Pages:
Author

Topic: [CARBON][SM] Carboncoin | For a Greener Future - Efficient+Secure+Sustainable - page 17. (Read 57424 times)

member
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
You can buy half a percent of the total 16 billion (a reasonable Dev premine) here https://yobit.net/en/trade/CARBON/BTC for less than 2 BTC (and this is all that is currently left on the market) - I don't know how this compares to many of the ICO's out there but this project is live and we're gunning for it to work
member
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
Our goal is to provide secure value storage and transfer facility automatically with our fixed total of 16 Billion coins. We will certainly implement rewards to those providing hashing nodes but these will not incentivise competitive mining.
member
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
Are you saying you will fork to Proof of Stake?

No but have a network of masternodes processing transactions - there is no need for a secondary hashing layer
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 250
Are you saying you will fork to Proof of Stake?
member
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
Lots of chat on the wires about Masternodes today. Y'all do realise that Carboncoin is a masternode system when it's fully deployed don't you?

Nope.

Probably a good time to make that clear then. It's developed organically thus far, without formal fundraising, but it can upscale as soon as we want/need it to. Our goal is to make it unstoppable.

How's the testing been going?
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 250
Lots of chat on the wires about Masternodes today. Y'all do realise that Carboncoin is a masternode system when it's fully deployed don't you?

Nope.
member
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
Lots of chat on the wires about Masternodes today. Y'all do realise that Carboncoin is a masternode system when it's fully deployed don't you?
member
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
We have added the distribution bubble chart to the homepage

www.carboncoin.cc
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0


EDIT: If you want to have a look at most of the cryptocurrencies in existence 2% of total circ is extremely low. Have a delve into some of the rich lists of some of the major cryptocurrencies.



Wow that is really surprising! Many of them have well over 4% of coins in the largest wallet and it's not even for a good cause
sr. member
Activity: 407
Merit: 250

They got more than 2 percent. I assure u that they do hold much more of a carbon than sheeple thinks, but as long as the price is low as it is now the size of their holdings has a little to no weight on impartiality and fairness of distribution because everyone can amass as more carbon as they wish though more time may be needed. Note theres no activity in markets which proves the point that money does not change hands meaning everyone is deliberately overlooking this coin. Why? Seek whales among ur supporters and betrayers and ask them.

Each individual is urged not to own more than 2%. I would not stop any member of the team owning the maximum if they wished to pay what it cost to acquire it, moreover for three years of hard work, 2% of a coin valued at $370 000, isn't really all that much - remember these coins are not as a result of any premine and therefore would absolutely have to be acquired fair and square through either mining or trading.

EDIT: If you want to have a look at most of the cryptocurrencies in existence 2% of total circ is extremely low. Have a delve into some of the rich lists of some of the major cryptocurrencies.

Some 70% of the circulation of the coin has been placed into the hands of people new to cryptocurrencies in accordance with this 2% rule. This is a decent explanation for the absence of any sell-side depth on the exchange.

The lack of trading is due in part to the large gap between bid and offer price, and in part due to the fact that our business to business operations haven't even started yet.

The reality as was previously mentioned is that you could not get 2% right now if you wanted to at exchange, they are not available.

I do not know who you are referring to when you mention sheeple, that would imply some sort of mass participation, which I actually feel we have yet to see to any real extent yet. Yet, of course, is the big word there.
hero member
Activity: 2147
Merit: 518
If dev was selling coins, then clearly he had more than 2%.

Simply not true when coins are available on exchange, however balances can fluctuate short term (it's an unrestricted protocol)  subject to the principal that no one maintains a long term position of more than 2% of total circulation.

Thanks for your continued interest. You are looking at a great deal of hard work from several good people.

Are you considering joining the network?

They got more than 2 percent. I assure u that they do hold much more of a carbon than sheeple thinks, but as long as the price is low as it is now the size of their holdings has a little to no weight on impartiality and fairness of distribution because everyone can amass as more carbon as they wish though more time may be needed. Note theres no activity in markets which proves the point that money does not change hands meaning everyone is deliberately overlooking this coin. Why? Seek whales among ur supporters and betrayers and ask them.
sr. member
Activity: 407
Merit: 250
Here is the start of the story https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-carbon-coin-payout-x15-and-more-at-launch-cryptorush-465364, you should be able to complete most of your due diligence from starting there.

You may also like to check out the carboncointalk forum which is there for when we need it but populated with a great deal of useful information, as well as the twitter and facebook accounts which are easily discoverable from our homepage which you can find linked above or by googling Carboncoin.
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 250
You have had straight answers to all of your questions and failed to answer any questions asked of you, specifically regarding any intentions you may have. The only conclusion is that your intentions are not constructive and until you can show me otherwise you shall have no more of my attention. Best of luck with your chosen path.

Just doing basic due diligence before investing in a project. This is normal.


sr. member
Activity: 407
Merit: 250
You have had straight answers to all of your questions and failed to answer any questions asked of you, specifically regarding any intentions you may have. The only conclusion is that your intentions are not constructive and until you can show me otherwise you shall have no more of my attention. Best of luck with your chosen path.
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 250
Sorry who are you? and define Dev?

We have an original developer who no one knows, which I am sure you are aware affords us the same legal advantages as Bitcoin (cf. Satoshi Nakamoto)

We have had many others work on the project subsequently, and I have been instrumental in providing and finding resources for us to get as far as we have.

Would you care to answer my question about your intentions regarding the network? Many thanks

Can't seem to get a straight answer.
sr. member
Activity: 407
Merit: 250
Sorry who are you? and define Dev?

We have an original developer who no one knows, which I am sure you are aware affords us the same legal advantages as Bitcoin (cf. Satoshi Nakamoto)

We have had many others work on the project subsequently, and I have been instrumental in providing and finding resources for us to get as far as we have.

Would you care to answer my question about your intentions regarding the network? Many thanks
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 250
The original issuer of coins (the person who started the blockchain) remains completely anonymous and unknown to anyone currently working on the project.

There is nothing wrong with anyone selling/exchanging coins on or off the market, as with bitcoin.

So you are not the dev?
sr. member
Activity: 407
Merit: 250
The original issuer of coins (the person who started the blockchain) remains completely anonymous and unknown to anyone currently working on the project.

There is nothing wrong with anyone selling/exchanging coins on or off the market, as with bitcoin.
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 250
Are you saying dev wasn't selling coins?
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 250
If dev was selling coins, then clearly he had more than 2%.

Simply not true when coins are available on exchange, however balances can fluctuate short term (it's an unrestricted protocol)  subject to the principal that no one maintains a long term position of more than 2% of total circulation.

Thanks for your continued interest. You are looking at a great deal of hard work from several good people.

Are you considering joining the network?

What's not true?
Pages:
Jump to: