CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 725.

s7icky

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 22, 2016, 03:11:34 PM

Quote from: sp_ on March 22, 2016, 02:35:50 PM

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 02:31:20 PM

k dude im not a coder... thus why im ASKING you why its showing up different on the pools... and sure you can copy and paste/edit code.... cool for you WHY IS THERE SUCH A HUGE DIFFERENCE ON ANY POOL? Huh

?

Because #4 contain a bug. Still 20% faster than then opensource if you mine @yiimp or solomine

So this is fixed in #5?

Care to post a screenshot of the miner next to pool dashboard on mnool, coinmine, or suprnova?

just admit ur bullshitting people doood

Zekku

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Just bought it and there's a bug. Sad

Will test for 24h on each and compare.

2x GTX 970 EVGA SSC+

Edit: stock clocks

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 22, 2016, 03:11:34 PM

Quote from: sp_ on March 22, 2016, 02:35:50 PM

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 02:31:20 PM

k dude im not a coder... thus why im ASKING you why its showing up different on the pools... and sure you can copy and paste/edit code.... cool for you WHY IS THERE SUCH A HUGE DIFFERENCE ON ANY POOL? Huh

?

Because #4 contain a bug. Still 20% faster than then opensource if you mine @yiimp or solomine

So this is fixed in #5?
Care to post a screenshot of the miner next to pool dashboard on mnool, coinmine, or suprnova?

I am working on it #6, but my gtx 960 is crashing. I need mod the code to case on the cards..

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 22, 2016, 03:11:34 PM

So this is fixed in #5?

No.

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: sp_ on March 22, 2016, 02:35:50 PM

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 02:31:20 PM

k dude im not a coder... thus why im ASKING you why its showing up different on the pools... and sure you can copy and paste/edit code.... cool for you WHY IS THERE SUCH A HUGE DIFFERENCE ON ANY POOL? Huh

?

Because #4 contain a bug. Still 20% faster than then opensource if you mine @yiimp or solomine

So this is fixed in #5?

Care to post a screenshot of the miner next to pool dashboard on mnool, coinmine, or suprnova?

antantti

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 02:51:25 PM

i have done tests on 3 pools.

ccminer.exe -d 0,1 -i 24,29.6 -a decred -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9112 -u s7icky.1 -p x
pause

^^^ 980ti x2

ive been running that soooooooo............................... i kinda figured you would say that.and the other setup i have is 960 x 2 and 1 x 750ti...

ccminer.exe -i 29.6 -d 0 -a decred -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u s7icky.2 -p x
pause
ccminer.exe -i 29.6 -d 1 -a decred -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u s7icky.2 -p x
pause
ccminer.exe -i 29.6 -d 2 -a decred -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u s7icky.2 -p x
pause

so can you explain the 3ghs? :/ cause i am at a dead end bro.

Have you tried port 2252?

s7icky

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: sp_ on March 22, 2016, 02:46:32 PM

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 02:43:22 PM

good way to ignore it dude.

Change pool and use the correct intensity.

yiimp.ccminer.org

If you have a 980ti card with release #4 use -i 31.9 as a parameter for the intensity. Mine for 24Hours. A Single card. The gtx 970 works good with -i 30. the 750ti with -i 29.6.

sorry i already did that no change... any other reasons it would be showing 3ghs difference with 2 x 980ti? or 500ish mhs on 960's?

i have done tests on 3 pools.

ccminer.exe -d 0,1 -i 24,29.6 -a decred -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9112 -u s7icky.1 -p x
pause

^^^ 980ti x2

ive been running that soooooooo............................... i kinda figured you would say that.and the other setup i have is 960 x 2 and 1 x 750ti...

ccminer.exe -i 29.6 -d 0 -a decred -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u s7icky.2 -p x
pause
ccminer.exe -i 29.6 -d 1 -a decred -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u s7icky.2 -p x
pause
ccminer.exe -i 29.6 -d 2 -a decred -o http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111 -u s7icky.2 -p x
pause

so can you explain the 3ghs? :/ cause i am at a dead end bro.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 02:43:22 PM

good way to ignore it dude.

Change pool and use the correct intensity.

yiimp.ccminer.org

If you have a 980ti card with release #4 use -i 31.9 as a parameter for the intensity. Mine for 24Hours. A Single card. The gtx 970 works good with -i 30. the 750ti with -i 29.6.

s7icky

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 02:37:42 PM

do you want to blame it on my 5960x @ 4.4ghz? or 3930k @ 4.9ghz?

sorry but that is not any faster that is actually slower....

good way to ignore it dude.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: sp_ on March 19, 2016, 03:40:38 PM

I can teach you why the kernal is displaying low numbers for low difficulty shares. (and for single cards with a low hashrate)

Take a look at at
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/blob/windows/Algo256/decred.cu

and line 259

      if (h[7] == 0 && cuda_swab32(h[6]) <= highTarget) {

We don't care about the 4 first bytes of the hash and assume they are 0. This is to spead up the search.


Here is a found decred block:(hash)

0000000000000d1ec551b6e0b734dbfa31e95059aa84e50f7db2ab244499c87c

0000000 000000d1ec551b6e0b734dbfa31e95059aa84e50f7db2ab244499c87c

but when a pool asks for a low difficulty share
f.eks find a number that is less than this:
00000ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
We are not submitting the shares that have anything else than 00 in the low byte of the first 32 bits. (why should we when we know that the solution doesn't give a block)

If I mod the kernal to search the top 32bits only (h[7]) <= Target the mining software will work exellent at low difficulty, but not so good on higher diff.. We are searching for blocks with 14 leading zero's So I believe the current kernal is good, and the pools are fucked..

Why should we when we know it doesn't give a block? BECAUSE POOLS WORK THAT WAY, DUDE. Not submitting those is literally burning cash. The problem isn't the pools, it's you.

He have fixed it in the opencl version..

With a nice comment

   /* Debug code to help you assess the correctness
    * of your hashing function in case someone decides
    * to try to optimize.
   if (!((pre7 ^ V7 ^ VF) & 0xFFFF0000)) {

https://github.com/tpruvot/sgminer/commit/d78cfbbc77df7a0d2b8c87168a4750e4eb8830a4

s7icky

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

do you want to blame it on my 5960x @ 4.4ghz? or 3930k @ 4.9ghz?

sorry but that is not any faster that is actually slower....

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 02:31:20 PM

k dude im not a coder... thus why im ASKING you why its showing up different on the pools... and sure you can copy and paste/edit code.... cool for you WHY IS THERE SUCH A HUGE DIFFERENCE ON ANY POOL? Huh

?

Because #4 contain a bug. Still 20% faster than then opensource if you mine @yiimp or solomine

s7icky

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: sp_ on March 22, 2016, 02:23:50 PM

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 01:05:20 PM

So... SP_ please explain how this works? Or can you just come out and admit you are screwing people? this is your decred #4

Ofcouse it works

Here is a snapshot of #6 beta:

Here is why it works. (I have removed the intensity parameter.)

Code:

int dev_id = device_map[thr_id];
//int intensity = 29;
// if (device_sm[dev_id] < 350) intensity = 22;
// if (device_sm[dev_id] > 500)
// {
// intensity = 30;
// }
//
//uint32_t throughput = cuda_default_throughput(thr_id, 1U << intensity);

uint32_t throughput = (0xffffffff-5) / 5;
if (device_sm[dev_id] > 500)
{
throughput = (0xffffffff - 6) / 2;
}

k dude im not a coder... thus why im ASKING you why its showing up different on the pools... and sure you can copy and paste/edit code.... cool for you WHY IS THERE SUCH A HUGE DIFFERENCE ON ANY POOL? Huh

?And it looks like i am not the only one seeing this... so like wtf?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 01:05:20 PM

So... SP_ please explain how this works? Or can you just come out and admit you are screwing people? this is your decred #4

Ofcouse it works

Here is a snapshot of #6 beta:

Here is why it works. (I have removed the intensity parameter.)

Code:

int dev_id = device_map[thr_id];
//int intensity = 29;
// if (device_sm[dev_id] < 350) intensity = 22;
// if (device_sm[dev_id] > 500)
// {
// intensity = 30;
// }
//
//uint32_t throughput = cuda_default_throughput(thr_id, 1U << intensity);

uint32_t throughput = (0xffffffff-5) / 5;
if (device_sm[dev_id] > 500)
{
throughput = (0xffffffff - 6) / 2;
}

And here is the result that I am working on in #6:

This is 14 rounds of blake and not 8.. (decred)

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: nrg_wolf on March 22, 2016, 02:32:56 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 22, 2016, 01:59:38 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 22, 2016, 01:07:04 AM

Doesn't matter what Wolf is doing on FPGAs... Where can you purchase FPGAs? How much are they? Is he openly selling it? Pretty much no to everything there.

New version of Decred might be worth it if it gets the actual hashrate on pools now... But I bought Decred with the intention of getting that speed on pool. Doesn't seem worth buying another version that gives me 25% less hash then I should be getting. Not interested in Vanilla, haven't been for some time. There are quite a few fallback coins I'd hit before Vanilla, that's even with the extra hashrate if it were free.

Just because you have such a short attention span you can't google long enough to find out where to get FPGA boards doesn't mean no one can...

Last I checked the FPGAs for mining were hellah expensive and being sold used on eBay.

Shows what you know.

where can you find fpga's units for mining that dont cost a fortune. Australia seems to have a very weak range to pick from :-/

Don't buy mining ones - look into something like the Arrow SoCKit if you want a good dev board (Terasic has them) or if Xilinx is your thing, Digilent has a nice selection For mining with Xilinx, I would go with Artix-7. Scratch that, I DID go with Artix-7 - my Nexys 4 DDR board should be delivered today by 10:30AM. :3

And where do you get firmware to run on these, specifically made by you?

Quote from: sp_ on March 22, 2016, 04:00:30 AM

Quote from: sp_ on March 21, 2016, 03:20:28 PM

Decred #5 and Vanilla #3 is ready to be sendt to the donators. (0.2BTC)

Nobody want to buy the profitable v-cash kernal? Mine it while it's hot.

Still waiting for the 25% pool vs miner discrepancy to be fixed.

What are you getting for a 970 on x11?

s7icky

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: sp_ on March 22, 2016, 09:39:30 AM

Standard clocks.

Testing it now:

http://zpool.ca/?address=1CTiNJyoUmbdMRACtteRWXhGqtSETYd6Vd

but didn't work.

So... SP_ please explain how this works? Or can you just come out and admit you are screwing people? this is your decred #4

antantti

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: s7icky on March 22, 2016, 12:20:58 PM

Quote from: sp_ on March 22, 2016, 11:54:17 AM

Choosing the correct intensity is important. Because the 32bit nonce overflows and work is lost with incorrect intensities. Might explain why bensam is getting lower rates on the pool.

Decred buyers can try -i 29.6

lolololololol k so why does no ones rates show up on pool? Is ANYONE actually seeing ANY increase poolside?

http://yiimp.ccminer.org/?address=DskKQokmXSFdeU6EF7mYcAJox6xwcAqY35s

4x970, testing with -i settings continues...

There really are some problems with miner/poolside hash but there is no question if it is faster.

s7icky

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: sp_ on March 22, 2016, 11:54:17 AM

Choosing the correct intensity is important. Because the 32bit nonce overflows and work is lost with incorrect intensities. Might explain why bensam is getting lower rates on the pool.

Decred buyers can try -i 29.6

lolololololol k so why does no ones rates show up on pool? Is ANYONE actually seeing ANY increase poolside?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Choosing the correct intensity is important. Because the 32bit nonce overflows and work is lost with incorrect intensities. Might explain why bensam is getting lower rates on the pool.

Decred buyers can try -i 29.6

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Standard clocks.

Testing it now:

http://zpool.ca/?address=1CTiNJyoUmbdMRACtteRWXhGqtSETYd6Vd

but didn't work.

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 725. (Read 2347659 times)