it does not work on win 10, above -i 25 it say illegal memory access
The opensource miner cannot go above -i 25. The sp-mod #3 can go to -i 29 stable on the gtx 1070
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 581. (Read 2347641 times)
The opensource miner cannot go above -i 25. The sp-mod #3 can go to -i 29 stable on the gtx 1070
it does not work on win 10, above -i 25 it say illegal memory access
The opensource miner cannot go above -i 25. The sp-mod #3 can go to -i 29 stable on the gtx 1070
gtx1070 319mhs lbry
https://[Suspicious link removed]/photos/HwCU4255tVModkpz8
Damn slow on my poor gtx750.
https://[Suspicious link removed]/photos/HwCU4255tVModkpz8
Damn slow on my poor gtx750.
with what version this hash? with the sp version?
I've got 322mhs with -i 27 intensity later ))
can u post a print screen showing the hashrate with default clocks?
ty!
gtx1070 319mhs lbry
Damn slow on my poor gtx750.
with what version this hash? with the sp version?Damn slow on my poor gtx750.
I've got 322mhs with -i 27 intensity later ))
This is not the opensource miner.
with what version this hash? with the sp version?
I've got 322mhs with -i 27 intensity later ))
it does not work on win 10, above -i 25 it say illegal memory access
1.8.1 vs sp#3 70% tdp, strix 970 vs strix 970, intensity 25, windows 7x64 368.81
This is a confirmed +20% increase
Did you measure the watt on the sp-mod#1 compared to the opensource? (70% TDP is around 105Watt? )
Can you try -i 26 or -i 27 or higher if it doesn't crash or trottle.
158MHASH / 105 watt is making 1,5047MHASH per watt. (gtx 970 standard clocks)(70% TDP)
255MHASH / 150 watt is making 1,7MHASH per watt (gtx 1070 standard clocks)
with what version this hash? with the sp version?
I've got 322mhs with -i 27 intensity later ))
So we talk about 10% more than with the opensource miner. Not to mention you have to mine for SP_ for some time
I don't know in which pool you mine but is the reward covering it?
I don't know in which pool you mine but is the reward covering it?
not really 283 + 10% would put this at 311, instead of 300 so only 6& increase, minus 2% fee, = 4% increase on pascal
with what version this hash? with the sp version?
Ahh, so you have modded the bios to 170watt ?
No, I have Palit SuperJetStream. They all + GameRock and GameRock Premium have 170watt bios from the factory.
This is the results I claim:
LBRY sp-mod #3 vs opensource 1.8.1
Faster compute 5.0 +5-7% (750,750ti,960m)
Faster compute 5.2 +10-25% (950,960,970,980,980ti,titanx)
Faster compute 6.1 +5-7% (1070,1080) (gtx 1060 0%)
And they are pretty accurate. I get reports by ppl. who see a boost on their rigs, the pool and their profit.
For cards that doesn't trottle you get an extra boost by just increasing the intensity. Up to 29. My kernel can also be clocked higher than the opensource. +100mhz.
A 980ti clocked @ 1600mhz is almost impossible with the opensource kernel.
Max intensity is 25 in the opensource vs 31 in the sp-mod.
The max stable coreclock is always around +100mhz in the sp-mod.
The sp-mod doesn't trottle so fast (full boost)
LBRY sp-mod #3 vs opensource 1.8.1
Faster compute 5.0 +5-7% (750,750ti,960m)
Faster compute 5.2 +10-25% (950,960,970,980,980ti,titanx)
Faster compute 6.1 +5-7% (1070,1080) (gtx 1060 0%)
And they are pretty accurate. I get reports by ppl. who see a boost on their rigs, the pool and their profit.
For cards that doesn't trottle you get an extra boost by just increasing the intensity. Up to 29. My kernel can also be clocked higher than the opensource. +100mhz.
A 980ti clocked @ 1600mhz is almost impossible with the opensource kernel.
Max intensity is 25 in the opensource vs 31 in the sp-mod.
The max stable coreclock is always around +100mhz in the sp-mod.
The sp-mod doesn't trottle so fast (full boost)
gtx1070 with 170watt bios is not power limited with your version. The only limits are vddc and the max clock the card can handle.
Ahh, so you have modded the bios to 170watt ?
This was the extreme run to get the max what it can. I will use 310mhs@154watt (90%tdp) for a long run.
How much do you get @ 2025Mhz ?
This was the extreme run to get the max what it can. I will use 310mhs@154watt (90%tdp) for a long run.
How much do you get @ 2025Mhz ?
So we talk about 10% more than with the opensource miner. Not to mention you have to mine for SP_ for some time
I don't know in which pool you mine but is the reward covering it?
This was the extreme run to get the max what it can. I will use 310mhs@154watt (90%tdp) for a long run.I don't know in which pool you mine but is the reward covering it?
2 _sp
gtx1070 with 170watt bios is not power limited with your version. The only limits are vddc and the max clock the card can handle.
The clockspeed on the maxwell/pascal are dynamic. With the opensource the cards trottle and downclock themself. I have seen this on many models. Lowering the intensity might help.
Same card, same config. +20% with the sp-mod #3.
Same card, same config. +20% with the sp-mod #3.
Look your clockspeed is different - did you run opensource version with -pstate 0? The condition should be all clockspeeds are the same.
If I add the 200MHZ well sure it gives me more MH/s somehow i think...
If I add the 200MHZ well sure it gives me more MH/s somehow i think...
1.8.1 vs sp#3 70% tdp, strix 970 vs strix 970, intensity 25, windows 7x64 368.81
So we talk about 10% more than with the opensource miner. Not to mention you have to mine for SP_ for some time
I don't know in which pool you mine but is the reward covering it?
I don't know in which pool you mine but is the reward covering it?
and what u get with the opensource miner? Please to have a comparision.
Max I was able to get from 1.8.1 - slightly more then 290 mhs. gtx1070 319mhs lbry
https://[Suspicious link removed]/photos/HwCU4255tVModkpz8
https://[Suspicious link removed]/photos/HwCU4255tVModkpz8
and what u get with the opensource miner? Please to have a comparision.
Jump to: