I think the 14-16nm chips can give some fpga competion. 2x the number of cores and higher clockrates. Pascal might be 2x the speed in the memory algos, but could do 16x with proper coding in the simple algos.
SP....In general..... how much increase in hashrate from these.... forget the electricity... just a good guess plz. 
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 727. (Read 2347659 times)
1.7.6 does 99% without rejects. but the hashrate is 20% lower than the 1.5.78 sp-mod private. (98% rejects) (.1BTC)
HI guys can someone help me with a version of ccminer that work on x11 with cuda 7.5 thx in advance
Go to the OP. 
This version is working pretty good: (1.7.6 @github)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-ccminer-23-opensource-gpl-tpruvot-770064
Your compitition is making a Realtime JIT compiler and AI execution 14nm grid chips. Founded by the underground.
They're not focusing (nor could they care less about) hashing. They're making something you're more or less re-purposing - which is why I have room for success.Yes. I believe in your work. Keep focusing on decred and VCash, I will continue with Etherum.
HI guys can someone help me with a version of ccminer that work on x11 with cuda 7.5 thx in advance
Go to the OP.
Your compitition is making a Realtime JIT compiler and AI execution 14nm grid chips. Founded by the underground.
I think the 14-16nm chips can give some fpga competion. 2x the number of cores and higher clockrates. Pascal might be 2x the speed in the memory algos, but could do 16x with proper coding in the simple algos.
With the board I've got that I'm now feeling out (no docs) - that fight... you might as well be bear hunting with a switchblade. :3
Yeah I know but the wolf0 VHDL code is not opensource.
Here is a finger for the suite developers:
Decred #5 and Vanilla #3 is ready to be sendt to the donators. (0.2BTC)
Let's give the FPGA's some competition from the old Maxwell chips
Let's give the FPGA's some competition from the old Maxwell chips
I have added another
1.8% decred hash
0.8% vcash/vanilla hash
in the upcomming decred release #5 free for the vanilla/vcash buyers.
1.8% decred hash
0.8% vcash/vanilla hash
in the upcomming decred release #5 free for the vanilla/vcash buyers.
SP - I am not sure what is wrong with the Vanilla custom miner but I cannot get it to get consistent accepted shares on Suprnova. Alexis's works just fine however I get constant rejects with your newest one sent to me. I have tried a range of difficulty settings. Any ideas?
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes!
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e-
10
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes!
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e-
10
VCash sp-mod #2 sendt to the donators.
I have located the bug now that caused low difficulty shares. Mine on a pool wich starts at a diff>=1
example bat that works:
ccminer -a vanilla -o stratum+tcp://pool.v.cash:3001 -u VafRjT9uiVUasRPVdQi4KiKJJYW81BuDLQ -p x
Would explain why I earn 25% less on yiimp and get 25% less hash on other pools. I don't think I've ever had the hashrate show up correctly with decred.
Although that in itself is weird because some people say they're seeing the correct hashrate just fine poolside.
Although that in itself is weird because some people say they're seeing the correct hashrate just fine poolside.
The current decred difficulty has risen to from around 270 000 to 339 146 And the payouts have declined.
I have located an issue with 5-6 card rigs and Celeron cpu's (2 cores with little cache) This problem is beeing worked on and will hopefully be fixed in release #5. (without 100% cpu usage)
VCASH is doing good:
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/vcash/?markets=all#markets
And is profitable to mine. -a vanilla algo. (private kernal with a 11% boost for sale for 0.2BTC. Decred buyers get a 0.1BTC discount)
Now it is OK, miner 5.1.0 working too
You did not sad that must be rename one of .bin files to darkcoin-modFijigw64l4.bin
darkcoin-modFujigw64l4ku0.bin to be exact You did not sad that must be rename one of .bin files to darkcoin-modFijigw64l4.bin
I must test it. i have gtx 970 .
thank pro tập học sinh vĩnh thịnh
thank pro tập học sinh vĩnh thịnh
Since I have an new donator for cryoptonight I will release #2 with some fixes and more hash
yeah waiting for it
SP - I am not sure what is wrong with the Vanilla custom miner but I cannot get it to get consistent accepted shares on Suprnova. Alexis's works just fine however I get constant rejects with your newest one sent to me. I have tried a range of difficulty settings. Any ideas?
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes!
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e-
10
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes!
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e-
10
Did you try nicehash? Normally the low dfficulty shares problem can be solved with adding a correct --diff parameter. ie ---diff 256. --diff 65656 --diff 0.01. I will get back to my rigs tomorrow and can do some more testing.
AMD dropped the price of the Nano to $500 a few weeks ago.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100007709%20600566293
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100007709%20600566293
Let's do a profit calculation..
The nano can do 20MHASH of x11
0.020GHASH * 0.15 (Nicehash payment for 1 GHASH) = 0,003 BTC /DAY
500$ = 1,32BTC
1.32/0.003 = 440
It will take the Nano 440 days TO ROI with FREE POWER. And in these 440 days we have pascal and the 14NM chips comming..
How can i get 20 mh on Nano?? I have only 7 mh
Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version.
5.1.0 is not working on x11, only 5.1.1 or 5.3.0
speed 7 mh only
sgminer.exe --gpu-platform 0 -k x11 --url=stratum+tcp://x11.eu.nicehash.com:3336 --userpass=18dr7MAFwzUv8LwxGiTK3sNCz27UL3qKmp:x --api-listen --api-port=4050 --keccak-unroll 0 --hamsi-expand-big 4 --nfactor 10 --xintensity 640 --thread-concurrency 0 --worksize 64 --gpu-threads 1
Now it is OK, miner 5.1.0 working too
You did not sad that must be rename one of .bin files to darkcoin-modFijigw64l4.bin
Please tell me, how can i tweak same on lyra2rev2 and quark?
Clever move from tpruvot. He release a opensource decred miner that will only get the correct hashrate on his own pool(with a 5% fee) or solomining. Zpool.ca read my thread and reduced the default diff to 0.5 from 0.75. With a diff of 0.5 you only get payed for 1/2 the hash that you make.. wolf0 writes thats how the pools work. I agree and will fix the broken hash in my private decred miner #5
I'm sorry but its not true, i dont have the code of suprnova and the problem is inside...
Suprnova, Mnpool, and coinmine...
Starting to look like this is a visual bug more then a pool bug though. Would explain why I earn 25% less on yiimp and get 25% less hash on other pools. I don't think I've ever had the hashrate show up correctly with decred.
Although that in itself is weird because some people say they're seeing the correct hashrate just fine poolside.
SP - I am not sure what is wrong with the Vanilla custom miner but I cannot get it to get consistent accepted shares on Suprnova. Alexis's works just fine however I get constant rejects with your newest one sent to me. I have tried a range of difficulty settings. Any ideas?
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes!
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e-
10
Here is a sample of what I get:
[2016-03-20 21:39:29] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 750 Ti, 1090.92 MH/s
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/17 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s yes!
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] accepted: 11/18 (diff 13.771), 3317.49 MH/s booooo
[2016-03-20 21:39:30] reject reason: low difficulty share of 3.348334612836122e-
10
Jump to: