Topic: Can I dodge KYC using the his medium. - page 2. (Read 586 times)

There would really be always those threshold thing on which on the time that you do reach up a specific amount on which it did touch up those numbers then expect that the platform could really be asking out for some KYC and this is something that we should really be prepared about. If we do tend to look back and read those terms and conditions then we would really be able to see that they are really that being stated on there.This is why it would really be always better that you should really be wary about those probabilities even if we do speak about those legitimate platforms on which there would really be no assurance that you cant be asked out for some KYC on the time that you would be able to win up some significant amount. So it would be always be that prepared or anticipating that it would really be happening.

If it turns out that you do able to pull out those winnings without being questions asked then its good for you since you dont need to pass those KYC or identification thingy but
if it turns out that it would really be doing or asking it out then you would be having no choice. Actually its not really that something questionable whether you would comply or not
specially if the amount involved is significant then people would really be complying it right away without questions asked. 

I think you if the casino has certain threshold of total withdraw amount before the KYC is triggered.  You may withdraw some of the amount but once you meet the threshold then you have to comply with the KYC requirement in order to continue withdrawing your fund.  You may use this kind of loophole (withdrawing small amount) since some casinos that never bother gambler who withdraw with small amount but once they detect some irregular activities, like you keep on withdrawing even without playing on their site, they might consider looking at the balance of your account and eventually asked you for KYC.

There's a loophole but to be safe gamblers shouldn't take it. Some casino allow small withdrawals without kyc verification been done. For those casino that allow that, you can withdraw smaller amounts and not get asked to provide your documents for kyc verification but there's a problems as when you do it often and get the attention of the security department of the casino, they can place you account on suspension and you'll need to complete your kyc before you'll be allow access to your money.

If the money is in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrency and your kyc verify doesn't get attended to on time, you can lose when the market dumps and the value of your cryptocurrency drops. You can also get a rise in value of the coins instead of dropping but that's a risk you don't have to take that's why I said even though it's a loopholes, you don't have to take it. Just complete your kyc so you don't get issues from the casino.

This method doesn't work on all casinos and mind you,  the moment the balance in your account reaches the maximum trench hold in KYC casino some of them are set to automatically trigger your KYC demand and you will just receive an email from the casino asking you to provide some documents for verification and at that point it becomes mandatory for you to provide those document and if you don't have them,  you lose your balance or have to go through with getting the document from your government officials.

So if you thinking that,  by waiting until you win a bug amount before being prepared to use the less threshold withdrawal approach to bit casino KYC you may have to do rethink.

You might get away with a few small withdrawals, but certainly not possible with larger sums of money, or generally, there's no loophole around KYC; this thread is making it sound like there is. If you're unable to provide KYC, you shouldn't go ahead and participate in the first place. It won't be the casino's fault if you end up losing your money; that's something that needs to be acknowledged.

The OP hasn't replied in the thread again; it would be interesting to know the outcome; it's been a day since it was posted. Has he tried withdrawing? Did he manage to successfully withdraw some money before he was asked for KYC, or was it requested immediately? It'd be nice to see the outcome, whatever that is, I'd like to emphasize again that trying to avoid KYC at a casino that's requesting it isn't going to end well. Even if the OP manages to withdraw some of his funds, it's not advisable to do so.

This could be a great idea to dodge being asked to verify your account before your withdrawal request will be processed, but also have in mind that this may not work for every casino, this can only work for casinos that have automated their system to automatically request kyc verification from users withdrawing a certain amount of money that is above the limit that the casino allows non kyced users to withdraw.

But for some other casino, most especially new casinos that still process alot of stuffs manually, trust that this strategy won't work, as they may likely request kyc verification from the user as soon he or she wins a certain amount of money considered to be good or tangible.
This is what I think, I might be wrong though.

Not literally the withdrawal process but rather the amount on his balance he will gonna withdraw. Normal amount withdrawal will not gonna trigger KYC so both the winning big(huge balance) and the withdrawal process are the factors which KYC triggers.

KYC(Know Your Customer) is just a process for recording customers details to counter money laundering. It’s either busting current money laundering act or for future reference once the authorities ask them for records of certain players.

This is such an odd question because it makes it seem like it’s possible to win money without KYC if you use workarounds. I don’t think casino operators and regulators can be bamboozled so easily. I would recommend not gambling if you’re trying to get rich without KYC. Trying to get around these rules will only make it so even if you do get lucky and beat the odds to win a fortune, you still lose.

Some casino have user limit of total withdrawals, even if you withdraw bit by bit if you reach the maximum amount of withdrawals of evey non-verified user then you will probably ask KYC later. So just like other said, better to use no-KYC casinos to avoid getting asked. But you have to be careful of choosing which one since its too risky to use non-KYC casinos.

Before playing a casino it's a must that you need to check if they are implementing a KYC, if yes you must need to comply, if not you can freely get your money without having a KYC. If you are an active player in their casino and have a lot of games committed and played I guess having a withdrawal is not too much of an issue but if you are just newly created, make a deposit, use their casino to play and get earned a lot and want to exit the account might tag as to them, in terms of tagging I don't know or any idea how they implement their ruling. Are you wondering what if you win and KYC bothered you or you already won and are having trouble because of the KYC?. Reading FAQs and Terms and conditions is a must and not just keep clicking the agree button.

Maybe you haven't notice that there are some complaints in the scam accusation before that their winning weren't release beause after a big win, the gambling site requires them a KYC. So this discussion came out because of real situation in the past, and I think OP is just trying to get some information because his account probably is not KYC complied, so in the event he'll win, at least he already know what to do in order for the casino not to trigger in requiring a user for KYC.

For us KYC is just basic, but for some it could be a problem for whatever reasons, so at least we have some options here.

Requesting for KYC is not because of your big win, it's because of the withdrawal you're making request for, if you like, be making small withdrawals and if you also like, make the withdrawal at once, what is certain is that when they requested KYC from you and you're unable to make provision of it, you won't have access to make withdrawals, don't even think of dodging them by making false or incomplete provisions on what has been requested, else they may block your account.

Yeah if we compare $210 and $42K, obviously it's small, but we can't deny if people are always try to save as much as possible. Right now we're remember we shouldn't withdraw our winnings at once, but if the time comes and we win, we might change our mind.

It's not good to try on Stake, Stake is a very big casino and they don't mind to let you withdraw big amount without KYC. He should try middle range casinos e.g. Jacksclub, Coins.game, Shuffle etc.

If KYC is one of the processes demanded to cash out your gambling winnings then there is absolutely no option about it than to go with it because the casino company would not accept the to the obvious or considering an individual to bridge their financial structures otherwise your paycheck wouldn't be successfully processed.

Left alone, I believe the casino company would have the gambler who won such huge amount of money as one of their aided customers for campaign/adverts specifically to let the audience know about the possibilities or taking notes that their casino company has a convenience reputations that doesn't frustrate their gamblers during cash out no matter how huge the amount of winning may be.
This is tactically spreading the existence of their company too and so forth, the huge casino winner maybe be demanded to be identified and verified with traceable indications maybe considering the winner with an award of contracts such as an ambassador to be used as influence to attract the audience with its historical attractive winning.

Withdrawing by batches should be fine. But what if the said gambling site does have a mandatory KYC before anyone can withdraw?

To be aware of KYC-related stuff, it's now time to make it a habit of reading the Terms and Services of the site regarding KYC. If you are planning to play on that site for a long, but they require KYC as a mandatory requirement, then comply with KYC. If not and just want to test their promotions, then you have no choice but to skip that site since you don't want to do KYC.

In the event though that you luckily nailed a big win and they required a KYC, just comply if you really want to get the money.

If you would really be tending to have that kind of method then it does really mean that we dont really have that trust on the site. I cant blame on someone to be that paranoid but it would really be that just be applied into those sites which arent really that trusted on which means that you are testing out those sites arent reputable because if we are dealing with sites which are reputable then you wont really be having those kind of doubts on which it is really that wise that we should play into those platforms which can be trusted or had been known into this market. Of course we would really be that wanting to pull out all of the winnings that we do have.
Not all gamblers would really be planning on spending their winnings back and definitely people or gamblers would really be planning to cash it out all.

Even myself wont really be that having doubts when it comes on cashing out. Dont need on trying out to evade or being hesitant if you do know that you are dealing on the right place.
Just like i have said earlier that you wont really be having doubts if you are dealing with a trusted platform or company.

That should be the consequence of playing at the casino in question. If the OP doesn't want to comply with the rules regarding KYC on the site, of course he should avoid non-KYC casinos because they are safer than KYC for him, but they are prone to theft and fraud so there are not many decentralized casino sites. Non KYC is really safe, most of them are unsafe sites according to many rich gamblers.

So there is no reason or retreat when the casino suddenly asks for KYC except by following the rules they have set, in essence, never try to avoid anything because it is a risk for choosing to play at that casino and it is true what you say that it is best to follow the rules at the casino. because that will make everything safe, the account and the money won't be frozen if we don't refuse it.

This could be a reality if the said casino manually reviews withdrawal amount more than x and anything below that is automatic. You could just withdraw x-1 multiple times if it's processed automatically in order to avoid KYC hassle. I have done that not  exactly on a gambling site but from a website than needed manual verification on withdrawal of larger amount.
There could still be a cumulative amount threshold for monthly withdrawals or total withdrawal. But the worst that could come is a KYC request so it's a good idea to give it a try.

any casino will just require some check on your account. as many members has already said, they are not "stupid" there are some automatic control... even if we are talking about a big sum there is ALWAYS an additional check.
Moreover, if they see something suspicious you can just get blocked and maybe you need to waste more time and energy...

It can be done. But do imagine how long that will take? Are you patient enough to wait? Then, there's the urge to gamble while your balance is in the wallet of the gambling site. I mean, you will gamble because you want to increase the wagering amount so that you withdraw everything quickly. It's not just the KYC that will be your problem but because most gambling sites do put a wagering amount requirement will be a big barrier to what you are trying to achieve.
If I were you I'd just go the legal way. If you are not really doing something bad then do it especially if the gambling site is a respectable one that has been in the industry for years. I bet your documents will be kept in a secured manner and I doubt they will leak it out because they will also have big trouble if proven they are selling documents and profiles of their customers. Just because we got used to having good privacy doesn't mean we can do it all. This kind of business like online gambling also needs to follow the rules of one country so they can continue making their profits.