Pages:
Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 27. (Read 2347632 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
I was wrong, Chinese miners are still jacking hashrate while price of crypto was declining. So even though we're at basically the same price as a month ago, we're making quite a bit less. It looks like we'll go negative at $.1kwh around 6k~. You can't compete with do or die attitudes. Chinese are too industrious and too stupid to know when to start dialing things back, so we get to ride this into the ground with them. That mixed with the dark hashrate is going to make this even worse as when BTC starts climbing again it wont matter as people will flip on their rigs so we'll be left in limbo for quite some time.

There is a inordinate amount of FPGAs floating around as well. From my experience with niche algos it seems any thing that can be mined with a FPGA is currently being. It's like the new ASIC. If coin makers care about their coin and GPU users they should consider hardening them against FPGAs. Ideally GPU mineable coins should be a moving target with algo adjustments on a regular basis as no one is doing this currently.

I've been in quite a few niche markets and they're all showing similar signs. It's like back in '14 when scrypt asics started showing up. I'm sure the Chinese are fucking things, but it's not just that, considering the decline in GPU shipments according to makers we shouldn't be seeing this much growth in GPU hashrate. It wouldn't be far fetched to assume custom ASICs similar to baikals that can mine multiple algos as well. GPUs are basically big ASICs. A couple of the coins I've mined have had legitimate operations show up and start advertising their 'cloud' mining service, which wasn't just one coin, and they weren't using GPUs.

That aside, the 2XXX series and Eth fork couldn't happen at a worse time.


Lol, you're so angry... That's some big madz.. Ok, I'll stop making fun of you, go put your nose back in his ass and close your eyes. It'll all go away...

PLEASE LEAVE THE THREAD--

Your obscene remarks are unwelcome.       --scryptr



Lol, dude, get a life..

Go take your bruised ego else where. Stop into your locally owned store and start talking shit there to kill time. No? Guess there are limitations to being spoiled.
jr. member
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
Lol, you're so angry... That's some big madz.. Ok, I'll stop making fun of you, go put your nose back in his ass and close your eyes. It'll all go away...

PLEASE LEAVE THE THREAD--

Your obscene remarks are unwelcome.       --scryptr



Lol, dude, get a life..
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
ccminer.cpp: In function ‘void* miner_thread(void*)’:
ccminer.cpp:1852:12: error: ‘Sleep’ was not declared in this scope
     Sleep(1);
            ^
Makefile:1836: recipe for target 'ccminer-ccminer.o' failed
make[2]: *** [ccminer-ccminer.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
mv -f .deps/ccminer-pools.Tpo .deps/ccminer-pools.Po
mv -f .deps/ccminer-hefty1.Tpo .deps/ccminer-hefty1.Po
mv -f .deps/ccminer-util.Tpo .deps/ccminer-util.Po
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/miners/suprminer-spmod-git10'
Makefile:2262: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/m1/miners/suprminer-spmod-git10'
Makefile:680: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2



not compline Error here all
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
ccminer.cpp: In function ‘void* miner_thread(void*)’:
ccminer.cpp:1852:12: error: ‘Sleep’ was not declared in this scope
     Sleep(1);
            ^
Makefile:1836: recipe for target 'ccminer-ccminer.o' failed


saying that
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Whats the error message?
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
linux still not compile not work
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
fixed@git
hero member
Activity: 710
Merit: 502
ccminer.cpp: In function ‘void* miner_thread(void*)’:
ccminer.cpp:1852:12: error: ‘Sleep’ was not declared in this scope
     Sleep(1);
            ^
Makefile:1836: recipe for target 'ccminer-ccminer.o' failed





linux not compile  on ubuntu


Replace Sleep with usleep
I made a pull request to fix this but for some reason sp didn't want to merge it.
Worked!, Thanks!  Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
ccminer.cpp: In function ‘void* miner_thread(void*)’:
ccminer.cpp:1852:12: error: ‘Sleep’ was not declared in this scope
     Sleep(1);
            ^
Makefile:1836: recipe for target 'ccminer-ccminer.o' failed





linux not compile  on ubuntu


Replace Sleep with usleep
I made a pull request to fix this but for some reason sp didn't want to merge it.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
ccminer.cpp: In function ‘void* miner_thread(void*)’:
ccminer.cpp:1852:12: error: ‘Sleep’ was not declared in this scope
     Sleep(1);
            ^
Makefile:1836: recipe for target 'ccminer-ccminer.o' failed





linux not compile  on ubuntu
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
sp do us a favor, buy a 2080ti and do some test on all algo, maybe we have a good perf on other non-eth algo
We will definitely get on gtx 2080 ti better speed because of wide memory and more CUDA cores. And it will be at lower power. The question is how big will be speed-up.

Will the structure be good for mining?
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
Lol, you're so angry... That's some big madz.. Ok, I'll stop making fun of you, go put your nose back in his ass and close your eyes. It'll all go away...

PLEASE LEAVE THE THREAD--

Your obscene remarks are unwelcome.       --scryptr

jr. member
Activity: 213
Merit: 3
Lol, you're so angry... That's some big madz.. Ok, I'll stop making fun of you, go put your nose back in his ass and close your eyes. It'll all go away...
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
The comparison of cuda cores between different architectures worked well for Maxwell Vs pascal, at least until the miner Devs figured out how to take the best out of the latter, and it wasn't a big difference. Same will be for Turing (if any).
Nvidia has been focusing on improving other things than integer math for many years now.

Maxwell and Pascal were almost identical as far as architecture. Turing is nothing like either of those (hence the tensor and RTX parts of the CPU). That's like comparing clockspeed or cores between AMD/Intel.

I based my assertion off of leaked benchmarks and rumors reporting performance on hardware websites.

I have no ax to grind with him.. I don't need mining, I do it as a hobby for fun, I could give two fucks about your shitty 5 dollar a day profit over 20 dollars a day profit.

You care an awwwwwwful lot about that shitty 5 dollar a day profit for someone who does this about a hobby. I'm more of a fan of 'what people do' rather then 'what people say' logic, and we can just look at the shear amount of time you've spent in this thread monitoring it and making responses.

Also you spend $20k on hardware, regardless of doing something for a hobby, you would probably care. XD

I've spent 7-8k on hardware for my hobby, I wipe my ass with 8k.. I get it's a lot of money to you, for adults with good jobs it's play money. My electricity bill is 650 a month, 150 of it is from mining, see if you can figure out why my bill is 650.. Relax kid, let it go..

Well that explains a lot. $8k is a lot of money for most people, that's not something even adults throw around, especially with obligations. More like a kid with too much money to know what to do with and now you're angry your hobby isn't doing what you want and you throw a tantrum.

You know a nifty thing you can do with someones power bill is reverse how much energy they're using. So at $150 you're using about 2000w a month, which amounts to about 8 1080tis (9 months ago). So you did pay $1k a piece for your 2 1/2 mining rigs worth of GPUs.

As to you pissing away your money and trying to make me care? I don't know why I would. You being a inefficient miner that always gets his way in real life because he bitches a lot has no bearing here and just adds all the more reason to you just being here making SPs life miserable because rich people don't care about things that actually matter, they care about bruised egos and reputation.

So while we're talking about being a kid, you remind me of the spoiled one. I'm not even sure why you're here and one of your butlers isn't. Heck I'm not even sure why you're trying to mine for 'peanuts' when you suck at it (since you don't seem to care about things that actually make you good at it) and it doesn't make that much money even if you're good at it.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
why there's code from alexis78 on "your" code ...?

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/commit/fa9e80cf4d71f97f431dede6b2265dbb9c3a8ec9#diff-c949f93d03f44a4217d7a138f9e2e54aL73

and i only skimmed that one fiile.. i wonder the rest.

My code is based on ccminer, and alexis78 is one of the contributors. The reason why the file is renamed is that it has been optimized to be faster than in the alexis fork. Alexis improved echo by removing some of the sharemem bank conflicts in AES. He solved this bymoving some of the tables to the global memory (level1 cache).
I increased the shared mem buffer by having several copies of the the aes table and removed all of the sharemem conflicts. this resulted in a +30% faster echo. The alexis echo function is based on my work back in 2015. Back then I  precualculated the P[] table to save some AES rounds among other improvements.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
hi!

Is there anyone here can compile Sgminer for AMD card with new algo. i can pay BTC or ETH

thanks
write in topic CriptoDredge
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4807821.240

Thanks
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 27
http://radio.r41.ru
hi!

Is there anyone here can compile Sgminer for AMD card with new algo. i can pay BTC or ETH

thanks
write in topic CriptoDredge
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4807821.240
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
hi!

Is there anyone here can compile Sgminer for AMD card with new algo. i can pay BTC or ETH

thanks
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
and you still try to portrait yourself as open source dev??

What do you call this?

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/commits/master

70 opensource commits done by me since 9th of may 2018. Mostly x16r improvements, but with some copy and paste skills you should be able to beat the alexis 1.0 in all his algos.

The competition compare and use my opensource work so they can get a faster hashrate.
 

why there's code from alexis78 on "your" code ...?

https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/commit/fa9e80cf4d71f97f431dede6b2265dbb9c3a8ec9#diff-c949f93d03f44a4217d7a138f9e2e54aL73

and i only skimmed that one fiile.. i wonder the rest.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
The comparison of cuda cores between different architectures worked well for Maxwell Vs pascal, at least until the miner Devs figured out how to take the best out of the latter, and it wasn't a big difference. Same will be for Turing (if any).
Nvidia has been focusing on improving other things than integer math for many years now.

Maxwell and Pascal were almost identical as far as architecture. Turing is nothing like either of those (hence the tensor and RTX parts of the CPU).

Yeah, those parts which are useless for mining :-D

As for me, I can easily propose the way to use AI blocks to create neural network which will help mining.

Propose away then ...

Let's see if we can build on the idea.

PM if you want also.

#crysx
Pages:
Jump to: