Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 1239. (Read 2347426 times)
My 970 and 980 are wotking with latest miner on X13 for several hours, but report about 3.5-3.8 % of losses
Today I worked on x13 (fugue)
x0 = ((c0 ^ r0) & SPH_C32(0xFF000000)) \
| ((c1 ^ r1) & SPH_C32(0x00FF0000)) \
| ((c2 ^ r2) & SPH_C32(0x0000FF00)) \
| ((c3 ^ r3) & SPH_C32(0x000000FF)); \
x1 = ((c1 ^ (r0 <<
) & SPH_C32(0xFF000000)) \
| ((c2 ^ (r1 <<) & SPH_C32(0x00FF0000)) \
| ((c3 ^ (r2 <<) & SPH_C32(0x0000FF00)) \
| ((c0 ^ (r3 >> 24)) & SPH_C32(0x000000FF)); \
x2 = ((c2 ^ (r0 << 16)) & SPH_C32(0xFF000000)) \
| ((c3 ^ (r1 << 16)) & SPH_C32(0x00FF0000)) \
| ((c0 ^ (r2 >> 16)) & SPH_C32(0x0000FF00)) \
| ((c1 ^ (r3 >> 16)) & SPH_C32(0x000000FF)); \
x3 = ((c3 ^ (r0 << 24)) & SPH_C32(0xFF000000)) \
| ((c0 ^ (r1 >>) & SPH_C32(0x00FF0000)) \
| ((c1 ^ (r2 >>) & SPH_C32(0x0000FF00)) \
| ((c2 ^ (r3 >>) & SPH_C32(0x000000FF)); \
Replaced with:
t0 = __byte_perm(c0, c1, 0x0145);\
t1 = __byte_perm(c0, c1, 0x2367);\
t2 = __byte_perm(c2, c3, 0x0145);\
t3 = __byte_perm(c2, c3, 0x2367);\
t4 = __byte_perm(t0, t3, 0x0347);\
t6 = __byte_perm(t1, t2, 0x4703);\
t7 = __byte_perm(c1, c2, 0x0505);\
t8 = __byte_perm(c0, c3, 0x6363);\
t9 = __byte_perm(t7, t8, 0x0145);\
t10 = __byte_perm(c0, c3, 0x4141);\
t11 = __byte_perm(c1, c2, 0x1717);\
t12 = __byte_perm(t10, t11, 0x0145);\
t13 = __byte_perm(r0, r1, 0x0505);\
t14 = __byte_perm(r2, r3, 0x3737);\
t15 = __byte_perm(t13, t14, 0x0145);\
t16 = __byte_perm(r0, r1, 0x1616);\
t17 = __byte_perm(r2, r3, 0x3434);\
t18 = __byte_perm(t16, t17, 0x0145);\
t19 = __byte_perm(r0, r1, 0x2727);\
t20 = __byte_perm(r2, r3, 0x0505);\
t21 = __byte_perm(t19, t20, 0x0145);\
t22 = __byte_perm(r0, r1, 0x3434);\
t23 = __byte_perm(r0, r2, 0x5151);\
t24 = __byte_perm(t22, t23, 0x0145);\
x0 = t4^t15;\
x1 = t9^t18;\
x2 = t6^t21;\
x3 = t12^t24;\
There is a bug somewhere in the perms so the code doesn't hash correctly. PTX code shows half the assembly instructions used, but the speed is the same/perhaps a little bit faster. seems to be a dead end. :/
x0 = ((c0 ^ r0) & SPH_C32(0xFF000000)) \
| ((c1 ^ r1) & SPH_C32(0x00FF0000)) \
| ((c2 ^ r2) & SPH_C32(0x0000FF00)) \
| ((c3 ^ r3) & SPH_C32(0x000000FF)); \
x1 = ((c1 ^ (r0 <<
) & SPH_C32(0xFF000000)) \| ((c2 ^ (r1 <<
) & SPH_C32(0x00FF0000)) \| ((c3 ^ (r2 <<
) & SPH_C32(0x0000FF00)) \| ((c0 ^ (r3 >> 24)) & SPH_C32(0x000000FF)); \
x2 = ((c2 ^ (r0 << 16)) & SPH_C32(0xFF000000)) \
| ((c3 ^ (r1 << 16)) & SPH_C32(0x00FF0000)) \
| ((c0 ^ (r2 >> 16)) & SPH_C32(0x0000FF00)) \
| ((c1 ^ (r3 >> 16)) & SPH_C32(0x000000FF)); \
x3 = ((c3 ^ (r0 << 24)) & SPH_C32(0xFF000000)) \
| ((c0 ^ (r1 >>
) & SPH_C32(0x00FF0000)) \| ((c1 ^ (r2 >>
) & SPH_C32(0x0000FF00)) \| ((c2 ^ (r3 >>
) & SPH_C32(0x000000FF)); \Replaced with:
t0 = __byte_perm(c0, c1, 0x0145);\
t1 = __byte_perm(c0, c1, 0x2367);\
t2 = __byte_perm(c2, c3, 0x0145);\
t3 = __byte_perm(c2, c3, 0x2367);\
t4 = __byte_perm(t0, t3, 0x0347);\
t6 = __byte_perm(t1, t2, 0x4703);\
t7 = __byte_perm(c1, c2, 0x0505);\
t8 = __byte_perm(c0, c3, 0x6363);\
t9 = __byte_perm(t7, t8, 0x0145);\
t10 = __byte_perm(c0, c3, 0x4141);\
t11 = __byte_perm(c1, c2, 0x1717);\
t12 = __byte_perm(t10, t11, 0x0145);\
t13 = __byte_perm(r0, r1, 0x0505);\
t14 = __byte_perm(r2, r3, 0x3737);\
t15 = __byte_perm(t13, t14, 0x0145);\
t16 = __byte_perm(r0, r1, 0x1616);\
t17 = __byte_perm(r2, r3, 0x3434);\
t18 = __byte_perm(t16, t17, 0x0145);\
t19 = __byte_perm(r0, r1, 0x2727);\
t20 = __byte_perm(r2, r3, 0x0505);\
t21 = __byte_perm(t19, t20, 0x0145);\
t22 = __byte_perm(r0, r1, 0x3434);\
t23 = __byte_perm(r0, r2, 0x5151);\
t24 = __byte_perm(t22, t23, 0x0145);\
x0 = t4^t15;\
x1 = t9^t18;\
x2 = t6^t21;\
x3 = t12^t24;\
There is a bug somewhere in the perms so the code doesn't hash correctly. PTX code shows half the assembly instructions used, but the speed is the same/perhaps a little bit faster. seems to be a dead end. :/
All ccminers crash sometime (random) when I try to close the 980cards miner, anybody have a clue about this?
Only the 980 crashs, 750Ti closes the miners window OK.
Cheers
Only the 980 crashs, 750Ti closes the miners window OK.
Cheers
Guys, can you please post your configs and OCs?
On my EVGA SC GTX970 ACX 1.0 I can't get more than:
X11 - 5000-5200
X13 - 4000-4500
It's driving me nuts!
Restart your computer firstOn my EVGA SC GTX970 ACX 1.0 I can't get more than:
X11 - 5000-5200
X13 - 4000-4500
It's driving me nuts!
use this ccminer: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
there is no real 'config' u just set pool and set x11 as algo
you should get 5600 stock and 6100 if you OC your clock by 200 and leave memory untouched, using EVGA Precision X 16
Thanks for testing guys. I managed to remove the bugs in quark and jackpotcoin.
I will compile a version with compute 5.2 wich will give boosts on 970 and 980
I will compile a version with compute 5.2 wich will give boosts on 970 and 980
excited for this
As i mentioned earlier in my testing report for GTX970, no improvements ono x11
Thanks for testing guys. I managed to remove the bugs in quark and jackpotcoin.
I will compile a version with compute 5.2 wich will give boosts on 970 and 980
Your welcome , I do have a lot of booo's. Please let me know when you have it compiled for 750ti. thank you I will compile a version with compute 5.2 wich will give boosts on 970 and 980
Guys, can you please post your configs and OCs?
On my EVGA SC GTX970 ACX 1.0 I can't get more than:
X11 - 5000-5200
X13 - 4000-4500
It's driving me nuts!
On my EVGA SC GTX970 ACX 1.0 I can't get more than:
X11 - 5000-5200
X13 - 4000-4500
It's driving me nuts!
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s
how about consumption?
still room for improvement then, i think a 970 could reach 6k on x13, at peak maybe
driver version 344.16
"-q -r 3 -R 10 -a" as config
no OC - I click on the DEFAULT in PrecisionX
Win7 x64 4GB
I have some experience mining, but you could say I'm a newbie in cudaminig.
"-q -r 3 -R 10 -a" as config
no OC - I click on the DEFAULT in PrecisionX
Win7 x64 4GB
I have some experience mining, but you could say I'm a newbie in cudaminig.
I have the EVGA SC 970 ACX 1.0 and only getting 5100 at X11.
Using the https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
Default clocks and everything.
Which build are you guys using and what clocks?
Tell us more , driver version ? OC settings , miner cfg? Using the https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
Default clocks and everything.
Which build are you guys using and what clocks?
I have the EVGA SC 970 ACX 1.0 and only getting 5100 at X11.
Using the https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
Default clocks and everything.
Which build are you guys using and what clocks?
Using the https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
Default clocks and everything.
Which build are you guys using and what clocks?
Hmm I sam something else - with this boost version 970 almost cant get any accepted share - strange...
EDIT: I lowered OC and started accepting with 4970 kH/s
EDIT: I lowered OC and started accepting with 4970 kH/s
Thanks for testing guys. I managed to remove the bugs in quark and jackpotcoin.
I will compile a version with compute 5.2 wich will give boosts on 970 and 980
I will compile a version with compute 5.2 wich will give boosts on 970 and 980
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s
how about consumption?
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s
how about consumption?
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases - this miner seems more optimized on 900s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s
GTX970 on x13 - 5000 kH/s
GTX980 on x13 - 5850 kH/s
i dont see any improvements on X11 against my version :
Yours :
and mine :
Yours :
Code:
==30576== Profiling application: ccminersp.exe -a x11 --benchmark
==30576== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
20.95% 14.5236s 296 49.066ms 48.325ms 52.197ms x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
19.27% 13.3595s 297 44.982ms 44.554ms 50.817ms quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad
11.74% 8.13434s 296 27.481ms 26.976ms 30.969ms x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
10.63% 7.36593s 296 24.885ms 24.556ms 27.590ms x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, un
6.99% 4.84835s 296 16.380ms 16.199ms 18.494ms x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int,
5.29% 3.66619s 297 12.344ms 12.201ms 13.939ms quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
5.02% 3.47754s 296 11.748ms 11.322ms 13.248ms x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
4.24% 2.93967s 296 9.9313ms 9.4073ms 10.335ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int,
3.51% 2.43131s 296 8.2139ms 8.0358ms 8.5024ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int,
2.87% 1.99201s 297 6.7071ms 6.3100ms 7.6564ms quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
2.69% 1.86559s 297 6.2814ms 6.1864ms 7.1012ms quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
2.66% 1.84484s 297 6.2116ms 6.1330ms 7.0152ms quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int,
2.38% 1.65098s 297 5.5589ms 5.4953ms 6.2752ms quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, u
1.47% 1.01983s 296 3.4454ms 3.3832ms 3.6530ms x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, uns
0.28% 195.46ms 295 662.57us 652.23us 699.94us cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsig
0.00% 875.13us 295 2.9660us 2.4000us 12.479us [CUDA memset]
0.00% 627.25us 295 2.1260us 1.3430us 9.0870us [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
0.00% 63.389us 82 773ns 512ns 1.2480us [CUDA memcpy HtoD]
==30576== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
20.95% 14.5236s 296 49.066ms 48.325ms 52.197ms x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
19.27% 13.3595s 297 44.982ms 44.554ms 50.817ms quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad
11.74% 8.13434s 296 27.481ms 26.976ms 30.969ms x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
10.63% 7.36593s 296 24.885ms 24.556ms 27.590ms x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, un
6.99% 4.84835s 296 16.380ms 16.199ms 18.494ms x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int,
5.29% 3.66619s 297 12.344ms 12.201ms 13.939ms quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsi
5.02% 3.47754s 296 11.748ms 11.322ms 13.248ms x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
4.24% 2.93967s 296 9.9313ms 9.4073ms 10.335ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int,
3.51% 2.43131s 296 8.2139ms 8.0358ms 8.5024ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int,
2.87% 1.99201s 297 6.7071ms 6.3100ms 7.6564ms quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, uns
2.69% 1.86559s 297 6.2814ms 6.1864ms 7.1012ms quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, u
2.66% 1.84484s 297 6.2116ms 6.1330ms 7.0152ms quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int,
2.38% 1.65098s 297 5.5589ms 5.4953ms 6.2752ms quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, u
1.47% 1.01983s 296 3.4454ms 3.3832ms 3.6530ms x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, uns
0.28% 195.46ms 295 662.57us 652.23us 699.94us cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsig
0.00% 875.13us 295 2.9660us 2.4000us 12.479us [CUDA memset]
0.00% 627.25us 295 2.1260us 1.3430us 9.0870us [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
0.00% 63.389us 82 773ns 512ns 1.2480us [CUDA memcpy HtoD]
and mine :
Code:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
20.80% 6.36219s 146 43.577ms 42.978ms 44.897ms x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
18.86% 5.77071s 146 39.525ms 39.119ms 44.727ms quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
11.66% 3.56600s 146 24.425ms 24.071ms 27.458ms x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
10.59% 3.24123s 146 22.200ms 21.875ms 24.802ms x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*)
7.53% 2.30443s 146 15.784ms 15.575ms 17.894ms x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
5.30% 1.62276s 146 11.115ms 10.976ms 12.522ms quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
4.99% 1.52627s 146 10.454ms 10.235ms 11.892ms x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
4.21% 1.28899s 146 8.8287ms 8.4681ms 9.1675ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
3.48% 1.06443s 146 7.2906ms 6.9558ms 7.5275ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
3.05% 934.36ms 147 6.3562ms 6.2786ms 7.1199ms quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
2.68% 820.56ms 146 5.6203ms 5.5330ms 6.3415ms quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
2.64% 807.37ms 146 5.5299ms 5.4526ms 6.2354ms quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
2.63% 804.03ms 147 5.4696ms 5.4003ms 6.1889ms quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, unsigned int, void*)
1.46% 446.72ms 146 3.0597ms 3.0059ms 3.1561ms x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
0.11% 33.535ms 145 231.28us 214.59us 265.21us cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
0.00% 428.88us 145 2.9570us 2.4000us 9.4720us [CUDA memset]
0.00% 320.11us 145 2.2070us 1.3440us 9.4390us [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
0.00% 77.406us 110 703ns
20.80% 6.36219s 146 43.577ms 42.978ms 44.897ms x11_echo512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
18.86% 5.77071s 146 39.525ms 39.119ms 44.727ms quark_groestl512_gpu_hash_64_quad(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
11.66% 3.56600s 146 24.425ms 24.071ms 27.458ms x11_shavite512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
10.59% 3.24123s 146 22.200ms 21.875ms 24.802ms x11_simd512_gpu_expand_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*)
7.53% 2.30443s 146 15.784ms 15.575ms 17.894ms x11_cubehash512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
5.30% 1.62276s 146 11.115ms 10.976ms 12.522ms quark_jh512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
4.99% 1.52627s 146 10.454ms 10.235ms 11.892ms x11_luffa512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
4.21% 1.28899s 146 8.8287ms 8.4681ms 9.1675ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress2_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
3.48% 1.06443s 146 7.2906ms 6.9558ms 7.5275ms x11_simd512_gpu_compress1_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
3.05% 934.36ms 147 6.3562ms 6.2786ms 7.1199ms quark_bmw512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
2.68% 820.56ms 146 5.6203ms 5.5330ms 6.3415ms quark_skein512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
2.64% 807.37ms 146 5.5299ms 5.4526ms 6.2354ms quark_keccak512_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*)
2.63% 804.03ms 147 5.4696ms 5.4003ms 6.1889ms quark_blake512_gpu_hash_80(int, unsigned int, void*)
1.46% 446.72ms 146 3.0597ms 3.0059ms 3.1561ms x11_simd512_gpu_final_64(int, unsigned int, __int64*, unsigned int*, uint4*, int*)
0.11% 33.535ms 145 231.28us 214.59us 265.21us cuda_check_gpu_hash_64(int, unsigned int, unsigned int*, unsigned int*, unsigned int*)
0.00% 428.88us 145 2.9570us 2.4000us 9.4720us [CUDA memset]
0.00% 320.11us 145 2.2070us 1.3440us 9.4390us [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
0.00% 77.406us 110 703ns
My version is compiled with compute 5.0 only. The next version will be compiled with 5.2 as well. Something strange with your numbers though. I didn't modify luffa512, but my version is slower in your test. Perhaps compute 5.2 compilation will help
after some trouble getting it started i got this:
x11: 2750 - 2850 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2740 - 2780 khash)
x13: 2100 - 2180 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2090 - 2110 khash)
x15: 1880 - 1910 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 1840 - 1860 khash)
750ti, Core: 1332 Mhz, Ram: 3425 Mhz
x11: 2750 - 2850 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2740 - 2780 khash)
x13: 2100 - 2180 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 2090 - 2110 khash)
x15: 1880 - 1910 khash (nvminer1.2u-d8: 1840 - 1860 khash)
750ti, Core: 1332 Mhz, Ram: 3425 Mhz
Using CCMINER -djm34-m7v7, average of 5 x Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti the black edition (GV-N75TWF2BK-2GI) with 50/50 OC, not solomining.
And ccminer-Maxwell.7z, the same 5 x Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti the black edition (GV-N75TWF2BK-2GI) with 50/50 OC, not solomining.
With different pools.
X11 ~2675,~2725 X13 ~2050,~2155 X15 ~1825,~1910 nist5 ~8250,~8360 quark ~4100,~5280
Im going to try over clocking more, i may get more.
And ccminer-Maxwell.7z, the same 5 x Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti the black edition (GV-N75TWF2BK-2GI) with 50/50 OC, not solomining.
With different pools.
X11 ~2675,~2725 X13 ~2050,~2155 X15 ~1825,~1910 nist5 ~8250,~8360 quark ~4100,~5280
Im going to try over clocking more, i may get more.
Jump to: