Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1065. (Read 2347601 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
970 gets me about 1030
gtx750 gets me 910 )))

That's probably why I don't mine lyra... The GPU usage graph goes up and down in a zig-zag pattern really fast too. I assume there is something wrong with the miner at least for 970s.

Using the TPR fork it doesn't zig-zag, but still only get around 1100 hash.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
970 gets me about 1030
gtx750 gets me 910 )))

Thanks , mates , I couldn't get more than 820kh/s with my 750TIs.
Which clock do you using with it..
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Which are the speeds of r.52 on lyra2re ?

970 gets me about 1030


Funny... you're complaining about people not advertising the existence and specifications of private miners, yet as far as I know, I was one of the first in the field to do this, and I continue to do so...

'Bragging' about your miner in various threads and telling people you don't like it's 'private' is not the same thing as advertising that you're selling it. You also don't have a set price for your product do you? That's not the same thing as SP saying he has a miner, telling you the specs, and that it's .1BTC for it. He'll tell you how much it hashes on what cards and how much power it uses. Not 'it runs very cool'.

You could even add these things to your signature... But you don't... why is that? The absolute easiest place to advertise in the world and get attention... Huh...
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
Which are the speeds of r.52 on lyra2re ?
newbie
Activity: 94
Merit: 0


I'm not interested in AMD mining at all, I'm all for nvidia but it is valuable to know how those cards will run because they could potentially cripple the green team especially because they will be cheap (R9 390X 8GB - $390; R9 390 8GB - $329).

And to be completely honest I wish more people would advertise their private miners because as much as I appreciate sp_, tpruvot, djm34 and other's work their optimizations are being used by everyone because they are free and in reality if everyone has fast miners then nobody really have an advantage.
It might be a good example (or just a coincidence) that since sp_ announced a week ago that he "pushed Quark on the AMD 280x from 1.7 MHASH to 4,5MHASH on standard clocks" the weekly average hashrate on yaamp for quark increased from 572 mh/s to 852 mh/s even though the profit decreased from 0.051 to 0.0398 mbtc/mh/d. And apparently there's a private russian miner which does 11mh/s (280x)


11Mh was a long time now 13-15Mh 
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
Where is djm34 with his optimized lyra ccminer? )))))))))))))))
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
Speaking of one card per instance.  I am actually trying to control that.. I want to run one card per instance... Easy enough for the GPU (using -d ) however i cant seem to control wich core of the cpu processes for a specified GPU.  
Does the CPU affinity command control this and if so how do we utilize it.
Perhaps i can be pointed to the line of code and i can compile/build a custom version for my needs


When running one instance per card, you will need to use -b to specify a different port for each additional instance:
 
Code:
-b 127.0.0.1:5068 

And yes, --cpu-affinity allows you to set the specific core you want that instance to use:

Code:
--cpu-affinity 3

Thanks Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
nothing about power consumption in that AMD release article.  which, for miners with > free electricity, means almost everything.

The 390x is rumored to have 300W TDP and they will be released on June 18th and the flagship device, Fury will be released on June 24th. I'll be curious what Wolf0 will crank out of those ones.

It's not going to matter. Wolf0 makes private kernels and sells them to the select few. Good reason if any to stay away from AMD. I was already there and saw that.

And yeah, efficiency...

I'm not interested in AMD mining at all, I'm all for nvidia but it is valuable to know how those cards will run because they could potentially cripple the green team especially because they will be cheap (R9 390X 8GB - $390; R9 390 8GB - $329).

And to be completely honest I wish more people would advertise their private miners because as much as I appreciate sp_, tpruvot, djm34 and other's work their optimizations are being used by everyone because they are free and in reality if everyone has fast miners then nobody really have an advantage.
It might be a good example (or just a coincidence) that since sp_ announced a week ago that he "pushed Quark on the AMD 280x from 1.7 MHASH to 4,5MHASH on standard clocks" the weekly average hashrate on yaamp for quark increased from 572 mh/s to 852 mh/s even though the profit decreased from 0.051 to 0.0398 mbtc/mh/d. And apparently there's a private russian miner which does 11mh/s (280x) and if that was free, quark mining would turn unprofitable very fast. So really, you either have very cheap electiricty, a fast private miner or tons of time to research coins nobody is looking at.

Miners mine mainly for profit so why shouldn't devs prioritize their profits as well? Assuming sp_ haven't changed his donation address he only received 4.6 BTC in the last 9 months meanwhile on yaamp alone currently there are 98 miners (with who knows how many cards per miner) using different SP-MOD ccminer forks. How many of those people ever donated or even knew this thread existed? Sure, private miners have plenty of cons on both sides but I'd certainly like to know the options.

Yup... outside of mining AMD has really good bang for your buck and these new ones sound like killer deals once again.

Also agree about people advertising their private miners and even suggested it to great lengths as small miners could get a idea of entry costs into mining which are currently obfuscated by not having a market you can buy these on. Strange isn't it? We live in a environment of extremely transparent and fluid money, yet what we use to mine it seems to be a extremely guarded secret...

I'm not against paying someone for their work and buying a 'product', but if people don't know it exists or refuse to sell it to everyone... it's kinda... That's what happened with AMD and why I abandon it.

Quoted for emphasis. Everyone should truly consider some sort of crowdfunding. I have a long running joke about people wanting more performance and sort but don't tell anyone (LOL)!

Yup and I mentioned this to both Wolf0 and DJM and they enjoyed a two page rant of making fun of me for suggesting such a thing. To paraphrase, a miner with a built in fee will always be re-engineered to be free, no one donates, and if they sold it so normal miners could afford it, it would get leaked sooner...

I'm not against a miner with a built in fee as well as long as it's reasonable (like 2%).
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
However, I take offense to those that make false accusations of leeching.

That was not my intention, I was just trying to point out that private miners are probably more profitable for devs.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
And to be completely honest I wish more people would advertise their private miners because as much as I appreciate sp_, tpruvot, djm34 and other's work their optimizations are being used by everyone because they are free and in reality if everyone has fast miners then nobody really have an advantage.
It might be a good example (or just a coincidence) that since sp_ announced a week ago that he "pushed Quark on the AMD 280x from 1.7 MHASH to 4,5MHASH on standard clocks" the weekly average hashrate on yaamp for quark increased from 572 mh/s to 852 mh/s even though the profit decreased from 0.051 to 0.0398 mbtc/mh/d. And apparently there's a private russian miner which does 11mh/s (280x) and if that was free, quark mining would turn unprofitable very fast. So really, you either have very cheap electiricty, a fast private miner or tons of time to research coins nobody is looking at.

Miners mine mainly for profit so why shouldn't devs prioritize their profits as well? Assuming sp_ haven't changed his donation address he only received 4.6 BTC in the last 9 months meanwhile on yaamp alone currently there are 98 miners (with who knows how many cards per miner) using different SP-MOD ccminer forks. How many of those people ever donated or even knew this thread existed? Sure, private miners have plenty of cons on both sides but I'd certainly like to know the options.
Quoted for emphasis. Everyone should truly consider some sort of crowdfunding. I have a long running joke about people wanting more performance and sort but don't tell anyone (LOL)!
hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 500
MOBU
Got it...I came in on the middle of the conversation, I guess.

Yes....I'm sure that a lot of ppl don't respect what is being done or helping out the devs. However, I take offense to those that make false accusations of leeching.
hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 500
MOBU
Got it...I came in on the middle of the conversation, I guess.
hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 500
MOBU
Miners mine mainly for profit so why shouldn't devs prioritize their profits as well? Assuming sp_ haven't changed his donation address he only received 4.6 BTC in the last 9 months meanwhile on yaamp alone currently there are 98 miners (with who knows how many cards per miner) using different SP-MOD ccminer forks. How many of those people ever donated or even knew this thread existed? Sure, private miners have plenty of cons on both sides but I'd certainly like to know the options.
[/quote]




You can't just look at BTC donations. Some of us donated mining time to DASH & development time/trials.
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
nothing about power consumption in that AMD release article.  which, for miners with > free electricity, means almost everything.

The 390x is rumored to have 300W TDP and they will be released on June 18th and the flagship device, Fury will be released on June 24th. I'll be curious what Wolf0 will crank out of those ones.

It's not going to matter. Wolf0 makes private kernels and sells them to the select few. Good reason if any to stay away from AMD. I was already there and saw that.

And yeah, efficiency...

I'm not interested in AMD mining at all, I'm all for nvidia but it is valuable to know how those cards will run because they could potentially cripple the green team especially because they will be cheap (R9 390X 8GB - $390; R9 390 8GB - $329).

And to be completely honest I wish more people would advertise their private miners because as much as I appreciate sp_, tpruvot, djm34 and other's work their optimizations are being used by everyone because they are free and in reality if everyone has fast miners then nobody really have an advantage.
It might be a good example (or just a coincidence) that since sp_ announced a week ago that he "pushed Quark on the AMD 280x from 1.7 MHASH to 4,5MHASH on standard clocks" the weekly average hashrate on yaamp for quark increased from 572 mh/s to 852 mh/s even though the profit decreased from 0.051 to 0.0398 mbtc/mh/d. And apparently there's a private russian miner which does 11mh/s (280x) and if that was free, quark mining would turn unprofitable very fast. So really, you either have very cheap electiricty, a fast private miner or tons of time to research coins nobody is looking at.

Miners mine mainly for profit so why shouldn't devs prioritize their profits as well? Assuming sp_ haven't changed his donation address he only received 4.6 BTC in the last 9 months meanwhile on yaamp alone currently there are 98 miners (with who knows how many cards per miner) using different SP-MOD ccminer forks. How many of those people ever donated or even knew this thread existed? Sure, private miners have plenty of cons on both sides but I'd certainly like to know the options.
sr. member
Activity: 318
Merit: 250
Amazon rock, just returned a 750ti bought almost a year ago as the fan failed, they have given me a full refund.



Should've RMA'd that to the manufacturer. Not sure why Amazon would honor a return like that.

I'm very happy, mined on the card for a year and now I have my £109 back to put towards my next purchase.  Amazon even paid for the return postage.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Amazon rock, just returned a 750ti bought almost a year ago as the fan failed, they have given me a full refund.



Should've RMA'd that to the manufacturer. Not sure why Amazon would honor a return like that.
sr. member
Activity: 318
Merit: 250
Amazon rock, just returned a 750ti bought almost a year ago as the fan failed, they have given me a full refund.

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
nothing about power consumption in that AMD release article.  which, for miners with > free electricity, means almost everything.

The 390x is rumored to have 300W TDP and they will be released on June 18th and the flagship device, Fury will be released on June 24th. I'll be curious what Wolf0 will crank out of those ones.

It's not going to matter. Wolf0 makes private kernels and sells them to the select few. Good reason if any to stay away from AMD. I was already there and saw that.

And yeah, efficiency...
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
nothing about power consumption in that AMD release article.  which, for miners with > free electricity, means almost everything.

The 390x is rumored to have 300W TDP and they will be released on June 18th and the flagship device, Fury will be released on June 24th. I'll be curious what Wolf0 will crank out of those ones.

i think EVERYONE will be interested in what wolf does with these cards ...

wolf - i want to be first in line mate Wink ...

#crysx

I've got a free one coming to me the moment they drop. And no, it's not some farmer wanting me to optimize; there's no strings attached. A guy owes me a favor.

which one? ...

australia is ALWAYS behind in all this - so we will not see the cards for a while after they are released ...

i really need to move to a place thats more current - like the us or uk or eu ... o bugger it - anywhere else Tongue ...

#crysx

You could utilize a buyer in one of those areas, an agreed-upon cryptocurrency of choice, and a provider of escrow so that you could probably have it in your hands within a week or so of its release in whatever area your buyer is in.


that is a possibility ... but so is amazon Tongue ...

i suppose if any new cards come out - its probably better to wait till they hit the shelves here for warranty purposes ...

am waiting on the new optimizations that sp is going to release ... will be something to see when the new cards come out for nvidia also ...

#crysx
Jump to: