 10 days will be big I believe.

Oh, give us some hint then what we might expect

Topic: Cajutel ICO Schedule: 18 Aug to 18 Nov 2017 - page 26. (Read 81045 times)