Ethereum platform does not completely meet requirements for a blockchain for Casper. Graphene platform fully meets requirements for Casper creation. If the Ethereum is not be developed on sufficient level to fit by all parameters by the time of prototype readiness the user version will be written for Graphene. Is that true?
Ohhh I'll get my research too about this but Ethereum is really great I don't have much information on Graphene platform unlike Ethereum platform that has really made their name here in crypto world and they are really good because their technology was really great and their Smart Contract also. But I hope they still choose Ethereum but right now I'll do my own search about on this. Thanks for the share.
Okay this is based on whitepaper that i've read, just wanna share it to you and for everyone who's reading.
Platform Compliance Criteria1.
Availability of smart contractsThe Ethereum platform supports smart contracts in Turing-complete language. The
Graphene platform supports smart contracts, however, not-Turing-complete language of
smart contracts requires more detailed work during programming. Turing-complete language
of Ethereum smart contracts simplify development.
2.
Quick execution of transactionsBoth Graphene and Ethereum execute transactions within fractions of
seconds which is satisfactory for Casper service.
3.
Execution of substantial amount of transactions per secondToday, the Ethereum platform does not match by platform performance but
Ethereum team develops transition from PoW algorithm to PoS algorithm, and
seriousness of team approach to development and testing allows us to trust
implementation being prepared. The PoW algorithm used to compose digital
signature of blockchain log is such that it makes hard to rewrite the log. Barrier for
rewriting consists in time-consuming calculations on computer which consume
processor time. Due to more complex cryptography the PoS algorithm protects a log
against rewriting without time-consuming calculations. Transition to PoS must
increase Ethereum performance to suitable level.
4.
Reliability of implementationGraphene and Ethereum have multiply proven implementations.
5.
Public credibilityBoth Graphene and Ethereum have stable and independent miner
community.
Simplicity of development under Ethereum and planned transition to PoS determined the
selection of this platform for Casper prototype development. 722 projects already emerged
within the last 2 years allow us to make conclusion that their rapid development will continue
in future, and demand for them in API for decentralized data storage will only grow further.
In case of Ethereum transition to PoS confirmation, the prototype will be developed to
fully-functional version. Otherwise, after prototype creation, user version will be written for
Graphene or other suitable blockchain.
But the charm of Casper API consists in that you can use it for any DApp, on any
existent or being developed platform. All you need is connection of smart contract of your
DApp with Casper API smart contracts.