The latest (29) should give a small boost in x11,x13,x14,x15
x14 has been more profitable than quark the last 24 hours. 0.4 BTC for 1GHASH.
x11 on nicehash has paid 0.3816 BTC/GH/Day the last 24hours.
All my rigs are using profit switching software. Miner control (1.6). Windows only.
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1189. (Read 2347597 times)
-Faster bmw,keccak, echo and jh512
Not much though.
The 29th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (11-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release28
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
Not much though.
The 29th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (11-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release28
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
SP_ v29 RESULTS--
Initially, quark is +100kh/s on my faster rig, not much change on my slower rig. Its Sempron 145 compiles noticably more slowly than the AMD FX on my faster rig. If the CPU processing load is a factor in hashing speed, it may be a bottleneck on my slower rig. I now get 36.3-4mh/s on my faster rig, and 35.1-2mh/s on my slower rig. Version 28 pushed the slow rig to 35.1mh/s, and the fast rig to 36.2mh/s. --scryptr
why dont you make the sempron machine faster by changing the cpu scryptr? ...
or are you not in a position to get that done? ...
i have most of my machines upgraded to the 4300 cpu for the same reason ... now i compile once and distribute it - rather than compile on every machine due to the different cpu's that were in them ...
although now im changing over to the h81-pro-btc boards and intel chips ... couldnt go any other way with those boards ...
quark is running more stable though i havent seen a lift in hashrate ...
maybe need to recompile with the latest 29 ... do that after i build the next machine ...
#crysx
I corrected the link, it was pointing to the 28 release binary.
In release 22 and up I increased the cpu usage abit. In benchmark mode, my rig with 4 cards does 600KHASH bether than mining on a pool I think it is connected to the increased cpu usage.
In release 22 and up I increased the cpu usage abit. In benchmark mode, my rig with 4 cards does 600KHASH bether than mining on a pool I think it is connected to the increased cpu usage.
-Faster bmw,keccak, echo and jh512
Not much though.
The 29th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (11-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release28
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
Not much though.
The 29th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (11-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release28
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
SP_ v29 RESULTS--
Initially, quark is +100kh/s on my faster rig, not much change on my slower rig. Its Sempron 145 compiles noticably more slowly than the AMD FX on my faster rig. If the CPU processing load is a factor in hashing speed, it may be a bottleneck on my slower rig. I now get 36.3-4mh/s on my faster rig, and 35.1-2mh/s on my slower rig. Version 28 pushed the slow rig to 35.1mh/s, and the fast rig to 36.2mh/s. --scryptr
-Faster bmw,keccak, echo and jh512
Not much though.
The 29th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (11-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release29
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
Not much though.
The 29th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (11-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release29
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
I expect couple of testing samples of GTX960 next week. Would be interesting what could they do 
That card is what I have been waiting for. Where can I buy one please. 
I expect couple of testing samples of GTX960 next week. Would be interesting what could they do
That card is what I have been waiting for. Where can I buy one please. I expect couple of testing samples of GTX960 next week. Would be interesting what could they do
That card is what I have been waiting for. Where can I buy one please.
750 ti
About 6150kh/s 100kh/s + quark
X11 3,235kh/s on one of my cards.
About 6150kh/s 100kh/s + quark
X11 3,235kh/s on one of my cards.
Here are my release28 stats for X11. GPU0 as seen in GPU-Z, GPU1 @ 1499 MHz.
I the hashrate is dropping, check the temps on the cards. My ti's are downclocked automaticly if they reach 70degrees(c). With windows and firestorm software you can overvolt the cards. Then they will accept temps up to 80 degrees(c)
My cards stay between 55c - 60c during the day (I assume at night they get a little cooler when the house heat doesn't come on). Neither are overclocked (I run linux and never really delved into the overclocking aspect) by me (one is a SuperClocked EVGA 750Ti though). It might just be because I am using the computer (albeit only firefox to write this post), b/c I noticed when I sat down it was ~11180 and now it is ~11145. No change in temp, diff, pool, etc.
None the less, great work.
Yeah, its from using the computer lightly... my bad.
2 750 Ti's
v28= Quark ~11,160 kh/s
v28.git = Quark ~11,185 kh/s
I the hashrate is dropping, check the temps on the cards. My ti's are downclocked automaticly if they reach 70degrees(c). With windows and firestorm software you can overvolt the cards. Then they will accept temps up to 80 degrees(c)
My cards stay between 55c - 60c during the day (I assume at night they get a little cooler when the house heat doesn't come on). Neither are overclocked (I run linux and never really delved into the overclocking aspect) by me (one is a SuperClocked EVGA 750Ti though). It might just be because I am using the computer (albeit only firefox to write this post), b/c I noticed when I sat down it was ~11180 and now it is ~11145. No change in temp, diff, pool, etc.
None the less, great work.
I the hashrate is dropping, check the temps on the cards. My ti's are downclocked automaticly if they reach 70degrees(c). With windows and firestorm software you can overvolt the cards. Then they will accept temps up to 80 degrees(c)
my numbers. Rigs are running at standard clocks mining quark
testrig 2: 4 cards. (1 gtx980, 1gtx970, 2 750ti.)
release 28
39500
release 28.git (faster bmw)
39700
testrig 2: 4 cards. (1 gtx980, 1gtx970, 2 750ti.)
release 28
32100
release 28.git (faster bmw)
32500
testrig 2: 4 cards. (1 gtx980, 1gtx970, 2 750ti.)
release 28
39500
release 28.git (faster bmw)
39700
testrig 2: 4 cards. (1 gtx980, 1gtx970, 2 750ti.)
release 28
32100
release 28.git (faster bmw)
32500
Do you mean? (This would correspond to your previously posted test rig profiles.)
testrig 1: 6 750ti(non powered)
release 28
32100
release 28.git (faster bmw)
32500
testrig 2: 4 cards. (1 gtx980, 1gtx970, 2 750ti.)
release 28
39500
release 28.git (faster bmw)
39700
My results:
2 750 Ti's
v28= Quark ~11,115 kh/s (my earlier report was higher, but it seems to have stabilized closer to this)
v28.git = Quark ~11,130 kh/s (it seems to start around ~11,175, but then slowly goes down to ~11,1130)
@ sp
Any chance for an optimized Spreadcoin ccminer?
It seems the community is willing to pay for it.
Any chance for an optimized Spreadcoin ccminer?
It seems the community is willing to pay for it.
I am working on it. 30-40% faster on 980 cards.
@ sp
Any chance for an optimized Spreadcoin ccminer?
It seems the community is willing to pay for it.
Any chance for an optimized Spreadcoin ccminer?
It seems the community is willing to pay for it.
my numbers. Rigs are running at standard clocks mining quark
testrig 2: 4 cards. (1 gtx980, 1gtx970, 2 750ti.)
release 28
39500
release 28.git (faster bmw)
39700
testrig 2: 4 cards. (1 gtx980, 1gtx970, 2 750ti.)
release 28
32100
release 28.git (faster bmw)
32500
testrig 2: 4 cards. (1 gtx980, 1gtx970, 2 750ti.)
release 28
39500
release 28.git (faster bmw)
39700
testrig 2: 4 cards. (1 gtx980, 1gtx970, 2 750ti.)
release 28
32100
release 28.git (faster bmw)
32500
I submitted an optimized BMW. ptx assembly is down from 36000 lines to around 34000 lines.
I am still running v26, which appears very stable. It went over 4000 accepts on each rig with less than 1% rejects. --scryptr
I agree, v26 was also very stable for me. 11540 +/- 50 khash/s, accepted: 11422/11476 (99.53%) for two EVGA 750Ti SCs.
I just built v28. A little improvement for Quark, 11680 +/- 50 khash/s.
- merged with klaust fork
- improved blake,keccak and skein
The 28th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (10-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release28
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
- improved blake,keccak and skein
The 28th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (10-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release28
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
SP_ v28 beta-
Sorry to report this, but on both of my rigs I got the following error when attempting to compile v28:
"cuda_myriadgroestl.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `d_resultNonce'
Algo256/cuda_fugue256.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [ccminer] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/borqd/spminer'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/borqd/spminer'
make: *** [all] Error 2"
There was no executable "ccminer" left in the directory. I am still running v26, which appears very stable. It went over 4000 accepts on each rig with less than 1% rejects. --scryptr
To fix this edit cuda_myriadgroestl.cu (in ccminer's root folder).
On line eleven add: extern
the line should read: extern uint2 *d_resultNonce[8];
I made that edit, compiled without issue, and have been hashing away 2 hours without issue.
(This line was changed to its current iteration of lacking "extern" 1/5/14 via commit: 462dd9bc99a255e4b593f82b1237ce152d55cb59)
v28 TYPO--
It worked like a charm. Running v28, each card is hashing about +50kh/s from v26 now, about +300kh/s on each rig. My faster rig is running about 36,267kh/s. This rig is over 36mh/s average for the first time. One of my cards is at 6120kh/s.
--scryptr
Jump to: