lol.. Jesus... and lemmings fall over themselves defending that shit
I would have more respect for the truth, I'm charging this cuz thats what I feel my work is worth. You want it, then buy it, or stfu. That at least has some truth to it.
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 25. (Read 2347599 times)
At the end of the day, all the devs "borrow" code or ideas from any open source that has something of value to give. I enjoy watching the lemmings fall over themselves trying to justify every little thing SP does, trying to explain away the exaggerations and lies, and getting oh so mad when you won't follow. Everyone knows all the devs do this, not all the devs are making up stories about how they need to charge .05btc "to protect the profits of the coins because my miner is so fast it reduces profits for miners". or my favorite "I need to charge otherwise other devs will steal my work"..
lol.. Jesus... and lemmings fall over themselves defending that shit
I would have more respect for the truth, I'm charging this cuz thats what I feel my work is worth. You want it, then buy it, or stfu. That at least has some truth to it.
lol.. Jesus... and lemmings fall over themselves defending that shit
I would have more respect for the truth, I'm charging this cuz thats what I feel my work is worth. You want it, then buy it, or stfu. That at least has some truth to it.
Code:
CUfunction ASM_SIMD = NULL;
// if (LoadPtxKernel("Enemy_120_simd_32_52.ptx", &ASM_SIMD) != CUDA_SUCCESS)
if (LoadPtxKernel("cuda_x11_simd512.compute_52.ptx", &ASM_SIMD) != CUDA_SUCCESS)
{
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
Competition is good for the hashrate. My fork will still be opensource, but the actual cuda work is done in the ptx assembly files compiled at runtime. The ptx files extracted from the free competition miners, modded to fit my miner.
Free opensource speed boost. Without virus warnings.
With such speed of stealing you will always be far behind competitors. 0.6.7 t-rex is out already. I guess enemy 1.21 is not long to wait. 
Code:
CUfunction ASM_SIMD = NULL;
// if (LoadPtxKernel("Enemy_120_simd_32_52.ptx", &ASM_SIMD) != CUDA_SUCCESS)
if (LoadPtxKernel("cuda_x11_simd512.compute_52.ptx", &ASM_SIMD) != CUDA_SUCCESS)
{
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
Competition is good for the hashrate. My fork will still be opensource, but the actual cuda work is done in the ptx assembly files compiled at runtime. The ptx files extracted from the free competition miners, modded to fit my miner.
Free opensource speed boost. Without virus warnings.
kernels from cd/t-rex/enemy.
The best from cd/t-rex/enemy kernels is only giving 28MHASH on the 1080ti (x17). So I add the profitable percent. The +10% the other guys can't copy..For the moment - your miner is the slowest, far behind z/t.
Pity for you, but your time has passed. There is no alexis78 to stole code from
So you are saying ...
That they are doing what Rune Stensland has been doing for the last 4 years?
Nice work!
When you learn what this guy has ACTUALLY done, you will see how little 'work' he really does, and how much opensource code he takes to implement into the 'private' miners of his own. So the pot calling the kettle black in this case. This argument has been going on for years and NO ONE seems to police this. So EVERYONE is jumping on the bandwagon that Rune STARTED and is STILL driving. Good luck trying to defend a thief of opensource code and plagiarist/tweaker of everyone else's code.
So he is making himself out to be a victim of thievery now. What a farce. He has been doing the SAME thing he is accusing others of ALL his Crypto life. The few that are ACTUAL developers have all gone private and underground because of his bullshit sense of authority and power. Rune cannot code to save his life, and that little which he has learned, he has learned from the real developers who have thus disappeared from the public market.
Every one here talks about Alexis code and the old Alexis git which Rune continues to compare to which is more than 16months old. You want current Alexis code? Then you will be waiting a long time because it is the actions of Rune that forces the REAL developers like Alexis to remove themselves from the public eye. Protection of REAL code by REAL coders is the one thing that needs to be done, and REAL code needs to be kept away from REAL THIEVES like Rune.
So support his trivial efforts, especially when he can't compete with the current code that the REAL devs have these days. All private of course, which you can thank Rune for.
#crysx
The x17 profit is declining. The noob miners move to something more profitable...
That's the difference between private kernel code and public code.
Yes sure. I think the only "optimized"miner that is left in your stock is for spread algo. What if z/t will bother to make their's? That's the difference between private kernel code and public code.
kernels from cd/t-rex/enemy.
The best from cd/t-rex/enemy kernels is only giving 28MHASH on the 1080ti (x17). So I add the profitable percent. The +10% the other guys can't copy..For the moment - your miner is the slowest, far behind z/t.
Pity for you, but your time has passed. There is no alexis78 to stole code from
Why sp_ want to steal their kernels, if these kernels are just compiled from "his" opensource code? He can't compile, or he has no code?
Something is completely wrong with your logic.
The x17 profit is declining. The noob miners move to something more profitable...
That's the difference between private kernel code and public code.
That's the difference between private kernel code and public code.
kernels from cd/t-rex/enemy.
The best from cd/t-rex/enemy kernels is only giving 28MHASH on the 1080ti (x17). So I add the profitable percent. The +10% the other guys can't copy..For the moment - your miner is the slowest, far behind z/t.
Pity for you, but your time has passed. There is no alexis78 to stole code from
kernels from cd/t-rex/enemy.
The best from cd/t-rex/enemy kernels is only giving 28MHASH on the 1080ti (x17). So I add the profitable percent. The +10% the other guys can't copy..For the moment - your miner is the slowest, far behind z/t.
Pity for you, but your time has passed. There is no alexis78 to steal code from
Stealing kernels won't help you - it's a dead end. kernels from cd/t-rex/enemy.
The best from cd/t-rex/enemy kernels is only giving 28MHASH on the 1080ti (x17). So I add the profitable percent. The +10% the other guys can't copy..
but for free
I have extracted all the kernels from the other devs and can soon publish a ptx opensource miner.. 30MHASH x17(asus 1080ti 90% tdp, +130 core +600 mem). 0.8% dev fee. Kernels made by t-rex/enemy/sp-mod. Thanks for the free work guys..
you now confessed that you are stealing code from other developers, it's very bad
I have found evidence of my gpl code in their work. The sourcecode is provided for free in the public exefiles released by team cryptodregde/team enemy/team-t-rex (assembly language). My miner will be opensource and under GPL. The ptx kernels will be compiled runtime and executed by my program. If they release a faster miner, I will extract the new ptx code to make sure that my opensource miner always is the fastest.
but for free
I have extracted all the kernels from the other devs and can soon publish a ptx opensource miner.. 30MHASH x17(asus 1080ti 90% tdp, +130 core +600 mem). 0.8% dev fee. Kernels made by t-rex/enemy/sp-mod. Thanks for the free work guys..
you now confessed that you are stealing code from other developers, it's very bad _sp and in a month write that we steal your code from you
I don't steal code. I plan use your free code in you "free" miner and release the sourcecode with it. (the Ptx assembly code). Then I won't violate the GPL licence you are violating. My miner will be faster,opensource, free and with a smaller devfee of 0.8%
but for free
I have extracted all the kernels from the other devs and can soon publish a ptx opensource miner.. 30MHASH x17(asus 1080ti 90% tdp, +130 core +600 mem). 0.8% dev fee. Kernels made by t-rex/enemy/sp-mod. Thanks for the free work guys..
Do not forget to rename everything - _sp and in a month write that we steal your code from you
I don't earn any money from my opensource work, but my private bins are getting faster and faster.
X16R/X17 has improved to become +30% faster in a few months thanks to optimalizations. I made the 27MHASH x17 miner first..
Here is a post from August 8th. When enemy 1.14 and t-rex 5.7 was "the fastest"
We all know how you "measure". X16R/X17 has improved to become +30% faster in a few months thanks to optimalizations. I made the 27MHASH x17 miner first..
Here is a post from August 8th. When enemy 1.14 and t-rex 5.7 was "the fastest"
Still 20% slower than Enemy?
My private is around 20% faster than (enemy 1.14)/(t-rex 5.7) in x16r/x16s/x17 27 MHASH x17 1080ti, (2BTC) 27Mh was "on paper". In reality maybe 23-24 was achieved.but for free
I have extracted all the kernels from the other devs and can soon publish a ptx opensource miner.. 30MHASH x17(asus 1080ti 90% tdp, +130 core +600 mem). 0.8% dev fee. Kernels made by t-rex/enemy/sp-mod. Thanks for the free work guys..
I don't earn any money from my opensource work, but my private bins are getting faster and faster.
X16R/X17 has improved to become +30% faster in a few months thanks to optimalizations. I made the 27MHASH x17 miner first..
Here is a post from August 8th. When enemy 1.14 and t-rex 5.7 was "the fastest"
We all know how you "measure". X16R/X17 has improved to become +30% faster in a few months thanks to optimalizations. I made the 27MHASH x17 miner first..
Here is a post from August 8th. When enemy 1.14 and t-rex 5.7 was "the fastest"
Still 20% slower than Enemy?
My private is around 20% faster than (enemy 1.14)/(t-rex 5.7) in x16r/x16s/x17 27 MHASH x17 1080ti, (2BTC) 27Mh was "on paper". In reality maybe 23-24 was achieved.I don't earn any money from my opensource work, but my private bins are getting faster and faster.
X16R/X17 has improved to become +30% faster in a few months thanks to optimalizations. I made the 27MHASH x17 miner first..
Here is a post from August 8th. When enemy 1.14 and t-rex 5.7 was "the fastest"
We all know how you "measure". X16R/X17 has improved to become +30% faster in a few months thanks to optimalizations. I made the 27MHASH x17 miner first..
Here is a post from August 8th. When enemy 1.14 and t-rex 5.7 was "the fastest"
Still 20% slower than Enemy?
My private is around 20% faster than (enemy 1.14)/(t-rex 5.7) in x16r/x16s/x17 27 MHASH x17 1080ti, (2BTC) 27Mh was "on paper". In reality maybe 23-24 was achieved.
I don't earn any money from my opensource work, but my private bins are getting faster and faster.
X16R/X17 has improved to become +30% faster in a few months thanks to optimalizations. I made the 27MHASH x17 miner first..
Here is a post from August 8th. When enemy 1.14 and t-rex 5.7 was "the fastest"
X16R/X17 has improved to become +30% faster in a few months thanks to optimalizations. I made the 27MHASH x17 miner first..
Here is a post from August 8th. When enemy 1.14 and t-rex 5.7 was "the fastest"
Still 20% slower than Enemy?
My private is around 20% faster than (enemy 1.14)/(t-rex 5.7) in x16r/x16s/x17 27 MHASH x17 1080ti, (2BTC)Jump to: