Hi Guys. did you see that speed?
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=news&id=53
damn... amd again can be more profitable than nvidia.
Look at X11 speed. 11.72mh with r9 280x.
P.S. wolf, is it your work on nicehash?
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 834. (Read 2347659 times)
Thanks for testing. lyra2v2 is up 5% on the gtx 960.
Is it worth 0.01BTC in donations guys? Your moneymaker is 5% faster. Time to support the optimizers
Is it worth 0.01BTC in donations guys? Your moneymaker is 5% faster. Time to support the optimizers
-Faster lyra2v2(5-10%on the gtx 950 and gtx 960)
-Faster x11
1.5.77(sp-MOD) is available here: (20-dec-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
-Faster x11
1.5.77(sp-MOD) is available here: (20-dec-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
Noboby tested yet?
What speeds are you getting in release 77 (lyra2v2) ? Can you compare with release 74 and 76 please. This program is supported by donations. If you want more speead, please donate to my donation adress. A handful of people did it for release 76.
Thanks for your support.
Lyre2REV2
74-6051
77-6363
Qubit
74-8458
77-8150
X11
74-5592
77-5400
sp ...
750ti oc lp card ...
tested with ccminer-spmod77 ... build f23x64c75 ...
-------
[2015-12-21 13:55:33] accepted: 107/107 (100.00%), 5919 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-21 13:55:33] mining-ace.granitecoin.com:6010/ quark block 2682200
[2015-12-21 13:55:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5930 (T= 71C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:55:48] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5911 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:56:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5920 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:56:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5915 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:56:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5922 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
-------
seems to be about the same - so as you mentioned earlier - it seems that the compute 5.0 cards dont have much of an increase ...
#crysx
750ti oc lp card ...
tested with ccminer-spmod77 ... build f23x64c75 ...
-------
[2015-12-21 13:55:33] accepted: 107/107 (100.00%), 5919 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-21 13:55:33] mining-ace.granitecoin.com:6010/ quark block 2682200
[2015-12-21 13:55:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5930 (T= 71C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:55:48] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5911 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:56:03] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5920 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:56:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5915 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-21 13:56:33] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5922 (T= 72C F= 59% C=1163/2700)
-------
seems to be about the same - so as you mentioned earlier - it seems that the compute 5.0 cards dont have much of an increase ...
#crysx
The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).
Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate... And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that Stop dreaming.
Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions
I MUST BE DREAMING--
Tomorrow's question: Does Selena Gomez still love me?
--scryptr
this thread is getting a bit hijacked amd card,dream, then fantasy about some unknown actress (at least to me...)... lets call that Christmas spirit (not sure how it fits with amd though...)
anyway, my turn: I love you Anne !
hahaha ...
yup - i agree with djm34 ... its the christmas spirits ...
and all you guys and gals drink way too much of those spirits ...
...#crysx
The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).
Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate... And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that Stop dreaming.
Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions
I MUST BE DREAMING--
Tomorrow's question: Does Selena Gomez still love me?
--scryptr
this thread is getting a bit hijacked amd card,dream, then fantasy about some unknown actress (at least to me...)... lets call that Christmas spirit (not sure how it fits with amd though...)
anyway, my turn: I love you Anne !
hahaha ...
yup - i agree with djm34 ... its the christmas spirits ...
and all you guys and gals drink way too much of those spirits ...
...#crysx
The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).
Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate... And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that Stop dreaming.
Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions
I MUST BE DREAMING--
Tomorrow's question: Does Selena Gomez still love me?
--scryptr
this thread is getting a bit hijacked amd card,dream, then fantasy about some unknown actress (at least to me...)... lets call that Christmas spirit (not sure how it fits with amd though...)
anyway, my turn: I love you Anne !
The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).
Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate... And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that Stop dreaming.
Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions
I MUST BE DREAMING--
Tomorrow's question: Does Selena Gomez still love me?
--scryptr
The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).
Well, they seem to have tuned it very well. over 100 watt less on a nano vs a fury x while almost doing the exact same hash rate... And i have both of them, so i'm 200% sure of that Stop dreaming.
Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions
The nano has just a differently tuned Fiji chip, the same that's on the fury series. And, apart from the ram interface, it's very very similar to hawaii (290 and 390).
Stop dreaming.
Stop dreaming.
-Faster lyra2v2(5-10%on the gtx 950 and gtx 960)
-Faster x11
1.5.77(sp-MOD) is available here: (20-dec-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
-Faster x11
1.5.77(sp-MOD) is available here: (20-dec-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
Noboby tested yet?
What speeds are you getting in release 77 (lyra2v2) ? Can you compare with release 74 and 76 please. This program is supported by donations. If you want more speead, please donate to my donation adress. A handful of people did it for release 76.
Thanks for your support.
edit: No, it's same +-1%
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
4 750ti's draw 260 watts.4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz per card!..
Is that at the wall? My fury draws more than 300 watt, the single card! And it's the same chipset.
yup ...
apparently the nano has mixed specs of the fury x and fury - but with a much lower power draw - and a much smaller size mate ...
very impressive cards ... but very expensive cards
...#crysx
980 performance in a half length card with only one 8 pin power connector, it's only a matter of time for someone
to build a 2x-nano.
True, and push the price down :p
Or someone who builds a farm with 100 of those
Or maybe there is one in the making... 
Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.
4 750ti's draw 260 watts.4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz per card!..
Is that at the wall? My fury draws more than 300 watt, the single card! And it's the same chipset.
yup ...
apparently the nano has mixed specs of the fury x and fury - but with a much lower power draw - and a much smaller size mate ...
very impressive cards ... but very expensive cards
...#crysx
980 performance in a half length card with only one 8 pin power connector, it's only a matter of time for someone
to build a 2x-nano.
Make sure that you run with the latest drivers. Seems that cuda 7.5 is only improving the speed on compute 5.2 devices.
Thx sp .........yes I forgot to update my drivers.
5 x 970 default clocks.
.74
X11 39300
Lyra2v2 47800
Quark 78200
.76
X11 38400
Lyra2v2 46900
Quark 81000
.77
X11 38600
Lyra2v2 48300
Quark 80900
.74
X11 39300
Lyra2v2 47800
Quark 78200
.76
X11 38400
Lyra2v2 46900
Quark 81000
.77
X11 38600
Lyra2v2 48300
Quark 80900
Make sure that you run with the latest drivers. Seems that cuda 7.5 is only improving the speed on compute 5.2 devices.
I have uploaded another binary in zip format.
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.77
This includes the latest changes on git. (release 77 +)
There you go ... that's the right zip format https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.77
This includes the latest changes on git. (release 77 +)
Got it now sp. So what's the speed? compared to the older releases. (lyra2v2 and quark)
EDIT: AGAIN..need to update drivers.
I have uploaded another binary in zip format.
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.77
This includes the latest changes on git. (release 77 +)
There you go ... that's the right zip format https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.77
This includes the latest changes on git. (release 77 +)
Got it now sp. So what's the speed? compared to the older releases. (lyra2v2 and quark)
I have uploaded another binary in zip format.
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.77
This includes the latest changes on git. (release 77 +)
There you go ... that's the right zip format https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.77
This includes the latest changes on git. (release 77 +)
Got it now sp.
I have uploaded another binary in zip format.
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.77
This includes the latest changes on git. (release 77 +)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.77
This includes the latest changes on git. (release 77 +)
Jump to: