Can online platforms like Youtube and Facebook really be decentralized? - page 5.

jseverson

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 759

Quote from: CRYPTORALF on November 20, 2019, 04:05:49 PM

Bitcoin has a decentralized ledger where all transactions are stored. How would that ledger look for a decentralized Youtube or Facebook?

Or am I missing something? Does decentralization mean something different in this regard?

There might be better implementations, but here's one which seems to work well enough:

Quote from: https://diasporafoundation.org/about

diaspora* is completely different from most networks that you use. It is completely decentralized, with no central “hub”. Even so, it’s very easy to connect and communicate with people. Here’s how.

diaspora* is a true network, with no central base. There are servers (called “pods”) all over the world, each containing the data of those users who have chosen to register with it. These pods communicate with each other seamlessly, so that you can register with any pod and communicate freely with your contacts, wherever they are on the network.

Most social networks are run from centralized servers owned and run by a corporation. These store all the private data of their users. This information can be lost or hacked, and like any system with a bottleneck, any problem at the central servers can make the whole network run very slowly, or not at all. It is also more easy for governments to “listen in.”

It apparently has over a million users, so if you're interested in the concept, this seems like a perfect starting point.

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 3015

Welt Am Draht

Quote from: CRYPTORALF on November 20, 2019, 04:05:49 PM

Does decentralization mean something different in this regard?

In most cases 'we are building a decentralised xxxx' means they want your dollars and then they're going to disappear.

Most people don't want decentralisation in most areas of life let alone need it. They want someone to run what they use and whine to when it goes wrong.

When it comes to money there clearly is a case for it as financial abuse happens at every level which is why Bitcoin is still chugging.

For buying pants online or watching kitten videos why on Earth would I give a fuck whether it's centralised or not?

tippytoes

sr. member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 275

Quote from: Hydrogen on November 21, 2019, 04:12:35 AM

Quote from: CRYPTORALF on November 20, 2019, 04:05:49 PM

I started to learn about crypto two months ago. Bitcoin, Monero, Ethereum etc. make total sense to me.

I can't, however, understand why it would make sense to decentralize large online platforms like Youtube and Facebook. Or let's say: I don't understand how this could work.

Bitcoin has a decentralized ledger where all transactions are stored. How would that ledger look for a decentralized Youtube or Facebook?

Decentralization could be applied to corporations like facebook, in terms of its leadership, decision making and authority structures becoming more democratic. A CEO based structure where Mark Zuckenberg ruled with absolute power could represent centralization. Decentralization could entail breaking up the power and authority of a single person and distributing it amongst multiple people. This would come with advantages and disadvantages of course.

The centralized arrangement could resemble a dictator state like north korea where Kim Jong rules within a centralized format. With decentralization being more like the united states where power is split between congress, a senate and a President.

I like the logic you presented here. Kim Jong Un and the US. Grin

Actually, that is a very good example on how an ordinary individual can look at this scenario. So yes, these big platforms can play a decentralized system in some ways but there is some centralized part within its ecosystem. I think we can't avoid that.

ReiMomo

sr. member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 305

Duelbits - $100k Bonus/week

Be decentralized? Probably yes. Just like Dtube(Decentralized Tube) a version on youtube that has been decentralized and free of ads.
This is like a youtube, a video platform that has built an apps version and utilizing the video content and the video creator awarded by uploading content. So, it is possible.

Hydrogen

legendary

Activity: 2562

Merit: 1441

Quote from: CRYPTORALF on November 20, 2019, 04:05:49 PM

I started to learn about crypto two months ago. Bitcoin, Monero, Ethereum etc. make total sense to me.

I can't, however, understand why it would make sense to decentralize large online platforms like Youtube and Facebook. Or let's say: I don't understand how this could work.

Bitcoin has a decentralized ledger where all transactions are stored. How would that ledger look for a decentralized Youtube or Facebook?

Decentralization could be applied to corporations like facebook, in terms of its leadership, decision making and authority structures becoming more democratic. A CEO based structure where Mark Zuckenberg ruled with absolute power could represent centralization. Decentralization could entail breaking up the power and authority of a single person and distributing it amongst multiple people. This would come with advantages and disadvantages of course.

The centralized arrangement could resemble a dictator state like north korea where Kim Jong rules within a centralized format. With decentralization being more like the united states where power is split between congress, a senate and a President.

alexsandria

sr. member

Activity: 896

Merit: 268

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!

Of course, NO. Though internet is decentralized because the distribution must be one way or another, that doesn't mean such popular platforms must be decentralized. It has to be controlled though, 'cause if not it will be surely problematic. In addition, platforms has its own databases which in the first place has one single authority that regulates a certain platforms to avoid data breach, and other such information loss.

Wexnident

hero member

Activity: 2702

Merit: 672

I don't request loans~

A decentralized social media platform? No. Just with the problem with content itself, having it decentralized would already become quite a problem. Having a central decision maker actually makes social media platforms gain dominance over anyone using their services. This avoids constant change of rules which could be a problem in a decentralized system.

Besides, this could go to a situation where for example youtube has different implementations for each platform. America has x feature while India don't have it but India has y feature instead.

Basically, it's a pain when dealing with decisions. Comparing crypto to social media platforms in terms of decentralization isn't really that much of a good idea.

mu_enrico

copper member

Activity: 2324

Merit: 2142

Slots Enthusiast & Expert

If it is free, then the simple answer is no. Ever heard of "economies of scale?" It is about the bigger you are, the cheaper your service is. Youtube et al. can offer free service because of this centralization. They will beat small competitors in terms of the price until no competitors left.

The problem is they offer you "free" services, but actually, you have to pay it with your ~~soul~~ data. Furthermore, they can do whatever they want, including blocking unpopular speech (censorship), demonetizing, and clogging your feed with advertisements.

Now, if we want decentralization, we must pay for these services with money and not with our privacy/freedom. Then perhaps, fund startups with this business model.

CryptoBry

sr. member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 355

Quote from: CRYPTORALF on November 20, 2019, 04:05:49 PM

Bitcoin has a decentralized ledger where all transactions are stored. How would that ledger look for a decentralized Youtube or Facebook? Or am I missing something? Does decentralization mean something different in this regard?

I don't see these famous platforms decide to be decentralized. Decentralization entails a lot of things and on top of that is the control and censorship. Facebook and YouTube will never be multi-billion companies if they are not controlled platforms though they are open to the public still decisions on many matters are done by the corporate personalities and not by the users themselves. There had been many attempts to introduce decentralized social media platforms but up to now not one is flourishing all of them are still unknown and many are already dead.

dimonstration

hero member

Activity: 2744

Merit: 702

Dimon69

Quote from: CRYPTORALF on November 20, 2019, 04:05:49 PM

PS: I'm asking because I again and again read headlines that say something along the line of "everything will be decentralized".

Not everything, crypto supposed to be decentralized but there are many who changes it's purpose. They tend to do it in a way that they will benefit like how those countries implementing their own token to ban other cryptocurrencies. Facebook and youtube will be that way, they will just use token maybe for the sense of having a currency that can be used in their platform but not as decentralized since they knew our infos.

shoreno

full member

Activity: 1750

Merit: 118

for facebook yes they should make it decentralized so that the issue of data breach are going to be fixed but on youtube , there is no problem with it right now . not just these two but other cex social media platform should turn to decentralized so that people are sure that thier datas were safe and wont be exploited by someone else because those people are only getting the benefit the most but it also harm us users .

paskah01

newbie

Activity: 65

Merit: 0

Quote from: Kyraishi on November 20, 2019, 11:06:12 PM

It would work with no one having full control of the content platforms, which means that they wouldn't be able to regulate their platforms unless everyone would agree with the moves.

Wouldn't it function like Wikipedia? So it would work that people require permission from everyone in order for things to be changed (so it would need permission from everyone in order for content to be taken down).

That's the way it should work - single companies don't need this much power.

But rich can pay people to spam the network with same point for it to be change... Anyone with money and power can change the truth and it can be centralized in some other way...

Kyraishi

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 513

It would work with no one having full control of the content platforms, which means that they wouldn't be able to regulate their platforms unless everyone would agree with the moves.

Wouldn't it function like Wikipedia? So it would work that people require permission from everyone in order for things to be changed (so it would need permission from everyone in order for content to be taken down).

That's the way it should work - single companies don't need this much power.

avikz

legendary

Activity: 3080

Merit: 1500

Quote from: CRYPTORALF on November 20, 2019, 04:05:49 PM

I started to learn about crypto two months ago. Bitcoin, Monero, Ethereum etc. make total sense to me.

I can't, however, understand why it would make sense to decentralize large online platforms like Youtube and Facebook. Or let's say: I don't understand how this could work.

Bitcoin has a decentralized ledger where all transactions are stored. How would that ledger look for a decentralized Youtube or Facebook?

Or am I missing something? Does decentralization mean something different in this regard?

Thank you!

PS: I'm asking because I again and again read headlines that say something along the line of "everything will be decentralized".

Can be done! Facebook and Youtube, both can be decentralized with some tweaking in the existing blockchain system so that the privacy of the users are not evaded! Distributed ledger usually means that your data will be available openly for public viewing, but that structure can be changed using an authorization layer to ensure only authorized people are able to see your profile and not everyone on the earth!

However, it literally makes no sense for these two conglomerates to move onto a blockchain! Blockchain is bette used in transactions based platforms and that's why it can be used better in fintech. Blockchain is not really made for large social media portals!

CRYPTORALF

jr. member

Activity: 53

Merit: 3

thanks guys, but no reply really answers my question how this would look in detail Wink

paskah01

newbie

Activity: 65

Merit: 0

Quote from: AniviaBtc on November 20, 2019, 10:27:31 PM

Quote from: NathanJB on November 20, 2019, 10:10:40 PM

I think it is possible to decentralize everything, even the likes of youtube and facebook. I cannot go on the specifics because I am not a programmer nor a coder myself but there are apps that are decentralized, popularly known as DApps. I think an app similar to youtube or facebook which is built on a distributed ledger is going to become a decentralized one.

I think not, it doesn't mean that if you observed something that decentralize, all of the things around you can also decentralized. They have different levels of standard to be able to achieve that.

For example, let's say Youtube, it is a powerful and broad social media platform and nothing can influences it easily. You need to achieve those standards.

Absolutely agree.

I think both decentralization and centralization system have their plus and minus. Not all thing can and should be decentralized, for Youtube and Facebook i think it's better that way- centralized (but not too obvious/ much) . Different for financial transactions i believe decentralization will be so much better..

But do you think we can trust the system much more than what we have trust yeaarsss ago from bank? I mean, it'll be hard to be the part of something different from what's already in mind..

AniviaBtc

sr. member

Activity: 1120

Merit: 272

First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold

Quote from: NathanJB on November 20, 2019, 10:10:40 PM

I think it is possible to decentralize everything, even the likes of youtube and facebook. I cannot go on the specifics because I am not a programmer nor a coder myself but there are apps that are decentralized, popularly known as DApps. I think an app similar to youtube or facebook which is built on a distributed ledger is going to become a decentralized one.

I think not, it doesn't mean that if you observed something that decentralize, all of the things around you can also decentralized. They have different levels of standard to be able to achieve that.

For example, let's say Youtube, it is a powerful and broad social media platform and nothing can influences it easily. You need to achieve those standards.

NathanJB

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 251

I think it is possible to decentralize everything, even the likes of youtube and facebook. I cannot go on the specifics because I am not a programmer nor a coder myself but there are apps that are decentralized, popularly known as DApps. I think an app similar to youtube or facebook which is built on a distributed ledger is going to become a decentralized one.

LUCKMCFLY

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 1882

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Facebook and YouTube decentralized is something almost impossible, especially for Facebook, it is said that a lot of data has been leaked from there for different government fines, it is also a goldmine in information, it could not be decentralized, since Mark would not , or maybe think so, but with all the development he has had lately I do not think so, in fact even Snowden thinks that both Facebook and Google do not have good intentions.

The case of YouTube, is changing completely, has new policies where many influencers are complaining, far from all this I don´t see a decentralization.

These platforms can use Blockchain to have much more control and be able to do some audits, but controlled by their owners, a decentralization technology cannot be confused by applying the technology to already centralized platforms, it is like affirming that a bank will be decentralized because it wants to acquire blockchain technology or use blockchain.

goinmerry

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1083

Facebook and Youtube switching into a decentralized thing is not an easy task to do. They are already good at their current status so no need or necessity for a big change. There will be lots of questions if they will plan for a decentralized concept. Cross fingers that they will not do something shitty in the future although chances are low.

But as how blockchain evolves through years, expect that more and more industries will adopt the idea of being decentralized.

Don't think about it too much or maybe there is something you need to know and we might give you a better answer without using Facebook and Youtube as an example.

Topic: Can online platforms like Youtube and Facebook really be decentralized? - page 5. (Read 1130 times)