CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 345.

avirdoz

legendary

Activity: 1191

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2017, 10:00:31 AM

Quote from: sp_ on May 18, 2017, 06:35:42 AM

Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2017, 05:38:26 AM

he was earning more than 5 btc daily, if we assume that he was doing 2% from all the emission of zcash,

NVIDIA is only 10% of the world hashrate. Most farms use AMD. Perhaps he was doing 0.5BTC per day

not on zcash, zcash is full of nvidia not amd, amd is pointed at ETH and monero

old amd cards on zcash

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1072

Quote from: sp_ on May 18, 2017, 06:35:42 AM

Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2017, 05:38:26 AM

he was earning more than 5 btc daily, if we assume that he was doing 2% from all the emission of zcash,

NVIDIA is only 10% of the world hashrate. Most farms use AMD. Perhaps he was doing 0.5BTC per day

not on zcash, zcash is full of nvidia not amd, amd is pointed at ETH and monero

giagge

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1001

WHICH MINER ARE YOU USING?

Yeah i want know this .

scryptr

legendary

Activity: 1797

Merit: 1028

Quote from: jr69 on May 18, 2017, 03:47:36 AM

Is there any reason why there isn't a tutorial on how to run this?

And why does the mining default to some person's bitcoin wallet, instead of prompting the user for their own?

WHICH MINER ARE YOU USING?

This thread is not exactly newbie territory. There are many versions of CCminer now, each code author is slightly different in their approach. Many include a batch file or even include internal coding to mine to a donation address. If you start the CCminer with an example batch file, and do not edit the batch file first, you will be mining to a donation address. No version of CCminer will prompt for an address upon launch.

Either edit the batch file to point to your coin address, or use an interface like NiceHashMiner. NiceHashMiner controls multiple mining softwares, and uses only a single BitCoin address for payment. You will be able to see the BitCoin address on starting the miner, and change it to your own address. If you have only a few GPUs, it is an easy way to start. --scryptr

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Amph on May 18, 2017, 05:38:26 AM

he was earning more than 5 btc daily, if we assume that he was doing 2% from all the emission of zcash,

NVIDIA is only 10% of the world hashrate. Most farms use AMD. Perhaps he was doing 0.5BTC per day

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1072

Quote from: minerx117 on May 18, 2017, 04:32:44 AM

Quote from: sp_ on May 18, 2017, 04:26:33 AM

flypool.org. I don't run with the --fee 0 option. The -fee 0 is supposed to be slower than the build in 2% fee.

not in my test 0.3.3b with --fee 0 is the fastest for me.... if you don't use --fee 0 then yes ewbf has a default fee of 2% in 0.3.3b he introduced the --fee option to give users the choice of donating or not ...
running with default 2%fee and --fee 0 yields exactly the same sol's there is no speed decrease for not donating he is simply a TRUE amazing Dev who had already made enough from the 2% fee option in all his previous version's so now he gives user's the option many people still use a fee because his code is worth it..

i dont use flypool.org i use mph for zcash...

he was earning more than 5 btc daily, if we assume that he was doing 2% from all the emission of zcash, which is 288 btc per day, even if not all the hash on zcash was using his miner there are other equihash coin that were using it probably

now this is 150 a month for 6 months, since the release of his miner, that is almost 1000 btc...yes he has enough money, i'm glad that is not greedy and did the no fee option, at this point i see no reason for him to leave the miner private he should release the code

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Wich driver give the most speed?

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: sp_ on May 18, 2017, 04:26:33 AM

flypool.org. I don't run with the --fee 0 option. The -fee 0 is supposed to be slower than the build in 2% fee.

not in my test 0.3.3b with --fee 0 is the fastest for me.... if you don't use --fee 0 then yes ewbf has a default fee of 2% in 0.3.3b he introduced the --fee option to give users the choice of donating or not ...
running with default 2%fee and --fee 0 yields exactly the same sol's there is no speed decrease for not donating he is simply a TRUE amazing Dev who had already made enough from the 2% fee option in all his previous version's so now he gives user's the option many people still use a fee because his code is worth it..

i dont use flypool.org i use mph for zcash...

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

flypool.org. I don't run with the --fee 0 option. The -fee 0 is supposed to be slower than the build in 2% fee.

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

ill confirm

ewbf latest version has a 0 % - fee option .....

Code:

--fee 0

which pool you having that speed issue with sp ?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: minerx117 on May 18, 2017, 03:41:56 AM

G1 GAMING 1070 default tdp is 180watt.. if you running a g1 GAMING @ 80% tdp you are using over 150watt.. i run my g1 GAMING 1070's @ 65% tdp = 120watt .....
most other 1070 are 150watt default tdp... i run those @ 77% tdp = 120watt...
120watt is the sweet spot efficiency for the 1070 tested with multiple algo's

It's just a test.
150watt good for benchmark. You should be able to reach 450 with mild oc and 150watt on most cards using the EWFB miner.

But it doesn't explain why the pool is showing 417SOL/s average 24 hours, and the miner show 450sol/s. Is EWFB is taking 7.5% fee instead of 2% ? Can anyone else confirm my findings?

jr69

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Is there any reason why there isn't a tutorial on how to run this?

And why does the mining default to some person's bitcoin wallet, instead of prompting the user for their own?

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: sp_ on May 18, 2017, 02:38:39 AM

Quote from: go6ooo1212 on May 17, 2017, 06:20:06 PM

80% TDP gives around 470-80sol on 1070 with EWBF's miner...

Not on my rigs. The EWBF miner seem to be slow when you run 6 cards in the rig. (meassured on the pool)

I am testing on a 6 gtx 1070 rig and a 1840 celeron cpu / 4gig ram. (80% tdp with oc gigabyte g1 gaming)

Reported in the miner window 2700 (450 sol/s per card
Reported on the pool 24h (flypool.org) 2500 (416.66 sol/s per card)

I did a test with more than one rig, and all of them can't break 2500 with 6x 1070 cards using the EWBF miner.

G1 GAMING 1070 default tdp is 180watt.. if you running a g1 GAMING @ 80% tdp you are using over 150watt.. i run my g1 GAMING 1070's @ 65% tdp = 120watt .....

most other 1070 are 150watt default tdp... i run those @ 77% tdp = 120watt...

120watt is the sweet spot efficiency for the 1070 tested with multiple algo's

Kompik

sr. member

Activity: 463

Merit: 250

Quote from: go6ooo1212 on May 17, 2017, 06:20:06 PM

80% TDP gives around 470-80sol on 1070 with EWBF's miner...

80% TDP on MSi gaming can be higher than 110% TDP on ASUS or EVGA SC - just to let you know that it is useless to use this measure.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: go6ooo1212 on May 17, 2017, 06:20:06 PM

80% TDP gives around 470-80sol on 1070 with EWBF's miner...

Not on my rigs. The EWBF miner seem to be slow when you run 6 cards in the rig. (meassured on the pool)

I am testing on a 6 gtx 1070 rig and a 1840 celeron cpu / 4gig ram. (80% tdp with oc gigabyte g1 gaming)

Reported in the miner window 2700 (450 sol/s per card
Reported on the pool 24h (flypool.org) 2500 (416.66 sol/s per card)

I did a test with more than one rig, and all of them can't break 2500 with 6x 1070 cards using the EWBF miner.

kopija

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Greetings SP et al,
I am seeing very low hashrate on lyra2v2 on gtx970 Linux compared to 1060 on Win.
7 vs 22 MH/s
Is that normal hashrate for Maxwell?
Maybe the problem is Cuda 8 on that Linux machine?
Thanks.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Why quoting tdp percent? It's not coherent across cards. Use the wattage instead.

sxafir

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 500

Ccminer is fine but i dont know is 1% fee is in all version.Someone know?

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

80% TDP gives around 470-80sol on 1070 with EWBF's miner...

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

equihash sp-mod #1

I modded the dj-ezo solver. Not for sale.

But here is a screenshot of the preresults

80% tdp

Gives a small boost on the pool compared to EWFB.

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 345. (Read 2347664 times)