Topic: Can long term rollovers work in sports betting?? - page 5. (Read 1098 times)

It's insane for anyone to believe he can rollover a set of odds for 30 days with a 100% success rate; it's not impossible, but the chances of that happening are the same as picking 25 random games on a single betting slip.

 I consider myself the king of 1.50 Odd rollover bets, however the longest stretch of not losing I've gone is 15 days, and I haven't been able to break that record in over a year. On paper, it appears to be quite simple, but in practice it is not.

If I win for a week in a row, I already consider that a great triumph, so... I can't imagine or think that anyone can win for 30 days in a row without suffering a loss.
I agree with you... bets need to be short on the beginning and end of a cycle, being greedy with the aim of "lining up" several bets in order to obtain more profits is a risky strategy and should only be used with great prudence and conviction of the results that are very favorable for your bet, otherwise this could cause you a lot of loss.
And yes... I also agree that the best thing is to always make a good part of the profits and come back with a smaller bet again.

It's a good suggestion to avoid mixing your bankroll and profits, but it's only possible if your sportsbook doesn't charge fees and has no withdrawal limit. Most sportsbooks i've used set their minimum withdrawal higher than the minimum deposit so even if you continue with that plan you still have no other choice. I remember some gamblers used to have two accounts to separate their profits within the casino and later on they introduced a vault which is a good alternative.

Withdrawing your money when you are winning doesn't help much at all unless you don’t plan to come back the next day. The thing is, we think we can win every day, so we think of withdrawing, but in the long term, we don't need to. We understand that on a daily basis, we might experience losses and winnings. It's part of it, but your goal is to be profitable, which means you'll need more wins (positive) than losses (negative). Instead of focusing on the timing of withdrawing, you should focus more on the quality of your picks, as that will bring the wins for you.

As long as you have the discipline to follow your bankroll management and the skills to pick the right play, you'll certainly be profitable in the long run. Lastly, view sports betting as skill-based so you'll be inspired to work hard to improve your sports capping skills.

This is sportsbetting, so it is different from the regular casino games. Consider each match or game that you need to bet. You should know the sports well and very familiar with the athletes involved. In this way, you have better chance of selecting odds which has higher potential of winning. If you don't know the sports, you are just betting blindly and losing is inevitable.


That is actually true. Most gamblers will try their luck to hit more winnings. Thus, they tend to continue their game even after winnings. Unfortunately, most will lose what they won. And they will only regret it once they totally lost their bankroll. If you want to have an assurance, it is always best to withdraw some winnings and just leave what you think you are more  than happy to lose for that session.

Why wait for a month when you can add 25 games in a single betting slip? You can bet 5 cents in 25 games at the same time and consider it a lottery ticket. If you win you get a crazy multiplier like 5000x or much more. If you pick games with odds above 1.75x the odds become above 1 millions. It's crazy to think how cheap and easy it is to reach big odds in sports. However the chances of hitting a win under these conditions is realistically trending towards zero.

You can't expect to keep rolling over your balance and keep winning forever. That's why if you want to keep gambling it's a good idea to withdraw some profits when you hit anything. Otherwise in the long term all money ends up lost, because also when you lose there ain't no way the money is getting back.

maybe yes, maybe no. betting 1.30 odds for a month is very risky even if your target odds are 1.30. if you ask me I don't see any reason to put yourself in that kind of risk. maybe people who like taking big risks would do it but the best thing to do is to just withdraw your winnings after every betting session.

@Saint-loup there is nothing written on your post, it only has the quoted post of the OP.

First of all, no one play bet for fun and those who want to catch fun, play video games. Even the rich play to win as there is a feeling that comes with winning irrespective of how small the money is. That idea of gambling for fun is just a psychological remedy used by many to avoid getting depressed when they lose money.

This does not work especially if you are going all in. A single bad gambling day will return you to zero and that is not a good experience. Nothing is sure in gambling so the idea of roll over will always produce bad results unless it is refined to preserve the capital by going 30% of today balance in successive plays. This way, you need to lose three hands to be out.

Yes I think it's a very good advice because it prevents the casino/bookie to lock your funds if you win too much, too often especially if you win and make profits almost everyday like you are saying. The sportsbooks itself or its odds provider won't take time to sport you and to flag your account or even to flag yourself that is to say to flag your real identity as a winning bettors. And then stake will get limited and your funds will be hard to withdraw if possible at all.

So, this is going to be martingale in sports betting? I doubt it that it's going to work.

The typical martingale in dice and other luck based games don't even work in the long term. And that's why give up with this idea if you don't to burn your money.

But if it's the opposite, good luck with what you're doing.

The option at low odds does not guarantee that the team you choose will win the battle, even though theoretically the chance is quite large.  but in a match, let's say football, there are various options for the outcome of a match. a draw, or the Underdog team could provide a surprise. As far as my experience goes, it is not always the team that is superior, especially those with very low odds, that will win the match. So, let alone 30 days, in just one week we won't necessarily be able to win every bet even if the choice is at the lowest odds. or in other words, the superior team. Let's say you bet on several matches with the lowest odds, the results are not certain. Remember, a strong or favorite team cannot always win every match smoothly. After all, the money you bet is not commensurate with the winning percentage you get. Imagine, of the 3 options you are betting on, two of them win and one loses with the same money to bet. you will still experience losses, or a decrease in your initial bankroll.

For example football, the most ideal for me is betting on one or two matches. that too, with ideal odds. Or, we can choose other options provided by the bookmaker. That's why betting on sports is just as uncertain as betting on other types. although, here we can involve research and analysis. Therefore, in sports betting must be careful in research and analysis. Thus, you don't need to bet on many matches. Also, you can choose other betting options to find ideal odds. so that you always win consistently, especially within 30 days. I can't guarantee it, in fact the possibility is difficult to realize.

In sports betting, rollover will not apply to those who only gamble on sports betting types. If they win a large amount by multiplying the odds with the betting capital, they will withdraw most of it and will leave a small amount sufficient to make other bets on sports betting.
My habit is that I don't let any winnings I get in sports betting sit there, although sometimes I use winnings from sports betting to play slot gambling.

You have to be extremely lucky to win 30 days straight, even 5 games in a row is too much in my standards.

Betting on low odd game is decent strategy but there is no certainty that those games always end up your favourite, there are also people who always bet small amount on the underdogs so even one win can compensate the loss of 10 best or atleast 5 like that.

Basically if you gamble for money then you're doing it wrong and should be looking for the right way instead of shortcut.

I decide to withdraw once I have no more bets to play. It's not just related to a profit... it's something related the events to bet.
During these days in wimbledon at a certain point I have just got my money back (not related to profit or not but related to no more bets to be placed).
I don't want leave any amount on gambling or bookmakers (yes I know some are offering great opportunities but not your keys...)

The role over you are talking about, are you referring to spending previous winnings on gambling instead of withdrawing them? If that's what you mean, a most of gamblers don't withdraw after winning; they continue gambling until they have won more than their previous balance or until they lose all the balance. Personally, I take my profit without hesitation as soon as my game is successful. I only keep a small amount from winning, which I will use for next time, but sometimes too, I lose everything, and there's no balance to keep.

This method can only be useful to gamblers who have self control. A gambler who chooses not to withdraw his wins but allows them to accumulate for a period of one month should be disciplined enough not to use up the entire money before the end of the month. He should be able to set limits on the amount he should be playing with per day and the duration of time he would gamble for each day. Mind you, it is not possible for anyone to win consecutively in a roll for one month without any loss. If losses arise, it should not push the gambler to gambler more to cover up what was lost.

Anyone who cannot stick to a daily gambling budget should not bother rolling over anything to avoid losing out of everything. Withdraw your winnings immediately and come back the next day for another session if you wish.

winning within 30 days already sounds like fantasy for a number of objective reasons. For example, in football there is also a draw, which means that the chance of winning your bet is 33.3%, so there is even more risk. If you are confident that your strategy will work open a topic on the forum and post daily reports and together we’ll see if this is possible or not.

This doesn’t change the fact that you are still betting using your original bankroll since you just removed profit after your bet complete. This method is more safe than rollover but you are still taking too much risk if you are betting frequently for example in daily basis since you are just earning 30% for 1.3 odds bet while you will lose 100% once your bet failed.

I think this is the reason why some gambler preferred rollover bet and try their luck on a one time high bet so that they will not exposed frequently since they can take profit right after they and come back later after they enjoy the huge profit.

That's the reality, but some fail to realize it until they lose their money and learn from their mistakes. We might think that 1.30 odds give a big chance of winning, but the math behind that doesn't favor us in the long run. Bookies are smart in creating odds to attract the public, and if we are not smart and think we can exploit those odds based on our methods, then we are just fooling ourselves. In the end, we will still lose.

What I’ve learned in sports betting is to analyze and find the right value. It's always about the teams' chances of winning or covering the spread, plus the odds that are not overvalued.

I have not seen or found anyone who uses the Rollover method in sports betting, as far as I know, rollover is often used in trading, they use it to sign contracts or extend trading terms for a long time in the future.

Gambling does not require a long-term contractual agreement, such as soccer betting only takes 90 minutes, boxing takes a maximum of 12 rounds and so do others such as basketball, If examined and compared, it is clear that the rollover method cannot be used in gambling or betting, because the betting method is not long term.