WINDOWS RELEASE VERSIONS--
If you use release dot 74, as compiled by sp_ , you will get optimal Neoscrypt rates. Release dot 74 was the last release compiled by sp_ that used CUDA 6.5.
If you use release dot 77+, it is compiled with CUDA 7.5, and Neoscrypt rates are lower. Other algos have been improved.
In Linux, it is possible to compile a hybrid version if you use both CUDA 6.5 and 7.5, as described by Pallas a few pages back in the thread. At least, he describes the hybrid method. No programmer has released a hybrid pre-compiled version.
--scryptr
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 832. (Read 2347664 times)
So... Must I install CUDA 6.5 for faster NeoScrypt mining? And if so, would the other algorithms suffer as a result?
You must compile ccminer with cuda 6.5...
Other algos will be affected but in unpredictable ways.
So... Must I install CUDA 6.5 for faster NeoScrypt mining? And if so, would the other algorithms suffer as a result?
Install Cuda 6.5 you must, and "normal" neoscrypt speed, you'll getMaster Yoda
So... Must I install CUDA 6.5 for faster NeoScrypt mining? And if so, would the other algorithms suffer as a result?
If you want to test the latest @git the cryptomining blog has just compiled a new version. release 77+
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
HYBRID COMPILED RELEASE--
Pallas described a method to compile CCminer with both CUDA 7.5 and 6.5. The idea was that the Neoscrypt could be compiled with CUDA 6.5, and all other algos with CUDA 7.5. The CUDA 7.5 compilation would be first, and then a re-compile with CUDA 6.5 would compile only the Neoscrypt algo. The hybrid would work until Neoscrypt code is re-tuned.
For a brief moment, I thought that DJM34 might contibute with some Nescrypt updates. I'd contribute to both you and DJM34, I don't know why the whole thing became "Wreck The Halls" with Yuletide folly.
--scryptr
I said I might, but I don't know if I will have time... will keep you inform
DECK THE HALLS WITH YULETIDE FOLLY--
Falalalala, lalalala! English Christmas carol, widely sung in the UK, USA, Canada, etc. It refers to Christmas decorations about the many households (Not bloody red noses!
). --scryptrEDIT: I think the original line was "Deck the halls with boughs of holly!" --scryptr
If you want to test the latest @git the cryptomining blog has just compiled a new version. release 77+
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
HYBRID COMPILED RELEASE--
Pallas described a method to compile CCminer with both CUDA 7.5 and 6.5. The idea was that the Neoscrypt could be compiled with CUDA 6.5, and all other algos with CUDA 7.5. The CUDA 7.5 compilation would be first, and then a re-compile with CUDA 6.5 would compile only the Neoscrypt algo. The hybrid would work until Neoscrypt code is re-tuned.
For a brief moment, I thought that DJM34 might contibute with some Nescrypt updates. I'd contribute to both you and DJM34, I don't know why the whole thing became "Wreck The Halls" with Yuletide folly.
--scryptr
I said I might, but I don't know if I will have time... will keep you inform
DECK THE HALLS WITH YULETIDE FOLLY--
Falalalala, lalalala! English Christmas carol, widely sung in the UK, USA, Canada, etc. It refers to Christmas decorations about the many households (Not bloody red noses!
). --scryptrEDIT: I think the original line was "Deck the halls with boughs of holly!" --scryptr
If you want to test the latest @git the cryptomining blog has just compiled a new version. release 77+
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
HYBRID COMPILED RELEASE--
Pallas described a method to compile CCminer with both CUDA 7.5 and 6.5. The idea was that the Neoscrypt could be compiled with CUDA 6.5, and all other algos with CUDA 7.5. The CUDA 7.5 compilation would be first, and then a re-compile with CUDA 6.5 would compile only the Neoscrypt algo. The hybrid would work until Neoscrypt code is re-tuned.
For a brief moment, I thought that DJM34 might contibute with some Nescrypt updates. I'd contribute to both you and DJM34, I don't know why the whole thing became "Wreck The Halls" with Yuletide folly.
--scryptr
I said I might, but I don't know if I will have time... will keep you inform
If you want to test the latest @git the cryptomining blog has just compiled a new version. release 77+
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
HYBRID COMPILED RELEASE--
Pallas described a method to compile CCminer with both CUDA 7.5 and 6.5. The idea was that the Neoscrypt could be compiled with CUDA 6.5, and all other algos with CUDA 7.5. The CUDA 7.5 compilation would be first, and then a re-compile with CUDA 6.5 would compile only the Neoscrypt algo. The hybrid would work until Neoscrypt code is re-tuned.
For a brief moment, I thought that DJM34 might contibute with some Nescrypt updates. I'd contribute to both you and DJM34, I don't know why the whole thing became "Wreck The Halls" with Yuletide folly.
I'm pretty poor on my coding skills. But, I think most miners would chip in for even a simple hybrid. If DJM34 wants some well-deserved contributions, maybe he could add some new Neoscrypt code.
--scryptr
EDIT: The hybrid release would allow the use of auto-switching software with only one mining executable. --scryptr
The neoscrypt hashrate can easily be verified. Why don`t you build it yourself with cuda 7.5.
A 750ti will do 60-70 khash with your code.
And 90-100khash with my code.
A 750ti will do 60-70 khash with your code.
And 90-100khash with my code.
There is nothing negative in my message, I am just a bit tired of people moaning each time amd or nvidia become the fastest...
There is a lot less negativity in what I wrote than in the message I was responding, and clearly you didn't understand at all what I was saying, so let me rephrase it for you
:
Regarding which one is the fastest: I couldn't care less, I program for both...
Regarding nvidia/amd communities: I reiterate, there is no such thing as an AMD or an NVIDIA communities there are miners period.
hence: grow the fuck up (seriously nvidia is the fastest, people buy nvidia; amd is the fastest people buy amd... that's all there is to these so called communities... )
Regarding the fact that devs tend to lean toward nvidia... this is just not true (even if I prefer cuda...), there are far more people in here developing for opencl than there is for cuda...
There is a lot less negativity in what I wrote than in the message I was responding, and clearly you didn't understand at all what I was saying, so let me rephrase it for you
: Regarding which one is the fastest: I couldn't care less, I program for both...
Regarding nvidia/amd communities: I reiterate, there is no such thing as an AMD or an NVIDIA communities there are miners period.
hence: grow the fuck up
(seriously nvidia is the fastest, people buy nvidia; amd is the fastest people buy amd... that's all there is to these so called communities... )Regarding the fact that devs tend to lean toward nvidia... this is just not true (even if I prefer cuda...), there are far more people in here developing for opencl than there is for cuda...
Well, i reread his message and i came to the conclusion that he never said anything about being the fastest.
Ok, if you program for both. Contact me, in private. i'm looking for someone to work with. I'll explain why in pm. This goes for all of you developers out there.
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I wonder why the kernal is perfoming so shit with Cuda 7.5. Djm34 will say that the compiler is shit, but I say that the code is shit.
yeah admit you already regret to have chosen that path to speak of my code... )A smiley won't disguise the fact that you are "once again" being negative.
There is nothing negative in my message, I am just a bit tired of people moaning each time amd or nvidia become the fastest...
There is a lot less negativity in what I wrote than in the message I was responding, and clearly you didn't understand at all what I was saying, so let me rephrase it for you :
Regarding which one is the fastest: I couldn't care less, I program for both...
Regarding nvidia/amd communities: I reiterate, there is no such thing as an AMD or an NVIDIA communities there are miners period.
hence: grow the fuck up (seriously nvidia is the fastest, people buy nvidia; amd is the fastest people buy amd... that's all there is to these so called communities... )
Regarding the fact that devs tend to lean toward nvidia... this is just not true (even if I prefer cuda...), there are far more people in here developing for opencl than there is for cuda...
There is a lot less negativity in what I wrote than in the message I was responding, and clearly you didn't understand at all what I was saying, so let me rephrase it for you
: Regarding which one is the fastest: I couldn't care less, I program for both...
Regarding nvidia/amd communities: I reiterate, there is no such thing as an AMD or an NVIDIA communities there are miners period.
hence: grow the fuck up
(seriously nvidia is the fastest, people buy nvidia; amd is the fastest people buy amd... that's all there is to these so called communities... )Regarding the fact that devs tend to lean toward nvidia... this is just not true (even if I prefer cuda...), there are far more people in here developing for opencl than there is for cuda...
Well, i reread his message and i came to the conclusion that he never said anything about being the fastest.
Ok, if you program for both. Contact me, in private. i'm looking for someone to work with. I'll explain why in pm. This goes for all of you developers out there.
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I wonder why the kernal is perfoming so shit with Cuda 7.5. Djm34 will say that the compiler is shit, but I say that the code is shit.
yeah admit you already regret to have chosen that path to speak of my code... )A smiley won't disguise the fact that you are "once again" being negative.
My version is already 50% fastef than your version when compiled with cuda 7.5.
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I wonder why the kernal is perfoming so shit with Cuda 7.5. Djm34 will say that the compiler is shit, but I say that the code is shit.
yeah admit you already regret to have chosen that path to speak of my code... ) If only the AMD community was as nice as the Nvidia community here...
Same with the developers. Not saying that the amd developers are bad. But it's just not like Nvidia..
But times can change, i can only hope so
yeah well, as far as the devs are concerned... I think you have no clue about what you are talking...Same with the developers. Not saying that the amd developers are bad. But it's just not like Nvidia..
But times can change, i can only hope so
Having written algo for both nvidia and amd, the only difference between the two is that for nvidia there is someone which doesn't do any work and ask people to send him the donation instead to the real developer...
and with amd you get message from Wolf0 telling you, that you could have done it better (as well as a few clue to where to look...)
Considering "communities", only 3 words: Grow up people !!!
It seems that you are your good old grumpy self again Djm.
Why always the negativity?
It seems that you're not so happy with AMD giving Nvidia a big kick in the but. Isn't that what this is all about?
Who said anything about donations? He was talking about the "community", i believe that that means, the people involved. Not only the developers, the miners as well.
And yes. The opencl compiler is crap, that's a well known fact. Plus so many other reasons. So developers tend to lean towards nvidia. Which is normal.
Wolf0 is a different story, again i have no clue what his part is in this conversation.
Well, i hope i have lots of growing up to do.
Let us leave it like this and let us not take over this thread with bullshit.
There is a lot less negativity in what I wrote than in the message I was responding, and clearly you didn't understand at all what I was saying, so let me rephrase it for you
: Regarding which one is the fastest: I couldn't care less, I program for both...
Regarding nvidia/amd communities: I reiterate, there is no such thing as an AMD or an NVIDIA communities there are miners period.
hence: grow the fuck up
(seriously nvidia is the fastest, people buy nvidia; amd is the fastest people buy amd... that's all there is to these so called communities... )Regarding the fact that devs tend to lean toward nvidia... this is just not true (even if I prefer cuda...), there are far more people in here developing for opencl than there is for cuda...
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I wonder why the kernal is perfoming so shit with Cuda 7.5. Djm34 will say that the compiler is shit, but I say that the code is shit.
I NEED DONATIONS FOR 5% INCREASE OR FUCK EVERYONE <3
Why don't you try release 77 and the quark algo on your 980ti's. My G1 gigabyte is showing +1.2MHASH per card from release 74 to release 77 on the standard clocks. (+4.55%) 27,7 MHASH
Only if the AMD community was as nice as the Nvidia community here...
Same with the developers. Not saying that the amd developers are bad. But it's just not like Nvidia..
But times can change, i can only hope so
yeah well, as far as the devs are concerned... I think you have no clue about what you are talking...Same with the developers. Not saying that the amd developers are bad. But it's just not like Nvidia..
But times can change, i can only hope so
Having written algo for both nvidia and amd, the only difference between the two is that for nvidia there is someone which doesn't do any work and ask people to send him the donation instead to the real developer...
and with amd you get message from Wolf0 telling you, that you could have done it better (as well as a few clue to where to look...)
Considering "communities", only 3 words: Grow up people !!!
I NEED DONATIONS FOR 5% INCREASE OR FUCK EVERYONE <3
If you want to test the latest @git the cryptomining blog has just compiled a new version. release 77+
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6341-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-77-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell/
DJM34's Neoscrypt kernal is hurting when compiled with cuda 7.5.
I managed to increase it 50% faster on the 750ti with some tuning. (from 60KHASH to 90KHASH). (release 74 cuda 6.5 is doing 180khash)
After changing the compiler from 6.5 to 7.5, all the kernals has to be retuned/rewritten. This takes time, but is Necessary.
People who donate will get private kernals.
I would donate or even pay you (well) to put your hands dirty for AMD based cards
Think about it
Please continue to donate. I will contiune to optimize the most profitable algos
My adress is here:
thats a really big aarowMy adress is here:
People who donate will get private kernals.
Jump to: