Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1191. (Read 2347597 times)

working on it. Merging the fork. But it wil take a while. The hashrate has dropped. But the PTX assembly is bether. (less instructions)

release 27 is after this commit:  4de3436ba38702feda3c625c43cdc07530e82bb8 but before the merge

does not compile on linux with gcc 4.8 from latest git pull:

cuda_myriadgroestl.o:(.bss+0x40): multiple definition of `d_resultNonce'
Algo256/cuda_fugue256.o:(.bss+0x40): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

also error on git clone from KlausT fork

How much % of the total algo is that SHA part? If it's 50% of the time, it might be worth it (cuda Even with just a simple 2GH USB miner. Need one? I have 10x antminer U2 ^^

Also, get on IRC, sp_, and idle there

spreadcoin is using sha256 (bitcoin) hashing in addition to other algorithms. Don't throw your old btc Asic miners(usb?)... Perhaps they can be used in a hybrid miner? NVIDIA + ASICS +SP-HASH=$$$$

I heard they are selling useless miners at ebay

fixed x11 on 970 and 980
bether performance on 750ti but will drop if the cards get too hot.

new beta:


The 27th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (08-jan-2015)

http://www.filedropper.com/release27

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

Post your stats here. Card name/gpu clock/memclock

I tested on the 980 and the 970. The launch configuration was way off. the new blake code needed different launchparameters. I modified a bit, and booom 150KHASH more (x11) will test some more and submit to github.
The standard clocked 980 is now hashing at 9MHASH.

You where right, i reduced the core by 5% and now it`s been running for 18hrs non stop, thank for the hint and quick reply

Make that 3 750ti  sp  6mh/s 750ti.     3 750ti  6mh x 3 = 18mh   18,000kh/s 

Release26 seems to be a tiny bit slower than 25 for me (GTX970, X11).

Pretty good hash for quark!

[2015-01-07 14:42:37] accepted: 200/202 (99.01%), 16938 khash/s yay!!!

This is around the same speed as 6 750TI's mining x11. (but with one 980 card)

The latest versions uses more GPU and CPU in x11. It's just to get a few extra khash. Not really needed. The 21 build is ok, but it will report a lower hashrate on some pools. (coinmine.pl, suchpol.pw etc)

Klaus_t has been busy@github, I think I will re-merge his fork with mine.

I think after release 23 or 24 I reverted to something like 19 or 21 (it's the one dated: 12/21/2014).  I like this one because I consistently get over 3 Mh/s in X11 and it doesn't have much noticeable affects on regular usage of the 3 PCs it's running on. 

So the reason I'm saying this... How is the latest as far as computer usability?  I know there's probably more support for rig based miners as opposed to average joe blows like me but just figured I'd ask for some feedback in general from anyone who might have similar interests like me.

My 2-bits worth --


First, I've tried quark mining for the first time.  My fast rig runs at ~6mh/s per card, a tiny bit less on average.  My slow rig runs at 5.7-5.8mh/s per card.  My slow rig seems stable with v26; I am trying each version as it becomes available.  This rate is greater by at least 100kh/s per card than my stable fallback, tpruvot's 1.5.2-git.

Second, I think these new algorithm developments are great.  I think older developments, like cryptonite and M7, should be folded into the mix, also.  And, for the donations, there should perhaps be a minimum contribution publicly stated for receipt of software benefits. 

Thanks for the hard work.  If I understood the coding better, I would be trying myself.       --scryptr

i dont agree with that wolf ... i believe if there IS a price that is willing to be worked AND there are people out there willing to contirbute - then why not make it public? ...

i for one am more than happy to point my miners as a donation ... but am more than happy to 'fund' the 'private' release before it goes public ...

people like you and sp and djm - just to name a few of teh devs here - deserve to be paid for the amazing work you guys do ...

i have just taken receipt of 30 x gigabyte 750ti oc non-powered cards yesterday ... this being the first shipment of the new farm i am building as of today - and will be willing to put the entire farm 'where my mouth is' ...

make all the costs public i say ... and if someone is willing to 'contract' you - THEN its a private pm discussion ...

this is just my small btc worth ... but it is an opinion that i am willing to back ...

i admire the work you guys do ... YOU all help US ... so damned if any of this is going to go private with me - unless you are working for me ... hehehe ...

phew - now i got that out ... ccminer! ...

after the new implementation today of these cards - ill setup the latest git pull - compile and start testing ...

seems ive missed a few tests that everyone has done since ive been interstate the last few days ...

catch up time - the the farm build ...

#crysx

its a Asus Strix OC 4gb GTX 980 and mining quark

Upgrade to 347.09 drivers.  They've been a lot more stable for me with these recent ccminer builds.

Didn't work. :/ slower with 2 pipes and uint. uses more registers and codesize is too big.

Looks like you pushed it too hard yes.
Use a tool like GPUZ to messure the temperature. Open the case if the card is too hot.

wich card model, and wich algorithm are you mining?

Single card, no risers, it is overclocled, tonight i will see how much power it draws, it`s a gtx 980, and a 650w psu, should be more than enought for a single card.
i might be pushing it to much, i will also reduced the OC a bit. also the drivers are 344.75