its not the problem, the problem is the perf are reduced with the thermal limits
nvm, as you can see the problem was not in ccminer code
nvm, as you can see the problem was not in ccminer code
mmh ok, btw are you on win 10 with those perf?
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 634. (Read 2347641 times)
mmh ok, btw are you on win 10 with those perf?
Look like the 1070 mem perf was fixed in driver 368.69, i now get 950 kH/s on windows (+30%)
but the 1080 seems worst sigh
GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s
accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes!
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s
accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes!
but the 1080 seems worst
sighGPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s
accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes!
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s
accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes!
Already installed the driver, haven't checked Ethereum and Neo hash as other 'users' reported it didn't fix it. Shame on me for listening to them I guess.
NeoS gets around 1000~ Mh/s on W8.1 x64. Using DJMs last build.
Definitely still room for tuning. Should be closer to 1200. Watching the GPUs, none of them are 'maxed' out and sit at about 85% utilization and MCU is also at about 80% utilization. This may be a intensity issue, but I kind of doubt it considering what Pallas was saying. Intensity seems about ballpark with a little bit of testing as well.
its not the problem, the problem is the perf are reduced with the thermal limits
nvm, as you can see the problem was not in ccminer code
nvm, as you can see the problem was not in ccminer code
its the FE and 30°c today but yep i guess 1MH is reachable with the "normal" P0 mem clock
http://ccminer.org/preview/ccminer.exe
but yep i guess 1MH is reachable with the "normal" P0 mem clockhttp://ccminer.org/preview/ccminer.exe
yeah it's 30 here too, but just a test to see how much the oc will perform, you can try for 5 min, i doubt you will screw the fe edition
its the FE and 30°c today but yep i guess 1MH is reachable with the "normal" P0 mem clock
http://ccminer.org/preview/ccminer.exe
but yep i guess 1MH is reachable with the "normal" P0 mem clockhttp://ccminer.org/preview/ccminer.exe
Look like the 1070 mem perf was fixed in driver 368.69, i now get 950 kH/s on windows (+30%)
but the 1080 seems worst sigh
GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s
accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes!
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s
accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes!
but the 1080 seems worst
sighGPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s
accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes!
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s
accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes!
oh nice, neoscrypt right? and windows 10 or 7? someone can confirm that the same perf are there for win 7?
also can you try to oc +200 first and then +400 on the core? it should be able to hit almost 1300
Look like the 1070 mem perf was fixed in driver 368.69, i now get 950 kH/s on windows (+30%)
but the 1080 seems worst sigh
GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s
accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes!
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s
accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes!
but the 1080 seems worst
sighGPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 391.72 kH/s
accepted: 15/15 (diff 0.003), 1324.49 kH/s yes!
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 949.84 kH/s
accepted: 16/16 (diff 0.004), 1325.44 kH/s yes!
the problem with sia is that it has no pool, so unless you have 10 rig, it's pointless to mine, diff is too high at the moment, for a little farm
http://sia.nanopool.org/
oh tnx didn't know that there was one, but the diff is even higher now, almost on par with other top altcoin, in terms of profit
it does not work with the cuda version
ODDS ARE BETTER THAN WINNING THE LOTTERY--
I solo-mined SiaCoin overnight with Gominer (open-cl). When I woke up, my 980ti was mining at 1.4GH/s. It should hit a block within 2-4 weeks, and a block is worth about 0.25BTC. I am going back to Lyra2v2 after I type this, though. I also need to check my $2 lottery ticket to see if I am a new millionaire, the drawing was last night. No SiaCoin in the wallet this morning...
--scryptr
the problem with sia is that it has no pool, so unless you have 10 rig, it's pointless to mine, diff is too high at the moment, for a little farm
http://sia.nanopool.org/
oh tnx didn't know that there was one, but the diff is even higher now, almost on par with other top altcoin, in terms of profit
it does not work with the cuda version
the problem with sia is that it has no pool, so unless you have 10 rig, it's pointless to mine, diff is too high at the moment, for a little farm
http://sia.nanopool.org/
the problem with sia is that it has no pool, so unless you have 10 rig, it's pointless to mine, diff is too high at the moment, for a little farm
SP_ AND EPSYLON3--
SiaCoin uses the Blake2b algorithm. Would either one of you, or both, be able to incorporate the algo into CCminer? Several othe Blake algos are currently supported, and they have been given CUDA enhanced optimization. My 980ti hashes at about 1.3GH/s, better than the reported 1.0GH/s for a 290X. Gominer, reported on by CryptoMining-Blog today, uses only Open-cl coding, and CUDA enhanced code should really improve the performance. Gominer runs smoothly, no problems, and is open source.
Blake2b would be a good addition to the CCminer list of supported algos. SiaCoin is a coin with more value than just another clone coin. Like ETH, it offers a practical side, the use of the blockchain for data storage in this case.
What do you say? --scryptr
SiaCoin uses the Blake2b algorithm. Would either one of you, or both, be able to incorporate the algo into CCminer? Several othe Blake algos are currently supported, and they have been given CUDA enhanced optimization. My 980ti hashes at about 1.3GH/s, better than the reported 1.0GH/s for a 290X. Gominer, reported on by CryptoMining-Blog today, uses only Open-cl coding, and CUDA enhanced code should really improve the performance. Gominer runs smoothly, no problems, and is open source.
Blake2b would be a good addition to the CCminer list of supported algos. SiaCoin is a coin with more value than just another clone coin. Like ETH, it offers a practical side, the use of the blockchain for data storage in this case.
What do you say? --scryptr
There is no optimization to do on pascal yet, its almost the same hardware, reduced in size
Maybe the next cuda versions will show some hidden functions, but im not confident about that
Maybe the next cuda versions will show some hidden functions, but im not confident about that
Maybe 'optimize' wasn't the right word... How about bug fixing? Skein only scales +50% on 1070 compared to 970, when it should be closer to +100%.
so in the last day :
zpool some segfaults issues
decred team ask me to check gominer
mrM4D ask me quark changes
and im working on neoscrypt... not enough ?
i already checked this SIA several times... but i forgot again why i stopped...
zpool some segfaults issues
decred team ask me to check gominer
mrM4D ask me quark changes
and im working on neoscrypt... not enough ?
i already checked this SIA several times... but i forgot again why i stopped...
I don't know, who pays more and what's needed more?
Still need a dual miner for Eth + other algo. Apparently Claymore now has a Eth + Sia miner. We need something similiar for Nvidia. If you're wondering where the donations are, it's where the money is.
I just wanted to bring it to your attention. You can implement if it makes sense at your leisure. I thought you might stand to gain some revenue from a bunch of people jumping on the SIA bandwagon with the dual miner.
Yup... Earning me more money makes me inclined to donate (I assume it works this way for other miners as well). If there was a miner fee, there would be a direct correlation between the two. Dual miner has been talked about here for close to seven months, especially after Claymore released his. Still no one biting at it... Eth is going to be PoS before one shows up.
There is also Cryptonote floating around. The 'elusive' Cryptonote no one has really touched in years that has craptons of volume floating around multiple coins.
I've been asked to compile for someone, might as well share it. It's Tpruvots 1.8 CUDA 8 version from today : https://1drv.ms/f/s!Aq23cheCBvi_bfyZ1qVCgcKiASA
tpruvot's 1.8 is out, thread still report 1.7.6? so i can get rid of that "theft" from cryptominingblog for 11evo
so in the last day :
zpool some segfaults issues
decred team ask me to check gominer
mrM4D ask me quark changes
and im working on neoscrypt... not enough ?
i already checked this SIA several times... but i forgot again why i stopped...
zpool some segfaults issues
decred team ask me to check gominer
mrM4D ask me quark changes
and im working on neoscrypt... not enough ?
i already checked this SIA several times... but i forgot again why i stopped...
I just wanted to bring it to your attention. You can implement if it makes sense at your leisure. I thought you might stand to gain some revenue from a bunch of people jumping on the SIA bandwagon with the dual miner.
ive almost the same values on linux 750 ti and 960
[2016-07-08 20:15:10] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 221 (T= 45C F= 34% C=1306/2700)
[2016-07-08 20:15:10] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 597.97 kH/s yes!
[2016-07-08 20:15:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 403 (T= 56C F= 20% C=1341/3004)
me
[2016-07-08 18:20:36] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 226.73 kH/s
[2016-07-08 18:20:36] accepted: 23/23 (diff 0.001), 621.69 kH/s yes!
[2016-07-08 18:20:44] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 960, 395.18 kH/s
[2016-07-08 20:15:10] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 221 (T= 45C F= 34% C=1306/2700)
[2016-07-08 20:15:10] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 597.97 kH/s yes!
[2016-07-08 20:15:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 960, 403 (T= 56C F= 20% C=1341/3004)
me
[2016-07-08 18:20:36] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 226.73 kH/s
[2016-07-08 18:20:36] accepted: 23/23 (diff 0.001), 621.69 kH/s yes!
[2016-07-08 18:20:44] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 960, 395.18 kH/s
There is no optimization to do on pascal yet, its almost the same hardware, reduced in size
Maybe the next cuda versions will show some hidden functions, but im not confident about that
Maybe the next cuda versions will show some hidden functions, but im not confident about that
it looks like you are right since benchmark shows 50-70% improvement over a 970, which is what we are getting already on all algo
Excellent job on your commit today for Neoscrypt, its working great!
725 kh/s on 1080 from around 197 prior
725 kh/s on 1080 from around 197 prior
from who sp? you should get that with the djm34 version
No, from tpruvot's 1.8. Isn't the latest version from djm34 from January?
you can get that hash with djm34, he imported the work on his fork?
so in the last day :
zpool some segfaults issues
decred team ask me to check gominer
mrM4D ask me quark changes
and im working on neoscrypt... not enough ?
i already checked this SIA several times... but i forgot again why i stopped...
zpool some segfaults issues
decred team ask me to check gominer
mrM4D ask me quark changes
and im working on neoscrypt... not enough ?
i already checked this SIA several times... but i forgot again why i stopped...
Epsylon - Are you able to add blake2b support to your yiimp pool for SIA coin? Claymore's latest Dual Miner v5.0 now supports Eth+Sia mining and I'd like to continue supporting your pool as thanks for your continued open source support.
Jump to: