Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1192. (Read 2347597 times)
Looks like a driver crash. Download the latest driver. But could be that one of the risers are missing power, the card is to overclocked. The PSU is not strong enough. Try to disconnect 1 card and see if it still crash.
Any Idea why this happens to me all the time
[2015-01-07 14:41:54] accepted: 197/199 (98.99%), 15941 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-07 14:42:09] accepted: 198/200 (99.00%), 16212 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-07 14:42:36] accepted: 199/201 (99.00%), 16953 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-07 14:42:37] accepted: 200/202 (99.01%), 16938 khash/s yay!!!
Cuda error in func 'cuda_check_cpu_setTarget' at line 28 : unspecified launch fa
ilure.
D:\Nvidia Mining\MinerControl-1.6.1>pause
Press any key to continue . . .
and than when i restart it, speed drops to 5kh/s
Thanks
[2015-01-07 14:41:54] accepted: 197/199 (98.99%), 15941 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-07 14:42:09] accepted: 198/200 (99.00%), 16212 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-07 14:42:36] accepted: 199/201 (99.00%), 16953 khash/s yay!!!
[2015-01-07 14:42:37] accepted: 200/202 (99.01%), 16938 khash/s yay!!!
Cuda error in func 'cuda_check_cpu_setTarget' at line 28 : unspecified launch fa
ilure.
D:\Nvidia Mining\MinerControl-1.6.1>pause
Press any key to continue . . .
and than when i restart it, speed drops to 5kh/s
Thanks
I am now rewriting luffa to work on 64 bits(uint2) simd style. 2 hashes instead of one per iteration.
Expect another boost in x11.
Expect another boost in x11.
100kh more quark 750ti. good job.
HI,
How much with one 750ti?
Thx
100kh more quark 750ti. good job.
HI,
How much with one 750ti?
Thx
I third that.
[/quote]
You should really PM questions like that.
[/quote]
Yes your right.
Submitted the optimized blake kernals to gihub.(25% faster)
I had to split the kernals and implement 2 seperate implementations. one for the x series. x11,x13,x14,x15,x17 and one for the others, quark, nist5, jackpotcoin etc. In the x'series implementation I moved some precalculation from const mem into the instructioncache. I also improved the uint2 implementation.
Building release 26
results on 750ti: (up from release 25)
x11 +30-50 KHASH
quark +50-100 KHASH
970 and 980 untested. Please test if you have time
100kh more quark 750ti. good job. I had to split the kernals and implement 2 seperate implementations. one for the x series. x11,x13,x14,x15,x17 and one for the others, quark, nist5, jackpotcoin etc. In the x'series implementation I moved some precalculation from const mem into the instructioncache. I also improved the uint2 implementation.
Building release 26
results on 750ti: (up from release 25)
x11 +30-50 KHASH
quark +50-100 KHASH
970 and 980 untested. Please test if you have time
I am working on a private spreadcoin miner. Anyone interested in paying for a boost? 30-40% faster
how much?I second this question...
I am working on a private spreadcoin miner. Anyone interested in paying for a boost? 30-40% faster
how much? I tested version 23 on the 980 and it made 15.5 MHASH on stock clocks. but build 26 should be faster.
13MHASH@970 is very good.
Sgminer does 5.6MHASH on the AMD 290x
13MHASH@970 is very good.
Sgminer does 5.6MHASH on the AMD 290x
They're Gigabyte G1 cards so they should be a bit higher than most, but I haven't had a chance to verify that's the rate the pools are getting. If so, good job. If I can manage to keep my 12 750s and 2 970s running on the positive side of profit that would be great and I'll donate what I can, but it may come too late since I might need to sell everything for cash soon
Too much lost btc in scams, exchanges, and bad timing recently.
100MHASH spreadcoin earnings with the current difficulty:
Calculation result:
Calculating for period: Day
Coin mining: 358.83607091 SPR
Pool fee: 0 % / 0 SPR
Coins to get: 358.83607091 SPR
First exchange to BTC:
Exchange rate to BTC: 0.00028005 BTC per SPR
Exchange fee: 0 % / 0 BTC
% for transfering to wallet 0 % / 0 BTC
I'll get BTC: 0.10049204 BTC
Exchange to USD:
Exchange rate to USD: 285.512 USD for BTC
Exchange fee: 0 % / 0 USD
I'll get USD: 28.69168332 $
Withdraw in Fiat
Exchange fee: 0 % / 0 USD
Cash, USD: 28.69 $
Spreadcoin pays 5-10 times bether than x11 mining per MHASH.
Calculation result:
Calculating for period: Day
Coin mining: 358.83607091 SPR
Pool fee: 0 % / 0 SPR
Coins to get: 358.83607091 SPR
First exchange to BTC:
Exchange rate to BTC: 0.00028005 BTC per SPR
Exchange fee: 0 % / 0 BTC
% for transfering to wallet 0 % / 0 BTC
I'll get BTC: 0.10049204 BTC
Exchange to USD:
Exchange rate to USD: 285.512 USD for BTC
Exchange fee: 0 % / 0 USD
I'll get USD: 28.69168332 $
Withdraw in Fiat
Exchange fee: 0 % / 0 USD
Cash, USD: 28.69 $
Spreadcoin pays 5-10 times bether than x11 mining per MHASH.
I am working on a private spreadcoin miner. Anyone interested in paying for a boost? 30-40% faster
I'm not sure if you caught my earlier message about releases. When you made the r26 commit (86dd73f) and updated the version numbers in cpuminer-config.h it only reflects this change for windows builds. The first line of configure.ac needs to also be changed for linux builds.
I will fix it later.
I tested version 23 on the 980 and it made 15.5 MHASH on stock clocks. but build 26 should be faster.
13MHASH@970 is very good.
Sgminer does 5.6MHASH on the AMD 290x
13MHASH@970 is very good.
Sgminer does 5.6MHASH on the AMD 290x
Submitted the optimized blake kernals to gihub.(25% faster)
I had to split the kernals and implement 2 seperate implementations. one for the x series. x11,x13,x14,x15,x17 and one for the others, quark, nist5, jackpotcoin etc. In the x'series implementation I moved some precalculation from const mem into the instructioncache. I also improved the uint2 implementation.
Building release 26
results on 750ti: (up from release 25)
x11 +30-50 KHASH
quark +50-100 KHASH
970 and 980 untested. Please test if you have time
I had to split the kernals and implement 2 seperate implementations. one for the x series. x11,x13,x14,x15,x17 and one for the others, quark, nist5, jackpotcoin etc. In the x'series implementation I moved some precalculation from const mem into the instructioncache. I also improved the uint2 implementation.
Building release 26
results on 750ti: (up from release 25)
x11 +30-50 KHASH
quark +50-100 KHASH
970 and 980 untested. Please test if you have time
Didn't test much, but I think my 2 970s were getting about 13000 each. Doesn't seem like they're doing as well as they could, but then again I haven't really mined quark on them before so i don't have previous numbers to compare them to.
The 26th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (07-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release26
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
http://www.filedropper.com/release26
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
I'm not sure if you caught my earlier message about releases. When you made the r26 commit (86dd73f) and updated the version numbers in cpuminer-config.h it only reflects this change for windows builds. The first line of configure.ac needs to also be changed for linux builds.
The 26th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (07-jan-2015)
http://www.filedropper.com/release26
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
http://www.filedropper.com/release26
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
Submitted the optimized blake kernals to gihub.(25% faster)
I had to split the kernals and implement 2 seperate implementations. one for the x series. x11,x13,x14,x15,x17 and one for the others, quark, nist5, jackpotcoin etc. In the x'series implementation I moved some precalculation from const mem into the instructioncache. I also improved the uint2 implementation.
Building release 26
results on 750ti: (up from release 25)
x11 +30-50 KHASH
quark +50-100 KHASH
970 and 980 untested. Please test if you have time
I had to split the kernals and implement 2 seperate implementations. one for the x series. x11,x13,x14,x15,x17 and one for the others, quark, nist5, jackpotcoin etc. In the x'series implementation I moved some precalculation from const mem into the instructioncache. I also improved the uint2 implementation.
Building release 26
results on 750ti: (up from release 25)
x11 +30-50 KHASH
quark +50-100 KHASH
970 and 980 untested. Please test if you have time
More hashrate is comming. I have optimized blake 25% faster.
Tested release25 now, I think we're getting there! Hashrate is now recognized correctly as far as I can tell, fluctuates around the real hashrate as it should. Awesome job SP, here's the graph:
Jump to: