can you post a screen of your 390 doing 39MH
https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/8243/390-nitro-39-mh-s-running-at-55-60-c-for-6-days#latest
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 632. (Read 2347641 times)
https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/8243/390-nitro-39-mh-s-running-at-55-60-c-for-6-days#latest
Not even Wolfo was able to reach that hash(i see his highest was 33MH)
He is using old 290x and mod the code. I mod the bios.
The 390 g1 gaming comes with a 6 pin and a 8 pin connector.
6pin= 75Watt
8pin= 150Watt
Motherboard 66 watt
MAX power is 291 watt, but the wall readings is abit higher. (Powered usb risers)
6pin= 75Watt
8pin= 150Watt
Motherboard 66 watt
MAX power is 291 watt, but the wall readings is abit higher. (Powered usb risers)
The expensive 16nm chips are equipped with slow ggr5 memory and a slow 256bit bus.
My modded 512bit bussed 28nm r9 390 mine Etherum @ 39MHASH (full power, single card) or 27MHASH with lower power than the gtx 970. (messured in the wall). With the 390 I get I shitload of SIA coins for free, thanks to Claymore.
I have looked at klaust's blake2s cuda kernal. I could only gain 7%.
My modded 512bit bussed 28nm r9 390 mine Etherum @ 39MHASH (full power, single card) or 27MHASH with lower power than the gtx 970. (messured in the wall). With the 390 I get I shitload of SIA coins for free, thanks to Claymore.
I have looked at klaust's blake2s cuda kernal. I could only gain 7%.
can you post a screen of your 390 doing 39MH, because i find it hard to believe this not even Wolfo was able to reach that hash(i see his highest was 33MH)
and even if that was possible your consumption was probably 350w with a single gpu, a 1070 can do on linux 37MH with 150w, so no you can't beat 16nm sry
The expensive 16nm chips are equipped with slow ggr5 memory and a slow 256bit bus.
My modded 512bit bussed 28nm r9 390 mine Etherum @ 39MHASH (full power, single card) or 27MHASH with lower power than the gtx 970. (messured in the wall). With the 390 I get I shitload of SIA coins for free, thanks to Claymore.
I have looked at klaust's blake2s cuda kernal. I could only gain 7%.
My modded 512bit bussed 28nm r9 390 mine Etherum @ 39MHASH (full power, single card) or 27MHASH with lower power than the gtx 970. (messured in the wall). With the 390 I get I shitload of SIA coins for free, thanks to Claymore.
I have looked at klaust's blake2s cuda kernal. I could only gain 7%.
Memory runs cool and doesn't need to be cooled.
Generally true, but for Ethereum I measured the memory being as high as 98°C on a WF3OC 970 (and 104°C on the mini 1 fan models).
Meanwhile the GPU core was limited to 70 or 75°C and not even reaching that.
Reducing what is basically the intensity (–cuda-grid-size) helps but at the loss of hashrate.
Cryptomining blog did an article on it: http://cryptomining-blog.com/7501-nvidia-geforce-gtx-970-thermal-images-for-ethererum-and-decred-mining/
Regarding SIA, KlausT's SIA CUDA miner now supports poolmining but it's kind of glitchy and reports slower speeds even locally. And even lower speeds poolside.
Now with Claymore's dual Eth/Sia miner it will probably go way down in profitability.
indeed, like ETH, unfinished RPC. You need to modify yourself the wallet to be able to link a pool :p
Exist one program to powerful SIACOIN on Nvidia maxwell ?
Now mining at 1255 mh/s on windows 10 with gtx 980 1460 boost gpu .
Siacoin Go Pool miner hashrate:
– GTX 1080 – 1945 MHS
– GTX 1070 – 1466 MHS
– GTX 980 Ti – 1220 MHS
– GTX 970 – 803 MHS
– GTX 950 – 385 MHS
– GTX 750 Ti – 301 MHS
– RX 480 – 872 MHS
– R9 280X – 849 MHS
– R9 290x – 1116 MHS
http://cryptomining-blog.com/8080-siamining-another-open-public-siacoin-sc-gpu-mining-pool/
.
Now mining at 1255 mh/s on windows 10 with gtx 980 1460 boost gpu .
Siacoin Go Pool miner hashrate:
– GTX 1080 – 1945 MHS
– GTX 1070 – 1466 MHS
– GTX 980 Ti – 1220 MHS
– GTX 970 – 803 MHS
– GTX 950 – 385 MHS
– GTX 750 Ti – 301 MHS
– RX 480 – 872 MHS
– R9 280X – 849 MHS
– R9 290x – 1116 MHS
http://cryptomining-blog.com/8080-siamining-another-open-public-siacoin-sc-gpu-mining-pool/
.
i'm doing 905 with my 970, up to 1G with oc(i'm limiting it to 60% tdp) so a 1070 can do almost 1800 or 1g with oc
SIACOIN IS ANOTHER VALUE ADDED COIN--
Like ETH, it is more than another clone coin. SiaCoin (SC) stores data in the blockchain, you can both mine SC and offer drive space for data storage in return for SC. My 980ti mined at 1400MH/s when running undisturbed.
I was hoping that one of the coding talents would add it to CCminer. SC uses the Blake2b algo. --scryptr
from my tests, the 1070/1080 can handle without real ui slow down a higher default intensity (on my miner), the problem is we reach a software/cuda limit with memory offsets when doing that.
So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...
So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...
Are you talking about neoscrypt or in general?
in general, on my miner the default is set to be able to use windows when you mine
not the max possible (which also reduce the stability for long runs) Exist one program to powerful SIACOIN on Nvidia maxwell ?
Now mining at 1255 mh/s on windows 10 with gtx 980 1460 boost gpu .
Siacoin Go Pool miner hashrate:
– GTX 1080 – 1945 MHS
– GTX 1070 – 1466 MHS
– GTX 980 Ti – 1220 MHS
– GTX 970 – 803 MHS
– GTX 950 – 385 MHS
– GTX 750 Ti – 301 MHS
– RX 480 – 872 MHS
– R9 280X – 849 MHS
– R9 290x – 1116 MHS
http://cryptomining-blog.com/8080-siamining-another-open-public-siacoin-sc-gpu-mining-pool/
.
Now mining at 1255 mh/s on windows 10 with gtx 980 1460 boost gpu .
Siacoin Go Pool miner hashrate:
– GTX 1080 – 1945 MHS
– GTX 1070 – 1466 MHS
– GTX 980 Ti – 1220 MHS
– GTX 970 – 803 MHS
– GTX 950 – 385 MHS
– GTX 750 Ti – 301 MHS
– RX 480 – 872 MHS
– R9 280X – 849 MHS
– R9 290x – 1116 MHS
http://cryptomining-blog.com/8080-siamining-another-open-public-siacoin-sc-gpu-mining-pool/
.
i'm doing 905 with my 970, up to 1G with oc(i'm limiting it to 60% tdp) so a 1070 can do almost 1800 or 1g with oc
Exist one program to powerful SIACOIN on Nvidia maxwell ?
Now mining at 1255 mh/s on windows 10 with gtx 980 1460 boost gpu .
Siacoin Go Pool miner hashrate:
– GTX 1080 – 1945 MHS
– GTX 1070 – 1466 MHS
– GTX 980 Ti – 1220 MHS
– GTX 970 – 803 MHS
– GTX 950 – 385 MHS
– GTX 750 Ti – 301 MHS
– RX 480 – 872 MHS
– R9 280X – 849 MHS
– R9 290x – 1116 MHS
http://cryptomining-blog.com/8080-siamining-another-open-public-siacoin-sc-gpu-mining-pool/
.
Now mining at 1255 mh/s on windows 10 with gtx 980 1460 boost gpu .
Siacoin Go Pool miner hashrate:
– GTX 1080 – 1945 MHS
– GTX 1070 – 1466 MHS
– GTX 980 Ti – 1220 MHS
– GTX 970 – 803 MHS
– GTX 950 – 385 MHS
– GTX 750 Ti – 301 MHS
– RX 480 – 872 MHS
– R9 280X – 849 MHS
– R9 290x – 1116 MHS
http://cryptomining-blog.com/8080-siamining-another-open-public-siacoin-sc-gpu-mining-pool/
.
from my tests, the 1070/1080 can handle without real ui slow down a higher default intensity (on my miner), the problem is we reach a software/cuda limit with memory offsets when doing that.
So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...
So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...
Are you talking about neoscrypt or in general?
from my tests, the 1070/1080 can handle without real ui slow down a higher default intensity (on my miner), the problem is we reach a software/cuda limit with memory offsets when doing that.
So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...
So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...
Any interest in helping us sp-private miners w/ gtx1080's with neoscrypt? My 980 is getting 700kh but my 1080's are only getting in the 300's
Might be a Windows 10 problem, I don't have time to load in a fresh Windows 7.
Might be a Windows 10 problem, I don't have time to load in a fresh Windows 7.
Yes my gtx980 get 700 kh/s with windows 10 x64 on neoscrypt ( FTC ) .
The gtx 1070 on windows 10 x64 last driver go around 1000 kh/s i think .
7/8 also get these speeds, which still isn't up to par, but much better then what we were getting before.
Both the 1070 and 1080 need tuning/optimizations to get them up to where they should be.
Any interest in helping us sp-private miners w/ gtx1080's with neoscrypt? My 980 is getting 700kh but my 1080's are only getting in the 300's
Might be a Windows 10 problem, I don't have time to load in a fresh Windows 7.
Might be a Windows 10 problem, I don't have time to load in a fresh Windows 7.
no it's 1080 problem, it does the same crappy hashrate on win 7 too, on the other hand the 1070 is great, is doing 1MH on win 7, but again poor hahs on win 10
not a code problem like someone else think "cough bensam cough", but simply driver problem on win 10 side, you can tell this by the fact that on win 7 it work and win 10 not...
Any interest in helping us sp-private miners w/ gtx1080's with neoscrypt? My 980 is getting 700kh but my 1080's are only getting in the 300's
Might be a Windows 10 problem, I don't have time to load in a fresh Windows 7.
Might be a Windows 10 problem, I don't have time to load in a fresh Windows 7.
Yes my gtx980 get 700 kh/s with windows 10 x64 on neoscrypt ( FTC ) .
The gtx 1070 on windows 10 x64 last driver go around 1000 kh/s i think .
Gigabyte's cooler seems to be exactly the same as the one from the 970s, with the same crappy fans.
What's wrong with the Windforce fans? They are my favourite by far and I never ever had any major issues with any of them on dozens of cards (780 Ti, 750 Ti, 970).
The only issue I had was some fans on 780 Ti's slowing down because of dust but after cleaning they were perfect again.
They burn out. The coolers are pretty good, but the fans wear out after about a year of mining. They're small and use sleeve bearings. Pretty much all manuf. use sleeve bearings, sadly. It's weird you buy a $450 graphics card and they can't even spend the extra bit of money on a more exotic bearing type that lasts longer.
I think eVGA this time around has a double ball bearing, but I don't have one yet. You can usually tell if it has a ball bearing based on spinning the fan. If it sort of 'wobbles' back and forth into place after you spin it, it's probably a ball bearing.
Sometimes this is labeled on the sticker on the back of the fan as well, but not always (especially not with GPU fans).
In my experience it seems to be there is a correlation between the thickness of the fan (shaft length), diameter, and reliability. Thinner and smaller fans burn out faster then larger ones. The ones on the Asus 970s were pretty good. Gigabyte fans burn out quite fast, I've also had lots of problems with XFX back when I used AMD (they used very similar fans to Gigabyte), and Asus is now using a similar looking fan so I expect it to go after about a year.
Ball bearings you can almost always oil as you pop off the back sticker and there is a reservoir in back there. Sleeve bearings are usually sealed and it's next to impossible to open them, especially with GPU fans. If you need to oil your fans on a regular basis that probably means it's a junk fan to begin with. Cleaning fans helps. It seems as though Gigabyte fan blades gather dust faster then other types as well.
You are right new eVGA cards seems to coming with ball bearings which are lightyears away from the shitty sleeve bearing, geez!.
but no backplate?, and I don't see that they cool properly the memory and vrm's which gigabyte does fantastically well.
Still ,the sleeve bearing can be opened and oiled, it just takes practice, i separate the rotor (blades) from the stator to oil them but it is tricky to do, the first time i did that i broke the magnetic assembly from the circuit board
(the cost of learning how to do it) next time I need to oil a fan i will film it and upload to youtube 
Memory runs cool and doesn't need to be cooled. VRMs on the other hand do need to be. Based on the 970s, I would believe eVGA might be up to schenanagins. As far as the 1070 EVGA's they look to be cooled properly. You can see a plate over the top of all the important bits in some of the photos online.
Gigabyte's cooler seems to be exactly the same as the one from the 970s, with the same crappy fans.
What's wrong with the Windforce fans? They are my favourite by far and I never ever had any major issues with any of them on dozens of cards (780 Ti, 750 Ti, 970).
The only issue I had was some fans on 780 Ti's slowing down because of dust but after cleaning they were perfect again.
They burn out. The coolers are pretty good, but the fans wear out after about a year of mining. They're small and use sleeve bearings. Pretty much all manuf. use sleeve bearings, sadly. It's weird you buy a $450 graphics card and they can't even spend the extra bit of money on a more exotic bearing type that lasts longer.
I think eVGA this time around has a double ball bearing, but I don't have one yet. You can usually tell if it has a ball bearing based on spinning the fan. If it sort of 'wobbles' back and forth into place after you spin it, it's probably a ball bearing.
Sometimes this is labeled on the sticker on the back of the fan as well, but not always (especially not with GPU fans).
In my experience it seems to be there is a correlation between the thickness of the fan (shaft length), diameter, and reliability. Thinner and smaller fans burn out faster then larger ones. The ones on the Asus 970s were pretty good. Gigabyte fans burn out quite fast, I've also had lots of problems with XFX back when I used AMD (they used very similar fans to Gigabyte), and Asus is now using a similar looking fan so I expect it to go after about a year.
Ball bearings you can almost always oil as you pop off the back sticker and there is a reservoir in back there. Sleeve bearings are usually sealed and it's next to impossible to open them, especially with GPU fans. If you need to oil your fans on a regular basis that probably means it's a junk fan to begin with. Cleaning fans helps. It seems as though Gigabyte fan blades gather dust faster then other types as well.
and I don't see that they cool properly the memory and vrm's which gigabyte does fantastically well.
this is all i care when it come to custom gpu, vrm, the damn vram need to be covered properly, gigabyte is the best there
^This. The reason why I abandoned Asus cards. The VRM's on the DirectCU II 780 Ti's were like ~30 °C higher than the core.
Gigabyte's cooler seems to be exactly the same as the one from the 970s, with the same crappy fans.
What's wrong with the Windforce fans? They are my favourite by far and I never ever had any major issues with any of them on dozens of cards (780 Ti, 750 Ti, 970).
The only issue I had was some fans on 780 Ti's slowing down because of dust but after cleaning they were perfect again.
They burn out. The coolers are pretty good, but the fans wear out after about a year of mining. They're small and use sleeve bearings. Pretty much all manuf. use sleeve bearings, sadly. It's weird you buy a $450 graphics card and they can't even spend the extra bit of money on a more exotic bearing type that lasts longer.
I think eVGA this time around has a double ball bearing, but I don't have one yet. You can usually tell if it has a ball bearing based on spinning the fan. If it sort of 'wobbles' back and forth into place after you spin it, it's probably a ball bearing.
Sometimes this is labeled on the sticker on the back of the fan as well, but not always (especially not with GPU fans).
In my experience it seems to be there is a correlation between the thickness of the fan (shaft length), diameter, and reliability. Thinner and smaller fans burn out faster then larger ones. The ones on the Asus 970s were pretty good. Gigabyte fans burn out quite fast, I've also had lots of problems with XFX back when I used AMD (they used very similar fans to Gigabyte), and Asus is now using a similar looking fan so I expect it to go after about a year.
Ball bearings you can almost always oil as you pop off the back sticker and there is a reservoir in back there. Sleeve bearings are usually sealed and it's next to impossible to open them, especially with GPU fans. If you need to oil your fans on a regular basis that probably means it's a junk fan to begin with. Cleaning fans helps. It seems as though Gigabyte fan blades gather dust faster then other types as well.
and I don't see that they cool properly the memory and vrm's which gigabyte does fantastically well.
this is all i care when it come to custom gpu, vrm, the damn vram need to be covered properly, gigabyte is the best there
Gigabyte's cooler seems to be exactly the same as the one from the 970s, with the same crappy fans.
What's wrong with the Windforce fans? They are my favourite by far and I never ever had any major issues with any of them on dozens of cards (780 Ti, 750 Ti, 970).
The only issue I had was some fans on 780 Ti's slowing down because of dust but after cleaning they were perfect again.
They burn out. The coolers are pretty good, but the fans wear out after about a year of mining. They're small and use sleeve bearings. Pretty much all manuf. use sleeve bearings, sadly. It's weird you buy a $450 graphics card and they can't even spend the extra bit of money on a more exotic bearing type that lasts longer.
I think eVGA this time around has a double ball bearing, but I don't have one yet. You can usually tell if it has a ball bearing based on spinning the fan. If it sort of 'wobbles' back and forth into place after you spin it, it's probably a ball bearing.
Sometimes this is labeled on the sticker on the back of the fan as well, but not always (especially not with GPU fans).
In my experience it seems to be there is a correlation between the thickness of the fan (shaft length), diameter, and reliability. Thinner and smaller fans burn out faster then larger ones. The ones on the Asus 970s were pretty good. Gigabyte fans burn out quite fast, I've also had lots of problems with XFX back when I used AMD (they used very similar fans to Gigabyte), and Asus is now using a similar looking fan so I expect it to go after about a year.
Ball bearings you can almost always oil as you pop off the back sticker and there is a reservoir in back there. Sleeve bearings are usually sealed and it's next to impossible to open them, especially with GPU fans. If you need to oil your fans on a regular basis that probably means it's a junk fan to begin with. Cleaning fans helps. It seems as though Gigabyte fan blades gather dust faster then other types as well.
You are right new eVGA cards seems to coming with ball bearings which are lightyears away from the shitty sleeve bearing, geez!.
but no backplate?, and I don't see that they cool properly the memory and vrm's which gigabyte does fantastically well.
Still ,the sleeve bearing can be opened and oiled, it just takes practice, i separate the rotor (blades) from the stator to oil them but it is tricky to do, the first time i did that i broke the magnetic assembly from the circuit board
(the cost of learning how to do it) next time I need to oil a fan i will film it and upload to youtube Jump to: