Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 765. (Read 2347659 times)
Sp_ in drunk mode.
Food for the trolls:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR0q57z0v1c
Now add AI drones, infrared xray cameras, donald duck for president.
Desmont IOAWA. American so(u)il(s)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR0q57z0v1c
Now add AI drones, infrared xray cameras, donald duck for president.
Desmont IOAWA. American so(u)il(s)
thats actually pretty sad - watching that ...
i have no sound at the moment on the computer - so its just visual ...
but the silence doesnt mask the devastation ...
just sad ...
#crysx
Also, tpruvot's miner does not need more RAM with more time you run it for.
Free french buffer overflow.... With a remote control API. Payed by the governmentThere is no free lunch
Also, tpruvot's miner does not need more RAM with more time you run it for.
Free french buffer overflow.... With a remote control API. Payed by the governmentThere is a difference between a wolf of cryto and the wolf of wallstreet.
Also, tpruvot's miner does not need more RAM with more time you run it for.
Free french buffer overflow.... With a remote control API. Payed by the government
The improvements in sp_ 's branch are due to assembly code optimizations. He does not bill himself as a CUDA programmer. He tweaks other coders' base work.
Decred is not a processor challenge. It's a VHDL job. I was trained by the creators of the Cell processor at IBM Germany. I created a simd processor that was pretty good for a student, but my work was abandoned
The Cell is old and outperformed. The cryptos have invented ALOGO's to trade the s(t)ox market. Enjoy you fiat's
Unless some new coins come out using a broken implementation, there is not much to work on blake.
Some percent are possible thru unrolling and other tuning, but nothing special.
Some percent are possible thru unrolling and other tuning, but nothing special.
Anyone know what SP's is getting on decred? Tpruvot's is doing 1.4Mhs
Also, tpruvot's miner does not need more RAM with more time you run it for. sp_ please look why your miner's RAM usage keeps increasing with time. Will be sending tpruvot some coins when i make profit on decred.
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X.how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance.
For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason.
R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess).
Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock.
On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf).
Eth is a good coin to mine if you think the future will hold or be better but there are other coins out now that you can do better right now with. Just a little research.
I mined with 7 cards about 78 Mh/s and was getting about 2.2 coins per day. Probably less than that now since more people have started.
970 should get you 15-17 Mh/s depending on you set up. 960 about 10-12 Mh/s. 750ti about 2-4 Mh/s but I would not try with that. I seen someone post they got 8 mh/s per 750ti but I have never seen anyone confirm that while actually mining except on the testnet.
Like what? Ohhh... You wont say, but you'll tell us that you know of much better coins. Quite helpful.
You'd be hard pressed to find better profits then mining Eth right now. It's giving me about .0086 BTC per 970 per day. Next up would be Vanilla coin as it seems to be rising too, but it's much more volatile. Decred is up there too, but also quite volatile as it's brand new and untested.
I have my own private coins I mine when things get rough, but I don't expect anyone else to find them.
I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.
See how you contradicted yourself. Your last statement makes you quite helpful as well. The key statement on mine was "just a little research."
Read the whole thing, alllll the way through. I don't gloat about coins I wont tell people about. If you're not going to tell people, don't bother waggling your dick around.
People can find a needle in a haystack with a little bit of research too... Or a lot, depending on how lucky they are. There are always great coins out there, they're extremely hard to find... Matter of a fact you can spend a lot of time hunting them down, that's why I mentioned that as one of the particular job categories when I pointed out all four of them.
Speaking of Decred, does SP's ccminer support it yet? Is there a performance boost?
ALL TROLLING ASIDE--
When I began mining with sp_ 's branch I was barely getting 9.7-9.9 Mh/s mining Quark with my GTX 960. I now get 11.5-11.6 Mh/s mining Quark, with improvements in other algos as well. Especially good are the improvements in NeoScrypt (credit to DJM34).
The improvements in sp_ 's branch are due to assembly code optimizations. He does not bill himself as a CUDA programmer. He tweaks other coders' base work. He could improve his CUDA coding and produce cleaner code for release, perhaps. If he gave more effort to support Linux miners, he'd get more donations.
TPruvot's VanillaCoin (VNL) coding was clean and efficient. I haven't tried his absolute latest, but I will. I guess I owe him a donation, too.
Donate to your favorite coder, people! --scryptr
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X.how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance.
For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason.
R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess).
Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock.
On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf).
Eth is a good coin to mine if you think the future will hold or be better but there are other coins out now that you can do better right now with. Just a little research.
I mined with 7 cards about 78 Mh/s and was getting about 2.2 coins per day. Probably less than that now since more people have started.
970 should get you 15-17 Mh/s depending on you set up. 960 about 10-12 Mh/s. 750ti about 2-4 Mh/s but I would not try with that. I seen someone post they got 8 mh/s per 750ti but I have never seen anyone confirm that while actually mining except on the testnet.
Like what? Ohhh... You wont say, but you'll tell us that you know of much better coins. Quite helpful.
You'd be hard pressed to find better profits then mining Eth right now. It's giving me about .0086 BTC per 970 per day. Next up would be Vanilla coin as it seems to be rising too, but it's much more volatile. Decred is up there too, but also quite volatile as it's brand new and untested.
I have my own private coins I mine when things get rough, but I don't expect anyone else to find them.
I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.
See how you contradicted yourself. Your last statement makes you quite helpful as well. The key statement on mine was "just a little research."
Read the whole thing, alllll the way through. I don't gloat about coins I wont tell people about. If you're not going to tell people, don't bother waggling your dick around.
People can find a needle in a haystack with a little bit of research too... Or a lot, depending on how lucky they are. There are always great coins out there, they're extremely hard to find... Matter of a fact you can spend a lot of time hunting them down, that's why I mentioned that as one of the particular job categories when I pointed out all four of them.
Speaking of Decred, does SP's ccminer support it yet? Is there a performance boost?
Updated ccMiner 1.7.2 fork by tpruvot With VanillaCoin and Decred Support
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
It's free
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
It's free
Works much better than that cgminer stuff.
I sent tpruvot a small donation, enough for a beer and a bit of cat food, Hope others do the same, he works hard maintaining his forks.
Go ETH!
Updated ccMiner 1.7.2 fork by tpruvot With VanillaCoin and Decred Support
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
It's free
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
It's free
Works much better than that cgminer stuff.
I sent tpruvot a small donation, enough for a beer and a bit of cat food, Hope others do the same, he works hard maintaining his forks. Also he is the only Nvidia dev who could be bothered to do a public release.
Go ETH!
Updated ccMiner 1.7.2 fork by tpruvot With VanillaCoin and Decred Support
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
It's free
Now its profitable. worth 0.1 BTC lol https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
It's free
Updated ccMiner 1.7.2 fork by tpruvot With VanillaCoin and Decred Support
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
It's free
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
It's free
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X.how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance.
For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason.
R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess).
Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock.
On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf).
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X.how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance.
For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason.
R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess).
Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock.
On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf).
Eth is a good coin to mine if you think the future will hold or be better but there are other coins out now that you can do better right now with. Just a little research.
I mined with 7 cards about 78 Mh/s and was getting about 2.2 coins per day. Probably less than that now since more people have started.
970 should get you 15-17 Mh/s depending on you set up. 960 about 10-12 Mh/s. 750ti about 2-4 Mh/s but I would not try with that. I seen someone post they got 8 mh/s per 750ti but I have never seen anyone confirm that while actually mining except on the testnet.
15-17 Mh/s is very pessimistic. I get 19.5 Mh/s even on the gimped, one fan gigabyte cards at +500 Mhz memory.
With 19.5 Mh/s Eth is the most profitable about 22 hours a day unless you know something I don't. Decred (especially because of getwork) and Vanilla are not even in the top 3 alternatives to Eth.
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X.how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance.
For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason.
R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess).
Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock.
On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf).
Eth is a good coin to mine if you think the future will hold or be better but there are other coins out now that you can do better right now with. Just a little research.
I mined with 7 cards about 78 Mh/s and was getting about 2.2 coins per day. Probably less than that now since more people have started.
970 should get you 15-17 Mh/s depending on you set up. 960 about 10-12 Mh/s. 750ti about 2-4 Mh/s but I would not try with that. I seen someone post they got 8 mh/s per 750ti but I have never seen anyone confirm that while actually mining except on the testnet.
ACCORDING TO GENOIL--
The 750ti cards did well untill the DAG file became too large, and 7-8Mh/s was possible early last Spring and Summer. There was a miner on his thread that kept claiming 8-10Mh/s even last Fall, but he likely was trolling. --scryptr
Yep scryptr I meant currently.
Someone posted yesterday that they are still getting 8 Mh/s on a 750ti but I find it hard to believe.
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X.how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance.
For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason.
R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess).
Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock.
On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf).
Eth is a good coin to mine if you think the future will hold or be better but there are other coins out now that you can do better right now with. Just a little research.
I mined with 7 cards about 78 Mh/s and was getting about 2.2 coins per day. Probably less than that now since more people have started.
970 should get you 15-17 Mh/s depending on you set up. 960 about 10-12 Mh/s. 750ti about 2-4 Mh/s but I would not try with that. I seen someone post they got 8 mh/s per 750ti but I have never seen anyone confirm that while actually mining except on the testnet.
Like what? Ohhh... You wont say, but you'll tell us that you know of much better coins. Quite helpful.
You'd be hard pressed to find better profits then mining Eth right now. It's giving me about .0086 BTC per 970 per day. Next up would be Vanilla coin as it seems to be rising too, but it's much more volatile. Decred is up there too, but also quite volatile as it's brand new and untested.
I have my own private coins I mine when things get rough, but I don't expect anyone else to find them.
I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.
See how you contradicted yourself. Your last statement makes you quite helpful as well. The key statement on mine was "just a little research."
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X.how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance.
For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason.
R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess).
Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock.
On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf).
Eth is a good coin to mine if you think the future will hold or be better but there are other coins out now that you can do better right now with. Just a little research.
I mined with 7 cards about 78 Mh/s and was getting about 2.2 coins per day. Probably less than that now since more people have started.
970 should get you 15-17 Mh/s depending on you set up. 960 about 10-12 Mh/s. 750ti about 2-4 Mh/s but I would not try with that. I seen someone post they got 8 mh/s per 750ti but I have never seen anyone confirm that while actually mining except on the testnet.
ACCORDING TO GENOIL--
The 750ti cards did well untill the DAG file became too large, and 7-8Mh/s was possible early last Spring and Summer. There was a miner on his thread that kept claiming 8-10Mh/s even last Fall, but he likely was trolling. --scryptr
Jump to: