Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 350. (Read 2347659 times)
that is something that belong to you, since you were the first one to ignore me, ignoring someone else is childish in my view
ccminer-equihash tpruvot source code compiled by me:
Source Code: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/tree/equihash
Windows Binary: https://mega.nz/#F!hi4SUIrY!hqSSsMxCgXDJ_FjlgpDYNw
X64 Release compile from tpruvot source with vs2013 cuda 8.0 for compute 3.0-5.2
tested on gtx 1060 & 1070 100% stable no crashes
Best Regards
#Nemo
Source Code: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/tree/equihash
Windows Binary: https://mega.nz/#F!hi4SUIrY!hqSSsMxCgXDJ_FjlgpDYNw
X64 Release compile from tpruvot source with vs2013 cuda 8.0 for compute 3.0-5.2
tested on gtx 1060 & 1070 100% stable no crashes
Best Regards
#Nemo
seems that epsylon is not aware thta JHA is broken in his last version, i get memory errors when i try to use it
I bought another gpu to minning.
ccminer-equihash tpruvot source code compiled by me:
Source Code: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/tree/equihash
Windows Binary: https://mega.nz/#F!hi4SUIrY!hqSSsMxCgXDJ_FjlgpDYNw
X64 Release compile from tpruvot source with vs2013 cuda 8.0 for compute 3.0-5.2
tested on gtx 1060 & 1070 100% stable no crashes
Best Regards
#Nemo
What about speed? 300&440? Source Code: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/tree/equihash
Windows Binary: https://mega.nz/#F!hi4SUIrY!hqSSsMxCgXDJ_FjlgpDYNw
X64 Release compile from tpruvot source with vs2013 cuda 8.0 for compute 3.0-5.2
tested on gtx 1060 & 1070 100% stable no crashes
Best Regards
#Nemo
ccminer-equihash tpruvot source code compiled by me:
Source Code: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/tree/equihash
Windows Binary: https://mega.nz/#F!hi4SUIrY!hqSSsMxCgXDJ_FjlgpDYNw
X64 Release compile from tpruvot source with vs2013 cuda 8.0 for compute 3.0-5.2
tested on gtx 1060 & 1070 100% stable no crashes
Best Regards
#Nemo
Source Code: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/tree/equihash
Windows Binary: https://mega.nz/#F!hi4SUIrY!hqSSsMxCgXDJ_FjlgpDYNw
X64 Release compile from tpruvot source with vs2013 cuda 8.0 for compute 3.0-5.2
tested on gtx 1060 & 1070 100% stable no crashes
Best Regards
#Nemo
can someone make this work on other pools ?
yeah,really need.
Works on Suprnova now (ZEC and KMD) - I'll update the rest as well.
The ccminer variant works on a special port.
According to the responses he got in his thread, the speed upgrade isn't legitimate. It's based on a technique that yields less work pool side. Is that correct?
PALGIN HAS SHELVED THE PROJECT--
He withdrew the binaries from his GitHub after a discussion with djeZo (an author). Apparently his optimization strategy was a dead-end previously visited by djeZo, and known by djeZo to produce false local hashhates. The code was unstable for me and others, Palgin may have a personal version that is stable on his rig(s).
In contrast, Palgin's CCminer 2.1 v3 reported locally about 150Sols/s on a GTX 960, but crashed almost immediately. Excavator v1.1 from the NiceHash GitHub hashes at 130Sols/s at the local console, and the hashrate is verified by the pool (YIIMP). Pool hashrate is based on submitted shares, often it is reported higher than the console hashrate. --scryptr
can someone make this work on other pools ?
yeah,really need.
Works on Suprnova now (ZEC and KMD) - I'll update the rest as well.
The ccminer variant works on a special port.
According to the responses he got in his thread, the speed upgrade isn't legitimate. It's based on a technique that yields less work pool side. Is that correct?
I did not run his binary version (I never run any binarys from unknown sources, especially when it comes to crypto
) and cannot speak for "his" version - but tpruvot's version (compiled from tpruvot's source) is legit:
can someone make this work on other pools ?
yeah,really need.
Works on Suprnova now (ZEC and KMD) - I'll update the rest as well.
The ccminer variant works on a special port.
According to the responses he got in his thread, the speed upgrade isn't legitimate. It's based on a technique that yields less work pool side. Is that correct?
can someone make this work on other pools ?
yeah,really need.
Works on Suprnova now (ZEC and KMD) - I'll update the rest as well.
The ccminer variant works on a special port.
Fake speed. Dev updated his thread
Sorry, comrades, while v1 is still a bit fasted than EWBF's version, stability is a shit. DjeZo pointed that I'm going the wrong way, so I decided to rewrite equi kernel from scratch and without any obligatory licenses
Maybe rewrite miner code too to get rid of licensing issues, but all that needs time and I don't want to waste my vacation trip for this, hope you understand. I'll try to keep my thread updated, anyway.
can someone make this work on other pools ?
i have 650 h/s on a gtx g1 gaming
with ewbf 460 h/s
core +100 mem +700 , tdp 80%
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/tag/2.1-equihash_test
the third one (v3)
it works on zpool and yimp
but on nicehash and flypool it says failed to get extranonce .
i have 650 h/s on a gtx g1 gaming
with ewbf 460 h/s
core +100 mem +700 , tdp 80%
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/tag/2.1-equihash_test
the third one (v3)
it works on zpool and yimp
but on nicehash and flypool it says failed to get extranonce .
Fake speed. Dev updated his thread
can someone make this work on other pools ?
yeah,really need.
can someone make this work on other pools ?
i have 650 h/s on a gtx g1 gaming
with ewbf 460 h/s
core +100 mem +700 , tdp 80%
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/tag/2.1-equihash_test
the third one (v3)
it works on zpool and yimp
but on nicehash and flypool it says failed to get extranonce .
i have 650 h/s on a gtx g1 gaming
with ewbf 460 h/s
core +100 mem +700 , tdp 80%
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/tag/2.1-equihash_test
the third one (v3)
it works on zpool and yimp
but on nicehash and flypool it says failed to get extranonce .
what i see now is what matter, and lbry is at top with feathercoin with 2x profit over sia
btw lbry pumped hard to 10k...
btw something isn't right in your post, are you comparing a 1070 on both coin? 1800 MH vs 300 MH right? because i get different things that what you posted, which seems to be taken from current profitability...
btw lbry pumped hard to 10k...
btw something isn't right in your post, are you comparing a 1070 on both coin? 1800 MH vs 300 MH right? because i get different things that what you posted, which seems to be taken from current profitability...
Am I missing something about SIA profitability?
A 1070 should have got 1850MH/s right?
BTX instead?
A 1070 should have got 1850MH/s right?
BTX instead?
And no... Look around a bit.
if you provide source and everything, i don't see the issue with being newbie, would be good to start your thread, i see that your first work is on bitcore right?
Bitcore was my first try with github, I'm kinda newbie in CUDA developement, to be true, I haven't written single CUDA kernel from scratch, for me it's easier (and much more faster) to mod existing open-sourced code (or at least try to do it). It's more like self-educational hobby for me, not business, in Equihash particular case I won't release source at that moment, I've implemented some thread-synchronization tricks that can be unstable in long perspective and give wrong results, so I need testers with different equipment
My cheers go to tpruvot, who keeps ccminer up-to-date, he makes 99.9% of work, I'm just another shitty dev digging his code.
You have a winner if you can make it work with normal pools. Although knowing EWBF he's going to eat your code anytime soon and incorporate it into his miner.
Stuff like this is why we need some sort of community miner in which devs can contribute work and get paid for it (fee or otherwise).
what miner is better right now on sia, then?
5 bucks it's a general profitability value these days
5 bucks it's a general profitability value these days
what i see now is what matter, and lbry is at top with feathercoin with 2x profit over sia
btw lbry pumped hard to 10k...
btw something isn't right in your post, are you comparing a 1070 on both coin? 1800 MH vs 300 MH right? because i get different things that what you posted, which seems to be taken from current profitability...
btw lbry pumped hard to 10k...
btw something isn't right in your post, are you comparing a 1070 on both coin? 1800 MH vs 300 MH right? because i get different things that what you posted, which seems to be taken from current profitability...
sia is bad, only good for dual mining, thre is no profit there, BTX is much better but again the diff is climbing, still there are better option than both...
At least look before you comment.
It was at $5.30 yesterday, only reason it's falling is because the exchange rate is going down (not rise in difficulty).
That's 1070, not 1080.
Am I missing something about SIA profitability?
A 1070 should have got 1850MH/s right?
BTX instead?
A 1070 should have got 1850MH/s right?
BTX instead?
And no... Look around a bit.
sia is bad, only good for dual mining, thre is no profit there, BTX is much better but again the diff is climbing, still there are better option than both...
Am I missing something about SIA profitability?
A 1070 should have got 1850MH/s right?
BTX instead?
A 1070 should have got 1850MH/s right?
BTX instead?
Jump to: