of course ... i guess the whole concept of optimization is spending time and effort to make the algo perform better - and faster ...
profitability plays a big part in that area - otherwise its not worth it - i understand ...
so if i understand correctly - there is more to be had in the way of better and faster performance with most of these algos - including x11 x13 x15? ...
#crysx
x11,x13 and x15 can be alot faster on NVIDIA if all of the AES implementations are rewritten.
In my quark implementation the chained algorithms are running in parallel, and the speed of the total hash is just a little bit slower than the slowest of the algos wich is groestl.
This meens that quark is not much more secure than groestl with a proper implementation. When kernals are running in parallell, they use 0 time.
Go and write a paper about it.
On bitcointalk.org all we care about it profit and hashrate.
mate - im not in the business of writing papers - nor are we in the business of making it all about profit for the short term ...
its about performance and hashrate - agreed ... but also consistency and reliability ... once that is optimal - the profit and the rest follow ...
you and the other devs have a great deal of respect from us lowly miners ...
...
but thats one thing we know how to do REALLY well ... mine! ...
#crysx
