Pages:
Author

Topic: [CANCELLED] Mainstreet Investment LP (MIT) SECURITIZED BLOCKCHAIN ASSET - page 8. (Read 23231 times)

sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
Don't you looooooove how offensive my name sounds?
is there any bounty?

sign camp?

translation?

Probably already have a signature campaign according to the post above. Information about it is not present on the first page.

ya they are funny.  they want the communities money, but are picking and choosing what they consider "high-level" members to rep their sigs privately to add legitimacy to the project. Says alot actually, tells me the OPPOSITE:  they are saying FUCK YOU to the community, still want our money tho, and are willing to use shit like bitcointalk "celebrities" like on TV to try shill, good job using PEON TACTICS, charlie...

this is so sad, im happy 12 pages only, FUCK YOUR 15% ROI A YEAR CHARLIE, this is CRYPTO!  maybe you can get your sig shills here to buy in?!? hahaha
sr. member
Activity: 297
Merit: 250
is there any bounty?

sign camp?

translation?

Probably already have a signature campaign according to the post above. Information about it is not present on the first page.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 503
is there any bounty?

sign camp?

translation?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Mainstreet.ky - 1st Securitized Blockchain Asset

Would you hire a criminal in your restaurant? And if you say yes you better be prepared to be out of business soon. Don't you think there's a reason big companies wont hire people with a criminal record? It cant be because they are stupid and dont know how to make money. Its because people who have broken the law are not to be trusted.

I would definitely hire someone who has a criminal record so long as he/she didn't physically harm or threaten another person, there are things that are rightly called criminal others that are not.
By your logic someone who goes to prison doesn't deserve to be given a second chance, that is really shortsighted and morally wrong in my opinion.

Also this case is different Charlie is not being employed by a company he's part of it so your logic fails again here.

Charlie's fault was not to have a money transmitter licence and it was made an example by Fincen at the time of his arrest, if you were around at the time you would know but I can see you are a newbie.

I would happily employ Charlie anytime because of his contacts, knowledge and experience in the bitcoin and blockchain space. He was running Bitinstant, one of the first bitcoin exchanges, he is well respected by the community and definetily not a criminal as you try to portray him. He was made a scapegoat that's all it was.

Mainstreet and Intellisys have gone to great lenghts to make sure everything on the legal side has been taken care of, I read their ITOM and company prospectus, maybe you should do the same.

My logic is not failed dude. Criminals deserve second chances and that's what welfare is for. Criminals who are involved with breaking laws especially that revolve around money should not be given a second chance by running a ico and asking for millions of dollars. If you don't get that then there's no help for you and whatever you lose you deserve to lose.


Guys, jokes aside - Charlie did his time and I'm sure he wants to move on.
That being said, this project is heavily regulated - which is why US and EU and other jurisdictions are blocked from participating in the token sale.
There is alot being done on the legal side to make sure this project abides by securities laws.
Moreover, this isn't another ICO asking for millions of dollars to put into development that never ends up going anywhere.
If you take a look at the ITOM and the Prospectus, their plan is to buy American companies, and verified token holders will receive dividends/distributions.
Hope this clarifies things, and whether you chose to still question Charlie's motives because of his past, I ask you to remember that everyone makes mistakes when they're young, especially when they're the compliance officer of their own company, and doing alot of btc volume.

Just wondering, what happens if someone from the eu or us does manage to buy some. I guess then all it would take is one angry user with a vpn to make it a bad day for everyone else. Right.

And I must admit. That meme is hilarious.
Any news on the ICO, the exchange/s on which the ICO will be available to buy.

The problem with some people is that they only look at the result and not the source of the prone. So you won't vote for Mandela then because we went to prison. Let's always cross check things before forming opinion on it, also remember nobody is an angel and everyone deserves second chance.

Great question - if a person from US or EU does manage to buy some after the sale then they wouldnt be able to receive the distribution (dividend).
During the token sale, only the whitelisted addresses will be able to purchase tokens - this means anyone buying MIT tokens have to go through the exchanges and must have a verified account, so even if you are using a VPN (which I'm using generally for all my interneting) then you would have to be able to prove the address you're putting forward.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10

Would you hire a criminal in your restaurant? And if you say yes you better be prepared to be out of business soon. Don't you think there's a reason big companies wont hire people with a criminal record? It cant be because they are stupid and dont know how to make money. Its because people who have broken the law are not to be trusted.

I would definitely hire someone who has a criminal record so long as he/she didn't physically harm or threaten another person, there are things that are rightly called criminal others that are not.
By your logic someone who goes to prison doesn't deserve to be given a second chance, that is really shortsighted and morally wrong in my opinion.

Also this case is different Charlie is not being employed by a company he's part of it so your logic fails again here.

Charlie's fault was not to have a money transmitter licence and it was made an example by Fincen at the time of his arrest, if you were around at the time you would know but I can see you are a newbie.

I would happily employ Charlie anytime because of his contacts, knowledge and experience in the bitcoin and blockchain space. He was running Bitinstant, one of the first bitcoin exchanges, he is well respected by the community and definetily not a criminal as you try to portray him. He was made a scapegoat that's all it was.

Mainstreet and Intellisys have gone to great lenghts to make sure everything on the legal side has been taken care of, I read their ITOM and company prospectus, maybe you should do the same.

My logic is not failed dude. Criminals deserve second chances and that's what welfare is for. Criminals who are involved with breaking laws especially that revolve around money should not be given a second chance by running a ico and asking for millions of dollars. If you don't get that then there's no help for you and whatever you lose you deserve to lose.


Guys, jokes aside - Charlie did his time and I'm sure he wants to move on.
That being said, this project is heavily regulated - which is why US and EU and other jurisdictions are blocked from participating in the token sale.
There is alot being done on the legal side to make sure this project abides by securities laws.
Moreover, this isn't another ICO asking for millions of dollars to put into development that never ends up going anywhere.
If you take a look at the ITOM and the Prospectus, their plan is to buy American companies, and verified token holders will receive dividends/distributions.
Hope this clarifies things, and whether you chose to still question Charlie's motives because of his past, I ask you to remember that everyone makes mistakes when they're young, especially when they're the compliance officer of their own company, and doing alot of btc volume.

Just wondering, what happens if someone from the eu or us does manage to buy some. I guess then all it would take is one angry user with a vpn to make it a bad day for everyone else. Right.

And I must admit. That meme is hilarious.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0

Would you hire a criminal in your restaurant? And if you say yes you better be prepared to be out of business soon. Don't you think there's a reason big companies wont hire people with a criminal record? It cant be because they are stupid and dont know how to make money. Its because people who have broken the law are not to be trusted.

I would definitely hire someone who has a criminal record so long as he/she didn't physically harm or threaten another person, there are things that are rightly called criminal others that are not.
By your logic someone who goes to prison doesn't deserve to be given a second chance, that is really shortsighted and morally wrong in my opinion.

Also this case is different Charlie is not being employed by a company he's part of it so your logic fails again here.

Charlie's fault was not to have a money transmitter licence and it was made an example by Fincen at the time of his arrest, if you were around at the time you would know but I can see you are a newbie.

I would happily employ Charlie anytime because of his contacts, knowledge and experience in the bitcoin and blockchain space. He was running Bitinstant, one of the first bitcoin exchanges, he is well respected by the community and definetily not a criminal as you try to portray him. He was made a scapegoat that's all it was.

Mainstreet and Intellisys have gone to great lenghts to make sure everything on the legal side has been taken care of, I read their ITOM and company prospectus, maybe you should do the same.

My logic is not failed dude. Criminals deserve second chances and that's what welfare is for. Criminals who are involved with breaking laws especially that revolve around money should not be given a second chance by running a ico and asking for millions of dollars. If you don't get that then there's no help for you and whatever you lose you deserve to lose.


Guys, jokes aside - Charlie did his time and I'm sure he wants to move on.
That being said, this project is heavily regulated - which is why US and EU and other jurisdictions are blocked from participating in the token sale.
There is alot being done on the legal side to make sure this project abides by securities laws.
Moreover, this isn't another ICO asking for millions of dollars to put into development that never ends up going anywhere.
If you take a look at the ITOM and the Prospectus, their plan is to buy American companies, and verified token holders will receive dividends/distributions.
Hope this clarifies things, and whether you chose to still question Charlie's motives because of his past, I ask you to remember that everyone makes mistakes when they're young, especially when they're the compliance officer of their own company, and doing alot of btc volume.
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Working to pay the bills and keep the lights on.

Would you hire a criminal in your restaurant? And if you say yes you better be prepared to be out of business soon. Don't you think there's a reason big companies wont hire people with a criminal record? It cant be because they are stupid and dont know how to make money. Its because people who have broken the law are not to be trusted.

I would definitely hire someone who has a criminal record so long as he/she didn't physically harm or threaten another person, there are things that are rightly called criminal others that are not.
By your logic someone who goes to prison doesn't deserve to be given a second chance, that is really shortsighted and morally wrong in my opinion.

Also this case is different Charlie is not being employed by a company he's part of it so your logic fails again here.

Charlie's fault was not to have a money transmitter licence and it was made an example by Fincen at the time of his arrest, if you were around at the time you would know but I can see you are a newbie.

I would happily employ Charlie anytime because of his contacts, knowledge and experience in the bitcoin and blockchain space. He was running Bitinstant, one of the first bitcoin exchanges, he is well respected by the community and definetily not a criminal as you try to portray him. He was made a scapegoat that's all it was.

Mainstreet and Intellisys have gone to great lenghts to make sure everything on the legal side has been taken care of, I read their ITOM and company prospectus, maybe you should do the same.

My logic is not failed dude. Criminals deserve second chances and that's what welfare is for. Criminals who are involved with breaking laws especially that revolve around money should not be given a second chance by running a ico and asking for millions of dollars. If you don't get that then there's no help for you and whatever you lose you deserve to lose.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Mainstreet.ky - 1st Securitized Blockchain Asset
Latest update!


Token contract is posted here on github for public review: https://github.com/MainstreetLP/token

If you identify any bugs, we have Bug bounty details here: https://github.com/MainstreetLP/token/blob/master/bugbounty

Security audit of the token contract is here: http://www.intellisys.ai/security-audit-of-mainstreet-token-and-crowdfund-smart-contracts/

Thank you!
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Any news on the ICO, the exchange/s on which the ICO will be available to buy.

The problem with some people is that they only look at the result and not the source of the prone. So you won't vote for Mandela then because we went to prison. Let's always cross check things before forming opinion on it, also remember nobody is an angel and everyone deserves second chance.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Working to pay the bills and keep the lights on.
A convicted criminal asking for our money and trust. Excuse me while I go laugh my ass off. Grin Grin
Why should anyone trust you Charlie? You've proven you're willing to break the law and I dont know how you can sit here and ask us to invest in you.

Anyway, I cant justify it but Id like to hear your answer none the less.

ROFLMAO.... Sorry but sheeple who cry 'he broke the law' make me laugh my ass off... As though all 'laws' are just & equitable.




Would you hire a criminal in your restaurant? And if you say yes you better be prepared to be out of business soon. Don't you think there's a reason big companies wont hire people with a criminal record? It cant be because they are stupid and dont know how to make money. Its because people who have broken the law are not to be trusted.
sr. member
Activity: 436
Merit: 250
A convicted criminal asking for our money and trust. Excuse me while I go laugh my ass off. Grin Grin
Why should anyone trust you Charlie? You've proven you're willing to break the law and I dont know how you can sit here and ask us to invest in you.

Anyway, I cant justify it but Id like to hear your answer none the less.

ROFLMAO.... Sorry but sheeple who cry 'he broke the law' make me laugh my ass off... As though all 'laws' are just & equitable.


newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 592
Merit: 500

First off, the name intellisys is actually used by many other organizations including a major equity research company in the UK.


I knew that. I was able to skim through the first 2 pages of g/search results (incredible eh??), and found out that at least 10 sites advertising their business initiatives under intellysis brand name had their origins in the UK, but none of them had an affiliation with intellysisAI. But u deliberately put "AI" in ur site's name.




I assume you're talking about the intellisys AI conference which really has nothing to do with equities, markets, or bitcoin.


Yes, and this is why I'm asking u to drop "-AI" suffix and relaunch with a clean domain name.


Another thing, if you actually google Thomas' name you will find his Linkedin here: https://at.linkedin.com/in/thomas-holzinger-25834963


U make this stuff up. How can I be sure it's not ur brother-in-law's account masked to look like Thomas.


And if you bothered to do ANY ACTUAL FACT FINDING then you would have also come across these links:
http://sfspiritscomp.com/pdf/S14-PkgDesWinnerList.pdf
http://www.globalmanufacturers-directory.com/p-171046.html

MORE IMPORTANTLY, you could have done a whois lookup for Neftvodka.com and you would have seen: http://whois.domaintools.com/neftvodka.com



I see his name in there but I'm not bought, man. To convince me, u need to do an interview with thomas or find a trustworthy person willing to vouch for him as an advisory for this project, and hand his/her word over to me, so I can finally shut the fuck up.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
So u have to clarify whether u're affiliated with intellysys AI conference, otherwise I will conclude that u just use a random catchy name that u found on the interwebs to build up some more hype for ur scammy sale. U really need to put forth some guidelines for urself if u wish to stay in business and don't want me to google thomas' name and find out that he is part of ur imagination. NEFT website along with shipping hubs and facilities where vodka is produced belongs to russian Alex which makes ur statement about mr. holzinger being a general manager of NEFT not only ambiguous but outright retarded. Nobody at official NEFT store and shipping outlets has ever heard about holzinger. Who do u say thomas is?

Quote
Thomas Holzinger, a specialist in aircraft acquisition, leasing and financing, manages about $250 million in assets at Jet Level, a Vienna-based air-travel consultancy. Holzinger also serves as the general manager of NEFT Vodka, maker of NEFT Black Barrel Vodka.

So u want to convince noobs that u rush for a few bitcoins while thomas, man of unbending principles and allegedly a fund manager at air-travel agency, agreed to be one of the advisories for ur project. I cant help laughing at u bro. Everyone including urself knows that thomas is none other but a braindead character from marvel comics books, and a former detroit pimp, according to police sources.


First off, the name intellisys is actually used by many other organizations including a major equity research company in the UK. I assume you're talking about the intellisys AI conference which really has nothing to do with equities, markets, or bitcoin.

Another thing, if you actually google Thomas' name you will find his Linkedin here: https://at.linkedin.com/in/thomas-holzinger-25834963
And if you bothered to do ANY ACTUAL FACT FINDING then you would have also come across these links:
http://sfspiritscomp.com/pdf/S14-PkgDesWinnerList.pdf
http://www.globalmanufacturers-directory.com/p-171046.html

MORE IMPORTANTLY, you could have done a whois lookup for Neftvodka.com and you would have seen: http://whois.domaintools.com/neftvodka.com



hero member
Activity: 592
Merit: 500
So u have to clarify whether u're affiliated with intellysys AI conference, otherwise I will conclude that u just use a random catchy name that u found on the interwebs to build up some more hype for ur scammy sale. U really need to put forth some guidelines for urself if u wish to stay in business and don't want me to google thomas' name and find out that he is part of ur imagination. NEFT website along with shipping hubs and facilities where vodka is produced belongs to russian Alex which makes ur statement about mr. holzinger being a general manager of NEFT not only ambiguous but outright retarded. Nobody at official NEFT store and shipping outlets has ever heard about holzinger. Who do u say thomas is?

Quote
Thomas Holzinger, a specialist in aircraft acquisition, leasing and financing, manages about $250 million in assets at Jet Level, a Vienna-based air-travel consultancy. Holzinger also serves as the general manager of NEFT Vodka, maker of NEFT Black Barrel Vodka.

So u want to convince noobs that u rush for a few bitcoins while thomas, man of unbending principles and allegedly a fund manager at air-travel agency, agreed to be one of the advisories for ur project. I cant help laughing at u bro. Everyone including urself knows that thomas is none other but a braindead character from marvel comics books, and a former detroit pimp, according to police sources.
full member
Activity: 195
Merit: 100
Thank you for the response.

So how do token holders get paid first if any payments to them go only after 5% management fee is deducted?

Understood regarding independent signatures, waiting to hear the names.

Mainstreet team, any comments on the below please?

Had a look at the offering memorandum v.2. Improving investor economics to 50% vs 30% is great, thank you.

How would you explain introduction of 5% management fee though? Seems high + you will be paid ahead of investors which does not seem to be in line with the preferred return concept.

Also, you do not seem to have any independent signatures on your ETH wallet, not sure it counts as proper escrow.

Finally, you are planning to convert BTC to ETH immediately upon receiving. I guess given you don't have a refund feature it does not matter so much. Otherwise not sure I would be so happy to get ETH back at an unknown exchange rate after investing BTC, should the ICO not go ahead.

To clarify, token holders get paid first. also, the management fee is only after profits have been earned.
We will be using multisignature for the sale and there will be independent signatures on the ETH wallet when this is executed.

newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Mainstreet team, any comments on the below please?

Had a look at the offering memorandum v.2. Improving investor economics to 50% vs 30% is great, thank you.

How would you explain introduction of 5% management fee though? Seems high + you will be paid ahead of investors which does not seem to be in line with the preferred return concept.

Also, you do not seem to have any independent signatures on your ETH wallet, not sure it counts as proper escrow.

Finally, you are planning to convert BTC to ETH immediately upon receiving. I guess given you don't have a refund feature it does not matter so much. Otherwise not sure I would be so happy to get ETH back at an unknown exchange rate after investing BTC, should the ICO not go ahead.

To clarify, token holders get paid first. also, the management fee is only after profits have been earned.
We will be using multisignature for the sale and there will be independent signatures on the ETH wallet when this is executed.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Still waiting for the escrow Huh

Hi, there won't be escrow for this sale as they are using an ethereum smart contract and multisig
hero member
Activity: 2147
Merit: 518
Charlie featured on bitcoin.com  Smiley

Charlie Shrem Speaks About His New Investment Fund



I dont care if he's on CNN. Hes a law breaker, a criminal and I can never trust him. The same way I would never hire a criminal to work in my restaurant.

Dont forget that hes a wife beater and a murderer. He killed a former vietnam veteran after he refused ride home with him.
Pages:
Jump to: