CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1138.

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on April 14, 2015, 08:45:49 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on April 14, 2015, 08:42:29 AM

Quote from: sp_ on April 14, 2015, 07:55:05 AM

Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results.
Are there any other coins that are using this algo?
If not, I will remove the support in my fork

unfortunately i do not know of any others ...
but i do have a question ... are you going to implement the spreadcoinx11 algo ( amongst some others ) in this fork as you previously mentioned? ...
tanx sp ...
#crysx

I might add scrypt-n..

Just checked, not many profitable scrypt-n coins out there..

Spreadcoin is still only for the donators. New version is coming soon with more hash.

tanx sp ...

we are one of the donors ...

but i thought i would ask due to it being a pain in the backside to continue changing miners on EVERY worker in the farm when we want to mine sprx11 ...

would be so much easier if it was within the one miner ...

tanx again ...

#crysx

antonio8

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: sp_ on April 14, 2015, 08:45:49 AM

Quote from: chrysophylax on April 14, 2015, 08:42:29 AM

Quote from: sp_ on April 14, 2015, 07:55:05 AM

Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results.
Are there any other coins that are using this algo?
If not, I will remove the support in my fork

unfortunately i do not know of any others ...
but i do have a question ... are you going to implement the spreadcoinx11 algo ( amongst some others ) in this fork as you previously mentioned? ...
tanx sp ...
#crysx

I might add scrypt-n..

Just checked, not many profitable scrypt-n coins out there..

Spreadcoin is still only for the donators. New version is coming soon with more hash.

So are you still vacationing is the big question.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: chrysophylax on April 14, 2015, 08:42:29 AM

Quote from: sp_ on April 14, 2015, 07:55:05 AM

Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results.
Are there any other coins that are using this algo?
If not, I will remove the support in my fork

unfortunately i do not know of any others ...
but i do have a question ... are you going to implement the spreadcoinx11 algo ( amongst some others ) in this fork as you previously mentioned? ...
tanx sp ...
#crysx

I might add scrypt-n..

Just checked, not many profitable scrypt-n coins out there..

Spreadcoin is still only for the donators. New version is coming soon with more hash.

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on April 14, 2015, 07:55:05 AM

Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results.
Are there any other coins that are using this algo?

If not, I will remove the support in my fork

unfortunately i do not know of any others ...

but i do have a question ... are you going to implement the spreadcoinx11 algo ( amongst some others ) in this fork as you previously mentioned? ...

tanx sp ...

#crysx

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Yesterday I found out that the hefty 1 algo (mjolnir,heavycoin,securecoin?) is producing wrong results.
Are there any other coins that are using this algo?

If not, I will remove the support in my fork

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Here are the results from cryptomining-blog difference between 43 and 44 (quark /qubit) standard clocks

GTX 750 Ti
– Quark .43 – 5395 KHS
– Quark .44 – 5420 KHS
– Qubit .43 – 4319 KHS
– Qubit .44 – 4440 KHS

GTX 980
– Quark .43 – 15338 KHS
– Quark .44 – 15558 KHS
– Qubit .43 – 13771 KHS
– Qubit .44 – 14115 KHS

My tests show that the unreleased 45(working sourcecode on github) will add another 100KHASH to qubit on the 750ti. (after klaus-t's commit) (win32 windows build)

scryptr

legendary

Activity: 1797

Merit: 1028

Quote from: sp_ on April 14, 2015, 12:19:32 AM

Quote from: scryptr on April 13, 2015, 11:56:32 PM

THANKS! But apparently, sp_ modified his "build.sh" file and re-committed to Github while we were typing here. I re-cloned his Git and it compiled without error. I am running his latest commit on Quark right now, it is a shade slower on my rig, about 150kh/s overall for 6x750ti FTW cards.
I will note this for later use. Thanks again! -scryptr

Builds from the head of git are experimental.

Try qubit. What do you get.

Wich version are you comparing with. (44) ?

SP_ --

I was using a post-release compilation of v44 (v44a). This latest build runs Quark at 36500kh/s for 6x750ti FTW. The older release ran at 36520kh/s. After allowing the rig to run a few hours, it stabilized at the 36500kh/s speed. I'll try Qubit again soon. --scryptr

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: scryptr on April 13, 2015, 11:56:32 PM

THANKS! But apparently, sp_ modified his "build.sh" file and re-committed to Github while we were typing here. I re-cloned his Git and it compiled without error. I am running his latest commit on Quark right now, it is a shade slower on my rig, about 150kh/s overall for 6x750ti FTW cards.
I will note this for later use. Thanks again! -scryptr

Builds from the head of git are experimental.

Try qubit. What do you get.

Wich version are you comparing with. (44) ?

scryptr

legendary

Activity: 1797

Merit: 1028

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: scryptr on April 13, 2015, 11:35:44 PM

Quote from: chrysophylax on April 13, 2015, 11:00:47 PM

Quote from: scryptr on April 13, 2015, 10:41:50 PM

SP_ bmw fix build error --

Attempted to build sp_ 's latest mod (v1.5.44+, just now) and received this error:

"In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8/cstdint:35:0,
from qubit/qubit_luffa512.cu:21:
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/c++0x_warning.h:32:2: error: #error This file requires compiler and library support for the ISO C++ 2011 standard. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 compiler options.
#error This file requires compiler and library support for the \
^
make[2]: *** [qubit/qubit_luffa512.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs...."

My build platform is Ubuntu 14.04.2, and it has built all sp_ mods up to 1.5.44 succesfully. I built with the command
"bash build.sh" within the git build directory. --scryptr

that is strange scrptr ...

ive built it with fedora 19 x64 and it runs beautifully ...

though i do have both stdc++ and gnuc++ installed in the systems ...

#crysx

GNUC++11 --

With "sudo apt-get install gnuc++", I installed the gnuc++ compiler. I still get the same compile error, however, just as I quoted it above. Do I need to edit the build.sh file, or use a command line option when running "bash build.sh"?

--scryptr

First, nuke the entire downloaded directory and use git to clone again. Edit Makefile.am, adding -std=gnu++11 to the line that reads "ccminer_CPPFLAGS = ..." - just put it anywhere after the equals sign. Then do this:

Code:

./autogen.sh
./configure --with-cuda=/path/to/cuda
make

WOLF0 --

THANKS! But apparently, sp_ modified his "build.sh" file and re-committed to Github while we were typing here. I re-cloned his Git and it compiled without error. I am running his latest commit on Quark right now, it is a shade slower on my rig, about 150kh/s overall for 6x750ti FTW cards.

I will note this for later use. Thanks again! -scryptr

scryptr

legendary

Activity: 1797

Merit: 1028

Quote from: chrysophylax on April 13, 2015, 11:00:47 PM

Quote from: scryptr on April 13, 2015, 10:41:50 PM

SP_ bmw fix build error --

Attempted to build sp_ 's latest mod (v1.5.44+, just now) and received this error:

"In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8/cstdint:35:0,
from qubit/qubit_luffa512.cu:21:
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/c++0x_warning.h:32:2: error: #error This file requires compiler and library support for the ISO C++ 2011 standard. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 compiler options.
#error This file requires compiler and library support for the \
^
make[2]: *** [qubit/qubit_luffa512.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs...."

My build platform is Ubuntu 14.04.2, and it has built all sp_ mods up to 1.5.44 succesfully. I built with the command
"bash build.sh" within the git build directory. --scryptr

that is strange scrptr ...

ive built it with fedora 19 x64 and it runs beautifully ...

though i do have both stdc++ and gnuc++ installed in the systems ...

#crysx

GNUC++11 --

With "sudo apt-get install gnuc++", I installed the gnuc++ compiler. I still get the same compile error, however, just as I quoted it above. Do I need to edit the build.sh file, or use a command line option when running "bash build.sh"?

--scryptr

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: scryptr on April 13, 2015, 10:41:50 PM

SP_ bmw fix build error --

Attempted to build sp_ 's latest mod (v1.5.44+, just now) and received this error:

"In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8/cstdint:35:0,
from qubit/qubit_luffa512.cu:21:
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/c++0x_warning.h:32:2: error: #error This file requires compiler and library support for the ISO C++ 2011 standard. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 compiler options.
#error This file requires compiler and library support for the \
^
make[2]: *** [qubit/qubit_luffa512.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs...."

My build platform is Ubuntu 14.04.2, and it has built all sp_ mods up to 1.5.44 succesfully. I built with the command
"bash build.sh" within the git build directory. --scryptr

that is strange scrptr ...

ive built it with fedora 19 x64 and it runs beautifully ...

though i do have both stdc++ and gnuc++ installed in the systems ...

#crysx

scryptr

legendary

Activity: 1797

Merit: 1028

SP_ bmw fix build error --

Attempted to build sp_ 's latest mod (v1.5.44+, just now) and received this error:

"In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8/cstdint:35:0,
from qubit/qubit_luffa512.cu:21:
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/c++0x_warning.h:32:2: error: #error This file requires compiler and library support for the ISO C++ 2011 standard. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 compiler options.
#error This file requires compiler and library support for the \
^
make[2]: *** [qubit/qubit_luffa512.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs...."

My build platform is Ubuntu 14.04.2, and it has built all sp_ mods up to 1.5.44 succesfully. I built with the command
"bash build.sh" within the git build directory. --scryptr

AliMan

hero member

Activity: 1974

Merit: 502

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: totoy on April 10, 2015, 11:19:13 AM

Quote from: AliMan on April 10, 2015, 08:19:00 AM

Quote from: MaxDZ8 on April 10, 2015, 12:29:12 AM

Again, what's up with Qubit? Lots of fuss about it recently.

Yea I don't really see it being profitable at all, DGB was the best of it, but that stopped being profitable sometime back.

this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anncyp-cypher-qubit-we-are-alive-cypher7a69-1006527

Just took notice of this today.

tbearhere

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1003

Quote from: totoy on April 10, 2015, 11:19:13 AM

Quote from: AliMan on April 10, 2015, 08:19:00 AM

Quote from: MaxDZ8 on April 10, 2015, 12:29:12 AM

Again, what's up with Qubit? Lots of fuss about it recently.

Yea I don't really see it being profitable at all, DGB was the best of it, but that stopped being profitable sometime back.

this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anncyp-cypher-qubit-we-are-alive-cypher7a69-1006527

Yup I missed that coin. Qubit too

Grim

sr. member

Activity: 506

Merit: 252

@ sp_ couldn't you optimize scrypt-jane algo nf 15+

you could probably sell it with

cryptonight
spreadx11

for 0.3 btc for all of them

Wink

totoy

hero member

Activity: 623

Merit: 500

Quote from: AliMan on April 10, 2015, 08:19:00 AM

Quote from: MaxDZ8 on April 10, 2015, 12:29:12 AM

Again, what's up with Qubit? Lots of fuss about it recently.

Yea I don't really see it being profitable at all, DGB was the best of it, but that stopped being profitable sometime back.

this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anncyp-cypher-qubit-we-are-alive-cypher7a69-1006527

AliMan

hero member

Activity: 1974

Merit: 502

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Quote from: MaxDZ8 on April 10, 2015, 12:29:12 AM

Again, what's up with Qubit? Lots of fuss about it recently.

Yea I don't really see it being profitable at all, DGB was the best of it, but that stopped being profitable sometime back.

MaxDZ8

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Again, what's up with Qubit? Lots of fuss about it recently.

AliMan

hero member

Activity: 1974

Merit: 502

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Hey sp_, seeing that VNL has hit the sky, any tweaks you think I could try out to squeeze a little more hash with the whirlpoolx algo, if possible?

smolen

hero member

Activity: 524

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Yeah, I've not seen sp_ do any AMD work. CUDA is pretty easy in comparison, so I'm more worried about you beating my current 10.75MH/s per 280X on Qubit, smolen.

Without taking any obligations and disclosing too much... Quite sure that you, pallas and some other developers here are ahead of me when it comes to OpenCL. dga, Supercomputing (and other) are great at math and CS - I truly enjoy playing here, but understand my limits. For fun, brawling and such there are simple algos; we have had a nice competition with Whirlpool, may be next arena will be Skein or something else, small both in code and money, as a challenge Qubit is just too big Wink

Talking about money, I think I see a way to milk big farms and private miners without doing any GPU code - if they are at, say, wrong local Nash equilibrium. Perhaps this idea will fail, I just have to try. Another crazy idea, eating my spare time, is smart codegenerator. Not exactly compiler, not exactly SAT. Some good code, unpublished, perhaps patentable tricks, a perspective to profit not just from mining - and nothing ready for production yet.
You see, it's possible that I'll jump in and take your profits, but I'm driven not only by money

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1138. (Read 2347601 times)