Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 676. (Read 2347641 times)

sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Got my hands on 1080
with ccMiner 1.5.80-git SP-MOD fork on Quark at default clokcs at ~170W it does 32000
unfortunetly it needs optimization for neoscrypt as it did only 0.450 with default settings
at ethereum it crashes with Genoil build - says doesnt recognizes the device
but at original Ocl version it gives... 12.5mhs with low tdp (need to double check but it is around 30W!) - needs an optimization as well

Neoscrypt is doing 1MHASH @ 1290 core on my 980ti.

Build etherum with compute 5.0/sm 5.0 in the projectfile/makefile. Then it will work.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
I wonder if the new gtx 1070/1080 cards will beat the 980ti in the quark algo.

Here is sp-mod #6 private compute 5.2 unreleased:



Got my hands on 1080
with ccMiner 1.5.80-git SP-MOD fork on Quark at default clokcs at ~170W it does 32000
unfortunetly it needs optimization for neoscrypt as it did only 0.450 with default settings
at ethereum it crashes with Genoil build - says doesnt recognizes the device
but at original Ocl version it gives... 12.5mhs with low tdp (need to double check but it is around 30W!) - needs an optimization as well



can you try decred?
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
Took the 970 out...I'm done with it. A book marker for now.

I have a couple of cards that don't like to switch algos much but they will run for days on one algo.

One example is a 970 that will mine quark at default intensity fresh from a reboot but over time
while profit switching it will fail to start. Sometimes it will start at lower intensity but continues
to degrade and eventually won't start at all until a system reboot. Then it will run at default intensity
again.

The symptoms smell like a memory leak but if that was the case it should affect all cards eventually
but it doesn't. I'm stumped.
As soon as I put that card into the rig its core clock reads 1519 the other 1492 and it will mine for a few seconds then drivers crash not ccminer. I tried every combo I could think of. Thats on any algo. I'm thinking of putting it on this computer and take out 2 750ti move them to the 970 rig. As soon as I can. See if that works.

That's what I get with too much OC, runs for a while then the driver crashes.
legendary
Activity: 1164
Merit: 1010
I wonder if the new gtx 1070/1080 cards will beat the 980ti in the quark algo.

Here is sp-mod #6 private compute 5.2 unreleased:



Got my hands on 1080
with ccMiner 1.5.80-git SP-MOD fork on Quark at default clokcs at ~170W it does 32000
unfortunetly it needs optimization for neoscrypt as it did only 0.450 with default settings
at ethereum it crashes with Genoil build - says doesnt recognizes the device
but at original Ocl version it gives... 12.5mhs with low tdp (need to double check but it is around 30W!) - needs an optimization as well



...
...
...
Scuse me??
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
I wonder if the new gtx 1070/1080 cards will beat the 980ti in the quark algo.

Here is sp-mod #6 private compute 5.2 unreleased:



Got my hands on 1080
with ccMiner 1.5.80-git SP-MOD fork on Quark at default clokcs at ~170W it does 32000
unfortunetly it needs optimization for neoscrypt as it did only 0.450 with default settings
at ethereum it crashes with Genoil build - says doesnt recognizes the device
but at original Ocl version it gives... 12.5mhs with low tdp (need to double check but it is around 30W!) - needs an optimization as well

legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
Took the 970 out...I'm done with it. A book marker for now.

I have a couple of cards that don't like to switch algos much but they will run for days on one algo.

One example is a 970 that will mine quark at default intensity fresh from a reboot but over time
while profit switching it will fail to start. Sometimes it will start at lower intensity but continues
to degrade and eventually won't start at all until a system reboot. Then it will run at default intensity
again.

The symptoms smell like a memory leak but if that was the case it should affect all cards eventually
but it doesn't. I'm stumped.
As soon as I put that card into the rig its core clock reads 1519 the other 1492 and it will mine for a few seconds then drivers crash not ccminer. I tried every combo I could think of. Thats on any algo. I'm thinking of putting it on this computer and take out 2 750ti move them to the 970 rig. As soon as I can. See if that works.

Yeah, 1500+ Mhz will not be stable for most algos. Even on the highest factory OC cards (WF3OC or G1).
Even if they seem stable, the cards will crash in a matter of hours/days if not minutes.

You're either overclocking like crazy or you have a custom BIOS.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
As soon as I put that card into the rig its core clock reads 1519 the other 1492 and it will mine for a few seconds then drivers crash not ccminer. I tried every combo I could think of. Thats on any algo. I'm thinking of putting it on this computer and take out 2 750ti move them to the 970 rig. As soon as I can. See if that works.

There is not a single gtx 970 card that have a default boost clock of 1519 or 1492 that I know of. You must be overclocking.
Different algos can be clocked higher.. Decred can mine for weeks at 1600, but quark cannot. My 970 g1 gaming is clocked at around 1390 for quark on the default clocks. The hashrate is around 18.4 with sp-mod private #5
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Took the 970 out...I'm done with it. A book marker for now.

I have a couple of cards that don't like to switch algos much but they will run for days on one algo.

One example is a 970 that will mine quark at default intensity fresh from a reboot but over time
while profit switching it will fail to start. Sometimes it will start at lower intensity but continues
to degrade and eventually won't start at all until a system reboot. Then it will run at default intensity
again.

The symptoms smell like a memory leak but if that was the case it should affect all cards eventually
but it doesn't. I'm stumped.
As soon as I put that card into the rig its core clock reads 1519 the other 1492 and it will mine for a few seconds then drivers crash not ccminer. I tried every combo I could think of. Thats on any algo. I'm thinking of putting it on this computer and take out 2 750ti move them to the 970 rig. As soon as I can. See if that works.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1022
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I wonder if the new gtx 1070/1080 cards will beat the 980ti in the quark algo.

Here is sp-mod #6 private compute 5.2 unreleased:


Looks like your speed is 30mh and how much you can mined altcoin with this speed.. are you mining ETH.?

it look like quark algo to me, there is no integration of etheruem in sp fork yet i think
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Took the 970 out...I'm done with it. A book marker for now.

I have a couple of cards that don't like to switch algos much but they will run for days on one algo.

One example is a 970 that will mine quark at default intensity fresh from a reboot but over time
while profit switching it will fail to start. Sometimes it will start at lower intensity but continues
to degrade and eventually won't start at all until a system reboot. Then it will run at default intensity
again.

The symptoms smell like a memory leak but if that was the case it should affect all cards eventually
but it doesn't. I'm stumped.

Memory OCs really mess with the cards and they need TLC when you do them. Different memory types also mess with things (Samsung for instance sucks at Eth).

Usually if there is a problem outside of that it's caused by power and power delivery like 99% of the time. You can look at monitor voltages for the hardware with Nvidiainspector or GPUZ. Powered risers and quality PSUs help with that. Sometimes the powered risers are crap too and need to be replaced.

SP are you actually working on a dual miner? ~_~

Yes. But today I worked 8 hours in C# in my daily job, so progress is slow.
.

Work your real job brah! ...as in making a dual miner.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
Took the 970 out...I'm done with it. A book marker for now.

I have a couple of cards that don't like to switch algos much but they will run for days on one algo.

One example is a 970 that will mine quark at default intensity fresh from a reboot but over time
while profit switching it will fail to start. Sometimes it will start at lower intensity but continues
to degrade and eventually won't start at all until a system reboot. Then it will run at default intensity
again.

The symptoms smell like a memory leak but if that was the case it should affect all cards eventually
but it doesn't. I'm stumped.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Took the 970 out...I'm done with it. A book marker for now.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
SP are you actually working on a dual miner? ~_~

Yes. But today I worked 8 hours in C# in my daily job, so progress is slow.
.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1030
I'm looking for free spin.
I wonder if the new gtx 1070/1080 cards will beat the 980ti in the quark algo.

Here is sp-mod #6 private compute 5.2 unreleased:


Looks like your speed is 30mh and how much you can mined altcoin with this speed.. are you mining ETH.?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
SP are you actually working on a dual miner? ~_~
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
Another point is that different cards have different intensity limits so if you have different cards in the same rig
you will have to set it to a value that works on all cards which may not be optimum on some cards.
You can use comma separation to set different intensities per card. ie -i 27.2,25,24.9
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
they will for sure, their power target is much lower, one 1080 has a power target about the same as 970, and i doubt it will be lower, it's already comfirmed that they are faster

yes it was no mining or gaming, but there is no way that a new generation is lower than the previous one, never happened
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
 I wonder if the new gtx 1070/1080 cards will beat the 980ti in the quark algo.

Here is sp-mod #6 private compute 5.2 unreleased:

legendary
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
I'm running a 5 cards rig with a sempron (single core, very slow, very little cache).
All the algos work fine. I didn't try ether, but ccminer is just ok. Cpu load under 20%.
What cards pallas?

some 980ti and some 970
And are you using ccminer latest build or yours?  On quark ?

I've been using many different forks, sp and tpruvot based, depending on the algo.
Quark is sp's, used to crash a couple times a day once, but it has been pretty stable during the last months.
Of course they include some code of mine.
Maybe it has to do with the operating system (ubuntu in my case) or the fact it's a headless machine (not even X windows running).
Ok thx    I'm going try try to add the 970gtx in again and using -i 23 and the new drivers seems stable now.
It's been running for hrs and did a switch to quark algo.. no problem.
See what happens.  Wink
ooo it is an asrock 81 btc  pro mb open air .... very cool here right now.
EDIT:when I add the 2nd 970 the stock clocks show 1418 the other 970 shows 1392.... i don't know why the difference and the same on the card i replaced 1418.
Do you have 2 version cards? Their bios is diferent? I have that same case with 970's and (!) with radeons 280x. MSI AB sets them diferently.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
I'm running a 5 cards rig with a sempron (single core, very slow, very little cache).
All the algos work fine. I didn't try ether, but ccminer is just ok. Cpu load under 20%.
What cards pallas?

some 980ti and some 970
And are you using ccminer latest build or yours?  On quark ?

I've been using many different forks, sp and tpruvot based, depending on the algo.
Quark is sp's, used to crash a couple times a day once, but it has been pretty stable during the last months.
Of course they include some code of mine.
Maybe it has to do with the operating system (ubuntu in my case) or the fact it's a headless machine (not even X windows running).
Ok thx    I'm going try try to add the 970gtx in again and using -i 23 and the new drivers seems stable now.
It's been running for hrs and did a switch to quark algo.. no problem.
See what happens.  Wink
ooo it is an asrock 81 btc  pro mb open air .... very cool here right now.
EDIT:when I add the 2nd 970 the stock clocks show 1418 the other 970 shows 1392.... i don't know why the difference and the same on the card i replaced 1418.
Jump to: