Topic: Can we now confirm that he's Faketoshi.? - page 4. (Read 787 times)
Craig is a clown and nothing more. This was obvious from begining
Maybe, he's planning a big step ahead in the next few weeks in order for him to somehow bypass the system, but it is merely impossible for him to do it so, why not just accept the fact that people will no longer believe on his arguments and they are just using him for news content that isn't really contributing to the development of the cryptocurrency space. If I were him, I will focus on advertising bitcoin SV and bitcoin Cash, where, the possibility of gaining more profit will be even more possible, instead of pushing further making people think he's insane.
Thing have moved so forward that's there's no going back for him now. And it seems that he have no much options left than to admit he was mentally unstable which he really is.
The man needs some medical help as he claims to be something but can't provide a single proof from literally hundreds of them.
The man needs some medical help as he claims to be something but can't provide a single proof from literally hundreds of them.
I'm sure if the court proves that he is not Satoshi, he will continue his assertion of the truth.
You can't prove a negative, and the only thing that can be proved is that he is Satoshi--if he shows he has those private keys. I really haven't been following this whole thing from the beginning, but so far it doesn't look like he's going to produce the keys and therefore show that he's the creator of bitcoin. It sure as hell would be something if he did that, but I don't think it's going to happen.What's exactly csw is doing with all of this attention and obviously a "fake" advertisement.
That's kind of what I'm wondering. You'd think if you had access to billions of dollars worth of bitcoin (which I think is the value), you'd want to keep quiet about it. Announcing that to the world might attract kidnappers or worse. He seems to be unfazed by that, so he's got steadier nerves than I would have in his situation. 
In my opinion, craig wright is definitely not Satoshi. But sure, he could be the most stupid member of a Satoshi team, probably the one that got kicked out. If I had to bet on who was Satoshi Nakamoto my money would be on Dave Kleiman. I read somewhere that he wrote in C++ and used a Windows machine. whether Wright was involved in it or not, it Might be useful to compare Kleiman's and Wright's code with Satoshi's, at most that'd only throw light on who wrote the actual code.
When will he get tired? it is already confirm and we saw that he is a fraud and he didn't have the keys or any hard proof that he is the real one. people that watch him at the beginning is already tired, but he is still there fighting, for what else? that we know already he is full of lies. the real one will never show and tell that he is the real satoshi that will change the future. lol
there have been a lot of lies that he did actually but people who still believe in him like closing any eyes about the lies he did, the goal of CSW followers is only to gain profit from BSV so they close their eyes about anything CSW, now he doesn't have the key to access all addresses wallet to find a new reason and then all his followers haven't left this person, it seems to be very funny and strange, logically if he satoshi why he was with BSV and why not continue with BTC to develop it, I'm sure even a child can know that he is not satoshi
Actually if we are going to decide we can ssy that he id not really him because of lot of evidences that shows in the court. But I guesd the court are just doing their job snd they know more than ud what to do because they hsve graduated and study hard just to be a lawyer.
We don't need to confirm anything, Craig is the one to confirm his BS, which he definately can't do
What's exactly csw is doing with all of this attention and obviously a "fake" advertisement. Do you think the people who are believing in him are really thinking that he is Satoshi..?
He doesnt have the keys but still telling the court that he will receive it in the future date. What kind of an argument is this.? First it was just the announcement, then it was "I will get the courier" and now this.
What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
We should have concluded this much much earlier. CSW was never Satoshi, even before he made this absurd claim. Satoshi was never a cocky man who is hungry of recognition.
No keys, no proof.
By this statement, it only shows another lie from him. Another proof that the only thing he know is to lie and benefit himself.
And what is that thing he said that he will received the key in the future, what a nonsense talk coming from him. Is he making a fool of the court and all people. LOL.
By this statement, it only shows another lie from him. Another proof that the only thing he know is to lie and benefit himself.
And what is that thing he said that he will received the key in the future, what a nonsense talk coming from him. Is he making a fool of the court and all people. LOL.
He doesnt have the keys but still telling the court that he will receive it in the future date. What kind of an argument is this.? First it was just the announcement, then it was "I will get the courier" and now this.
What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
I have long been confirmed and believe that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto because he keeps delaying the one thing that can make him verified as the real Nakamoto, and then this happens, I don't think he can really prove that, that delaying tactics will not do him good, in the future, he can set himself free by admitting that he really is not Nakamoto, the case against him that he is not is very strong he mus yield.
He doesnt have the keys but still telling the court that he will receive it in the future date. What kind of an argument is this.? First it was just the announcement, then it was "I will get the courier" and now this.
What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
We all know it's a lie, he can never become a satoshi. I still don't understand why he tried to impersonate someone else, I don't know what his purpose is in this market but his actions will surely fail. And after this trial is over, he will be held accountable for his actions and everyone should be careful BSV of him, the price will probably fall to 90% of the value if he cannot prove he is Satoshi. What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
From the start it was already the being questioned to him.
He cannot provide, that just means he is fake.
Many fake satoshi's will pop out. This is just the start.
But we all know how they can prove it. Move something out of that wallet and then maybe we could consider it.
It still needs investigation though.
He cannot provide, that just means he is fake.
Many fake satoshi's will pop out. This is just the start.
But we all know how they can prove it. Move something out of that wallet and then maybe we could consider it.
It still needs investigation though.
If you wouldn't mind, there's no significant matter to investigate him because it's not important to who really is satoshi. The creator of bitcoin is an anonymous person, and no matter what happens his identity shouldn't be divulged to anybody. This is only a diversion tactic to confuse a lot of people, and he's been used as escape goat.
He doesnt have the keys but still telling the court that he will receive it in the future date. What kind of an argument is this.? First it was just the announcement, then it was "I will get the courier" and now this.
What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
We could since the first time he showed up with controvisial statements, i think the real satoshi won't showed up it's identity because since the beginning that what he want, that's why he become anonymous and not show up until right now.
As long as he do not show that he has access to the Satoshi address private key, it is logical to think that he is not Satoshi thus there is no need for the confirmation because it is obvious. Though I read the other party requested for an extension regarding the case, and Craig had said that he will provide or have access on that key in the later days. I hope that all these drama be finished, there is nothing for us to gain here but distraction.
He doesnt have the keys but still telling the court that he will receive it in the future date. What kind of an argument is this.? First it was just the announcement, then it was "I will get the courier" and now this.
What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
There are many people claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, but up to now no one has been able to prove what they said. Craig Wright is also a self-confessed person like many others, he's just trying to lie to achieve his goals. What else is needed in the court to prove that he is not..?
https://decrypt.co/16998/confirmed-craig-wright-doesnt-have-keys-to-8-billion-of-bitcoin
Of course he doesn't have the keys, lol, we already know that. He has been claiming that he is Satoshi even prior to the case and I'm sure if the court proves that he is not Satoshi, he will continue his assertion of the truth. And that what a pathological liar like Craig is, even if we have all the evidence plaster around his face, in his mind, he is Satoshi.
You are right, since the beginning he has no evidence he knows it but continue to have an interview and get a media mileage. For instance that he has a key, he should allow media to cover him live and transfer even 0.00001000 BTC to prove he is the owner but he did not. I think this is case closed already.
if indeed he is satoshi, he should no longer wait for anything and submit all the evidence with full certainty, but in reality wright also waits for important files that seem designed to be for lie reasons. What I was surprised at was that Wright's supporters should have realized this irregularity in the first place, enough to admit that it was a mistake without having to make further speculations.
Of course he doesn't have the keys, lol, we already know that. He has been claiming that he is Satoshi even prior to the case and I'm sure if the court proves that he is not Satoshi, he will continue his assertion of the truth. And that what a pathological liar like Craig is, even if we have all the evidences plaster around his face, in his mind, he is Satoshi.
Jump to: