Topic: Casinopunkz.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | No KYC | 100% Welcome Bonus - page 9. (Read 3200 times)

Welcome to bitcointalk forum and good luck with your stay here.
I did a quick test of casinopunkz website and I dont like left sidebar that only has icons with titles showing up when hover over them.
Pages are opening in normal speed and I dont have any complains about that, but I need to have something more to make me register account in another casino.

The point is that governments force casinos to have a license and comply with KYC, and they do this for physical casinos. So it would be very strange if all physical casinos were required to have a license and comply with KYC but online casinos were not required to comply with KYC and were not required to have a license. The Internet is not an isolated world in which government laws do not work. That is why in my opinion this casino, as well as all casinos in the future, will require mandatory KYC. The sooner we all get used to KYC, the better, because that way we avoid being fooled by casinos that promise not to ask for KYC but in months or years will start asking for KYC.

Thanks for sharing. I’m not aware that this license seems being use already by new Casino like Metawin. Never tried to play on Metawin but they have solid community so I will consider this license somehow reliable.

The tricky part on Metawin is they are operating in Curacao while they have license on Anjoua. They might have backup that support their license that’s why they venture on this new license provider rather not well known license.

Many people love privacy that is basic human rights and nowadays, there are less and less no-KYC platforms from centralized exchanges to gambling sites to use.

Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless

With more and more regulations on Bitcoin, cryptocurrency and online gambling industries, do you imagine that someday your platform will have to obey to KYC/AML and enforce KYC on your platform?

Thank you for the warm welcome and your feedback! We’re glad you liked the retro theme and the pink color combination—it’s something we’re proud of.

You’ve raised a good point about the No KYC feature. While it’s designed for privacy, we’re taking steps to minimize any potential misuse.

Regarding Bitcointalk-exclusive promotions, we’ve got something special in the works for this community. Stay tuned—we’ll share updates soon! Looking forward to your detailed review once you’ve checked out the games.

They haven’t announced anything about adding sports betting to their platform yet. I think they’re pretty focused on casino games for now. Sure, a lot of casinos these days are adding sports betting, but it’s not for everyone. Sports betting comes with different regulations since they’d need to partner with an odds provider, which isn’t exactly simple, especially for an "Anonymous Crypto Casino."

Hey, will you offer sportsbetting too soon ?

Actually, cryptopunkz is also a no no mandatory kyc casino -- not to be confused with no kyc. I think the thread title should be changed to no-mandatory kyc instead.


I'm not op but metawin.com has an Anjouan license as well.

TBH, I wasn't aware of Anjouan gaming license until Skel -- metawin CEO -- brought it up but I believe we'll likely be seeing more casinos with Anjouan license. From what he has told us, they are more welcoming to web3 tech hence why he made the move from Curacao GCB license.

There's also evo.io. Well, they're pretty new so some might say, they're not at reputable level yet but I believe it's very promising and team has a good direction as well.

Welcome to the forum..

This is my first time to see a casino operates under the license of Anjouan which is new to me. I’m not sure how this no KYC works on a fully regulated casino because they kinda contradict to each other but this a good news to all gamblers that seek anonymous gaming.

This license is a breakthrough to the typical Curacao license that enforced mandatory KYC if Anjouan license is proven trusted and reliable.

@OP can you point out to me what other reputable casino use this same license?

They tend to exaggerate a bit to attract gamblers, but we know how it works. Once a casino has a license, they can’t go fully anonymous. However, if their provider isn’t strictly monitoring them, they might relax their implementation of KYC requirements. It’s similar to Binance, which wasn’t strict with KYC before but later faced charges for not enforcing rules to prevent money laundering.

In this case, the risk lies with the casinos or platforms. While they try to offer a way to protect our privacy as much as possible, they’re the ones who could face legal consequences if they fall short on compliance, but it's none of our business.

Like a centralized exchange can launch their DEX, Web3 wallet but if they began as a centralized exchange, with known founders, co-founders, their team are known by governments and they are already under radars of governments for any law enforcement in future. KYC and AML will be required by governments even with DEX, Web3 products from the centralized team.

They will not do this if there is no order from governments.

It's certainly that if governments send that order to the team, they will obey it shortly because it will keep their team are safe from legal threats, and it will also help their business operation continuation.

and in this matter mostly comes the issue , many casinos uses this option to take the advantage of getting against their players specially when winning comes , and when bigger amount is involved .
sorry am not saying that you are one of those but what comes here is the idea of claiming to be No-KYC but in the end there  will comes place .
anyway this is about the players to  believe and trust the system .

Welcome here and hope to see more update and advertisement from your team guys .

Usually web3 casino offering this no KYC feature, But for other out of that thing maybe in future they require this especially when there's something to look at on their users account. Also when they had been hit up  by  certain regulations just like what other big casino experience.

But guess they don't bother this for now since they are new and maybe the only thing we could expect that maybe in future this KYC requirements will be ask to their players. Being transparent on KYC requirements is really important and for sure that they could able to see that people is fine providing this requirement as long as they can show that people can trust their casino.

That is true, but the fact is that these so called no KYC casinos are all fake and usually request KYC whenever they feel like it which is why their big claims cannot be trusted. I have experienced this particular case myself unfortunately.

Only decentralised sites are proper no KYC casinos, but they cannot offer 100% anonymity either and they aren't as popular as their centralised counterparts.

Welcome to the forum @casinopunkz, I'm amazed with your Retro UI because it looks nice. At least not many retro themed casinos out there so it can be a good branding for your business that makes you different from the others. No doubt that UI/UX alone is not enough to attract new customers so you also need to have much more interesting offers for your customers. Currently there is only 1 available promotion and 1 tournament on your casino.

The promotion is 100% deposit bonus, unfortunately it comes with 40x wagering requirement (deposit + bonus) so basically it is 80x of the deposit. Isn't it too high wagering requirement? Usually wagering requirement is applied to the bonus or the deposit amount only, I think need to review your deposit bonus terms and consider to make a change. While the tournament is a multiplier contest with 1000EUR prizepool but the minimum bet to be eligible is too big imho (1EUR) but looking at the finished tournament, I'm surprised to see that all the winners are with less than 60x multiplier. Even less than 10x won the 3rd to 5th prize, it seems that currently you dont have enough players but it is reasonable since you are still new casino.

Coming up to the "no KYC" discussion above, I agree with most members here. It is better for you to remove the marketing gimmick because in the reality you have the right to ask KYC at anytime. I know that you use it to attract customers but I believe potential customers will be preferred to read real fact (not just gimmick).

Most of the casinos enforce the KYC verification rules to any users for similar reasons. It is completely unethical business practice to do the marketing with 'anonymous' and 'No-KYC' in the title while you will ask for KYC verification on some situation. There are a small number casinos where the KYC verification is mandatory now. Otherwise, it depends on the situation on most other casinos. I hope that you will remove those words from your marketing strategy (ANN thread title) for transparency.

It's unnecessary marketing in my opinion. 99/100 crypto casinos are no-KYC by default, and they all like to advertise it somehow. But if you spend some time reading their terms and conditions, you learn that there can be many reasons why they can ask you for KYC. Not to mention that they partner with different game providers, which can also request the casino to submit information about you if there is something suspicious going on. 

Well some casino make it a marketing stunt to announce that they are KYC free, so that people get attracted to the casino. Later when they find out that they are being ask for KYC at withdrawal, than they feel annoyed and think that the casino told false at the start. It is always better to play at a honest KYC casino and not at a dishonest casino without KYC. If the casino is very clear in the KYC policy, the gamblers like this transparency and they will still be attracted to the casino.

Showing false advertisements to promote the casino will never be helpful to gain the long term gamblers to the site. People will just come and go once they know the reality.

Wonderful! I thought as much because you could rarely get to find an online registered licensed casino nowadays that's absolutely KYC free. If such  is truly KYC free as claimed then it's either they are legally licensed/recognised or they are using a no KYC as a way to allure and fascinate users into their platform.

Coming clean in their ANN thread to make it known that it's a KYC casino still won't stop interested users from using their services in as much as they render quality and fair  service. Taking gamblers unaware isn't anything encouraging especially with KYC issues.

Even though it is a general rule that the casino can ask for KYC for special cases, putting that out in black and white will always be better so that individuals will be aware of the rules. I like setting the records straight from the beginning not when users have won something significant.

I fine this part somehow confusing because some casinos prohibits the use of VPN especially when they are aiming to stop people from restricted countries from using their services. I think Casinopunk running an open policy especially in the aspect of the use of VPN is a good one for them as that will eliminate some of the problems that lead to account closure of some individuals.