Pages:
Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 28. (Read 2347632 times)

sr. member
Activity: 954
Merit: 250
The comparison of cuda cores between different architectures worked well for Maxwell Vs pascal, at least until the miner Devs figured out how to take the best out of the latter, and it wasn't a big difference. Same will be for Turing (if any).
Nvidia has been focusing on improving other things than integer math for many years now.

Maxwell and Pascal were almost identical as far as architecture. Turing is nothing like either of those (hence the tensor and RTX parts of the CPU).

Yeah, those parts which are useless for mining :-D

As for me, I can easily propose the way to use AI blocks to create neural network which will help mining.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Z270 - 5 x 1060 2 x 1070 - BSODs too often

Check the power usage. reduce the tdp limit of the cards in msi afterburner or similar tool. You can also try to reduce the intensity with the -i parameter. -i 21 is a popular choice.
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
THE RAVEN/PIDGEON/C11 MINER IS FREE--

The source code is all there on GitHub.  Other programmers can use the code in free or fee-based miners at will.       --scryptr
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
X16r/X16s/C11 Spmod-git #10 has been released

- Fixed double nonce submission in simd and some other algos. (faster x16r/x16s)
- Improved the the poolside hashrate when mining on high intensity or/and low difficulty. (removed double work after a solution had been found)
- Reduced the pool network traffic by increasing the workload to the gpu to scan the whole 32bit nonce range.
- Reduced rejected shares on the pool.
- Added pool latency and blocks found to the miner output

This miner is free without any fee. Linux/Windows

cuda 9.2 binary:


https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases

source:

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/commits/master

Too much of BSODs on one rig and the other is fine. Dont no why.

B250 - 9 x 1070 1 x 1070ti - No Issues at all

Z270 - 5 x 1060 2 x 1070 - BSODs too often

Both the rigs have latest nvidia drivers. Even reinstalled OS on Z270, nothing sorted out.

Because you are using the worst two things you can use ...

Windows (still unstable and flaky) and SPMod (still a copy of opensource products being sold as an original product with some tweaking).

#crysx
jr. member
Activity: 127
Merit: 1
http://fpgadeck.com/
X16r/X16s/C11 Spmod-git #10 has been released

- Fixed double nonce submission in simd and some other algos. (faster x16r/x16s)
- Improved the the poolside hashrate when mining on high intensity or/and low difficulty. (removed double work after a solution had been found)
- Reduced the pool network traffic by increasing the workload to the gpu to scan the whole 32bit nonce range.
- Reduced rejected shares on the pool.
- Added pool latency and blocks found to the miner output

This miner is free without any fee. Linux/Windows

cuda 9.2 binary:


https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases

source:

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/commits/master

Too much of BSODs on one rig and the other is fine. Dont no why.

B250 - 9 x 1070 1 x 1070ti - No Issues at all

Z270 - 5 x 1060 2 x 1070 - BSODs too often

Both the rigs have latest nvidia drivers. Even reinstalled OS on Z270, nothing sorted out.
member
Activity: 653
Merit: 11
no, but I will release a faster phi2 sp-mod private soon. (0.05btc)

Faster than dredge? 75 % of bsod pool mines phi2 with dredge even though it uses too much power!
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
no, but I will release a faster phi2 sp-mod private soon. (0.05btc)
newbie
Activity: 93
Merit: 0
Any plans for a phi2 free miner?
copper member
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
The comparison of cuda cores between different architectures worked well for Maxwell Vs pascal, at least until the miner Devs figured out how to take the best out of the latter, and it wasn't a big difference. Same will be for Turing (if any).
Nvidia has been focusing on improving other things than integer math for many years now.

Maxwell and Pascal were almost identical as far as architecture. Turing is nothing like either of those (hence the tensor and RTX parts of the CPU). That's like comparing clockspeed or cores between AMD/Intel.

I based my assertion off of leaked benchmarks and rumors reporting performance on hardware websites.

I have no ax to grind with him.. I don't need mining, I do it as a hobby for fun, I could give two fucks about your shitty 5 dollar a day profit over 20 dollars a day profit.

You care an awwwwwwful lot about that shitty 5 dollar a day profit for someone who does this about a hobby. I'm more of a fan of 'what people do' rather then 'what people say' logic, and we can just look at the shear amount of time you've spent in this thread monitoring it and making responses.

Also you spend $20k on hardware, regardless of doing something for a hobby, you would probably care. XD

I've spent 7-8k on hardware for my hobby, I wipe my ass with 8k.. I get it's a lot of money to you, for adults with good jobs it's play money. My electricity bill is 650 a month, 150 of it is from mining, see if you can figure out why my bill is 650.. Relax kid, let it go..

pool?

weed?

weed uses more then 150 Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
The comparison of cuda cores between different architectures worked well for Maxwell Vs pascal, at least until the miner Devs figured out how to take the best out of the latter, and it wasn't a big difference. Same will be for Turing (if any).
Nvidia has been focusing on improving other things than integer math for many years now.

Maxwell and Pascal were almost identical as far as architecture. Turing is nothing like either of those (hence the tensor and RTX parts of the CPU). That's like comparing clockspeed or cores between AMD/Intel.

I based my assertion off of leaked benchmarks and rumors reporting performance on hardware websites.

I have no ax to grind with him.. I don't need mining, I do it as a hobby for fun, I could give two fucks about your shitty 5 dollar a day profit over 20 dollars a day profit.

You care an awwwwwwful lot about that shitty 5 dollar a day profit for someone who does this about a hobby. I'm more of a fan of 'what people do' rather then 'what people say' logic, and we can just look at the shear amount of time you've spent in this thread monitoring it and making responses.

Also you spend $20k on hardware, regardless of doing something for a hobby, you would probably care. XD

I've spent 7-8k on hardware for my hobby, I wipe my ass with 8k.. I get it's a lot of money to you, for adults with good jobs it's play money. My electricity bill is 650 a month, 150 of it is from mining, see if you can figure out why my bill is 650.. Relax kid, let it go..

pool?

weed?
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
The comparison of cuda cores between different architectures worked well for Maxwell Vs pascal, at least until the miner Devs figured out how to take the best out of the latter, and it wasn't a big difference. Same will be for Turing (if any).
Nvidia has been focusing on improving other things than integer math for many years now.

Maxwell and Pascal were almost identical as far as architecture. Turing is nothing like either of those (hence the tensor and RTX parts of the CPU). That's like comparing clockspeed or cores between AMD/Intel.

I based my assertion off of leaked benchmarks and rumors reporting performance on hardware websites.

I have no ax to grind with him.. I don't need mining, I do it as a hobby for fun, I could give two fucks about your shitty 5 dollar a day profit over 20 dollars a day profit.

You care an awwwwwwful lot about that shitty 5 dollar a day profit for someone who does this about a hobby. I'm more of a fan of 'what people do' rather then 'what people say' logic, and we can just look at the shear amount of time you've spent in this thread monitoring it and making responses.

Also you spend $20k on hardware, regardless of doing something for a hobby, you would probably care. XD

I've spent 7-8k on hardware for my hobby, I wipe my ass with 8k.. I get it's a lot of money to you, for adults with good jobs it's play money. My electricity bill is 650 a month, 150 of it is from mining, see if you can figure out why my bill is 650.. Relax kid, let it go..

pool?
jr. member
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
The comparison of cuda cores between different architectures worked well for Maxwell Vs pascal, at least until the miner Devs figured out how to take the best out of the latter, and it wasn't a big difference. Same will be for Turing (if any).
Nvidia has been focusing on improving other things than integer math for many years now.

Maxwell and Pascal were almost identical as far as architecture. Turing is nothing like either of those (hence the tensor and RTX parts of the CPU). That's like comparing clockspeed or cores between AMD/Intel.

I based my assertion off of leaked benchmarks and rumors reporting performance on hardware websites.

I have no ax to grind with him.. I don't need mining, I do it as a hobby for fun, I could give two fucks about your shitty 5 dollar a day profit over 20 dollars a day profit.

You care an awwwwwwful lot about that shitty 5 dollar a day profit for someone who does this about a hobby. I'm more of a fan of 'what people do' rather then 'what people say' logic, and we can just look at the shear amount of time you've spent in this thread monitoring it and making responses.

Also you spend $20k on hardware, regardless of doing something for a hobby, you would probably care. XD

I've spent 7-8k on hardware for my hobby, I wipe my ass with 8k.. I get it's a lot of money to you, for adults with good jobs it's play money. My electricity bill is 650 a month, 150 of it is from mining, see if you can figure out why my bill is 650.. Relax kid, let it go..
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
The comparison of cuda cores between different architectures worked well for Maxwell Vs pascal, at least until the miner Devs figured out how to take the best out of the latter, and it wasn't a big difference. Same will be for Turing (if any).
Nvidia has been focusing on improving other things than integer math for many years now.

Maxwell and Pascal were almost identical as far as architecture. Turing is nothing like either of those (hence the tensor and RTX parts of the CPU).

Yeah, those parts which are useless for mining :-D
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
The comparison of cuda cores between different architectures worked well for Maxwell Vs pascal, at least until the miner Devs figured out how to take the best out of the latter, and it wasn't a big difference. Same will be for Turing (if any).
Nvidia has been focusing on improving other things than integer math for many years now.

Maxwell and Pascal were almost identical as far as architecture. Turing is nothing like either of those (hence the tensor and RTX parts of the CPU). That's like comparing clockspeed or cores between AMD/Intel.

I based my assertion off of leaked benchmarks and rumors reporting performance on hardware websites.

I have no ax to grind with him.. I don't need mining, I do it as a hobby for fun, I could give two fucks about your shitty 5 dollar a day profit over 20 dollars a day profit.

You care an awwwwwwful lot about that shitty 5 dollar a day profit for someone who does this about a hobby. I'm more of a fan of 'what people do' rather then 'what people say' logic, and we can just look at the shear amount of time you've spent in this thread monitoring it and making responses.

Also you spend $20k on hardware, regardless of doing something for a hobby, you would probably care. XD
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
My miner isn't performing good when the latency on the pool is high. This is a known issue from ccminer 2.2.4 & cminer 1.0 alexis. Job not found rejected shares. etc,. The fee miners have improved the stratum code, and gained few percent more pool shares with a lower hashrate (gpu speed)..

These issues are fixed in spmod-git #10
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
X16r/X16s/C11 Spmod-git #10 has been released

- Fixed double nonce submission in simd and some other algos. (faster x16r/x16s)
- Improved the the poolside hashrate when mining on high intensity or/and low difficulty. (removed double work after a solution had been found)
- Reduced the pool network traffic by increasing the workload to the gpu to scan the whole 32bit nonce range.
- Reduced rejected shares on the pool.
- Added pool latency and blocks found to the miner output

This miner is free without any fee. Linux/Windows

cuda 9.2 binary:


https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases

source:

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/commits/master
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
and you still try to portrait yourself as open source dev??

What do you call this?

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/commits/master

70 opensource commits done by me since 9th of may 2018. Mostly x16r improvements, but with some copy and paste skills you should be able to beat the alexis 1.0 in all his algos.

The competition compare and use my opensource work so they can get a faster hashrate.
 
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Sure you paid .05 btc for something that is now slower and free. Relax. You'll survive.

My mods come with free updates. If the competition improves, I release a new faster binary.
legendary
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
@sp_ be honest and tell us which latest fee miner have you hexored for you speedup  Cool

first you was after open source community, then on personal agenda against alexis, which is dying atm so next you move at fee miners as you see them as threat

if you had any shame.... and you still try to portrait yourself as open source dev??
jr. member
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
Bensam, you're the perfect example of a fan-boi that has no ability to see beyond the desperate position he has staked his entire existence behind. If you pried your head out of his asshole you'd be able to see the excuses are non-sense. I have no ax to grind with him.. I don't need mining, I do it as a hobby for fun, I could give two fucks about your shitty 5 dollar a day profit over 20 dollars a day profit.

I work for a living, I make more than enough to not care. I simply point out the scams, I get that you got scammed to buy some of these miners, it sucks for you, I get it. It's hard to swallow, I understand. Look into the mirror with me.. repeat after me.. let it go... Sure you paid .05 btc for something that is now slower and free. Relax. You'll survive.

When teenagers get on the internet and become "wizards" suddenly... smh..


Pages:
Jump to: