Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 582. (Read 2347641 times)

gtx1070 319mhs lbry
https://goo.gl/photos/HwCU4255tVModkpz8

Damn slow on my poor gtx750.

Which intensity is best for Maxwells with mod#3 ?

My testcard has a tdp of 150W. the screenshot was taken with the 372.70 driver and windows 8.1 (-500 on the memory clock)

302 mh on the 980ti wasnt stable for more than 4 hours. I think the core was near 1600. Still able to get 297 stable I think though. Might be able to increase intensity from 26 to 27 and get 300 stable.

How fast is the opensource with the same settings on the same cards?

Can you hash @ 191 MHASH on the gtx 970 with the opensource?

Scroll back a few threads and you see screenshots reported by many users.

Windows 10 has issues with high intensities..

Using -i 29 on the gtx 1070 and the 980ti only works in windows 7 and 8.1

How fast is the opensource with the same settings on the 980ti?

Can you hash @ 300 MHASH on the gtx 980ti with the opensource?

_sp_ please provide a screenshot with miner and gpu-z/overclocking utility to support you're claims,...because we have no way of validating you're results prior too purchase

I'm only interested in same-power comparisons.
Can someone please test sp-mod and tpruvot on low TDP (2/3 or 3/4 max), to have maximum efficiency and no throttle?

i never seen a 970 so low stop saying crap

SP_

I think that if you take away 0.10 btc tax, you make it free, and use tax 2% for each miner .

It is much better, and you make more profit, many people in more send to you 2% profit .

Default intensity

The gainward trottle and only give 120MHASH with the opensource. and around 145 with release #3. (default intensity is -i 23)
This card has a reference cooler and a low clock (1178 MHz (boost) / 1051 MHz (base))

strange
I try latest 372.70 drivers and give only 1-2% increase: on last 1.8.1 tpruvot miner 149 mh, on your #3 release 151-153 mh.
And 368.69 drivers give 161 mh (~8% more).

Which intensity you set for 970 and 1070 ?

I get 20% increase on this card with the latest drivers and release #3. Tested with 6 cards in the rig. 24 hours of mining.

http://www.gainward.com.tw/main/vgapro.php?id=954&lang=en

which drivers give 20-25% increase ?
I receive only 10% on release #3 for 970 MSI & ASUS

If you have a gtx 970, 980 or 980ti card (compute 5.2 maxwell) the increase is 20-25% on the standard clocks.(release #3).
I need more time to increase the pascal speed. Next up is a speedup for the gtx 1060. I have a test card coming soon.

You can get 10% more if you know how to configure your rig properly. I have written many posts about this but I can write it again..

-Reduce the memclock (with nvinspector you can reduce -1000mhz, with a bios mod you can reduce to 850mhz or lower)You can use the nvidia-smi tool to get the supported clocks mem/core and use the lowest value for the memory
-Overclock the core to 2050-2100 or more. When you reduce the speed of the memory you free power that can be used to overclock. Since my kernel doesn't use memory. 0% load on the memory controller makes +100mhz stable oc on the core possible.

Receive a 5% increase and give 3.3% + 0.1 BTC - it's not fair.

You see, removing the initial payment of 0.1 BTC, you will attract more people who will bring you income. For those who have 1-2 cards in 1070 are not ready to buy your miner. Payback tends to infinity.

You will not hear the angry responses of those who gave money, and who were not satisfied with the speed of your miners. Using the "as is" - you will not reproach.

Claymore has made the right decision, and it is a success. You will stagnate.

Do 2% with no down payment, and earn more.

You are a good programmer, but a bad marketing.


PS. sorry for my English.

this guy is funny, keep posting retarded sentence, like regurgitating, no what i mean about intensity is that he changed how intensity work, by assigning it other value, but as usual you didn't understood shit, and i was hoping for a code rewrite instead....

and yes you can do the math about any coin, only because you don't know how to do it, it does not mean that it can not be done, please stay away with your ignorance is infecting me

I only have a 1070 card in my testrig. With the opensource i can reach 275-280mhash with oc. My private kernel oc around 100mhz higher than the opensource so you get an additional 5% from the oc. 305-310mhash stable. I don't have a 1080  card to test

Oh yeah? Because he owns a copy of the program? You're comparing apples to oranges dude. You can't do that in comparisons. You were comparing someone with a heavy OC to someone without one... Specifically the guy you mentioned didn't even post his OC, just the 'results' he's getting.


Hey look you regurgitated the part about intensity I posted a couple days ago... Good job bro and you have no idea what intensity actually does. Higher intensity does not mean you'll have better hashrate. Higher intensity can actually produce worse hashrate and use more power.

It's not a magic value too, where you increase intesnity by 5 and it's magically that much better. Your lack of understanding of... well... anything is astounding and you try to use it as 'proof' something is working wrong. Reminds me of the guy complaining that Wolf0 broke his rigs because he purchased a miner that utilized his GPUs better and produced more heat while drawing more wattage... then pretended like his cards would always use the same wattage.

If you don't know what you're talking about, don't act like you do.


Nothing is false advertising... He advertised 5-7%, that's what people are getting... You want better performance, that does not make what people are getting wrong.


You can't do math. What Yiimp lists as actual is what it paid for actual MH/BTC in the last day.