Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1134. (Read 2347601 times)
Release 45 gives twice slower speed on qubit with bunch of CPU validation errors:
looks like there is a bug in build 45 on some rigs. only 2 of 6 cards are hashing. working on it
the current compile of 45 actually broke x11 for the systems here sp ...
quark runs nicely though
...out of memory and core dump errors ... and 44 is fine with those algos though ...
#crysx
here are my numbers with the current build 45
Any suggestions to improve my output would be greatly appreciated
Using this startup
ccminer -i 21 -a x11 -o stratum+tcp://us-east1.dash.miningpoolhub.com:20465 -u user -p d=0.1
using precisionX to bump the GPU to +266 MHz
seems to do great rapid acceptance fo the first 7 then after that each line takes awhile like 10 seconds or more
[2015-04-18 08:43:35] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 10474 kH/s
[2015-04-18 08:43:35] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 10474 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-04-18 08:43:37] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 10559 kH/s
[2015-04-18 08:43:37] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 10517 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-04-18 08:43:41] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 10617 kH/s
[2015-04-18 08:43:41] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 10550 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-04-18 08:43:44] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 10612 kH/s
[2015-04-18 08:43:44] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 10566 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-04-18 08:43:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 10592 kH/s
[2015-04-18 08:43:47] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 10571 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-04-18 08:43:48] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 10759 kH/s
[2015-04-18 08:43:48] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 10602 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-04-18 08:43:50] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 10638 kH/s
[2015-04-18 08:43:50] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 10607 khash/s yay!!!
What is a good difficulty setting for a 6 card 750ti rig on Qubit. Thx
looks like there is a bug in build 45 on some rigs. only 2 of 6 cards are hashing. working on it
1.5.45(sp-MOD) is available here: (18-april-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.45
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.45
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
I have added a threads per gpu parameter just like in sgminer. ex: -g 2
Some algos get a boost.
Most impovement on compute 5.2 devices. (960,970,980)
x11 with -g 2 on the 750 ti, the performance is reduced by 0.5MHASH.
The parameter is not always producing higher hashrates.
The stats are reported by each thread, so some more work is needed. (run with -q, so the screen is not flooded with hashrates)
Note that -g 2 will reduce the intensity by one. this can be overridden with the -i parameter.
I will build release 45 now.
Some algos get a boost.
Most impovement on compute 5.2 devices. (960,970,980)
x11 with -g 2 on the 750 ti, the performance is reduced by 0.5MHASH.
The parameter is not always producing higher hashrates.
The stats are reported by each thread, so some more work is needed. (run with -q, so the screen is not flooded with hashrates)
Note that -g 2 will reduce the intensity by one. this can be overridden with the -i parameter.
I will build release 45 now.
awesome ...
cant wait sp ... tanx mate ...
#crysx
I have added a threads per gpu parameter just like in sgminer. ex: -g 2
Some algos get a boost.
Most impovement on compute 5.2 devices. (960,970,980)
x11 with -g 2 on the 750 ti, the performance is reduced by 0.5MHASH.
The parameter is not always producing higher hashrates.
The stats are reported by each thread, so some more work is needed. (run with -q, so the screen is not flooded with hashrates)
Note that -g 2 will reduce the intensity by one. this can be overridden with the -i parameter.
I will build release 45 now.
Some algos get a boost.
Most impovement on compute 5.2 devices. (960,970,980)
x11 with -g 2 on the 750 ti, the performance is reduced by 0.5MHASH.
The parameter is not always producing higher hashrates.
The stats are reported by each thread, so some more work is needed. (run with -q, so the screen is not flooded with hashrates)
Note that -g 2 will reduce the intensity by one. this can be overridden with the -i parameter.
I will build release 45 now.
If anyone is interested in renting Quark hashing power or mining Quark algo for BTC payouts: we added Quark algorithm to NiceHash.com/WestHash.com
Kind regards,
NiceHash
Kind regards,
NiceHash
now THAT is news ...
will test with the farm when it comes out of rental ...
tanx ...
#crysx
If anyone is interested in renting Quark hashing power or mining Quark algo for BTC payouts: we added Quark algorithm to NiceHash.com/WestHash.com
Kind regards,
NiceHash
Kind regards,
NiceHash
To clarify, yaamp's website has so many scripts running that it slows down my GTX 960 if I am watching the website and mining with my GTX 960 at the same time.
Man. Is that firefox?probably - mine does it too ...
not as bad as in chrome ...
this is all in linux too ...
#crysx
To clarify, yaamp's website has so many scripts running that it slows down my GTX 960 if I am watching the website and mining with my GTX 960 at the same time.
Man. Is that firefox? 
Yaamp has added the skein and the groestl algos...
VERSION 44e (my 5th compilation on Linux, your latest git)Skein rocks on Yaamp at 452,800kh/s for my 6x750ti FTW rig, or 75,000+ kh/s per 750ti. These hash rates are similar to Whirlpoolx rates.
Groestl only gives me rejects on Yaamp, 100% red "booooos". Might be poolside...
These two algos have not seen much use yet, payout is currently low. --scryptr
How much faster is SKEIN than the 1.6.1 ? (tpruvot version)
75MHASH is around 25 times faster than x11. Yamp is paying 0.0152 per GHASH. is 0.0152 *25 =0,38 per GHASH (x11 adusted rate )
mining x11 directly will only give you 0.199 per GHASH with the current rates..
NEW ALGOS--
I agree. However, no-one is getting shares for Groestl accepted at Yaamp just now. I saw sgminer v5.1.1 receiving 100% rejects, and CPUminer v2.3.2 receiving 100% rejects, and with your code I got the same.
Looks like a poolside problem.
I'll try tpruvot's miner sometime today.
Another note, my quark rate dropped slightly with this hours-old build, 36600 to about 36430 for the rig.
I have trouble making sense of Yaamps graphs, charts, and payout rates. Staying on their website is a real load for my system, also. It cuts mining performance 20-25%. --scryptr
Hmmmm...
To clarify, yaamp's website has so many scripts running that it slows down my GTX 960 if I am watching the website and mining with my GTX 960 at the same time. My dedicated, headless rigs are not affected by this. --scryptr
p.s. sp_'s latest builds on v44 are top performers. I checked out tpruvot's v 1.6.1 and KlausT's v 3.0 and they lag behind on most algos in kh/s. Both authors focus on other areas besides top performance, and both have fixed coding errors for other coders, as well. I am getting 9.4Mh/s with my GTX 960 SSC for Quark, at default intensity with v44e by sp_hash. --scryptr
I think yaamp sometimes have bandwidth problems. Curent hashrate is 9.2GHASH @ quark..
7.2% fee but the payout is 0.37BTC/GHASH
If you are testing the 1.6.1 release on linux, please test the quark performance as well.
And they charge 2% BTC fee. wow. 7.2% fee but the payout is 0.37BTC/GHASH
If you are testing the 1.6.1 release on linux, please test the quark performance as well.
Yaamp has added the skein and the groestl algos...
VERSION 44e (my 5th compilation on Linux, your latest git)Skein rocks on Yaamp at 452,800kh/s for my 6x750ti FTW rig, or 75,000+ kh/s per 750ti. These hash rates are similar to Whirlpoolx rates.
Groestl only gives me rejects on Yaamp, 100% red "booooos". Might be poolside...
These two algos have not seen much use yet, payout is currently low. --scryptr
How much faster is SKEIN than the 1.6.1 ? (tpruvot version)
75MHASH is around 25 times faster than x11. Yamp is paying 0.0152 per GHASH. is 0.0152 *25 =0,38 per GHASH (x11 adusted rate )
mining x11 directly will only give you 0.199 per GHASH with the current rates..
NEW ALGOS--
I agree. However, no-one is getting shares for Groestl accepted at Yaamp just now. I saw sgminer v5.1.1 receiving 100% rejects, and CPUminer v2.3.2 receiving 100% rejects, and with your code I got the same.
Looks like a poolside problem.
I'll try tpruvot's miner sometime today.
Another note, my quark rate dropped slightly with this hours-old build, 36600 to about 36430 for the rig.
I have trouble making sense of Yaamps graphs, charts, and payout rates. Staying on their website is a real load for my system, also. It cuts mining performance 20-25%. --scryptr
i'll try skein too, but ""ccminer.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp:xxx" not woring !! What should i write to -a ? ))))
-a skein is ok.What ccminer version are you using?
))
i'll try skein too, but ""ccminer.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp:xxx" not woring !! What should i write to -a ? ))))
-a skein is ok.What ccminer version are you using?
)) 
i'll try skein too, but ""ccminer.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp:xxx" not woring !! What should i write to -a ? ))))
-a skein is ok.What ccminer version are you using?
i'll try skein too, but ""ccminer.exe -a skein -o stratum+tcp:xxx" not woring !! What should i write to -a ? ))))
QUARK with SP_-44:
GTX 750Ti - 6,400Mh/s @ 1220/1350 MHz/s
GTX 970 - 15,200MH/s @ 1320/1753 MHz/s
This are my results!
How much do your cards make?
Does increasing the MEM give any additional Mh/s or should I decrease it to lower Power?
GTX 750Ti - 6,400Mh/s @ 1220/1350 MHz/s
GTX 970 - 15,200MH/s @ 1320/1753 MHz/s
This are my results!
How much do your cards make?
Does increasing the MEM give any additional Mh/s or should I decrease it to lower Power?
Jump to: